Endovascular Thrombectomy in Wake-Up Stroke and Stroke with Unknown Symptom Onset

Treatment outcome of bridge mechanical thrombectomy with different IV-tPA dosages in the standard and extended time window in real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Differences of treatment outcome between full or reduced dose of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for bridge mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the extended time window have not been clearly established. We aimed to present real-world results of bridge MT with different tPA dosages in the standard and extended windows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with MT between 2017 and 2021 at two stroke referral centers were retrospectively reviewed. Bridge MT with tPA were categorized as full (0.9 mg/kg) or reduced (<0.9 mg/kg) dose. Standard window (SW) cohort was defined as MT performed within 6 h of acute ischemic stroke onset, while those beyond 6 h as the extended window (EW) cohort. 90 days Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, technical treatment success, in-hospital mortality, and post-treatment hemorrhage were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients met the inclusion criteria, 218 of which treated in the SW, while 205 treated in the EW. Within the SW cohort, the full-dose tPA group demonstrated a higher proportion of good functional outcome (GFO) at 90 days (mRS0-3) versus reduced (49% vs 21%, p = 0.0358). The overall GFO of SW was higher than that of the EW cohort (33% vs 20%, p = 0.0480). Within the EW cohort, GFO was similar between full and reduced dose groups. Successful reperfusion rate was lower in SW versus EW cohorts (39% vs 58%, p = 0.0199).

CONCLUSION

In real-world practice, the GFO of bridge MT is better than MT alone. The tPA dosage is not a determining factor of GFO in EW MT.

Early Versus Late Initiation of Endovascular Therapy in Patients with Severe Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for severe cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is controversial in terms of indication and clinical benefit. The impact of delay of EVT on functional recovery is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of early versus late initiation of EVT in severe CVST.

METHODS

From prospective EVT and CVST registries, patients with CVST diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2022 were retrospectively identified for this multicenter collaboration. EVT was considered in severe CVST with features prone to a poor prognosis. We compared early (< 24 h) with late (> 24 h) initiation of EVT after the presentation in the emergency department and subsequent CVST diagnosis. Outcome parameters included functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-2) at 90 days, mRS score at discharge, in-hospital mortality, and mortality at 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 363 patients with CVST, 45 (12.4%; 31 [early EVT] vs. 14 [late EVT]) were included in this study. We found a higher proportion of patients with functional independence at 3 months among early versus late EVT (66.7% vs. 27.3%; odds ratio [OR] 5.3; 95% confidence interval 1.02-25; p = 0.036). In multivariate logistic regression, late EVT was inversely correlated with functional independence (OR 0.17 [0.04-0.83]; p = 0.011). The mortality rate was 16.7% versus 36.4% (mRS 6 at 3 months, OR 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.07-1.75; p = 0.217) at 90 days for early versus late EVT.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a higher rate of functional independence in patients with early EVT. These preliminary findings must be confirmed in subsequent randomized controlled trials evaluating a "time-is-brain" paradigm for EVT in CVST.

Outcomes of wake-up stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Wake-up stroke represents a significant challenge in acute treatment and care. Thrombolysis has been extensively studied in the wake-up stroke population. However, mechanical thrombectomy in wake-up stroke exclusively has not been well studied. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for wake-up stroke.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature using publically accessible databases. Data extraction was completed using Nested Knowledge AutoLit software. Outcomes of interest included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score 2b/3. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.1.2.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included in our study with a total of 510 patients included. Patients with wake-up stroke were found to have good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) in 46.2% of patients and successful reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) was seen in 83.5% of patients. Mortality was observed in 20.4% of patients with sICH seen in 8.3%.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical thrombectomy for patients with wake-up stroke was found to have favorable rates of good functional outcomes and relatively low rates of adverse events.

Outcome of Stroke Patients with Unknown Onset and Unknown Time Last Known Well Undergoing Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

Endovascular treatment (ET) in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) with unknown onset or an extended time window can be safe and effective if patients are selected by defined clinical and imaging criteria; however, it is unclear if these criteria should also be applied to patients with unknown onset and unknown time last known well. In this study, we aimed to assess whether absent information on the time patients were last known to be well impacts outcome in patients with unknown onset LVOS.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who were enrolled in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment between 2015 and 2019. Patients with unknown onset and unknown time last known well (LKWu) were compared to patients with known onset (KO) and to patients with unknown onset but known time last known well (LKWk) regarding clinical and imaging baseline characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 5909 patients, 561 presented with LKWu (9.5%), 1849 with LKWk (31.3%) and 3499 with KO (59.2%). At 90 days, functional independency was less frequent in LKWu (27.0%) compared to KO (42.6%) and LKWk patients (31.8%). These differences were not significant after adjusting for confounders. A main confounder was the initial Alberta stroke program early CT score.

