Thoracic pedicle screws: postoperative computerized tomography scanning assessment

The pedicle screw accuracy using a robotic system and measured by a novel three-dimensional method

Robotics in medicine is associated with precision, accuracy, and replicability. Several robotic systems are used in spine surgery. They are all considered shared-control systems, providing "steady-hand" manipulation instruments. Although numerous studies have testified to the benefits of robotic instrumentations, they must address their true accuracy. Our study used the Mazor system under several situations and compared the spatial accuracy of the pedicle screw (PS) insertion and its planned trajectory. We used two cadaveric specimens with intact spinal structures from C7 to S1. PS planning was performed using the two registration methods (preopCT/C-arm or CT-to-fluoroscopy registration). After planning, the implant spatial orientation was defined based on six anatomic parameters using axial and sagittal CT images. Two surgical open and percutaneous access were used to insert the PS. After that, another CT acquisition was taken. Accuracy was classified into optimal, inaccurate and unacceptable according to the degree of screw deviation from its planning using the same spatial orientation method. Based on the type of spatial deviation, we also classified the PS trajectory into 16 pattern errors. Seven (19%) out of 37 implanted screws were considered unacceptable (deviation distances > 2.0 mm or angulation > 5°), and 14 (38%) were inaccurate (> 0.5 mm and ≤ 2.0 mm or > 2.5° and ≤ 5°). CT-to-fluoroscopy registration was superior to preopCT/C-arm (average deviation in 0.9 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively, p < 0.003), and percutaneous was slightly better than open but did not reach significance (1.3 mm vs. 1.7 mm, respectively). Regarding pattern error, the tendency was to have more axial than sagittal shifts. Using a quantitative method to categorize the screw 3D position, only 10.8% of the screws were considered unacceptable. However, with a more rigorous concept of inaccuracy, almost half were non-optimal. We also identified that, unlike some previous results, the O-arm registration delivers more accurate implants than the preopCT/C-arm method.

Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Spinal Pedicle Screws Placement Precision Is in Full Agreement with Postoperative Computed Tomography Assessment

OBJECTIVE

To assess agreement between pedicle screw placement evaluated on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and on intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) and compare procedure characteristics when using first-generation and second-generation robotic C-arm systems in the hybrid operating room.

METHODS

All patients who received pedicle screws for spinal fusion at our institution between June 2009 and September 2019 and underwent intraoperative CBCT and postoperative CT were included. The CBCT and CT images were reviewed by 2 surgeons to assess the screw placement using the Gertzbein-Robbins and the Heary classifications. Intermethod agreement of screw placement classifications as well as interrater agreement were assessed using Brennan-Prediger and Gwet agreement coefficients. Procedure characteristics using first-generation and second-generation generation robotic C-arm systems were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were treated with 315 pedicle screws at thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels. No screw had to be repositioned. On CBCT, accurate placement was found for 309 screws (98.1%) using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification and 289 (91.7%) using the Heary classification and on CT, these were 307 (97.4%) and 293 (93.0%), respectively. Intermethod between CBCT and CT and interrater agreements between the 2 raters were almost perfect (>0.90) for all assessment. There were no significant differences in mean radiation dose (P = 0.83) and fluoroscopy time (P = 0.82), but length of surgery using the second-generation system was estimated at 107.7 minutes (95% confidence interval, 31.9-183.5 minutes; P = 0.006) shorter.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CBCT provides accurate assessment of pedicle screw placement and enables intraoperative repositioning of misplaced screws.

O-Arm Accuracy and Radiation Exposure in Adult Deformity Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In long thoracolumbar deformity surgery, accurate screw positioning is critical for spinal stability. We assessed pedicle and pelvic screw accuracy and radiation exposure in patients undergoing long thoracolumbar deformity fusion surgery (≥4 levels) involving 3-dimensional fluoroscopy (O-Arm/Stealth) navigation.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients aged >18 years who underwent fusion in 2016-2018 were reviewed. O-Arm images were assessed for screw accuracy. Effective radiation doses were calculated. The primary outcome was pedicle screw accuracy (Heary grade). Secondary outcomes were pelvic fixation screw accuracy, radiation exposure, and screw-related perioperative and postoperative complications or revision surgery within 3 years.

