1
|
Li H, Wang R. Blocking SIRT1 inhibits cell proliferation and promotes aging through the PI3K/AKT pathway. Life Sci 2017; 190:84-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
2
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Bonfill Cosp X, Flicker L. 18F PET with florbetapir for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012216. [PMID: 29164603 PMCID: PMC6486090 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012216.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-florbetapir uptake by brain tissue measured by positron emission tomography (PET) is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-florbetapir. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-florbetapir to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-florbetapir PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD), or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS This review is current to May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-florbetapir scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS We included three studies, two of which evaluated the progression from MCI to ADD, and one evaluated the progression from MCI to any form of dementia.Progression from MCI to ADD was evaluated in 448 participants. The studies reported data on 401 participants with 1.6 years of follow-up and in 47 participants with three years of follow-up. Sixty-one (15.2%) participants converted at 1.6 years follow-up; nine (19.1%) participants converted at three years of follow-up.Progression from MCI to any form of dementia was evaluated in five participants with 1.5 years of follow-up, with three (60%) participants converting to any form of dementia.There were concerns regarding applicability in the reference standard in all three studies. Regarding the domain of flow and timing, two studies were considered at high risk of bias. MCI to ADD;Progression from MCI to ADD in those with a follow-up between two to less than four years had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 30 to 93) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI 54 to 85) by visual assessment (n = 47, 1 study).Progression from MCI to ADD in those with a follow-up between one to less than two years had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 78 to 95) and a specificity of 58% (95% CI 53 to 64) by visual assessment, and a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI 76 to 94) and a specificity of 51% (95% CI 45 to 56) by quantitative assessment by the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR)(n = 401, 1 study). MCI to any form of dementia;Progression from MCI to any form of dementia in those with a follow-up between one to less than two years had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 9 to 99) and a specificity of 50% (95% CI 1 to 99) by visual assessment (n = 5, 1 study). MCI to any other forms of dementia (non-ADD);There was no information regarding the progression from MCI to any other form of dementia (non-ADD). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although sensitivity was good in one included study, considering the poor specificity and the limited data available in the literature, we cannot recommend routine use of 18F-florbetapir PET in clinical practice to predict the progression from MCI to ADD.Because of the poor sensitivity and specificity, limited number of included participants, and the limited data available in the literature, we cannot recommend its routine use in clinical practice to predict the progression from MCI to any form of dementia.Because of the high financial costs of 18F-florbetapir, clearly demonstrating the DTA and standardising the process of this modality are important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Flicker L, Bonfill Cosp X. 18F PET with flutemetamol for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012884. [PMID: 29164602 PMCID: PMC6486287 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-flutemetamol uptake by brain tissue, measured by positron emission tomography (PET), is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and the confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using some amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-flutemetamol. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-flutemetamol to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-flutemetamol PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD) or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS The most recent search for this review was performed in May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-flutemetamol scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Progression from MCI to ADD was evaluated in 243 participants from two studies. The studies reported data on 19 participants with two years of follow-up and on 224 participants with three years of follow-up. Nine (47.4%) participants converted at two years follow-up and 81 (36.2%) converted at three years of follow-up.There were concerns about participant selection and sampling in both studies. The index test domain in one study was considered unclear and in the second study it was considered at low risk of bias. For the reference standard domain, one study was considered at low risk and the second study was considered to have an unclear risk of bias. Regarding the domains of flow and timing, both studies were considered at high risk of bias. MCI to ADD;Progression from MCI to ADD at two years of follow-up had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 52 to 100) and a specificity of 80% (95% CI 44 to 97) by quantitative assessment by SUVR (n = 19, 1 study).Progression from MCI to ADD at three years of follow-up had a sensitivity of 64% (95% CI 53 to 75) and a specificity of 69% (95% CI 60 to 76) by visual assessment (n = 224, 1 study).There was no information regarding the other two objectives in this systematic review (SR): progression from MCI to other forms of dementia and progression to any form of dementia at follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Due to the varying sensitivity and specificity for predicting the progression from MCI to ADD and the limited data available, we cannot recommend routine use of 18F-flutemetamol in clinical practice. 