What is current practice for upper limb rehabilitation in the acute hospital setting following stroke? A systematic review

Rehabilitation using virtual gaming for Hospital and hOMe-Based training for the Upper limb in acute and subacute Stroke (RHOMBUS II): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the Neurofenix platform for upper-limb rehabilitation in acute and subacute stroke.

DESIGN

A feasibility randomised controlled trial with a parallel process evaluation.

SETTING

Acute Stroke Unit and participants' homes (London, UK).

PARTICIPANTS

24 adults (>18 years), acute and subacute poststroke, new unilateral weakness, scoring 9-25 on the Motricity Index (elbow and shoulder), with sufficient cognitive and communicative abilities to participate.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants randomised to the intervention or control group on a 2:1 ratio. The intervention group (n=16) received usual care plus the Neurofenix platform for 7 weeks. The control group (n=8) received usual care only.

OUTCOMES

Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs), pain, spasticity and fatigue. Feasibility was assessed through training and support requirements and intervention fidelity. Acceptability was assessed through a satisfaction questionnaire. Impairment, activity and participation outcomes were also collected at baseline and 7 weeks to assess their suitability for use in a definitive trial.

RANDOMISATION

Computer-generated, allocation sequence concealed by opaque, sealed envelopes.

BLINDING

Participants and assessors were not blinded; statistician blinded for data processing and analysis.

RESULTS

192 stroke survivors were screened for eligibility, and 24 were recruited and randomised. Intervention group: n=16, mean age 66.5 years; median 9.5 days post stroke.

CONTROL GROUP

n=8, mean age 64.6 years; median 17.5 days post stroke. Three participants withdrew before the 7-week assessment, n=21 included in the analysis (intervention group n=15; control group n=6). No significant group differences in fatigue, spasticity, pain scores or total number of AEs. The median (IQR) time to train participants was 98 (64) min over 1-3 sessions. Participants trained with the platform for a median (range) of 11 (1-58) hours, equating to 94 min extra per week. The mean satisfaction score was 34.9 out of 40.

CONCLUSION

The Neurofenix platform is safe, feasible and well accepted as an adjunct to usual care in acute and subacute stroke rehabilitation. There was a wide range of engagement with the platform in a cohort of stroke survivors which was varied in age and level of impairment. Recruitment, training and support were manageable and completion of data was good, indicating that a future randomised controlled trial would be feasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11440079.

Factors Influencing Decision-Making for Poststroke Paretic Upper Limb Treatment: A Survey of Japanese Physical and Occupational Therapists

This study investigated the treatment methods used by physical and occupational therapists for poststroke paretic upper limbs and the factors influencing their decision-making processes. For the treatment methods of poststroke paretic upper limbs, the respondents were asked to select the most clinically used treatment according to the severity of the patient's condition. For the factors influencing their decision-making processes, the respondents were asked to indicate each determinant using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = no influence at all to 5 = very strong influence). Six hundred thirty-eight therapists participated in this study. Exploratory factor analysis was used to assess the validity of the questionnaire. The findings indicated task-specific training (N = 333, 52%) as the most popular for mild cases, followed by repetitive facilitative exercise (n = 143, 22.3%) for moderate cases and electrical stimulation (n = 246, 38.4%) for severe cases. This study revealed that evidence about treatment (very strong: n = 171 (27.0%), and strong: n = 287 (45.0%)) and patient preferences (very strong: n = 203 (31.8%), and strong: n = 251 (39.3%)) affected decision-making significantly regarding treatment methods for the poststroke paretic upper limb.

Dose, Content, and Context of Usual Care in Stroke Upper Limb Motor Interventions: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this systematic review were to describe the current dose and content of usual care upper limb motor intervention for inpatients following stroke and examine if context factors alter dose and content.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search (EMBASE, MEDLINE) was completed from January 2015 to February 2023 (PROSPERO CRD42021281986).

METHODS

Studies were eligible if they reported non-protocolised usual care upper limb motor intervention dose data for stroke inpatients. Studies were rated using the Johanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Data were descriptively reported for dose dimensions of time (on task or, in therapy) and intensity (repetitions, repetition/minute), content (intervention type/mode), and context (e.g., severity strata).

RESULTS

Eight studies were included from four countries, largely reflecting inpatient rehabilitation. Time in therapy ranged from 23 to 121 min/day. Time on task ranged from 8 to 44 min/day. Repetitions ranged from 36 to 57/session, and 15 to 282/day. Time on task was lowest in the stratum of people with severe upper limb impairment (8 min/day), the upper limit for this stratum was 41.5 min/day. There was minimal reporting of usual care content across all studies.

CONCLUSION

Upper limb motor intervention dose appears to be increasing in usual care compared to prior reports (e.g., average 21 min/day and 23 to 32 repetitions/session). Context variability suggests that doses are lowest in the stratum of patients with a severely impaired upper limb. Consistent reporting of the multiple dimensions of dose and content is necessary to better understand usual care offered during inpatient rehabilitation.

Personalised Online Upper-Limb Physiotherapy for Stroke Survivors during the Inpatient Phase: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

After a stroke, inpatients often receive less than the recommended dose of therapy. Telerehabilitation may assist by providing personalised rehabilitation programmes without face-to-face therapy time. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of an individualised programme of upper-limb rehabilitation that is delivered via an online rehabilitation platform for inpatient stroke survivors.