RESULTS

Of 1477 pedicle screws placed in 91 patients (mean 16.41 ± 5.6 screws/patient), 1208 pedicle screws (81.8%) could be evaluated by 3-dimensional imaging after placement. Heary Grade I placement was achieved in 1150 screws (95.2%), Grade II in 47 (3.9%), Grade III in 10 (0.82%), Grade IV in 1 (0.08%), and Grade V in 0; Grade III-V were replaced intraoperatively. One of 60 (1.6%) sacroiliac screws placed showed medial cortical breach and was replaced. The average O-Arm-related effective dose was 29.54 ± 14.29 mSv and effective dose/spin was 8.25 ± 2.65 mSv. No postoperative neurological worsening, vascular injuries, or revision surgeries for screw misplacement were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

With effective radiation doses similar to those in interventional neuroendovascular procedures, the use of O-Arm in multilevel complex deformity surgery resulted in high screw accuracy, no need for surgical revision because of screw malposition, less additional imaging, and no radiation exposure for the surgical team.

Augmented reality for minimally invasive spinal surgery

Background

Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that can overlay computer graphics onto the real world and enhance visual feedback from information systems. Within the past several decades, innovations related to AR have been integrated into our daily lives; however, its application in medicine, specifically in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS), may be most important to understand. AR navigation provides auditory and haptic feedback, which can further enhance surgeons' capabilities and improve safety.

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to address previous and current applications of AR, AR in MISS, limitations of today's technology, and future areas of innovation.

Methods

A literature review related to applications of AR technology in previous and current generations was conducted.

Results

AR systems have been implemented for treatments related to spinal surgeries in recent years, and AR may be an alternative to current approaches such as traditional navigation, robotically assisted navigation, fluoroscopic guidance, and free hand. As AR is capable of projecting patient anatomy directly on the surgical field, it can eliminate concern for surgeon attention shift from the surgical field to navigated remote screens, line-of-sight interruption, and cumulative radiation exposure as the demand for MISS increases.

Conclusion

AR is a novel technology that can improve spinal surgery, and limitations will likely have a great impact on future technology.

Robotic Assistance for Minimally Invasive Cervical Pedicle Instrumentation: Report on Feasibility and Safety

BACKGROUND

Accurate screw placement remains challenging, especially in the cervical spine. We present our first experience of minimally invasive posterior cervical and upper thoracic pedicle screw fixation in the lower cervical spine.

METHODS

This study reports a case series of patients, undergoing posterior percutaneous pedicle fixation using Cirq robotic assistance coupled to the Airo intraoperative computed tomography scan and Brainlab navigation system. Routine computed tomography was performed on postoperative day 2 to evaluate pedicle screw placement. The effective dose was calculated.

RESULTS

Between February 2020 and December 2020, 7 patients (4 men and 3 women) were treated. The mean age was 58.8 years (range, 29-75 years). Fixation was performed with a cannulated PASS OCT Reconstruction System (Medicrea). Overall, 28 screws were placed within cervical and upper thoracic pedicles. According to the Neo and Heary classification, 85.7% were rated as acceptable and 14.3% as poor. The radiation dose received by the patient was 9.1 mSv (range, 7.7-10.6 mSv). The radiation dose received by the surgical staff was 0 mSv. The postoperative course was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior miniopen fixation using Cirq robotic assistance coupled with an intraoperative computed tomography navigation system is a major innovation that can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw positioning, with acceptable patient radiation and reduced surgical team exposure.

Evaluation of free-hand screw placement in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine by neurosurgical residents

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of free-hand screw technique remains critical to adequately train neurosurgical residents. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement via the free-hand technique in lumbar, thoracic, and cervical spine by neurosurgical residents completing an enfolded spine fellowship.

METHODS

Medical records of all patients who underwent free-hand screw placement at all spinal levels over a 6-month period by senior neurosurgical residents enrolled in an in-folded spine fellowship were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative CT images were assessed for presence and direction of cortical breach.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent 162 free-hand screw placements. The most commonly placed screws were cervical lateral mass screws (n = 69), thoracic (n = 41), and lumbar pedicle screws (n = 41). The most common indication for surgery was deformity (n = 22), followed by infection (n = 2) and trauma (n = 2). Fifty-five breaches were identified in 44 (27 %) screws placed in 21 patients (81 %). Anterior breach was identified in 22 cases (40.0 %), lateral in 12 (23.6 %), superior in 7 (12.7 %), and inferior in 7 (12.7 %), and medial in 6 (10.9 %). The most common level of breach was observed in cervical lateral mass screws (n = 19, 43 %) and least common in C2 pars screws (n = 1, 2%). With an average length of follow up of 12.1 ± 7.7 months of follow-up, no clinical sequalae of screw breach was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high prevalence of screw breach using the free-hand technique by neurosurgical residents, the absence of clinical sequelae implies safety and emphasizes the importance of early exposure to this technique during neurosurgical residency training.

