Correlation between fixation systems elasticity and bone tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction

Functional biomaterials for tendon/ligament repair and regeneration

With an increase in life expectancy and the popularity of high-intensity exercise, the frequency of tendon and ligament injuries has also increased. Owing to the specificity of its tissue, the rapid restoration of injured tendons and ligaments is challenging for treatment. This review summarizes the latest progress in cells, biomaterials, active molecules and construction technology in treating tendon/ligament injuries. The characteristics of supports made of different materials and the development and application of different manufacturing methods are discussed. The development of natural polymers, synthetic polymers and composite materials has boosted the use of scaffolds. In addition, the development of electrospinning and hydrogel technology has diversified the production and treatment of materials. First, this article briefly introduces the structure, function and biological characteristics of tendons/ligaments. Then, it summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of different materials, such as natural polymer scaffolds, synthetic polymer scaffolds, composite scaffolds and extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived biological scaffolds, in the application of tendon/ligament regeneration. We then discuss the latest applications of electrospun fiber scaffolds and hydrogels in regeneration engineering. Finally, we discuss the current problems and future directions in the development of biomaterials for restoring damaged tendons and ligaments.

Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Although the use of adjustable-loop suspensory fixation has increased in recent years, the influence of the shortcomings of suspensory fixation, such as the bungee-cord or windshield-wiper effects, on tunnel widening remains to be clarified. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspensory fixation and interference screw fixation in terms of tunnel widening and clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We hypothesized that tunnel widening in the adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspensory fixation (AL) group would be comparable to that in the interference screw fixation (IF) group. Methods: This study evaluated patients who underwent primary ACLR at our institution between March 2015 and June 2019. The femoral and tibial tunnel diameters were measured using plain radiographs in the immediate postoperative period and 2 years after ACLR. Tunnel widening and clinical outcomes (Lysholm score, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and Tegner activity level) were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 48 patients (mean age, 29.8 ± 12.0 years) in the AL group and 44 patients (mean age, 26.0 ± 9.5 years) in the IF group. Tunnel widening was significantly greater in the AL group than that in the IF group at the tibia anteroposterior (AP) middle (2.03 mm vs. 1.32 mm, p = 0.017), tibia AP distal (1.52 mm vs. 0.84 mm, p = 0.012), tibia lateral proximal (1.85 mm vs. 1.00 mm, p = 0.001), tibia lateral middle (2.36 mm vs. 1.03 mm, p < 0.001), and tibia lateral distal (2.34 mm vs. 0.85 mm, p < 0.001) levels. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to femoral tunnel widening and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Tibial tunnel widening was significantly greater in the AL group than in the IF group at 2 years after primary ACLR. However, the clinical outcomes in the two groups were comparable at 2 years.

Safe femoral condyle range for the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

To determine the characteristics of cross-pin protrusion in patients treated with the reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation device for femoral tunnel preparation through the anteromedial portal in Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), analyse the reasons for this outcome, and identify safety hazards of this surgical technique for improvement.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ACLR using this technology at our hospital in 2018 was conducted. Patients with and without cross-pin protrusion were included in the protrusion positive and negative groups, respectively. The sex, age and imaging characteristics of the patients with cross-pin protrusion were identified, and the reasons for cross-pin protrusion were analysed.

Results

There were 64 and 212 patients in the protrusion positive and negative groups, respectively. The proportion of cross-pin protrusion cases was 23.19% (64/276). There was a significant difference in the ratio of males to females (P < 0.001, χ2 = 185.184), the mediolateral femoral condyle diameter (protrusion positive group, 70.59 ± 2.51 mm; protrusion negative group, 82.65 ± 4.16 mm; P < 0.001, t = 28.424), and the anteroposterior diameter of the lateral femoral condyle (protrusion positive group, 58.34 ± 2.89 mm; protrusion negative group, 66.38 ± 3.53 mm; P < 0.001, t = 16.615). The cross-pins did not penetrate the lateral femoral condyle cortex in patients with a mediolateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 76 mm, but the cross-pins definitely penetrated the cortex when the diameter was ≤ 70 mm. The cross-pins did not penetrate when the anteroposterior lateral femoral condyle diameter was ≥ 66 mm, but the cross-pins definitely penetrated it when the diameter was ≤ 59 mm.

Conclusion

The patients with cross-pin protrusion after reverse Rigidfix femoral fixation treatment to prepare the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal in ACLR were mainly females with small femoral condyles. For patients with a mediolateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 76 mm and an anteroposterior lateral femoral condyle diameter ≥ 66 mm, there is no risk of cross-pin protrusion, so this technique can be used with confidence.

Levels of evidence

III.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05250-8.

