The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review

Evaluation of lumbar segmental motion using ultrasound imaging following common joint mobilization techniques

OBJECTIVES

Spinal mobility is clinically important in managing mechanical low back pain. Manual methods are commonly used for diagnosis and treatment in orthopedic practice. This study quantified changes in sagittal plane lumbar segmental motion using ultrasound imaging (USI) following common joint mobilization techniques in asymptomatic individuals. Additionally, tibial H-reflexes and sagittal plane trunk motion in standing were evaluated for association with lumbar segmental motion.Participants aged ≤ 30 or ≥ 50 years were recruited from among students, faculty, and affiliates of the Department of Physical Therapy at Winston-Salem State University and randomized to receive L4 central posterior-to-anterior (CPA) mobilization or left lumbar rotation mobilization interventions. Joint laxity was assessed using the Beighton score, and standing sagittal plane trunk motion was measured using the fingertip-to-floor method. Lumbar segmental motion was evaluated using USI in neutral, extension, and flexion positions at baseline, immediately following joint mobilization, and following 5 minutes of prone resting. Tibial H-reflexes were measured at baseline, immediately following joint mobilization, and in real-time during CPA mobilization. The primary outcome was lumbar segmental motion analyzed by position, mobilization group, sex, age category, and Beighton risk.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant increases in L4/5 flexion (p = .01, ƞ2=.21) and combined flexion and extension (p = .03, ƞ2=.15). These changes persisted following 5 minutes of prone resting, regardless of mobilization technique. Significant interactions between segmental motion, sex, and/or Beighton risk were observed.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Significant increases were observed in L4/5 flexion immediately following joint mobilization regardless of mobilization group, with significant statistical interactions observed between segmental motion, sex, and/or Beighton risk. This is the first investigation to demonstrate the value of USI for quantifying lumbar segmental motion following joint mobilization. Quantifying lumbar segmental motion helps clarify the underlying mechanisms of manual therapy. Future studies should include patients with low back pain.

A Critical Review of Trunk and Hip Exercise Prescription: Applying Evidence for a Modern Approach

Exercise targeting the trunk and hip (core) musculature is common practice in rehabilitation and performance training. Historical underpinnings of core exercise focus on providing stability to the spine, thus improving the function of the spine and extremities, while instability has been postulated to result in pathology and impaired performance. Mechanistic studies on the topic are often conflicting and indeterminate, suggesting the theoretical underpinnings of targeted core exercise may be over assumed in common practice. The best modes of intervention also remain undefined, with combined methods having potential to optimize outcomes. This includes moving beyond isolated exercise camps and being inclusive of both targeted exercise and progressive multi-joint movements. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to describe the historical mechanisms of the stability-instability continuum and the role of exercise intervention. A spectrum of ideologies related to core exercise are examined, while appreciating positive outcomes of exercise interventions across healthy and pathological populations. Finally, exercise summaries were compiled to improve critical reasoning within current practice and inspire future investigations.

Level of Evidence

5.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw applied to the treatment of Kümmel's disease in porcine vertebrae

Background and objective: Treatment of Kümmel's Disease (KD) with pure percutaneous kyphoplasty carries a greater likelihood of bone cement displacement due to hardened bone and defect of the peripheral cortex. In this study, we designed a novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this modified surgical instruments in porcine vertebrae. Methods: 18 mature porcine spine specimens were obtained and soaked in 10% formaldehyde solution for 24 h. 0.5000 mmol/L EDTA-Na2 solution was used to develop in vitro osteoporosis models of porcine vertebrae. They were all made with the bone deficiency at the anterior edge of L1. These specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups for different ways of treatment: Group A: pure percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group; Group B: unilateral novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw fixation combined with PKP group; Group C: bilateral novel minimally invasive pedicle bone cement screw fixation combined with PKP group. The MTS multi-degree of freedom simulation test system was used for biomechanical tests, including axial loading of 500 N pressure, range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right axial rotation at 5 Nm, and the displacement of bone cement mass at maximum angles of 5° and 10°. Result: The three groups were well filled with bone cement, no leakage or displacement of bone cement was observed, and the height of the vertebrae was higher than pre-operation (p < 0.05). In the left/right axial rotation, the specimens were still significantly different (p < 0.05) from the intact specimens in terms of ROM after PKP. In other directions, ROM of all group had no significant difference (p < 0.05) and was close to the intact vertebrae. Compared with PKP group, the relative displacement of bone cement in groups B and C was smaller (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the in vitro animal vertebral models, the treatment of KD with the placement of novel pedicle minimally invasive bone cement screw combined with PKP can effectively restore the vertebral height, improve the stability of the affected vertebra and prevent the displacement of bone cement. Biomechanically, there is no significant difference between bilateral and unilateral fixation.