20 Tips to Avoid and Handle Problems in the Placement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement is currently the most widely applied instrumentation for minimally invasive treatment of spinal injuries requiring stabilization. Although this technique has advantages over open instrumentation, it also presents new challenges and specific complications. The objective of this study was to provide recommendations developed from the experience of several spinal surgeons at different minimally invasive spine surgery reference centers to solve specific problems and prevent complications during the learning curve of this technique.

METHODS

An AO Spine Latin America minimally invasive spine surgery study group analyzed the most frequent complications and challenges occurring during the placement of >14,000 two-dimensional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screws at different centers over 15 years. Twenty tips considered most relevant to performing this technique, excluding problems directly related to specific brands of instruments, were presented.

RESULTS

The 20 tips included the following: (1) positioning; (2) clean and painless; (3) fewer x-rays; (4) check the clock; (5) beveled tip; (6) transverse-rib-pedicle; (7) double Jamshidi; (8) hammer the Kirschner wire; (9) bent tip; (10) too loose, too tight; (11) new trajectory; (12) manual control; (13) start over; (14) Kirschner wire first; (15) adhesive drape control; (16) bend the rod; (17) lower rods; (18) freehand inner; (19) posterior fusion; (20) revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of these tips might improve performance of this technique and reduce the complications related to percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To provide data about surgical workflow, accuracy, complications, radiation exposure, and learning curve effect in patients who underwent minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with navigation coupled with mobile intraoperative computed tomography.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of data from consecutive patients who underwent single- or double-level MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at a single institution; mobile intraoperative computed tomography combined with a navigation system was used as the sole intraoperative imaging method to place pedicular screws; decompression and interbody fusion were performed through a 22-mm tubular retractor. Clinical data, perioperative complications, accuracy of pedicular screw placement, and radiation exposure were analyzed. A learning curve effect on surgical time and accuracy was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 408 screws in 100 patients were analyzed. In all cases, spinal navigation allowed for identification of pedicular trajectories and greatly facilitated nerve root decompression through the MIS approach. Overall accuracy according to Heary classification was 95.3%. Nineteen screws (4.7%) presented a minor lateral breach (<2 mm), not clinically significant. Surgical time, blood loss, and patient radiation exposure compared favorably with reported values from other series using three-dimensional navigation. A learning curve effect on surgical time, but not on screw accuracy, was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion can now be performed without any radiation exposure to the surgeon and operating room staff, with almost absolute accuracy during screw positioning and tubular decompression. A learning curve effect on surgical time, but not on overall screw accuracy, may be expected.

3D-imaging in percutaneous spine surgery using the Surgivisio system

The Surgivisio system is a new generation of intraoperative 3D imaging, used in our institution for pedicle insertion in minimally invasive spine surgery since January 2018. The purpose of this technical note is to describe the Surgivisio system, its advantages and its limitations, in percutaneous spinal surgery. Results of the first year of use were analyzed, in a series of 29 patients, to evaluate accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, operative time and radiation exposure. On the Heary and Gertzbein classifications, 95.5% of pedicle screw placements (107/112) were rated as acceptable. Mean operative time was 29.3min per vertebra; mean radiation exposure per vertebra was 0.61 mSv. The Surgivisio system is an effective navigation tool for pedicle screw insertion in minimally invasive spinal surgery, with acceptable radiation exposure and operative time for each navigated vertebra. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

New Imaging, Diagnostic, and Assessment Techniques in Orthopedic Trauma

This article examines new imaging, diagnostic, and assessment techniques that may affect the care of patients with orthopedic trauma and/or infection. Three-dimensional imaging has assisted in fracture assessment preoperatively, whereas improvement in C-arm technology has allowed real-time evaluation of implant placement and periarticular reduction before leaving the operating room. Advances in imaging techniques have allowed earlier and more accurate diagnosis of nonunion and infection. Innovations in bacteriologic testing have improved the sensitivity and specificity of perioperative and peri-implant infections. It is critical that surgeons remain up to date on the options available for optimal patient care.