CONCLUSION

The LKWu patients had a similar outcome after ET as KO and LKWk patients after adjusting for confounders. Thus, ET should not be withheld if the time last known well is unknown. Instead, LKWu patients may be selected for ET using the same criteria as in LKWk patients.

Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Late Presentation of Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Guideline From the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Guidelines and Practice Standards Committee

Background and Purpose

Recent clinical trials investigating endovascular therapy (EVT) in the extended time window have opened new treatment paradigms for late-presenting patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. The aim of this guideline is to provide up to date recommendations for the diagnosis, selection, and medical or endovascular treatment of patients with LVO presenting in the extended time window.

Methods

The Society of Vascular & Interventional Neurology (SVIN) Guidelines and Practice Clinical Standards (GAPS) committee assembled a writing group and recruited interdisciplinary experts to review and evaluate the current literature. Recommendations were assigned by the writing group using the SVIN-GAPS Class of Recommendation/Level of Evidence algorithm and SVIN GAPS guideline format. The final guideline was approved by all members of the writing group, the GAPS committee, and the SVIN board of directors.

Results

Literature review yielded three high quality randomized trials and several observational studies that have been extracted to derive the enclosed summary recommendations. In patients with LVO presenting in the 6-to-24-hour window, and with clinical imaging mismatch as defined by the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 studies, EVT is recommended. Non contrast CT can be used to evaluate infarct size as sole imaging modality for patient selection, particularly when access to CT perfusion or MRI is limited, or if their performance would incur substantial delay to treatment. In addition, several clinical questions were reviewed based on the available evidence and consensus grading.

Conclusion

These guidelines provide practical recommendations based on recent evidence on the diagnosis, selection, and treatment of patients with LVO stroke presenting in the extended time window.

What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review

In 2015, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in combination with intravenous thrombolysis was demonstrated to be superior to best medical treatment alone in patients with anterior circulation stroke. This finding resulted in an unprecedented boost in endovascular stroke therapy, and MT became widely available. MT was initially approved for patients presenting with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation (intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery) within a 6-hour time window. Eventually, it was shown to be beneficial in a broader group of patients, including those without known symptom-onset, wake-up stroke, or patients with posterior circulation stroke. Technical developments and the implementation of novel thrombectomy devices further facilitated endovascular recanalization for acute ischemic stroke. However, some aspects remain controversial. Is MT suitable for medium or very distal vessel occlusions? Should emergency stenting be performed for symptomatic stenosis or recurrent occlusion? How should patients with large vessel occlusion without disabling symptoms be treated? Do certain patients benefit from MT without intravenous thrombolysis? In the era of personalized decision-making, some of these questions require an individualized approach based on comorbidities, imaging criteria, and the severity or duration of symptoms. Despite its successful development in the past decade, endovascular stroke therapy will remain a challenging and fascinating field in the years to come. This review aims to provide an overview of patient selection, and the indications for and execution of MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Endovascular treatment for wake-up stroke and daytime unwitnessed stroke: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence from sources outside the typical clinical research setting, such as a real-world setting, may complement evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of the present study was to carry out a meta-analysis of available real-world evidence that focused on the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment in patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) or daytime unwitnessed stroke (DUS) compared to that in patients treated ≤ 6 h after the onset of an ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Data mining was conducted on 1 May 2021 from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Cochrane Library. The study reviewed all published that assessed the effect of endovascular treatment in WUS and DUS compared to that received by patients with ischemic stroke. Relevant data were extracted and the narrative was reviewed and analysed. The results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

FINDINGS

The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of functional independence (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.02; P = 0.07), symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.57-1.30; P = 0.470), and all-cause mortality (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.16; P = 0.50). There was also no heterogeneity between the trials.

CONCLUSION

The pooled analysis provided evidence to support the use of endovascular treatment in WUS and DUS with favourable perfusion imaging. The meta-analysis confirmed the main findings of RCTs of endovascular treatment in WUS and DUS in a real-world setting and therefore strengthens the validity of this treatment strategy.

