1
|
Tembo J, Egbe NF, Maluzi K, Mulonga K, Chilufya M, Kapata N, Mukonka V, Simulundu E, Zumla A, Fwoloshi S, Mulenga L, Pallerla SR, Velavan TP, Bates M. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics and risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Zambia. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 120:150-157. [PMID: 35427785 PMCID: PMC9004225 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct a diagnostic validation study of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic kits. METHODS We compared SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test results from 3 RT-PCR assays used by the Zambian government between November 2020 and February 2021 (Panther Fusion assay, Da An Gene's 2019-nCoV RNA kit and Maccura's PCR Kit) with the Altona RealStar RT-PCR kit which served as the gold standard. We also evaluated results from rapid antigen testing and whether comorbidities were linked with increased odds of infection. RESULTS We recruited 244 participants, 61% (149/244) were positive by at least 1 PCR assay. Da An Gene, Maccura, and Panther Fusion assays had sensitivities of 0.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-41%), 27.1% (95% CI 15%-42%), and 76% (95% CI 65%-85%), respectively, but specificity was low (<85% for all 3 assays). HIV and TB were not associated with SARS-CoV-2, whereas female sex (OR 0.5 [0.3-0.9], p = 0.026) and chronic pulmonary disease (0.1 [0.0-0.8], p = 0.031) were associated with lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of 44 samples, 84% sequenced were Beta variant. CONCLUSIONS The RT-PCR assays evaluated did not meet WHO recommended minimum sensitivity of 80%. Local diagnostic validation studies should be embedded within preparedness plans for future outbreaks to improve the public health response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Tembo
- HerpeZ, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Nkongho Franklyn Egbe
- School of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Nathan Kapata
- Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | - Alimuddin Zumla
- Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sombo Fwoloshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Lloyd Mulenga
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Thirumalaisamy P. Velavan
- Institute for Tropical Medicine, University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany,Vietnamese German Center for Medical Research, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Matthew Bates
- HerpeZ, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia,School of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shanaube K, Schaap A, Klinkenberg E, Floyd S, Bwalya J, Cheeba M, de Haas P, Kosloff B, Ruperez M, Hayes R, Ayles H. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and associated risk factors in periurban Zambia: a population-based study. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 118:256-263. [PMID: 35306205 PMCID: PMC8925090 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We nested a seroprevalence survey within the TREATS (Tuberculosis Reduction through Expanded Antiretroviral Treatment and Screening) project. We aimed to measure the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and investigate associated risk factors in one community (population ∼27,000) with high prevalence of TB/HIV in Zambia. METHODS The study design was cross-sectional. A random sample of 3592 individuals aged ≥15 years enrolled in the TREATS TB-prevalence survey were selected for antibody testing. Randomly selected blocks of residence were visited between October 2020 and March 2021. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were detected using Abbott- ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay. RESULTS A total of 3035/3526 (86.1%) individuals had a blood sample taken. Antibody testing results were available for 2917/3035 (96.1%) participants. Overall, 401/2977 (13.5%) individuals tested positive for IgG antibodies. Seroprevalence was similar by sex (12.7% men vs 14.0% women) and was lowest in the youngest age group 15-19 years (9.7%) and similar in ages 20 years and older (∼15%). We found no evidence of an association between seroprevalence and HIV-status or TB. There was strong evidence (p <0.001) of variation by time of enrollment, with prevalence varying from 2.8% (95% CI 0.8-4.9) among those recruited in December 2020 to 33.7% (95% CI 27.7-39.7) among those recruited in mid-February 2021. CONCLUSION Seroprevalence was 13.5% but there was substantial variation over time, with a sharp increase to approximately 35% toward the end of the second epidemic wave.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Schaap
- Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | | | - S Floyd
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | | | | | - P de Haas
- KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, Netherlands
| | - B Kosloff
- Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | - M Ruperez
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | - R Hayes
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| | - H Ayles
- Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Müller SA, Wood RR, Hanefeld J, El-Bcheraoui C. Seroprevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 in healthcare workers from 11 African countries: a scoping review and appraisal of existing evidence. Health Policy Plan 2022; 37:505-513. [PMID: 34726740 PMCID: PMC8689910 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czab133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A better understanding of serological data and risk factors for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in healthcare workers (HCWs) is especially important in African countries where human resources and health services are more constrained. We reviewed and appraised the evidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence and its risk factors in HCWs in Africa to inform response and preparedness strategies during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines in this scoping review. Databases including PubMed, Embase and preprint servers were searched accordingly from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to 19 April 2021. Our search yielded 12 peer-reviewed and four pre-print articles comprising data on 9223 HCWs from 11 countries in Africa. Seroprevalence varied widely and ranged from 0% to 45.1%. Seropositivity was associated with older age, lower education, working as a nurse/non-clinical HCW or in gynaecology, emergency, outpatient or surgery departments. Asymptomatic rates were high and half of the studies recommended routine testing of HCWs. This scoping review found a varying but often high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in HCWs in 11 African countries and identified certain risk factors. COVID-19 public health strategies for policy and planning should consider these risk factors and the potential for high seroprevalence among HCWs when prioritizing infection prevention and control measures and vaccine deployment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Alice Müller
- Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Rebekah Ruth Wood
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Johanna Hanefeld
- Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, Germany
| | - Charbel El-Bcheraoui
- Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, Berlin 13353, Germany
| |
Collapse
|