High Speed, High Density Intraoperative 3D Optical Topographical Imaging with Efficient Registration to MRI and CT for Craniospinal Surgical Navigation

Intraoperative image-guided surgical navigation for craniospinal procedures has significantly improved accuracy by providing an avenue for the surgeon to visualize underlying internal structures corresponding to the exposed surface anatomy. Despite the obvious benefits of surgical navigation, surgeon adoption remains relatively low due to long setup and registration times, steep learning curves, and workflow disruptions. We introduce an experimental navigation system utilizing optical topographical imaging (OTI) to acquire the 3D surface anatomy of the surgical cavity, enabling visualization of internal structures relative to exposed surface anatomy from registered preoperative images. Our OTI approach includes near instantaneous and accurate optical measurement of >250,000 surface points, computed at >52,000 points-per-second for considerably faster patient registration than commercially available benchmark systems without compromising spatial accuracy. Our experience of 171 human craniospinal surgical procedures, demonstrated significant workflow improvement (41 s vs. 258 s and 794 s, p < 0.05) relative to benchmark navigation systems without compromising surgical accuracy. Our advancements provide the cornerstone for widespread adoption of image guidance technologies for faster and safer surgeries without intraoperative CT or MRI scans. This work represents a major workflow improvement for navigated craniospinal procedures with possible extension to other image-guided applications.

Intraoperative 3D Computed Tomography: Spine Surgery

Spinal instrumentation often involves placing implants without direct visualization of their trajectory or proximity to adjacent neurovascular structures. Two-dimensional fluoroscopy is commonly used to navigate implant placement, but with the advent of computed tomography, followed by the invention of a mobile scanner with an open gantry, three-dimensional (3D) navigation is now widely used. This article critically appraises the available literature to assess the influence of 3D navigation on radiation exposure, accuracy of instrumentation, operative time, and patient outcomes. Also explored is the latest technological advance in 3D neuronavigation: the manufacturing of, via 3D printers, patient-specific templates that direct implant placement.

Error Analysis and Experimental Study of a Bi-Planar Parallel Mechanism in a Pedicle Screw Robot System

Due to the urgent need for high precision surgical equipment for minimally invasive spinal surgery, a novel robot-assistant system was developed for the accurate placement of pedicle screws in lumbar spinal surgeries. The structure of the robot was based on a macro-micro mechanism, which includes a serial mechanism (macro part) and a bi-planar 5R parallel mechanism (micro part). The macro part was used to achieve a large workspace, while the micro part was used to obtain high stiffness and accuracy. Based on the transfer function of dimension errors, the factors affecting the accuracy of the end effectors were analyzed. Then the manufacturing errors and joint angle error on the position-stance of the end effectors were investigated. Eventually, the mechanism of the strain energy produced by the deformation of linkage via forced assembly and displacements of the output point were calculated. The amount of the transfer errors was quantitatively analyzed by the simulation. Experimental tests show that the error of the bi-planar 5R mechanism can be controlled no more than 1 mm for translation and 1° for rotation, which satisfies the required absolute position accuracy of the robot.

Three-dimensional Fluoroscopy-based Navigation for the Pedicle Screw Placement in Patients with Primary Invasive Spinal Tumors

Background:

Although pedicle screw placement (PSP) is a well-established technique for spine surgery, the treatment of patients with primary invasive spinal tumor (PIST) has high surgical risks secondary to destroyed pedicles. Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation (ITFN) system permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the spine with the advantage of obtaining intraoperative real-time three-dimensional images and automatic registration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of PSP using ITFN system for patients afflicted with PIST in the thoracic spine.

Methods:

Fifty-one patients diagnosed with PISTs were retrospectively analyzed, and 157 pedicles screws were implanted in 23 patients using the free-hand technique (free-hand group) and 197 pedicle screws were implanted in 28 patients using the ITFN system (ITFN group). Modified classification of Gertzbein and Robbins was used to evaluate the accuracy of PSP, and McCormick classification was applied for assessment of neurological function. Demographic data and factors affecting accuracy of screw insertion were compared using independent t-test while comparison of accuracy of screw insertion between the two groups was analyzed with Chi-square test.

Results:

Of 51 patients, 39 demonstrated improved neurological status and the other 12 patients reported that symptoms remained the same. In the free-hand group, 145 screws (92.4%) were Grade I, 9 screws (5.7%) were Grade II, and 3 screws (1.9%) were Grade III. In the ITFN group, 192 screws (97.4%) were Grade I, 5 screws (2.6%) were Grade II, and no Grade III screw was detected. Statistical analysis showed that the accuracies of pedicle screws in the two groups are significantly different (χ² = 4.981, P = 0.026).

