Detection of bladder cancer in urine sediments by a hypermethylation panel of selected tumor suppressor genes

DNA Methylation in Urine and Feces Indicative of Eight Major Human Cancer Types Globally

Toxic chemicals and epigenetic biomarkers associated with cancer have been used successfully in clinical diagnostic screening of feces and urine from individuals, but they have been underutilized in a global setting. We analyzed peer-reviewed literature to achieve the following: (i) compile epigenetic biomarkers of disease, (ii) explore whether research locations are geographically aligned with disease hotspots, and (iii) determine the potential for tracking disease-associated epigenetic biomarkers. Studies (n = 1145) of epigenetic biomarkers (n = 146) in urine and feces from individuals have established notable diagnostic potential for detecting and tracking primarily gastric and urinary cancers. Panels with the highest sensitivity and specificity reported more than once were SEPT9 (78% and 93%, respectively) and the binary biomarker combinations GDF15, TMEFF2, and VIM (93% and 95%), NDRG4 and BMP3 (98% and 90%), and TWIST1 and NID2 (76% and 79%). Screening for epigenetic biomarkers has focused on biospecimens from the U.S., Europe, and East Asia, whereas data are limited in regions with similar/higher disease incidence rates (i.e., data for New Zealand, Japan, and Australia for colorectal cancer). The epigenetic markers discussed here may aid in the future monitoring of multiple cancers from individual- to population-level scales by leveraging the emerging science of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE).

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Urinary DNA Methylation-based Biomarkers for the Detection of Primary and Recurrent Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of primary and relapsed bladder carcinomas is accomplished by urethrocystoscopy, an invasive procedure, combined with urinary cytology, with limited sensitivity, resulting in a substantial burden. Thus, noninvasive biomarkers have been investigated, among which DNA methylation has shown promise. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation biomarkers reported in the literature for bladder cancer detection, pinpointing the most informative one.

METHODS

The search for this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for relevant studies published until December 31, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model, to compute the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the markers. PROSPERO's registration ID for the study is CRD42023397703.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Out of the 2297 studies retrieved, 68 were included in the final analysis, despite considerable heterogeneity. These involved 12 696 participants, of whom 5557 were diagnosed with bladder cancer. Using diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as a comparative measure, the five most promising markers (pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR) were SALL3 (61%, 97%, and 55.67, respectively), PENK (77%, 93%, and 47.90, respectively), ZNF154 (87%, 90%, and 45.07, respectively), VIM (82%, 90%, and 44.81, respectively), and POU4F2 (81%, 89%, and 34.89, respectively). Urinary cytology identified bladder cancer with 55% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 14.37 DOR.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

DNA methylation biomarkers disclose high accuracy for bladder cancer detection in urine. Nonetheless, validation studies in different clinical settings are scarce, hampering clinical use. The identified biomarkers should be prioritized in future validation studies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this meta-analysis, we include previously published studies that used urine samples of bladder cancer patients' from all around the globe. We were able to compare the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive markers across different populations. We were able to conclude on the most promising DNA methylation markers to detect bladder cancer using urine.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) Promoter Gene Methylation in Urine-Derived DNA: A Non-invasive Biomarker for Early Bladder Cancer Detection and Tumor Aggressiveness

Background Bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, largely due to the high frequency of disease relapse and the lack of efficient endoscopic diagnostic methods. This study aimed to address this clinical gap by evaluating the potential of using adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter methylation as a biomarker detectable in urine DNA of individuals with BLCA. Methods Methylation-specific PCR was used to determine the methylation status of the APC promoter gene in 50 bladder carcinoma patients and 50 apparently healthy individuals. Electrophoresis on agarose gel was performed for the detection of PCR products. Statistical analysis was conducted using Excel, SPSS, and Python to assess correlations and significance. Results APC promoter methylation was detected in 34 (68%) of bladder cancer cases but in only eight (16%) of healthy controls, indicating a strong association between APC promoter methylation and bladder cancer (p < 0.001). High-grade tumors were found to have significantly higher levels of APC promoter methylation, suggesting a link between APC methylation and tumor aggressiveness (p = 0.048). Smoking was identified as a significant risk factor for BLCA (p < 0.001), but no correlation was observed with the tumor stage. Conclusion APC promoter gene methylation shows a diagnostic value for BLCA and may be useful as a non-invasive marker for early detection. This study highlights the clinical utility of using a simple urine test to detect bladder cancer, particularly in early stages, and suggests that combining APC methylation with other specific biomarkers could enhance diagnostic accuracy.