Benefits of Endovascular Treatment in Late Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke Selected without CT Perfusion: A Real-World Study

Objective

This study examined the functional outcomes and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients owing to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation, presented during a late-time window (6–24 hours after last seen well (LSW)) in a real-world practice.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis from a bi-center prospective cohort. According to the stroke treatment, patients with continuous Alberta Stroke Plan Early Aspect score (ASPECTS) ≥6 on non-contrast CT (NCCT) and moderate to good collateral state on CT angiography (CTA) were divided into EVT group and standard medical treatment (SMT) group. The primary outcome was the rate of functional independence (90-day mRS ≤2). Safety outcomes were the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and the 90-day mortality.

Results

Among the 288 enrolled patients (53.5% male, median age 64 years), there were 167 patients in the EVT group and 121 in the SMT group. After multivariable adjustments for potential confounders, EVT was associated with functional independence (adjusted OR: 3.052; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.553–5.997; p = 0.001). In the PSM cohort, 44.2% (42/95) of patients in the EVT group versus 18.9% (18/95) in the SMT group achieved functional independence (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.763–6.517), and there was a significant difference favoring EVT over the SMT in the overall distribution of mRS (OR: 2.170, 95% CI: 1.302–3.618) at 90 days. The rate of sICH did not differ between the EVT and SMT groups (10.5% vs 8.4%, p = 0.804) nor did 90-day mortality (18.9% vs 22.1%, p = 0.719). No interaction was found in p-values with statistical significance in subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

This real-world experience suggests that EVT for late-presenting stroke patients, based on small core on NCCT and moderate to good collaterals on CTA, is associated with better outcomes than SMT alone, with no increase in sICH and 90-day mortality rates.

The impact of time to reperfusion on recanalization rates and outcome after mechanical thrombectomy: A single center experience

Background:

Timely and effective recanalization to salvage the penumbra is the main determinant of outcome in acute ischemic strokes. Randomized controlled trials on late window mechanical thrombectomy (MT) have proved its safety and efficacy upto 24 h after stroke onset. We looked at the impact of time to reperfusion on vessel recanalization rates and short-term outcome in patients undergoing MT for large vessel occlusion.

Methods:

The clinical, imaging, and outcome of all patients undergoing MT upto 24 h from last seen normal was extracted from a prospectively maintained ischemic stroke database from January 2012 till September 2019.

Results:

There were 145 patients with a mean (SD) age of 58.2 (±14) years. Of them, 28 had wake up/unknown time of onset stroke and 9 presented beyond >360 min. There were 23 vertebrobasilar strokes. Median National Institute of Health Stroke scale score (NIHSS) at admission was 16.4 (Inter quartile range (IQR) 12–21). CT-Alberta Stroke program early CT score (CT-ASPECTS) was excellent (8–10) in 39 (31.6%) and fair (5–7) in 77 (63.6%) patients in anterior circulation strokes. About 25% underwent bridging therapy. Recanalization rates did not differ between those presenting early (<6 h) versus wake up strokes and late presenting patients (81.79% vs 71.9%). Symptomatic Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurred in 5%. At 3 months, excellent outcome (modified rankin scale <2) was observed in 28.9%. While Admission NIHSS remained strong predictor of poor outcome at 3 months, delay in presentation did not impact MT outcome (37.5% vs 45.79% and P = 0.460).

Conclusions:

The recanalization rates were similar in patients irrespective of the time to reperfusion from stroke onset. The functional outcome was not inferior in late presenters selected by advanced imaging.

Functional Outcome, Recanalization, and Hemorrhage Rates After Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Treated With Tenecteplase Before Thrombectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate in routine care the efficacy and safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic strokes (LVO-AIS), either secondarily transferred after IVT or directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and procedural data of patients treated with 0.25 mg/kg tenecteplase within 270 minutes of LVO-AIS who underwent brain angiography. The main outcome was 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2). Recanalization (revised Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia score 2b-3) was evaluated before (pre-MT) and after MT (final).