Bioinspired Silk Fibroin-Based Composite Grafts as Bone Tunnel Fillers for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) replacement is still a big challenge in orthopedics due to the need to develop bioinspired implants that can mimic the complexity of bone-ligament interface. In this study, we propose biomimetic composite tubular grafts (CTGs) made of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-cross-linked silk fibroin (SF) hydrogels containing ZnSr-doped β-tricalcium phosphate (ZnSr-β-TCP) particles, as promising bone tunnel fillers to be used in ACL grafts (ACLGs) implantation. For comparative purposes, plain HRP-cross-linked SF hydrogels (PTGs) were fabricated. Sonication and freeze-drying methodologies capable of inducing crystalline β-sheet conformation were carried out to produce both the CTGs and PTGs. A homogeneous microstructure was achieved from microporous to nanoporous scales. The mechanical properties were dependent on the inorganic powder’s incorporation, with a superior tensile modulus observed on the CTGs (12.05 ± 1.03 MPa) as compared to the PTGs (5.30 ± 0.93 MPa). The CTGs presented adequate swelling properties to fill the space in the bone structure after bone tunnel enlargement and provide a stable degradation profile under low concentration of protease XIV. The in vitro studies revealed that SaOs-2 cells adhered, proliferated and remained viable when cultured into the CTGs. In addition, the bioactive CTGs supported the osteogenic activity of cells in terms of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) production, activity, and relative gene expression of osteogenic-related markers. Therefore, this study is the first evidence that the developed CTGs hold adequate structural, chemical, and biological properties to be used as bone tunnel fillers capable of connecting to the ACL tissue while stimulating bone tissue regeneration for a faster osteointegration.

Ultimate Load Measuring System for Fixation of Soft Tissue to Bone

BACKGROUND

The initial ultimate load for graft fixation is one of the essential factors in the reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments. Several anchoring devices have been developed to fix the substitute ligament into the bone. A fair comparison of these fixation methods warrant a reproducible examination system. The purpose of this study was to make an experimental animal model and to compare the initial ultimate loads of 3 graft fixation methods, including the use of EndoButton (EB), interference screw (IFS), and a novel socket anchoring (SA) technique.

METHODS

Porcine calcaneus bones and 5-mm-wide split bovine Achilles tendons were used as fixation bases and graft materials, respectively. Both ends were firmly sutured side-by-side, using the circumferential ligation technique as a double-strand substitute that was 45 mm in length. Porcine calcanei with similar characteristics to adult human calcanei were mounted on a tensile testing machine, and substitutes were fixed into bones using the 3 fixation methods. A polyester tape was passed through the tendon loop and connected to a crosshead jig of the testing machine. The initial ultimate loads were measured in 15 specimens for each fixation method to simulate a lateral ankle ligament (LAL) injury.

RESULTS

The ultimate loads (ULs) were 223.6 ± 52.7 N for EB, 229.7 ± 39.7 N for SA, and 208.8 ± 65.3 N for IFS. No statistically significant difference was observed among the 3 groups (P = .571). All failures occurred at the bone-ligament substitute interface.

CONCLUSION

The initial ULs in all 3 fixation methods were sufficient for clinical usage. These values were larger than the UL of the anterior talofibular ligament; however, these were smaller than the UL of the calcaneofibular ligament.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In an experimental animal model, ULs for SA, EB, and IFS techniques showed no significant difference. All failures were observed in the fixation site of the calcaneus and were overwhelmingly related to suture fixation failure.

No tunnel widening following arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments is an emerging technique for treating chronic ankle instability. One of the known complications of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is tunnel widening; this makes revision more complicated. The aim of this study was to look for tunnel widening in the postoperative course of arthroscopic ankle ligament reconstruction. We hypothesized that significant widening of the bone tunnels is present 1 year after anatomical ankle ligament reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments with a gracilis graft were included prospectively. A CT-scan with 1-mm thick slices with multiplanar reconstruction was done 1 year after the surgery. The size and shape of the tunnels was analyzed, and the ratio of the preoperative to postoperative diameter was calculated. Based on this ratio, the tunnels were given a grade as described by Struewer. Tunnel widening was defined as a grade III tunnel, thus a ratio ≥ 1.3. The tunnel shape was classified as described by Peyrache as cone type, cavity type, line type.

RESULTS

None of the tunnels had widened 1 year after arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments. At the fibula, 81% of tunnels were grade I and 19% were grade II; 57% were cone type and 43% were line type. At the talus, 86% of tunnels were grade I and 14% were grade II. All were line type. At the calcaneus, 86% of tunnels were grade I and 14% were grade II; 57% were cone type and 43% were line type.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study was the absence of tunnel widening 1 year after arthroscopic reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Arthroscopic confirmation of femoral button deployment avoids post-operative X-ray in ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with cortical fixation adjustable-loop devices are associated with high potential risk of button malpositioning or interposition of the soft tissue between lateral femoral cortex and the button. Surgeons usually use X-rays to check and avoid button malposition and soft tissue interposition. Arthroscopic visualization of button position through the lateral gutter has been described. With this technique, it is possible for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and it could avoid the use of post-operative X-ray.

METHODS

A total of 193 ACLR were included and patients were randomized into two groups. The first series (Group A) of 112 patients who sustained an ACLR with post-operative X-ray to assess the position of the femoral button and the second series (Group B) of 81 patients who sustained an ACLR with an arthroscopic exploration of the button followed by post-operative X-ray.