18F-flutemetamol has high financial costs; therefore, clearly demonstrating its DTA and standardising the process of the 18F-flutemetamol modality is important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martínez G, Vernooij RWM, Fuentes Padilla P, Zamora J, Flicker L, Bonfill Cosp X. 18F PET with florbetaben for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD012883. [PMID: 29164600 PMCID: PMC6485979 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-florbetaben uptake by brain tissue, measured by positron emission tomography (PET), is accepted by regulatory agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicine Agencies (EMA) for assessing amyloid load in people with dementia. Its added value is mainly demonstrated by excluding Alzheimer's pathology in an established dementia diagnosis. However, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) revised the diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease and confidence in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease may be increased when using some amyloid biomarkers tests like 18F-florbetaben. These tests, added to the MCI core clinical criteria, might increase the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of a testing strategy. However, the DTA of 18F-florbetaben to predict the progression from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD) or other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES To determine the DTA of the 18F-florbetaben PET scan for detecting people with MCI at time of performing the test who will clinically progress to ADD, other forms of dementia (non-ADD), or any form of dementia at follow-up. SEARCH METHODS The most recent search for this review was performed in May 2017. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), BIOSIS Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science) and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), LILACS (BIREME), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/). We also searched ALOIS, the Cochrane Dementia & Cognitive Improvement Group's specialised register of dementia studies (http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/alois/). We checked the reference lists of any relevant studies and systematic reviews, and performed citation tracking using the Science Citation Index to identify any additional relevant studies. No language or date restrictions were applied to electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI at time of performing the test and the use of 18F-florbetaben scan to evaluate the DTA of the progression from MCI to ADD or other forms of dementia. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis, for example, the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles and abstracts identified in electronic-database searches. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data to create two-by-two tables, showing the binary test results cross-classified with the binary reference standard. We used these data to calculate sensitivities, specificities, and their 95% confidence intervals. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool plus some additional items to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Progression from MCI to ADD, any other form of dementia, and any form of dementia was evaluated in one study (Ong 2015). It reported data on 45 participants at four years of follow-up; 21 participants met NINCDS-ADRDA criteria for Alzheimer's disease dementia at four years of follow-up, the proportion converting to ADD was 47% of the 45 participants, and 11% of the 45 participants met criteria for other types of dementias (three cases of FrontoTemporal Dementia (FTD), one of Dementia with Lewy body (DLB), and one of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)). We considered the study to be at high risk of bias in the domains of the reference standard, flow, and timing (QUADAS-2). MCI to ADD; 18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 100% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and the specificity was 83% (95% CI 63% to 98%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 84% to 100%) and the specificity was 88% (95% CI 68% to 97%) for the diagnosis of ADD at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). MCI to any other form of dementia (non-ADD); 18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 0% (95% CI 0% to 52%) and the specificity was 38% (95% CI 23% to 54%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 0% (95% CI 0% to 52%) and the specificity was 40% (95% CI 25% to 57%) for the diagnosis of any other form of dementia at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). MCI to any form of dementia;18F-florbetaben PET scan analysed visually: the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 61% to 93%) and the specificity was 79% (95% CI 54% to 94%) (n = 45, 1 study). Analysed quantitatively: the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 61% to 93%) and the specificity was 84% (95% CI 60% to 97%) for the diagnosis of any form of dementia at follow-up (n = 45, 1 study). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although we were able to calculate one estimation of DTA in, especially, the prediction of progression from MCI to ADD at four years follow-up, the small number of participants implies imprecision of sensitivity and specificity estimates. We cannot make any recommendation regarding the routine use of 18F-florbetaben in clinical practice based on one single study with 45 participants. 18F-florbetaben has high financial costs, therefore, clearly demonstrating its DTA and standardising the process of the 18F-florbetaben modality are important prior to its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Martínez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