Conclusions:

The treatments of PISTs include total tumor resection and reconstruction of spine stability. The ITFN system provides a high accuracy of pedicle screw placement.

Novel free-hand T1 pedicle screw method: Review of 44 consecutive cases

Summary of Background Data:

Multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions are becoming more prevalent in current practice. Biomechanical characteristics of the cervicothoracic junction may necessitate extending the construct to upper thoracic segments. However, fixation in upper thoracic spine can be technically demanding owing to transitional anatomy while suboptimal placement facilitates vascular and neurologic complications. Thoracic instrumentation methods include free-hand, fluoroscopic guidance, and CT-based image guidance. However, fluoroscopy of upper thoracic spine is challenging secondary to vertebral geometry and patient positioning, while image-guided systems present substantial financial commitment and are not readily available at most centers. Additionally, imaging modalities increase radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon while potentially lengthening surgical time.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective review of 44 consecutive patients undergoing a cervicothoracic fusion by a single surgeon using the novel free-hand T1 pedicle screw technique between June 2009 and November 2012. A starting point medial and cephalad to classic entry as well as new trajectory were utilized. No imaging modalities were employed during screw insertion. Postoperative CT scans were obtained on day 1. Screw accuracy was independently evaluated according to the Heary classification.

Results:

In total, 87 pedicle screws placed were at T1. Grade 1 placement occurred in 72 (82.8%) screws, Grade 2 in 4 (4.6%) screws and Grade 3 in 9 (10.3%) screws. All Grade 2 and 3 breaches were <2 mm except one Grade 3 screw breaching 2-4 mm laterally. Only two screws (2.3%) were noted to be Grade 4, both breaching medially by less than 2 mm. No new neurological deficits or returns to operating room took place postoperatively.

Conclusions:

This modification of the traditional starting point and trajectory at T1 is safe and effective. It attenuates additional bone removal or imaging modalities while maintaining a high rate of successful screw placement compared to historical controls.

Periaortic pedicle screw removal with endovascular control of the aorta and intraoperative aortography: a case report and review of the literature

Study Design  Case report and review of the literature.

Objective The objective of the article is to report the case of a 20-year-old patient with a threatened aortic injury from pedicle screw instrumentation successfully managed without aortic grafting.

Methods The patient's clinical course is retrospectively reviewed. The offending hardware was removed after gaining endovascular control of the aorta.

Results Intraoperative aortography was normal and no graft was placed. The patient remains asymptomatic at 2 years after surgery.

Conclusions Hardware impinging on the aorta can safely be removed by gaining endovascular control of the aorta. In the setting of normal intraoperative aortography in a young patient, we recommend against further intervention to avoid the known morbidity of aortic grafting.

New therapeutics in spine metastases

The number of patients who will develop metastatic spinal tumors is estimated to be between 5 and 10% of all cancer patients. As the therapy for systemic cancer improves, the number of patients developing symptomatic spinal tumors that require local therapy will increase. Over the last 10 years there has been a dramatic evolution in our ability to treat spinal tumors. These advances have not only been created by improvements in surgical techniques and instrumentation, but also developments in radiographic imaging, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. It is important for spine surgeons, radiologists, and radiation and medical oncologists to continue developing techniques for spinal salvage that will improve pain relief, achieve mechanical stability, improve or maintain neurologic function and sustain local tumor control. The evolution of these technologies will help to provide palliation and improve quality of life for patients with metastatic disease.

Complications associated with thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity

Thoracic pedicle screws have superior anchoring strength compared with other available fixation techniques. However, these are not universally accepted in many developing countries because of the concerns regarding safety and complications. In addition, there is evidence that pedicle morphology is unique in Chinese patients. The goal of this study was to analyze the complications seen at our institution, while using thoracic pedicle screws for the treatment of thoracic deformity, and to determine the safety of our techniques for the treatment of thoracic deformity in a Chinese population. From 1998 to 2005, there were 208 thoracic deformity patients treated at our institution, 70 of whom were male and 138 were female. Their age ranged from 11 to 55 years (mean of 14.9 years). All of them underwent corrective deformity surgery using posterior pedicle screw systems and follow-up was available for at least 3 years. Etiologic diagnoses included adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in 119 patients, congenital kyphoscoliosis in 38, adult scoliosis in 37 and undetermined in 14. Screw positions were evaluated using intraoperative and postoperative radiographs and a CT scan was performed when a concern for screw malposition was present. All radiographic evaluations were carried out in a double-blinded fashion. A total of 1,123 thoracic pedicle screws were inserted (5.4 thoracic screws/patient). The deformity correction rate was 81, 65 and 62% for idiopathic, congenital and adult scoliosis patients, respectively. The overall complication rate was 16.5% at the final follow-up. Complication rates directly and indirectly related to pedicle screws were 7.2 and 9.3%, respectively. There were no significant screw-related neurologic or visceral complications that adversely affected long-term results. The complications seen with thoracic pedicle screws in a Chinese population were similar to other populations and could be utilized safely for the treatment of thoracic deformity in this population.