A Study of DNA Methylation of Bladder Cancer Biomarkers in the Urine of Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) in patients suffering from neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) is a significant concern due to its advanced stage at diagnosis and high mortality rate. Currently, there is a scarcity of specific guidelines for BCa screening in these patients. The development of urine biomarkers for BCa seems to be an attractive non-invasive method of screening or risk stratification in this patient population. DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification, resulting in the transcriptional silencing of tumor suppression genes, that is frequently detected in the urine of BCa patients. Objectives: We aimed to investigate DNA hypermethylation in five gene promoters, previously associated with BCa, in the urine of NLUTD patients, and in comparison with healthy controls. Design, setting and participants: This was a prospective case-control study that recruited neurourology outpatients from a public teaching hospital who had suffered from NLUTD for at least 5 years. They all underwent cystoscopy combined with biopsy for BCa screening following written informed consent. DNA was extracted and DNA methylation was assessed for the RASSF1, RARβ, DAPK, TERT and APC gene promoters via quantitative methylation-specific PCR in urine specimens from the patients and controls. Results: Forty-one patients of mixed NLUTD etiology and 35 controls were enrolled. DNA was detected in 36 patients' urine specimens and in those of 22 controls. In the urine specimens, DNA was hypermethylated in at least one of five gene promoters in 17/36 patients and in 3/22 controls (47.22% vs. 13.64%, respectively, p = 0.009). RASSF1 was hypermethylated in 10/17 (58.82%) specimens with detected methylation, APC in 7/17 (41.18%), DAPK in 4/17 (23.53%), RAR-β2 in 3/17 (17.56%) and TERT in none. According to a multivariate logistic regression analysis, NLUTD and male gender were significantly associated with hypermethylation (OR = 7.43, p = 0.007 and OR = 4.21; p = 0.04, respectively). In the tissue specimens, histology revealed TaLG BCa in two patients and urothelial squamous metaplasia in five patients. Chronic bladder inflammation was present in 35/41 bladder biopsies. Conclusions: DNA hypermethylation in a panel of five BCa-associated genes in the urine was significantly more frequent in NLUTD patients than in the controls. Our results warrant further evaluation in longitudinal studies assessing the clinical implications and possible associations between DNA hypermethylation, chronic inflammation and BCa in the NLUTD population.

Detecting and monitoring bladder cancer with exfoliated cells in urine

Current methods for the diagnosis and monitoring of bladder cancer are invasive and have suboptimal sensitivity. Liquid biopsy as a non-invasive approach has been capturing attentions recently. To explore the ability of urine-based liquid biopsy in detecting and monitoring genitourinary tumors, we developed a method based on promoter-targeted DNA methylation of urine sediment DNA. We used samples from a primary bladder cancer cohort (n=40) and a healthy cohort (n=40) to train a model and obtained an integrated area under the curve (AUC) > 0.96 in the 10-fold cross-validation, which demonstrated the ability of our method for detecting bladder cancer from the healthy. We next validated the model with samples from a recurrent cohort (n=21) and a non-recurrent cohort (n=19) and obtained an AUC > 0.91, which demonstrated the ability of our model in monitoring the progress of bladder cancer. Moreover, 80% (4/5) of samples from patients with benign urothelial diseases had been considered to be healthy sample rather than cancer sample, preliminarily demonstrating the potential of distinguishing benign urothelial diseases from cancer. Further analysis basing on multiple-time point sampling revealed that the cancer signal in 80% (4/5) patients had decreased as expected when they achieved the recurrent-free state. All the results suggested that our method is a promising approach for noninvasive detection and prognostic monitoring of bladder cancer.