- Institut Català de Neurociències AplicadesAlzheimer Research Center and Memory Clinic of Fundació ACEBarcelonaSpain
| | - Robin WM Vernooij
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
| | - Paulina Fuentes Padilla
- Iberoamerican Cochrane CentreC/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavelló 18 Planta 0BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain08025
- Universidad de AntofagastaFaculty of Medicine and DentistryAntofagastaChile
| | - Javier Zamora
- Ramon y Cajal Institute for Health Research (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid (Spain) and Women's Health Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of LondonClinical Biostatistics UnitLondonMadridUK
| | - Leon Flicker
- University of Western AustraliaWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing ‐ WACHACrawleyPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia6014
| | - Xavier Bonfill Cosp
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167Pavilion 18BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaSant Antoni Maria Claret, 167Pavilion 18 (D‐13)BarcelonaCatalunyaSpain08025
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Latimer CS, Keene CD, Flanagan ME, Hemmy LS, Lim KO, White LR, Montine KS, Montine TJ. Resistance to Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes and Apparent Cognitive Resilience in the Nun and Honolulu-Asia Aging Studies. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2017; 76:458-466. [PMID: 28499012 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlx030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Two population-based studies key to advancing knowledge of brain aging are the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study (HAAS) and the Nun Study. Harmonization of their neuropathologic data allows cross comparison, with findings common to both studies likely generalizable, while distinct observations may point to aging brain changes that are dependent on sex, ethnicity, environment, or lifestyle factors. Here, we expanded the neuropathologic evaluation of these 2 studies using revised NIA-Alzheimer's Association guidelines and compared directly the neuropathologic features of resistance and apparent cognitive resilience. There were significant differences in prevalence of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change, small vessel vascular brain injury, and Lewy body disease between these 2 studies, suggesting that sex, ethnicity, and lifestyle factors may significantly influence resistance to developing brain injury with age. In contrast, hippocampal sclerosis prevalence was very similar, but skewed to poorer cognitive performance, suggesting that hippocampal sclerosis could act sequentially with other diseases to impair cognitive function. Strikingly, despite these observed differences, the proportion of individuals resistant to all 4 diseases of brain or displaying apparent cognitive resilience was virtually identical between HAAS and Nun Study participants. Future in vivo validation of these results awaits comprehensive biomarkers of these 4 brain diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin S Latimer
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - C Dirk Keene
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Margaret E Flanagan
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Laura S Hemmy
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Kelvin O Lim
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Lon R White
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Kathleen S Montine
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| | - Thomas J Montine
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (CSL, CDK); Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California (MEF, KSM, TJM); Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH, KOL); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota (LSH); Pacific Health Research and Education Institute (PHREI), Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW); and Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii (LRW)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Farfel JM, Yu L, De Jager PL, Schneider JA, Bennett DA. Association of APOE with tau-tangle pathology with and without β-amyloid. Neurobiol Aging 2016; 37:19-25. [PMID: 26481403 PMCID: PMC4716785 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Revised: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that the association of apolipoprotein E (APOE) with paired helical filament tau (PHF-tau) tangle pathology differs in brains with and without β-amyloid. Participants were 1056 autopsied individuals from 2 clinical-pathologic cohort studies of aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), the Religious Orders Study, and the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Neuropathologic measures were obtained using immunohistochemistry targeting β-amyloid and PHF-tau tangles in 8 brain regions. Linear regression was used to compare the relation of APOE ε4 and ε2 to PHF-tau-tangle density in persons with β-amyloid relative to persons without β-amyloid. We found an interaction between APOE ε4 carriers and presence of β-amyloid (β = -0.968, p = 0.013) such that the association of APOE ε4 with PHF-tau tangles was much stronger in brains with β-amyloid. Stratified analysis shows that the association of APOE ε4 with PHF-tau tangles was considerably stronger among those with β-amyloid (β = 0.757, p = 1.1 × 10(-15)) compared to those without β-amyloid which was not significant (β = -0.201, p = 0.424). Separately, APOE ε2 was associated with fewer tangles in brains with β-amyloid (β = -0.425, p = 7.6 × 10(-4)) compared to those without β-amyloid which was not significant (β = -0.102, p = 0.506). Thus, the presence of APOE ε4 and ε2 alleles was not associated with PHF-tau tangles in the absence of β-amyloid. The data provide additional evidence that PHF-tau tangles in the absence of β-amyloid may reflect a pathologic process distinct from Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M. Farfel