RESULTS

We included 588 patients (median age 75 years [interquartile range (IQR) 61-84]; 315 women [54%]; median NIH Stroke Scale score 16 [IQR 10-20]), of whom 520 (88%) were secondarily transferred after IVT. Functional independence occurred in 47% (n = 269/570; 95% confidence interval [CI] 43.0-51.4) of patients. Pre-MT recanalization occurred in 120 patients (20.4%; 95% CI 17.2-23.9), at a similar rate across treatment paradigms (direct admission, n = 14/68 [20.6%]; secondary transfer, n = 106/520 [20.4%]; p > 0.99) despite a shorter median IVT to puncture time in directly admitted patients (38 [IQR 23-55] vs 86 [IQR 70-110] minutes; p < 0.001). Final recanalization was achieved in 492 patients (83.7%; 95%CI 80.4-86.6). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 2.5% of patients (n = 14/567; 95% CI 1.4-4.1).

DISCUSSIONS

Tenecteplase before MT is safe, effective, and achieves a fast recanalization in everyday practice in patients secondarily transferred or directly admitted to a CSC, in line with published results. These findings should encourage its wider use in bridging therapy.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that tenecteplase within 270 minutes of LVO-AIS increases the probability of functional independence.

Unknown Onset Stroke: Differences Between Patients with Wake-Up Stroke and Daytime-Unwitnessed Stroke

OBJECTIVES

Patients with unknown onset stroke (UOS) can be categorized as wake-up stroke (WUS) and daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS). We sought to determine whether decisions for initial imaging modalities, frequency of mismatch findings, resulting treatment decisions and outcome differ between WUS and DUS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, all patients with UOS admitted to our Stroke Unit from January to December 2018 were evaluated and classified as either WUS or DUS.

RESULTS

180 patients were included (74.4 % WUS, 25.6 % DUS). Compared to WUS patients, DUS patients received more often a non-contrast computed tomography initially (43.5 % vs. 24.6 %, p = 0.016). MR imaging was performed more frequently in WUS patients (53.7 % vs. 34.8 %, p = 0.027). The rate of mismatch findings in patients examined with either multimodal CT or MRI (126 patients, 101 WUS and 26 DUS) did not differ between the groups. Likewise, the rate of intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy was similar in both groups. DUS patients had more often severe neurological deficits at admission as defined by the National Institutes of Stroke Scale score (14.2 vs. 8.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DUS had disadvantages in mismatch-based treatment options due to initial imaging modalities. Current data do not support different treatment concepts in WUS and DUS patients. All UOS patients should initially be evaluated by either multimodal CT or MRI to open a chance to receive reperfusion therapy.

Severe Leukoaraiosis Is Associated with Poor Outcome after Successful Recanalization of M1 Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Strokes

BACKGROUND

Severe leukoaraiosis (LA) is an established risk factor for poor outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion stroke. There is uncertainty whether this association also applies to successfully recanalized patients with M1 segment middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre study of patients with successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction, TICI 2b or 3) after MT for an M1 MCA occlusion was performed over a 7-year period. LA score (LAS) was assessed using the age-related white matter change scale on pre-interventional brain imaging.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients (median age 75.0 years) were included. LAS was assessed on pre-interventional imaging by computed tomography in 177 (84.7%) patients and magnetic resonance imaging in 32 (15.3%) patients. The median LAS was 1 (IQR 0-8), and severe LA consisted of the top 25 percentile, ranging from 9 to 24. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an association of severe LA (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.88, p = 0.023), higher NIHSS on admission (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84-0.94, p < 0.001), advanced age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.039), good leptomeningeal collaterals (OR 3.65, 95% CI 1.46-8.15, p = 0.001), and TICI 3 score (OR 3.26, 95% CI 10.52-7.01) with good clinical outcome after 3 months as measured with the modified Rankin scale.

CONCLUSION

Severe LA is associated with poor clinical outcome at 3 months in acute stroke patients undergoing MT due to emergent M1 MCA occlusion.

Mechanical Thrombectomy: Answering Unanswered

The stroke physician community witnessed a major “breakthrough” in acute stroke therapeutics when the results of the first of the many positive trials, “MR CLEAN,” were published showing a significant absolute benefit in favor of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Thereafter, the investigators of ESCAPE, SWIFT PRIME, REVASCAT, THRACE, and PISTE concluded the same. Based on the initial studies, the American Stroke Association amended the 2013 guidelines in 2015 to include mechanical thrombectomy as the standard of care in patients with LVO presenting within six hours. In the past year, the horizon was further expanded when two major landmark trials, DAWN and DEFUSE 3, established the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy in the delayed window period in a select group of patients. It further led to the inclusion of the delayed window period treatment strategies in the 2018 guidelines. However, there are many unanswered questions in scenarios like small deficit with LVO, borderline large core, wake-up stroke (WUS), tandem occlusion, imaging of choice, conscious sedation (CS) versus general anesthesia (GA), and choice of technique. In our review, we aim to answer these questions along with a schematic representation of current techniques used in stroke thrombectomy.

Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke beyond the time window: A meta-analysis

Currently, endovascular treatment has been proven to be effective when conducted within 6 hours of symptom onset. However, when patients have symptoms for more than 6 hours, have a daytime-unwitnessed stroke (DUS) or wake up with a stroke (wake-up stroke, WUS), the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment need to be further elucidated. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with ischemic stroke beyond the time window with that ≤6 hours. PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE were searched from inception to November 2018. The following outcomes were evaluated by a random-effects model: efficacy outcomes, that is, functional independence and successful recanalization, and safety outcomes, that is, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality. Subgroup analyses were also performed to examine whether patient or study characteristics were associated with the outcomes. Nine observational studies, including 5192 patients (1414 patients with extended time windows [ETWs]; 3778 patients ≤6 hours), were eligible for analysis. The overall analysis demonstrated that the functional independence was worse in patients with ETWs vs those ≤6 hours (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90, P = .0006). However, subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in functional independence between the two groups when patients were selected for a perfusion mismatch by imaging (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43, P = 1.000). Therefore, compared with a window ≤6 hours, endovascular treatment with ETWs for ischemic stroke may not result in poor outcomes when patients are typically selected by perfusion techniques.

Cerebral ischaemia with unknown onset: Outcome after recanalization procedure

BACKGROUND

Stroke of unknown time of onset (UTOS) accounts for one-third of contra-indications for revascularization procedures. With modern neuroimaging techniques it is possible to differentiate the core infarcts and the presence of penumbra.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes in patients with UTOS, treated with intravenous (i.v.) recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), or both.

METHOD

We conducted this observational study in patients treated by i.v. rt-PA, MT, or both, selected by a diffusion-weighted image/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch. We evaluated outcomes with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months.

RESULTS

Of 992 consecutive patients (522 women, 52.6%; median age 76 years; median baseline national institutes of health stroke scale [NIHSS] 10), 153 (15.4%) had UTOS, including 101 with wake-up strokes. Compared to other patients, they were more likely to have pre-existing mRS scores >2 (P=0.022), multiple infarcts (P<0.001), middle cerebral artery occlusions (P=0.023), and to undergo MT (P=0.003), and less likely to receive i.v. rt-PA (P<0.001). They had higher NIHSS scores (P<0.001) and longer discovery to treatment initiation times (P<0.001). They were more likely to develop pulmonary (P=0.001) and urinary (P=0.006) infections, and pulmonary embolism (P=0.019), and tended to have a higher mortality rate (P=0.052) within 7 days. After adjustment, there was no association of UTOS with any of these outcome measures anymore.

CONCLUSION

Patients with UTOS have more severe strokes and more comorbidities, but after adjustment, their outcomes did not differ from those of other patients.

Risk factors of intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy of anterior circulation ischemic stroke

PURPOSE

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a potentially severe complication after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Here, we investigated risk factors for the occurrence of any and symptomatic ICH after MT due to large-vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with acute ischemic anterior circulation stroke with large-vessel occlusion undergoing MT were analyzed. ICH was categorized according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. Forty-three procedural and clinical parameters were analyzed using univariate tests and multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of 612 patients, any ICH was detected in 195 (31.9%), while 27 (4.4%) developed a symptomatic ICH. Infarct size > 1/3 of vascular territory in control imaging (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.45-3.21), higher serum glucose levels (OR 1.23 for change of 15 units mg/dL, 95% CI 1.10-1.39), and higher thrombectomy maneuver count (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.32) were significantly associated with a higher risk of developing any ICH compared to no ICH. Wake-up strokes (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.38-11.60), transfer from an external clinic (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.24-7.48), and higher serum glucose levels (OR 1.22 for change of 15 units mg/dL, 95% CI 1.05-1.42) were revealed as independent risk factors for development of symptomatic ICH compared to no symptomatic ICH. Patients with no infarct demarcation (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.80) and complete recanalization (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.86) showed a lower risk of developing any ICH.

CONCLUSION

Wake-up strokes and patients who are treated within a drip-and-ship concept are especially vulnerable for symptomatic ICH, while complete recanalization, contrary to subtotal recanalization only, was revealed as a protective factor against ICH.