The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?

The aim of this review is to analyze and describe the current landscape of bladder cancer diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers. We researched the literature from 2016 to November 2021 to find the most promising new molecules and divided them into seven different subgroups based on their function and location in the cell. Although cystoscopy and cytology are still the gold standard for diagnosis and surveillance when it comes to bladder cancer (BCa), their cost is quite a burden for national health systems worldwide. Currently, the research is focused on finding a biomarker that has high negative predictive value (NPV) and can exclude with a certainty the presence of the tumor, considering missing it could be disastrous for the patient. Every subgroup has its own advantages and disadvantages; for example, protein biomarkers cost less than genomic ones, but on the other hand, they seem to be less precise. We tried to simplify this complicated topic as much as possible in order to make it comprehensible to doctors and urologists that are not as familiar with it, as well as encourage them to actively participate in ongoing research.

A novel and sensitive DNA methylation marker for the urine-based liquid biopsies to detect bladder cancer

Background

Better prognostic outcome is closely correlated with early detection of bladder cancer. Current non-invasive urianalysis relies on simultaneously testing multiple methylation markers to achieve relatively high accuracy. Therefore, we have developed an easy-to-use, convenient, and accurate single-target urine-based DNA methylation test for the malignancy.

Methods

By analyzing TCGA data, 344 candidate markers with 424 primer pairs and probe sets synthesized were systematically screened in cancer cell lines, paired tissue specimens, and urine sediments from bladder cancer patients and normal controls. The identified marker was further validated in large case-control cohorts. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and c2 tests were performed to compare methylation levels between case-control groups and correlate methylation levels with demographic and clinical characteristics. In addition, MSP, qMSP, RT-PCR, western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry were performed to measure levels of DNA methylation, mRNA transcription, and protein expression in cancer cell lines and tissues.

Results

A top-performing DMRTA2 marker identified was tested in both discovery and validation sets, showing similar sensitivity and specificity for bladder cancer detection. Overall sensitivity in the aggregate set was 82.9%(179/216). The specificity, from a control group consisting of patients with lithangiuria, prostatoplasia, and prostatitis, is 92.5%(468/506). Notably, the methylation assay had the highest sensitivities for tumors at stages of T1(90.4%) and T2(95.0%) compared with Ta (63.0%), T3(81.8%), and T4(81.8%). Furthermore, the test showed admirable detection rate of 80.0%(24/30) for recurring cancers. While methylation was observed in 39/54(72.2%) urine samples from patients with carcinomas of renal pelvis and ureter, it was detected at extremely low rate of 6.0%(8/133) in kidney and prostate cancers. Compared with SV-HUC-1, the normal bladder epithelial cell line, DMRTA2 was hypermethylated in 8/9 bladder cancer cell lines, consistent with the results of MSP and qMSP, but not correlated with mRNA and protein expression levels in these cell lines. Similarly, DMRTA2 immunostaining was moderate in some tissues but weak in others. Further studies are needed to address functional implications of DMRTA2 hypermethylation.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrated that a single-target DNA methylation signature, mDMRTA2, could be highly effective to detect both primary and recurring bladder cancer via urine samples.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09616-y.

Improved urine DNA methylation panel for early bladder cancer detection

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is one of the most common malignancies but the corresponding diagnostic methods are either invasive or limited in specificity and/or sensitivity. This study aimed to develop a urine-based methylation panel for bladder cancer detection by improving published panels and validate performance of the new panel with clinical samples.

METHODS

Related researches were reviewed and 19 potential panels were selected. RRBS was performed on a cohort with 45 samples to reassess these panels and a new panel inherited best markers was developed. The new panel was applied with qMSP platform to 33 samples from the RRBS cohort and the results were compared to those of RRBS. Lastly, another larger cohort with 207 samples was used to validate new panel performance with qMSP.

