Azithromycin to Prevent Pertussis in Household Contacts, Catalonia and Navarre, Spain, 2012-2013

The ongoing challenge of prevention of pertussis in infants: what's new in 2024?

INTRODUCTION

Pertussis, a respiratory disease caused primarily by Bordetella pertussis, is undergoing a resurgence despite decades of high rates of vaccination. The prevention of pertussis in infants presents several challenges, including the waning immunity of the acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine, the limited protection afforded to newborns before they complete the vaccine series, and the existence of gaps in maternal vaccination. Furthermore, the unwillingness or refusal of a considerable number of individuals, including some healthcare workers, to receive vaccinations represents another significant challenge.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review provides an updated overview of the ongoing challenge of preventing pertussis in infants and discusses some possible solutions.

EXPERT OPINION

The ongoing challenge of preventing pertussis in infants is multifaceted. To address these challenging issues, a multi-pronged approach is required. This approach should be designed to address various barriers and increase uptake. It should include measures to strengthen maternal vaccination programs, ensure timely infant vaccinations, improve public education, and continue research into more effective vaccines with longer-lasting immunity.

Working group summary of the 2023 full update of the Finnish national guidelines for paediatric lower respiratory tract infections

AIM

The first evidence-based Finnish guidelines for paediatric lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) were published in 2014 and completely updated in 2023. This paper, by the interdisciplinary working group that developed the 2023 guidelines, summarises the main recommendations.

METHODS

The 2023 guidelines were produced after a systematic review. Strong evidence was at least two separate, high-quality studies, moderate evidence was at least one high-quality study and weak evidence was at least one satisfactory study. The authors have now summarised the key points.

RESULTS

There was strong evidence that antitussives and beta-sympathomimetics were not effective for bronchitis-related cough and that laryngitis should be treated with oral corticosteroids, with adrenaline inhalations added in severe cases. Also, that amoxicillin for 5 days provided sufficient treatment for paediatric community-acquired pneumonia and that children with apparent viral pneumonia could be observed without antimicrobial therapy. There was moderate evidence that corticosteroids or inhaled agents were not effective for bronchiolitis and that administering salbutamol with a holding chamber could relieve symptoms of wheezing bronchitis. Also, pertussis should be considered for unvaccinated infants with coughs.

CONCLUSION

The 2023 guidelines aim to improve acute evidence-based treatment of LRTIs, through appropriate antibiotics, inhaled drugs, corticosteroids, radiology and laboratory testing.

High post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) uptake among household contacts of pertussis patients enrolled in a PEP effectiveness evaluation - United States, 2015-2017

BACKGROUND

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for pertussis is recommended for household contacts of pertussis cases in the United States within 21 days of exposure, but data on PEP effectiveness for prevention of secondary cases in the setting of widespread pertussis vaccination are limited. We implemented a multi-state evaluation of azithromycin PEP use and effectiveness among household contacts.

METHODS

Culture- or PCR-confirmed pertussis cases were identified through surveillance. Household contacts were interviewed within 7 days of case report and again 14-21 days later. Interviewers collected information on exposure, demographics, vaccine history, prior pertussis diagnosis, underlying conditions, PEP receipt, pertussis symptoms, and pertussis testing. A subset of household contacts provided nasopharyngeal and blood specimens during interviews.

RESULTS

Of 299 household contacts who completed both interviews, 12 (4%) reported not receiving PEP. There was no evidence of higher prevalence of cough or pertussis symptoms among contacts who did not receive PEP. Of 168 household contacts who provided at least one nasopharyngeal specimen, four (2.4%) were culture or PCR positive for B. pertussis; three of these received PEP prior to their positive test result. Of 156 contacts with serologic results, 14 (9%) had blood specimens that were positive for IgG anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies; all had received PEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Very high PEP uptake was observed among household contacts of pertussis patients. Although the number of contacts who did not receive PEP was small, there was no difference in prevalence of pertussis symptoms or positive laboratory results among these contacts compared with those who did receive PEP.

Pharmacotherapy for Bordetella pertussis infection. II. A synthesis of clinical sciences

Despite the plethora of studies that have examined laboratory susceptibility testing for Bordetella pertussis, assessments of treatment have lagged far behind both in quality and quantity. Macrolides and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole historically served the needs of both treatment and prevention, albeit there is still controversy about the degree of protection measured both bacteriologically and clinically. As high-level macrolide resistance has emerged in some geographic regions and since macrolides have been the mainstay of therapy, alternative antibiotics need to be defined for pertussis. In vitro susceptibility testing suggests the potential for several alternatives to macrolides, including trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, specific β-lactam agents, chloramphenicol, some quinolones and possibly some tetracyclines. For the latter antibiotics, more clinical studies for treatment and prophylaxis are required in to order to establish bacteriological-clinical correlates for outcome. In the interim, if the clinical circumstances mandate the use of proposed interim alternatives to macrolides, outcomes should be assessed with test of cure by culture, since genetic amplification technologies do not discriminate bacterial viability. Whereas there may be debate in regard to using placebo or macrolides as the controls for alternative antibiotic therapy in geographies where most B. pertussis isolates are antibiotic-susceptible, both placebo and macrolide controls should be assessed along with alternative antibiotics in well-designed controlled studies in regions pressured by macrolide resistance. Outcomes of clinical response and epidemiological patterns of disease should continue to be monitored given the degree of macrolide resistance that is emerging.