RESULTS

On the post-operative radiographs, tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex was found in nine cases of 112 in Group A (8%) and in zero case of 81 in Group B (0%). In six cases (7,4%) in Group B, there was a soft tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex as visualized by arthroscopic confirmation and before post-operative X-ray; in all these cases, the soft tissue was removed, and the button was in contact with the bone in all X-ray made in the Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique allows for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and reduces the use of post-operative X-ray.

Femoral Tunnel Widening Via Transcondylar Cross-Pin Fixation Versus Extracortical Suspensory Fixation After Single-Bundle ACLR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Compared with extracortical suspensory fixation, the close-to-joint transcondylar cross-pin fixation method in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is believed to entail less intratunnel graft motion and subsequently lead to less tunnel widening.

Purpose:

To assess femoral tunnel widening via the transcondylar cross-pin method or the suspensory femoral fixation method in patients who had undergone ACLR.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

This review focused on studies on femoral-tunnel widening after single-bundle ACLR with cross-pin (Rigidfix or Transfix) and/or Endobutton closed loop (CL). Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening after ACLR.

Results:

Overall, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between cross-pin and Endobutton CL fixations in the pooled absolute change in tunnel widening from the immediate postoperative period to the final follow-up; this was true at both the tunnel aperture (2.48 mm [95% CI, 1.76-3.2 mm] vs 2.93 mm [95% CI, 1.73-4.13 mm], respectively; P = .527) and the midpoint of the femoral tunnel (2.43 mm [95% CI, 1.77-3.1 mm] vs 2.54 mm [95% CI, –0.33 to 5.42 mm], respectively; P = .937). No significant difference was found in the relative percentage of femoral-tunnel widening between the 2 fixation methods (cross-pin, 43.3% [95% CI, 25.8%-60.8%] vs Endobutton CL, 42.0% [95% CI, 34.1%-49.9%]; P = .965).

Conclusion:

No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was found to be associated with the use of either cross-pin or extracortical suspensory fixation in patients who underwent single-bundle ACLR.

Comparison of the aperture and midportion femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

To identify whether the aperture or the midportion of the femoral tunnel had a larger tunnel widening in patients who undergo ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for relative studies that evaluated tunnel widening in patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool the outcomes of tunnel widening by estimating the standardized mean differences in tunnel widening and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger test when the number of included studies was >10.

RESULTS

Eleven included studies compared tunnel widening between the aperture and the midportion. In these studies, 372 and 92 patients underwent single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions, respectively. Subgroup analyses in terms of evaluation imaging tool for tunnel widening showed no significant differences in tunnel widening between the aperture and the midportion of the femoral tunnel regardless of plain radiograph (mean difference, 0.02 mm; P = .97), computed tomography (mean difference 0.08 mm; P = .55), and magnetic resonance imaging (mean difference, 0.13 mm; P = .78). Likewise, no significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was found between the aperture and the midportion, irrespective of transtibial (mean difference, 0.18 mm; P = .57), anteromedial (mean difference, 0.02 mm; P = .90), and outside-in techniques (mean difference, 0.01 mm; P = .98).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was found between the aperture and the midportion in the patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

Tunnel osteolysis post-ACL reconstruction: a systematic review examining select diagnostic modalities, treatment options and rehabilitation protocols

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) identify the optimal diagnostic modality for tunnel widening in skeletally mature patients; (2) identify potentially modifiable risk factors for tunnel widening, such as graft type, and (3) determine what elements of a post-operative rehabilitation program exert the most influence on TW.

METHODS

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 2018. Studies that discussed tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) of skeletally mature patients and written in English were included. Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance (e.g. standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI)) are presented where applicable.

RESULTS

103 studies (6,383 patients) were included. Plain radiographs were the most commonly used diagnostic modality, but radiographs on average required 10 months longer than CT and 2 months longer on average than MRI to diagnose tunnel widening after ACLR. Although CT was the least commonly used modality, it was the shortest time to diagnose tunnel widening at 9.5 months after ACLR. Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft had the largest average tunnel widening overall. BPTB autograft had the lowest average tunnel widening overall. Double-bundle hamstring graft configuration had a lower average tunnel widening than single-bundle configuration. Rehabilitation protocols after ACLR that used a full weight-bearing prescription in rehabilitation showed a greater average femoral tunnel widening than partial weight-bearing, and partial weight-bearing showed a greater average tibial tunnel widening than full weight-bearing.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this systematic review and the descriptive data evaluated, CT demonstrated a time of 9.5 months on average from ACLR to diagnosing tunnel osteolysis post-ACLR. With respect to graft types, double-bundle hamstring autografts reported lower average femoral and tibial TW than single-bundle hamstring autografts. BPTB autografts reported the lowest average TW and BPTB allograft the largest average TW of all the grafts. Furthermore, extension-locked bracing had the lowest TW of all the brace protocols. Lastly, several other surgical technical parameters influencing tunnel osteolysis remain to be determined. No definitive recommendations can be made at this time due to the high heterogeneity of data and the lack of comparative studies analysed in this systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.