RESULTS

Three biomarkers (PCDH17, POU4F2 and PENK) were selected to construct a new panel P3. P3 panel achieved 100% specificity and 71% sensitivity with RRBS in corresponding cohort and then showed a better performance of 100% specificity and 84% sensitivity with qMSP platforms in a balanced cohort. When validated with 207-sample cohort, P3 with qMSP showed a performance of 97% specificity and 87% sensitivity which was modestly improved compared to the panels it derided from.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the P3 panel achieved relatively high sensitivity and accuracy in bladder cancer detection.

Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?

Urothelial bladder cancer is a complex disease displaying a landscape of heterogenous molecular subtypes, mutation profiles and clinical presentations. Diagnosis and surveillance rely on flexible cystoscopy which has high accuracy, albeit accompanied by a high-cost burden for healthcare providers and discomfort for patients. Advances in "omic" technologies and computational biology have provided insights into the molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer and provided powerful tools to identify markers for disease detection, risk stratification, and predicting responses to therapy. To date, numerous attempts have been made to discover and validate diagnostic biomarkers that could be deployed as an adjunct to the cystoscopic diagnosis and long-term surveillance of bladder cancer. We report a comprehensive literature analysis using PubMed to assess the changing trends in investigating DNA, RNA, or proteins as diagnostic urinary biomarkers over a period of 5 decades: 1970-2020. A gradual shift has been observed in research away from protein biomarkers to nucleic acids including different classes of RNA, and DNA methylation and mutation markers. Until 2000, publications involving protein biomarker discovery constituted 87% of the total number of research articles with DNA comprising 6% and RNA 7%. Since 2000 the proportion of protein biomarker articles has fallen to 40%, and DNA and RNA studies increased to 32% and 28%, respectively. Clearly research focus, perhaps driven by technological innovation, has shifted from proteins to nucleic acids. We optimistically hypothesise that, following thorough validation, a clinically useful detection test for bladder cancer based on a panel of DNA or RNA markers could become reality within 5-10 years.

Tumoral markers in bladder cancer (Review)

Bladder tumors are frequently diagnosed urologic malignant diseases with an extremely high recurrence rate compared to other neoplastic tumors. Urothelial bladder carcinomas are mostly identified in their incipient form, as non-muscle invasive, but despite that, a third of them develop into aggressive recurrent disease. The diagnosis of bladder carcinoma at this moment is established using cytology and cystoscopy and is a great challenge for clinicians due to the lack of sensitivity. Urinary biomarkers could improve and enhance the diagnosis and screening techniques and determine a more accurate recurrence rate. However, bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease and the existence of a single marker test with reduced cost is unlikely; thus, until then, the use of a panel of markers to obtain valuable information is inevitable even though suboptimal for use. To improve this deadlock, new biomarker panels should be identified and prepared to equalize the cost-efficiency balance. The present paper is a literature review concerning the most commonly used tumor markers in urinary bladder cancer as well as the most commonly encountered genetic modifications in such patients.

Research Progress of Urine Biomarkers in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common tumor with high incidence. Relative to other cancers, BC has a high rate of recurrence, which results in increased mortality. As a result, early diagnosis and life-long monitoring are clinically significant for improving the long-term survival rate of BC patients. At present, the main methods of BC detection are cystoscopy and biopsy; however, these procedures can be invasive and expensive. This can lead to patient refusal and reluctance for monitoring. There are several BC biomarkers that have been approved by the FDA, but their sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy are not ideal. More research is needed to identify suitable biomarkers that can be used for early detection, evaluation, and observation. There has been heavy research in the proteomics and genomics of BC and many potential biomarkers have been found. Although the advent of metabonomics came late, with the recent development of advanced analytical technology and bioinformatics, metabonomics has become a widely used diagnostic tool in clinical and biomedical research. It should be emphasized that despite progress in new biomarkers for BC diagnosis, there remains challenges and limitations in metabonomics research that affects its translation into clinical practice. In this chapter, the latest literature on BC biomarkers was reviewed.