CT-based patient-specific simulation software for pedicle screw insertion

STUDY DESIGN

Development of a 3-dimensional, patient-specific simulator for pedicle screw insertion.

OBJECTIVE

To allow the user to practice the insertion of pedicle screws into a 3-dimensional model of a patient-specific spine, and have both visual and quantitative feedback provided to the user. The goal is to better prepare surgeons to perform pedicle screw insertion surgery and help reduce the risk of pedicle screw misplacement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw insertion is particularly challenging to carry out on patients with abnormal spine morphology. Currently, preoperative planning for pedicle screw insertion is carried out using patient computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans. In addition, once screws are inserted, there are no quantitative metrics against which to measure the results.

METHODS

The simulator was developed in the TCL scripting language as a graphical plug-in for the commercial visualization software AmiraDev 3.11. Surgical simulation uses a 3-dimensional model of patient's spine developed from the patient's computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

Pedicle screw insertion can be practiced using pedicle screws of various sizes and analyzed in both 2-dimension and 3-dimension. Quantitative feedback is provided to the user in the form of anatomic lengths and angles, relative purchase of inserted screws, and a screw placement grading system. The software allows the user to adjust the translucency of a patient's spine to develop a better sense of the trajectories and depths involved with performing pedicle screw insertion on a patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The simulator offers many helpful features to the surgeon with respect to complex cases and to the surgical trainee learning the basic technique of pedicle screw insertion. A study is currently underway to evaluate the efficacy of the simulator as a teaching tool for surgical trainees in placing pedicle screws. Future work will focus on the transfer of the software to a stand-alone platform.

Free-hand thoracic pedicle screws placed by neurosurgery residents: a CT analysis

Free-hand thoracic pedicle screw placement is becoming more prevalent within neurosurgery residency training programs. This technique implements anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place thoracic pedicle screws. Because this technique is performed by surgeons in training, we wished to analyze the rate at which these screws were properly placed by residents by retrospectively reviewing the accuracy of resident-placed free-hand thoracic pedicle screws using computed tomography imaging. A total of 268 resident-placed thoracic pedicle screws was analyzed using axial computed tomography by an independent attending neuroradiologist. Eighty-five percent of the screws were completely within the pedicle and that 15% of the screws violated the pedicle cortex. The majority of the breaches were lateral breaches between 2 and 4 mm (46%). There was no clinical evidence of neurovascular injury or injury to the esophagus. There were no re-operations for screw replacement. We concluded that under appropriate supervision, neurosurgery residents can safely place free-hand thoracic pedicle screws with an acceptable breach rate.

Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography

Posterior corrective surgery using "all pedicle screw construct" carries risk of neurovascular complications. The study aims were to assess the screw placement in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using CT with low-radiation dose, and to evaluate the clinical outcome in patients with misplaced pedicle screws. CTs of 49 consecutive patients (873 screws, 79% thoracic) were retrospectively evaluated by two independent radiologists. A new grading system was developed to distinguish between lateral, medial and anterior cortical perforations, endplate perforation and foraminal perforation. The grading system is based on whether the cortical violation is partial or total rather than on mm-basis. The overall rate of screw misplacement was 17% (n = 149): 8% were laterally placed and 6.1% were medially placed. The rates of anterior cortical, endplate and foraminal perforation were 1.5, 0.9, and 0.5%, respectively. Lateral cortical perforation was more frequent in the thoracic spine (P = 0.005), whereas other types of misplacement including medial cortical perforation were more frequent on the left and the concave side of scoliotic curves (P = 0.002 and 0.003). No neurovascular complications were reported. The association between the occurrence of screw misplacement and the Cobb angle was statistically significant (P = 0.037). Misplacements exceeding half screw diameter should be classified as unacceptable. Low-dose CT implies exposing these young individuals to a significantly lower radiation dose than do other protocols used in daily clinical practice. We recommend using low-dose CT and the grading system proposed here in the postoperative assessment of screw placement.

