Improving the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules using an algorithm with combination of BRAFV600E mutation analysis and ultrasound pattern-based risk stratification

The combination of BRAFV600E mutation and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System is helpful in the management of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

To explore the utility of the BRAF^V600E mutation in combination with the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) in the management of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodule (TN).

METHODS

138 AUS/FLUS TNs in 129 patients were included. Each TN underwent preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis and was classified using the C-TIRADS. Histopathologic diagnosis served as reference standard.

RESULTS

46 benign TNs and 92 malignant TNs were identified. The C-TIRADS 4C and 5 (OR = 10.409, P = 0.000), BRAF^V600E mutation (OR = 36.493, P = 0.000) were independent predictors of malignant nodules. There were significant differences in malignancy rate among the different C-TIRADS TNs (P = 0.000), and these TNs with higher C-TIRADS were associated with increased malignancy rate (P for trend = 0.000). The rate of the nodule with BRAF^V600E mutation increased with the increase of C-TIRADS (P for trend = 0.001). For AUS/FLUS TNs without BRAF^V600E mutation, the malignancy rates of the C-TIRADS 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5 were 0%, 21.4%, 20.8%, 70.8%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.000), and the malignancy rate increased from C-TIRADS 3 to C-TIRADS 5 (P for trend = 0.000). C-TIRADS and BRAF^V600E mutation had similar diagnostic efficacy (P > 0.05), and the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the combination were significantly higher than BRAF^V600E gene or C-TIRADS alone (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

C-TIRADS can effectively provide risk stratification for AUS/FLUS nodules. The combination is helpful in selecting appropriate management for AUS/FLUS patients.

Comparison of diagnostic value of SWE, FNA and BRAF gene detection in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography (SWE), fine needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF gene detection (BRAFV600E gene mutation detection) in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules. METHODS: SWE images, FNA cytological results and BRAF detection results of ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology were analyzed retrospectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to determine the best cutoff value of SWE Emax. In the combined diagnosis of SWE, FNA and BRAF, firstly, the nodules with BRAF gene mutation were included in the positive ones, secondly, the nodules with benign and malignant FNA were included in the FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative and positive ones respectively, finally, for FNA uncertain nodules: those whose SWE Emax were less than or equal to the cutoff value were included in FNA + SWE or FNA + SWE + BRAF negative ones, and those whose SWE Emax were greater than the cutoff value were included in positive ones. The diagnostic efficacy of SWE, FNA, SWE + FNA, FNA + BRAF and their combination in ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules were compared. RESULTS: The ROC curve showed that the best cutoff value of SWE Emax was 40.9 kpa, and the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.842 (0.800∼0.885). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE were 76.3% (270/354), 75.5% (80/106) and 76.1% (350/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA were 58.2% (206/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 65.2(300/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA + BRAF were 95.5% (338/354), 88.7% (94/106) and 93.9% (432/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA were 85.9% (304/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 88.7% (408/460), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SWE + FNA + BRAF were 98.3% (348/354), 98.1% (104/106) and 98.3% (452/460), respectively. For the diagnostic accuracy, SWE + FNA + BRAF >  FNA + BRAF >  FNA + SWE >  SWE >  FNA, the difference was statistically significant (all P >  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For ACR TI-RADS 4 and 5 thyroid nodules, SWE and FNA have high diagnostic efficiency. For the diagnostic accuracy, FNA + BRAF is better than FNA + SWE. FNA combination with BRAF gene detection further improves the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of FNA. The combined application of the three is the best.

Feasibility and efficiency of contrast enhanced ultrasound real time guided fine needle aspiration for sentinel lymph node of breast cancer

AIM

To assess the feasibility and efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) real-time guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 21 breast cancer patients who scheduled for surgical resection performed CEUS real-time guided SLN-FNA and intraoperative SLN biopsy (SLNB). The success rate of CEUS real-time guided SLN-FNA was analyzed. The FNA diagnostic efficiency of SLN metastasis was analyzed compared to SLNB.

RESULTS

Twenty-six SLNs were detected by intradermal CEUS whereas 130 SLNs were detected by SLNB. The median SLNs detected by intradermal CEUS (n = 1) and by SLNB (n = 5) was significantly difference (p < 0.001). All 26 CE-SLNs of 21 patients were successfully performed intradermal CEUS dual image real-time guided SLN-FNA including 5 SLNs of 4 patients which were difficult to distinguish in conventional ultrasound. Compared to SLNB, FNA found 2 of 5 cases of SLN metastasis, the diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false negative rate, false positive rate and Yoden index were 40%, 100%, 100%, 84.2%, 60%, 0%and 40%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SLN-FNA real-time guided by dual CEUS image mode was technically feasible. Patients with a positive SLN-FNA should be advised to ALND without intraoperative SLNB according to Chinese surgeon and patients' conservatism attitude. But a negative SLN-FNA did not obviate the need of conventional SLNB because of the high false negative rate.