Toward urinary cell-free DNA-based treatment of urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review

Liquid biopsy technique targeting urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is getting a lot of attention to overcome limitations of the present treatment strategy for urothelial carcinoma, including urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Analysis of tumor-derived DNA in urine focusing either on genomic or epigenomic alterations, holds great potential as a noninvasive method for the detection of urothelial carcinoma with high accuracy. It is also predictive of prognosis and response to drugs, and reveals the underlying characteristics of different stages of urothelial carcinoma. Although cfDNA methylation analyses based on a combination of several methylation profiles have demonstrated high sensitivity for UBC diagnosis, there have been few reports involving epigenomic studies of urinary cfDNA. In mutational analyses, frequent gene mutations (TERT promoter, TP53, FGFR3, PIK3CA, RAS, etc.) have been detected in urine supernatant by using remarkable technological innovations such as next-generation sequencing and droplet digital PCR. These methods allow highly sensitive detection of rare mutation alleles while minimizing artifacts. In this review, we summarize the current insights into the clinical applications of urinary cfDNA from patients with urothelial carcinoma. Although it is necessary to conduct prospective multi-institutional clinical trials, noninvasive urine biopsy is expected to play an important role in the realization of precision medicine in patients with urothelial carcinoma in the near future.

In-Vitro Identification and In-Vivo Confirmation of DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Urothelial Cancer

We identified DNA methylation targets specific for urothelial cancer (UC) by genome-wide methylation difference analysis of human urothelial (RT4, J82, 5637), prostate (LNCAP, DU-145, PC3) and renal (RCC-KP, CAKI-2, CAL-54) cancer cell lines with their respective primary epithelial cells. A large overlap of differentially methylated targets between all organs was observed and 40 Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine motifs (CpGs) were only specific for UC cells. Of those sites, two also showed high methylation differences (≥47%) in vivo when we further compared our data to those previously obtained in our array-based analyses of urine samples in 12 UC patients and 12 controls. Using mass spectrometry, we finally assessed seven CpG sites in this “bladder-specific” region of interest in urine samples of patients with urothelial (n = 293), prostate (n = 75) and renal (n = 23) cancer, and 143 controls. DNA methylation was significantly increased in UC compared to non-UC individuals. The differences were more pronounced for males rather than females. Male UC cases could be distinguished from non-UC individuals with >30% sensitivity at 95% specificity (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.85). In summary, methylation sites highly specific in UC cell lines were also specific in urine samples of UC patients showing that in-vitro data can be successfully used to identify biomarker candidates of in-vivo relevance.

Methylation silencing of TGF-β receptor type II is involved in malignant transformation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Although massive studies have been conducted to investigate the mechanisms of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) carcinogenesis, the understanding of molecular alterations during the malignant transformation of epithelial dysplasia is still lacking, especially regarding epigenetic changes.

Results

To better characterize the methylation changes during the malignant transformation of epithelial dysplasia, a whole-genome bisulfite sequencing analysis was performed on a series of tumor, dysplastic, and non-neoplastic epithelial tissue samples from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Promoter hypermethylation in TGF-β receptor type II (TGFBR2), an important mediator of TGF-β signaling, was identified. Further, we evaluated the methylation and expression of TGFBR2 in tumor samples through The Cancer Genome Atlas multiplatform data as well as immunohistochemistry. Moreover, treatment of ESCC cell lines with5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, reactivated the expression of TGFBR2. The lentiviral mediating the overexpression of TGFBR2 inhibited the proliferation of ESCC cell line by inducing cell cycle G2/M arrest. Furthermore, the overexpression of TGFBR2 inhibited the tumor growth obviously in vivo.

Conclusions

The characterization of methylation silencing of TGFBR2 in ESCC will enable us to further explore whether this epigenetic change could be considered as a predictor of malignant transformation in esophageal epithelial dysplasia and whether use of a TGFBR2 agonist may lead to a new therapeutic strategy in patients with ESCC.

Methylation silencing of TGF-β receptor type II is involved in malignant transformation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although massive studies have been conducted to investigate the mechanisms of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) carcinogenesis, the understanding of molecular alterations during the malignant transformation of epithelial dysplasia is still lacking, especially regarding epigenetic changes.