The accuracy of multi-slice three-dimensional computerized tomography on the verification of the pedicle screw trajectory

The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic power of three-dimensional reformatted multi-slice computerized tomography (CT) images on misplaced pedicle screws in spinal surgery. Eighty-four consecutive patients with 458 screws in situ were investigated prospectively using both axial CT slices and reformatted images after operation by two blinded investigators. All the screw misplacements were documented and the differences between the two imaging modalities were recorded. Axial CT slices were able to show only 23 of 60 misplaced pedicle screws; multislice CT was three times more powerful in the diagnosis of pedicle screw complications in spinal surgery (p<0.05). We concluded that multi-slice CT reconstruction should be the primary diagnostic tool after screw implantation in the human spine.

Complication avoidance: thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures

Most thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures can be treated conservatively. Unstable fractures or fractures resulting in neurologic deficits usually require surgical treatment. Choosing an appropriate surgical approach requires a thorough understanding of the various techniques for decompression, fusion, and stabilization. Surgical options include an anterior approach, a posterior approach, or a combined anteroposterior approach. Each surgical option has unique advantages and disadvantages. Generally, the anterior approaches are best used at the thoracolumbar junction, posterior approaches are ideal for low lumbar injuries and lumbar injuries that result in complete spinal cord injuries,and anteroposterior surgeries typically are reserved for highly unstable fracture subluxations. Case illustrations show the various treatment options.

Decision-making in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine

The most common site of injury to the spine is the thoracolumbar junction which is the mechanical transition junction between the rigid thoracic and the more flexible lumbar spine. The lumbar spine is another site which is more prone to injury. Absence of stabilizing articulations with the ribs, lordotic posture and more sagitally oriented facet joints are the most obvious explanations. Burst fractures of the spine account for 14% of all spinal injuries. Though common, thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures present a number of important treatment challenges. There has been substantial controversy related to the indications for nonoperative or operative management of these fractures. Disagreement also exists regarding the choice of the surgical approach. A large number of thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures can be treated conservatively while some fractures require surgery. Selecting an appropriate surgical option requires an in-depth understanding of the different methods of decompression, stabilization and/or fusion. Anterior surgery has the advantage of the greatest degree of canal decompression and offers the benefit of limiting the number of motion segments fused. These advantages come at the added cost of increased time for the surgery and the related morbidity of the surgical approach. Posterior surgery enjoys the advantage of being more familiar to the operating surgeons and can be an effective approach. However, the limitations of this approach include inadequate decompression, recurrence of the deformity and implant failure. Though many of the principles are the same, the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures requires some additional consideration due to the difficulty of approaching this region anteriorly. Avoiding complications of these surgeries are another important aspect and can be achieved by following an algorithmic approach to patient assessment, proper radiological examination and precision in decision-making regarding management. A detailed understanding of the mechanism of injury and their unique biomechanical propensities following various forms of treatment can help the spinal surgeon manage such patients effectively and prevent devastating complications.

Observer reliability in evaluating pedicle screw placement using computed tomography

Pedicle screw insertion in spinal surgery is a demanding technique with potential risks to neurological structures, for example, within the spinal canal. Assessing screw placement in clinical practice has been performed using plain radiographs and/or mainly axial computed tomography (CT) images. Screw placement using CT image reconstructions in multiple planes has been described, but its reliability has yet to be studied. This study aimed at addressing the clinical issue of interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the use of axial and coronal CT images for the assessment of pedicle screw placement. Fifty nine pedicle screws were studied by two experienced radiologists on two separate occasions. Screw placement was classified as "in", "out" or "questionable". On average, 88% and 92% of the screws were classified as "in" by the first and second radiologist, respectively. Intraobserver agreement strength was almost perfect for both observers using either axial or coronal images. Interobserver agreement strength was almost perfect (axial) and substantial (coronal) in the first reading and substantial (axial, coronal) in the second reading. Assessing screw placement in more than one CT imaging plane is not only useful but reliable. Routine use may enhance reporting quality of screw placement by surgeons and radiologists.

Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement for Upper and Middle Thoracic Pathologies Without Coronal Plane Spinal Deformity Using Conventional Methods

There is a growing interest in the implantation of pedicle screws into the middle and upper thoracic spine. However, usage of the technique is still under debate for these levels because the pedicles in these regions are small and exhibit a high degree of inter- and intraspecimen variability. Twenty-four consecutive patients treated for upper and middle thoracic pathologies by pedicle screw instrumentation under biplanar or uniplanar fluoroscopy were evaluated retrospectively. The rate of screw misplacement on postoperative computerized tomography and complications caused by misplaced screws were determined. In 24 cases, a total of 113 upper-middle thoracic pedicle screws were inserted. Fifty-one of them were inserted between T2 and T5 with guidance of biplanar fluoroscopy, and 62 were inserted between T6 and T8 with uniplanar fluoroscopy. The rate of misplacement was 20.3% for 113 screws (27.4% for T2 to T5 screws, and 14.5% for 62 T6 to T8 screws). Four screws were incorrectly inserted which could have clinical significance (3.5%), and 1 of them required revision. The difference between the upper and middle thoracic screws was not statistically significant (P=0.089). Screw insertion with laminectomy did not cause significant difference in both upper and middle thoracic regions. Only 2 complications were seen because of screw insertion. Pedicle screw insertion with guidance of fluoroscopy may be a reliable and safe method for upper and middle thoracic pathologies.

Le système d’arthrodèse percutanée WSH®

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report our initial experience with a new percutaneous spine fixation system, avoiding open exposure, excessive blood loss and extensive muscle dissection. With the specially designed plates, this system can be used whatever the conformation of the segment instrumented is kyphotic or lordotic.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (9 men and 7 women ranging in age from 27 to 78 years, mean 54.9) underwent percutaneous pedicle fixation using this device. Twelve patients underwent single level fusions (discogenic lowback pain in 6 cases, spondylolisthesis in 1), and 4 underwent two-level fusions (2 for lumbar fracture and 2 for spondylolisthesis). TLIF by intersomatic cages were inserted at the same time in two patients with spondylolisthesis. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 15 months (mean 5 months).

RESULTS

Improvement in pain control was assessed using a specially designed scale, allowing qualitative self-evaluation of pain control. Pain control was excellent in 12 patients, good in 3 and poor in one case due to loss of independence related to multiple associated disabling conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous pedicule screw insertion using this device is a safe and reliable technique. Further improvements in the system which allows a certain degree of spinal mobility after screw placement are in process. Early results shown in this study illustrate the perspectives.

Clinical and radiological results after parapedicular screw fixation of the thoracic spine

OBJECT

The proximity of thoracic pedicles to the spinal cord and neurovascular structures has prompted numerous efforts to obtain proper screw placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of thoracic parapedicular (intercostovertebral) screw fixation by following anatomical landmarks and using fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Thoracic parapedicular screw fixation was performed in 41 patients (328 screws). Postoperative computerized tomography scans were obtained in all cases to analyze the position of each screw with respect to the pedicle rib unit, the spinal canal, and the vertebral body (VB) according to a proposed novel grading system. Additionally, screw convergence angles were calculated for each instrumented level. There was no additional morbidity associated with parapedicular screw insertion. In a single case a screw suspected of entering the spinal canal was revised without causing neurological damage. The remaining screws were placed entirely within the pedicle rib unit and VB without breaching the neural foramina, pleura, or vascular structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic and thoracolumbar instability can be treated adequately and safely by using parapedicular screw fixation guided by anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopic imaging. The use of computer-aided navigation may be beneficial but does not appear to be mandatory.

Evaluation and treatment of adult spinal deformity

✓ Spinal deformity is a complex and dynamic process that occurs in both the sagittal and coronal planes of the thoracolumbar spine. Successful treatment is aimed at achieving satisfactory balance in both of these planes. The spinal curvatures in the adult differ greatly from those in adolescents. As a general rule the adult curves tend to be stiffer, whereas adolescent curves are more flexible. In addition to cosmetic concerns, adult patients frequently present with pain and neurological symptoms in contrast to adolescents who usually do not experience this degree of pain or neurological symptoms. The treatment of adult spinal deformity differs substantially from that of adolescent deformity. Surgeries in the former tend to be more complex procedures associated with higher rates of intra- and perioperative complications. The goals of surgery in the adult are to obtain a solid fusion with a balanced spine, to relieve pain, and to prevent further deformity. A secondary goal is to correct the curve, and, in so doing, to improve the cosmetic appearance. In this review the author addresses the basic principles of spinal corrective surgery in the adult and provides insight into the varied treatment options available.