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil,Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lei Yu
- Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philip L. De Jager
- Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Institute for the Neurosciences, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Julie A. Schneider
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David A. Bennett
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil,Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA,Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
PART, a distinct tauopathy, different from classical sporadic Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol 2015; 129:757-62. [PMID: 25778618 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-015-1407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 03/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
8
|
Ma Y, Zhang S, Li J, Zheng DM, Guo Y, Feng J, Ren WD. Predictive accuracy of amyloid imaging for progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease with different lengths of follow-up: a meta-analysis. [Corrected]. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e150. [PMID: 25501055 PMCID: PMC4602781 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000000150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past decade, amyloid deposition has been shown to begin many years before the clinical symptoms of dementia in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer disease (AD). Longitudinal studies with different follow-up durations have suggested that C-Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography (C-PIB-PET) may play a role in stratifying patients with MCI into risk levels for developing AD. However, the predictive accuracy of amyloid imaging for the progression from MCI to AD with different follow-up durations has not yet been systematically evaluated. A formal systematic evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, and other properties of C-PIB-PET was performed.This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze published data on the diagnostic performance of C-PIB-PET for predicting conversion to AD in patients with MCI and to determine whether long-term follow-up has a positive effect on predictive accuracy. Relevant studies were systematically identified through electronic searches, which were performed in MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), BIOSIS Previews (ISI Web of Knowledge), Science Citation Index (ISI Web of Knowledge), PsycINFO (Ovid SP), and LILACS (Bireme). The methodological quality of each study was assessed by QUADAS-2. Sensitivities and specificities of C-PIB-PET in individual studies were calculated, and the studies underwent meta-analysis with a random-effects model. A summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (SROC) was constructed with the Moses-Shapiro-Littenberg method. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the SROC curve of each subgroup were determined. Heterogeneity was tested, and potential sources for heterogeneity were explored by assessing whether certain covariates significantly influenced the relative DOR.Eleven eligible studies consisting of a total of 352 patients with MCI at baseline were included. Overall, the studies were of moderate-to-high methodological quality. The sensitivity and specificity of C-PIB-PET for predicting conversion to AD ranged from 83.3% to 100% and 41.1% to 100%, respectively, with pooled estimates of 94.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.8%-97.7%) and 57.2% (95% CI: 50.1%-64.2%), respectively . Moderate heterogeneity was observed for specificity between the included studies (I = 42.1%). The pooled estimates for the long-term follow-up subgroup were 95.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 84.5%-99.4%) and 72.4% specificity (95% CI: 59.1%-83.3.8%), whereas the pooled estimates for the short-term follow-up subgroup were 94.4% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.2%-97.9%) and 51.0% specificity (95% CI: 42.6%-59.5%). Homogeneity in each subgroup was significantly higher than that of the included studies, and most diagnostic indicators in the long-term follow-up subgroup were far superior to those in the short-term follow-up subgroup or the entire group. Not all of the methodological quality scores of studies included in this systematic review were high. Current evidence suggests that prolongation of the follow-up duration tended to yield greater accuracy of C-PIB-PET for predicting the progression from MCI to AD. In particular, the specificity, which reflects the exploratory nature of the use of amyloid imaging to identify the process of MCI to AD, was improved with a longer follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Ma