RESULTS

To better characterize the methylation changes during the malignant transformation of epithelial dysplasia, a whole-genome bisulfite sequencing analysis was performed on a series of tumor, dysplastic, and non-neoplastic epithelial tissue samples from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. Promoter hypermethylation in TGF-β receptor type II (TGFBR2), an important mediator of TGF-β signaling, was identified. Further, we evaluated the methylation and expression of TGFBR2 in tumor samples through The Cancer Genome Atlas multiplatform data as well as immunohistochemistry. Moreover, treatment of ESCC cell lines with5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, reactivated the expression of TGFBR2. The lentiviral mediating the overexpression of TGFBR2 inhibited the proliferation of ESCC cell line by inducing cell cycle G2/M arrest. Furthermore, the overexpression of TGFBR2 inhibited the tumor growth obviously in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

The characterization of methylation silencing of TGFBR2 in ESCC will enable us to further explore whether this epigenetic change could be considered as a predictor of malignant transformation in esophageal epithelial dysplasia and whether use of a TGFBR2 agonist may lead to a new therapeutic strategy in patients with ESCC.

Epigenetics of Bladder Cancer: Where Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets Meet

Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasia of the urothelial tract. Due to its high incidence, prevalence, recurrence and mortality, it remains an unsolved clinical and social problem. The treatment of BC is challenging and, although immunotherapies have revealed potential benefit in a percentage of patients, it remains mostly an incurable disease at its advanced state. Epigenetic alterations, including aberrant DNA methylation, altered chromatin remodeling and deregulated expression of non-coding RNAs are common events in BC and can be driver events in BC pathogenesis. Accordingly, these epigenetic alterations are now being used as potential biomarkers for these disorders and are being envisioned as potential therapeutic targets for the future management of BC. In this review, we summarize the recent findings in these emerging and exciting new aspects paving the way for future clinical treatment of this disease.

DNA-Methylation-Based Detection of Urological Cancer in Urine: Overview of Biomarkers and Considerations on Biomarker Design, Source of DNA, and Detection Technologies

Changes in DNA methylation have been causally linked with cancer and provide promising biomarkers for detection in biological fluids such as blood, urine, and saliva. The field has been fueled by genome-wide characterization of DNA methylation across cancer types as well as new technologies for sensitive detection of aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. For urological cancers, urine is in many situations the preferred "liquid biopsy" source because it contains exfoliated tumor cells and cell-free tumor DNA and can be obtained easily, noninvasively, and repeatedly. Here, we review recent advances made in the development of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers for detection of bladder, prostate, renal, and upper urinary tract cancers, with an emphasis on the performance characteristics of biomarkers in urine. For most biomarkers evaluated in independent studies, there was great variability in sensitivity and specificity. We discuss issues that impact the outcome of DNA-methylation-based detection of urological cancer and account for the great variability in performance, including genomic location of biomarkers, source of DNA, and technical issues related to the detection of rare aberrantly methylated DNA molecules. Finally, we discuss issues that remain to be addressed to fully exploit the potential of DNA-methylation-based biomarkers in the clinic, including the need for prospective trials and careful selection of control groups.

Noninvasive diagnosis of urothelial cancer in urine using DNA hypermethylation signatures-Gender matters

Urothelial cancer (UCa) is the most predominant cancer of the urinary tract and noninvasive diagnosis using hypermethylation signatures in urinary cells is promising. Here, we assess gender differences in a newly identified set of methylation biomarkers. UCa-associated hypermethylated sites were identified in urine of a male screening cohort (n = 24) applying Infinium-450K-methylation arrays and verified in two separate mixed-gender study groups (n = 617 in total) using mass spectrometry as an independent technique. Additionally, tissue samples (n = 56) of mixed-gender UCa and urological controls (UCt) were analyzed. The hypermethylation signature of UCa in urine was specific and sensitive across all stages and grades of UCa and independent on hematuria. Individual CpG sensitivities reached up to 81.3% at 95% specificity. Albeit similar methylation differences in tissue of both genders, differences were less pronounced in urine from women, most likely due to the frequent presence of squamous epithelial cells and leukocytes. Increased repression of methylation levels was observed at leukocyte counts ≥500/μl urine which was apparent in 30% of female and 7% of male UCa cases, further confirming the significance of the relative amounts of cancerous and noncancerous cells in urine. Our study shows that gender difference is a most relevant issue when evaluating the performance of urinary biomarkers in cancer diagnostics. In case of UCa, the clinical benefits of methylation signatures to male patients may outweigh those in females due to the general composition of women's urine. Accordingly, these markers offer a diagnostic option specifically in males to decrease the number of invasive cystoscopies.