- From the Department of Ultrasound (YM, JL, WDR), Department of Neurology (SZ, DMZ, YG, JF), Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang S, Smailagic N, Hyde C, Noel‐Storr AH, Takwoingi Y, McShane R, Feng J. (11)C-PIB-PET for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD010386. [PMID: 25052054 PMCID: PMC6464750 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010386.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the latest revised National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (now known as the Alzheimer's Association) (NINCDS-ADRDA) diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease dementia, the confidence in diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease dementia is raised with the application of imaging biomarkers. These tests, added to core clinical criteria, might increase the sensitivity or specificity of a testing strategy. However, the accuracy of biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias has not yet been systematically evaluated. A formal systematic evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, and other properties of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with the (11)C-labelled Pittsburgh Compound-B ((11)C-PIB) ligand was performed. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the (11)C- PIB-PET scan for detecting participants with MCI at baseline who will clinically convert to Alzheimer's disease dementia or other forms of dementia over a period of time. SEARCH METHODS The most recent search for this review was performed on 12 January 2013. We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), BIOSIS Previews (ISI Web of Knowledge), Web of Science and Conference Proceedings (ISI Web of Knowledge), PsycINFO (OvidSP), and LILACS (BIREME). We also requested a search of the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (managed by the Cochrane Renal Group).No language or date restrictions were applied to the electronic searches and methodological filters were not used so as to maximise sensitivity. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected studies that had prospectively defined cohorts with any accepted definition of MCI with baseline (11)C-PIB-PET scan. In addition, we only selected studies that applied a reference standard for Alzheimer's dementia diagnosis for example NINCDS-ADRDA or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches. Two review authors independently assessed the abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. The identified full papers were assessed for eligibility and data were extracted to create two by two tables. Two independent assessors performed quality assessment using the QUADAS 2 tool. We used the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model to produce a summary ROC curve. MAIN RESULTS Conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease dementia was evaluated in nine studies. The quality of the evidence was limited. Of the 274 participants included in the meta-analysis, 112 developed Alzheimer's dementia. Based on the nine included studies, the median proportion converting was 34%. The studies varied markedly in how the PIB scans were done and interpreted.The sensitivities were between 83% and 100% while the specificities were between 46% and 88%. Because of the variation in thresholds and measures of (11)C-PIB amyloid retention, we did not calculate summary sensitivity and specificity. Although subject to considerable uncertainty, to illustrate the potential strengths and weaknesses of (11)C-PIB-PET scans we estimated from the fitted summary ROC curve that the sensitivity was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) 87 to 99) at the included study median specificity of 58%. This equated to a positive likelihood ratio of 2.3 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.07. Assuming a typical conversion rate of MCI to Alzheimer's dementia of 34%, for every 100 PIB scans one person with a negative scan would progress and 28 with a positive scan would not actually progress to Alzheimer's dementia.There were limited data for formal investigation of heterogeneity. We performed two sensitivity analyses to assess the influence of type of reference standard and the use of a pre-specified threshold. There was no effect on our findings. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although the good sensitivity achieved in some included studies is promising for the value of (11)C-PIB-PET, given the heterogeneity in the conduct and interpretation of the test and the lack of defined thresholds for determination of test positivity, we cannot recommend its routine use in clinical practice.(11)C-PIB-PET biomarker is a high cost investigation, therefore it is important to clearly demonstrate its accuracy and standardise the process of the (11)C-PIB diagnostic modality prior to it being widely used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Zhang
- China Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital36 Shanhao StreetShenyangLiaoningChina110004
| | - Nadja Smailagic
- University of CambridgeInstitute of Public HealthForvie SiteRobinson WayCambridgeUKCB2 0SR
| | - Chris Hyde
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterInstitute of Health ResearchVeysey BuildingSalmon Pool LaneExeterUKEX2 4SG
| | - Anna H Noel‐Storr
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineRoom 4401c (4th Floor)John Radcliffe Hospital, HeadingtonOxfordUKOX3 9DU
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- University of BirminghamPublic Health, Epidemiology and BiostatisticsEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - Rupert McShane
- University of OxfordRadcliffe Department of MedicineRoom 4401c (4th Floor)John Radcliffe Hospital, HeadingtonOxfordUKOX3 9DU
| | - Juan Feng
- Shengjing Hospital, China Medical UniversityDepartment of Neurology36 Shanhao StreetShenyangChina110004
| | | |
Collapse
|