Is APC hypermethylation a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer? A meta-analysis

Objective

Numerous studies have been performed to investigate the association between APC promoter hypermethylation and bladder cancer risk. Nevertheless, the conclusion was uncertain due to small sample size, different ethnicities, and tumor subtype. Hence, to accurately assess the effect of APC promoter hypermethylation on the risk of bladder cancer, we performed the meta-analysis.

Materials and methods

We retrieved the relevant literatures from electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, Vapp, and CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure). 95% CI and OR were calculated to evaluate the associations of APC promoter hypermethylation with risk and clinical features of bladder cancer. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed with Q test and I ² statistic. In addition, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) value of APC hypermethylation for bladder cancer were calculated.

Results

In total, 14 articles with 531 controls and 1,293 cases were included to assess the associations of APC promoter hypermethylation with the risk and clinical characteristics of bladder cancer. The significant association between APC promoter hypermethylation and bladder cancer risk was detected (OR =17.01, CI =7.40-39.07). Furthermore, the results revealed that APC promoter hypermethylation was significantly correlated with the grade of bladder tumor (pTNM stage: OR =1.84, CI =0.87-3.93; grade: OR =4.11, CI =1.62-10.43). According to the results of diagnostic evaluation, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value of APC hypermethylation for bladder cancer risk were 0.52 (95% CI =0.41-0.63), 0.98 (95% CI =0.90-1.00), and 0.80 (95% CI =0.76-0.83), respectively.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis revealed that APC promoter hypermethylation was a risk factor for bladder cancer risk. In addition, APC promoter hypermethylation was significantly associated with the grade of bladder cancer. APC hypermethylation might be a useful biomarker for the clinical diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update

Bladder cancer (BC) is ones of the most common cancer worldwide. It is classified in muscle invasive (MIBC) and muscle non-invasive (NMIBC) BC. NMIBCs frequently recur and progress to MIBCs with a reduced survival rate and frequent distant metastasis. BC detection require unpleasant and expensive cystoscopy and biopsy, which are often accompanied by several adverse effects. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel diagnostic methods for initial detection and surveillance in both MIBCs and NMIBCs. Multiple urine-based tests approved by FDA for BC detection and surveillance are commercially available. However, at present, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of these urine-based assays are still suboptimal and, in the attend to improve them, novel molecular markers as well as multiple-assays must to be translated in clinic. Now there are growing evidence toward the use of minimally invasive “liquid biopsy” to identify biomarkers in urologic malignancy. DNA- and RNA-based markers in body fluids such as blood and urine are promising potential markers in diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and monitoring urological malignancies. Thus, circulating cell-free DNA, DNA methylation and mutations, circulating tumor cells, miRNA, IncRNA and mRNAs, cell-free proteins and peptides, and exosomes have been assessed in urine specimens. However, proteomic and genomic data must to be validated in well-designed multicenter clinical studies, before to be employed in clinic oncology.

The diagnostic accuracy of methylation markers in urine for the detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review

Aim: Several urinary hypermethylation-markers (hmDNA) have been described for bladder cancer (BC) detection, but none have been able to replace cystoscopy yet. We systematically reviewed and evaluated current literature on urinary hmDNA markers for BC diagnostics. Patients & methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE.com and The Cochrane Library up to February 2017 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, was conducted. Results: A total of 30/42 studies included compared gene panels, with varying sensitivities (52–100%) and specificities (0–100%). Considerable heterogeneity across studies was observed and most was case–control studies. Conclusion: Reported diagnostic accuracy of urinary hmDNA for BC detection is highly variable and there is a lack of validation studies. Recent studies indicate that complementary markers are needed to allow for clinical implementation.

Detection of urothelial carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma with gross hematuria using selected urine-DNA methylation biomarkers: A prospective, single-center study

INTRODUCTION

Hematuria is the most common symptom of urothelial carcinomas (UC) but is often idiopathic. Cystoscopy is expensive which involves considerable patient discomfort, and conventional urine cytology for noninvasive UC detection and disease monitoring suffers from poor sensitivity. We aim to evaluate the performance of genes selected from a previous study in detecting UC, especially among patients with gross hematuria, as well as upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder carcinoma separately, in voided urine samples.

METHODS

Using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction, we examined the promoter methylation status of 10 genes in voided urine samples among 473 patients at our institution, including 217 UC patients and 256 control subjects.

RESULTS

The final combination of VIM, CDH1, SALL3, TMEFF2, RASSF1A, BRCA1, GDF15, and ABCC6 identified UC with a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.60. Additionally, a panel of selected genes (CDH1, HSPA2, RASSF1A, TMEFF2, VIM, and GDF15) identified UTUC with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.68, while a panel of selected genes (VIM, RASSF1A, GDF15, and TMEFF2) identified bladder carcinoma with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.53. Remarkably, a different panel (CDH1, SALL3, THBS1, TMEFF2, VIM, and GDF15) identified UC in patients with gross hematuria with 0.89 sensitivity and 0.74 specificity, and sensitivity (0.91) and specificity (0.92) could be achieved when cytology was included.

CONCLUSIONS

The selected urine-DNA methylation biomarkers are reliable, noninvasive, and cost-effective diagnostic tools for bladder carcinoma and UTUC, especially among patients with gross hematuria.

Metabolic Phase I (CYPs) and Phase II (GSTs) Gene Polymorphisms and Their Interaction with Environmental Factors in Nasopharyngeal Cancer from the Ethnic Population of Northeast India

Multiple genetic and environmental factors and their interaction are believed to contribute in the pathogenesis of Nasopharyngeal Cancer (NPC). We investigate the role of Metabolic Phase I (CYPs) and Phase II (GSTs) gene polymorphisms, gene-gene and gene-environmental interaction in modulating the susceptibility to NPC in Northeast India. To determine the association of metabolic gene polymorphisms and environmental habits, 123 cases and 189 controls blood/swab samples were used for PCR and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Analysis for GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphism was done by multiplex PCR. The T3801C in the 3'- flanking region of CYP1A1 gene was detected by PCR-RFLP method. The Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The GSTM1 null genotype alone (OR = 2.76) was significantly associated with NPC risk (P < 0.0001). The combinations of GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes also higher, 3.77 fold (P < 0.0001), risk of NPC, while GSTM1 null genotype along with CYP1A1 T3801C TC + CC genotype had 3.22 (P = 0.001) fold risk. The most remarkable risk was seen among individual carrying GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null genotypes and CYP1A1 T3801C TC + CC genotypes (OR = 5.71, P = 0.001). Further; analyses demonstrate an enhanced risk of NPC in smoked meat (OR = 5.56, P < 0.0001) and fermented fish consumers (OR = 5.73, P < 0.0001) carrying GSTM1 null genotype. An elevated risk of NPC was noted in smokers (OR = 12.67, P < 0.0001) and chewers (OR = 5.68, P < 0.0001) with GSTM1 null genotype. However, smokers had the highest risk of NPC among individuals carrying GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 4.46, P = 0.001) or CYP1A1 T3801C TC + CC genotype (OR = 7.13, P < 0.0001). The association of null genotypes and mutations of metabolic neutralizing genes along with the environmental habits (tobacco smokers and chewers, smoke meat, fermented fishes) can be used as a possible biomarker for early detection and preventive measure of NPC.