METHODS

Stroke survivors were recruited from three stroke units in one NHS Board in Scotland and randomised to the intervention (personalised upper-limb exercise programme delivered via an online physiotherapy platform for four weeks, up to 30 min five times per week, in addition to usual care) or the control group (usual care). The main outcomes are related to recruitment, attrition, adherence and safety. The clinical measures were the Action Research Arm Test, Trunk Impairment Scale and Modified Ashworth Scale. The intervention participants, their carers and physiotherapists completed questionnaires on the acceptability of the intervention.

RESULTS

Twenty-six participants, 42% males, were recruited around three weeks post-stroke, on average. There were 13 participants in each group, with a mean age of 69 years (SD of 12) and 67 years (SD of 11) for the control and intervention groups, respectively. Overall, 47% of those screened for eligibility were randomised, and attrition was 23% in the intervention group mainly due to discharge before the end of the intervention. Participants who adhered to their programme (completed more than two-thirds), generally those with an engaged carer, demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical outcomes. Overall, the patients, carers and physiotherapists were positive regarding the intervention. There was a total of five reported adverse events, none of which were related to the study.

CONCLUSION

An upper-limb unsupervised exercise intervention using an online physiotherapy platform for inpatient stroke survivors is feasible, safe and acceptable to patients, carers and physiotherapists. A fully powered RCT is warranted to investigate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of such interventions for this patient group.

Revisiting dose and intensity of training: Opportunities to enhance recovery following stroke

PURPOSE

Stroke is a global leading cause of adult disability with survivors often enduring persistent impairments and loss of function. Both intensity and dosage of training appear to be important factors to help restore behavior. However, current practice fails to achieve sufficient intensity and dose of training to promote meaningful recovery. The purpose of this review is to propose therapeutic solutions that can help achieve a higher dose and/or intensity of therapy. Raising awareness of these intensive, high-dose, treatment strategies might encourage clinicians to re-evaluate current practice and optimize delivery of stroke rehabilitation for maximal recovery.

METHODS

Literature that tested and evaluated solutions to increase dose or intensity of training was reviewed. For each therapeutic strategy, we outline evidence of clinical benefit, supporting neurophysiological data (where available) and discuss feasibility of clinical implementation.

RESULTS

Possible therapeutic solutions included constraint induced movement therapy, robotics, circuit therapy, bursts of training, gaming technologies, goal-oriented instructions, and cardiovascular exercise.

CONCLUSION

Our view is that clinicians should evaluate current practice to determine how intensive high-dose training can be implemented to promote greater recovery after stroke.

A low-cost virtual coach for 2D video-based compensation assessment of upper extremity rehabilitation exercises

Background

The increasing demands concerning stroke rehabilitation and in-home exercise promotion grew the need for affordable and accessible assistive systems to promote patients’ compliance in therapy. These assistive systems require quantitative methods to assess patients’ quality of movement and provide feedback on their performance. However, state-of-the-art quantitative assessment approaches require expensive motion-capture devices, which might be a barrier to the development of low-cost systems.

Methods

In this work, we develop a low-cost virtual coach (VC) that requires only a laptop with a webcam to monitor three upper extremity rehabilitation exercises and provide real-time visual and audio feedback on compensatory motion patterns exclusively from image 2D positional data analysis. To assess compensation patterns quantitatively, we propose a Rule-based (RB) and a Neural Network (NN) based approaches. Using the dataset of 15 post-stroke patients, we evaluated these methods with Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) and Leave-One-Exercise-Out (LOEO) cross-validation and the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_1$$\end{document}F1 score that measures the accuracy (geometric mean of precision and recall) of a model to assess compensation motions. In addition, we conducted a pilot study with seven volunteers to evaluate system performance and usability.

Results

For exercise 1, the RB approach assessed four compensation patterns with a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_1$$\end{document}F1 score of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$76.69 \%$$\end{document}76.69%. For exercises 2 and 3, the NN-based approach achieved a \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$F_1$$\end{document}F1 score of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$72.56 \%$$\end{document}72.56% and \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$79.87 \%$$\end{document}79.87%, respectively. Concerning the user study, they found that the system is enjoyable (hedonic value of 4.54/5) and relevant (utilitarian value of 4.86/5) for rehabilitation administration. Additionally, volunteers’ enjoyment and interest (Hedonic value perception) were correlated with their perceived VC performance (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho = 0.53$$\end{document}ρ=0.53).

Conclusions

The VC performs analysis on 2D videos from a built-in webcam of a laptop and accurately identifies compensatory movement patterns to provide corrective feedback. In addition, we discuss some findings concerning system performance and usability.

Safety, feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of the Neurofenix platform for Rehabilitation via HOMe Based gaming exercise for the Upper-limb post Stroke (RHOMBUS): results of a feasibility intervention study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, feasibility and acceptability of the Neurofenix platform for home-based rehabilitation of the upper limb (UL).

DESIGN

A non-randomised intervention design with a parallel process evaluation.

SETTING

Participants' homes, South-East England.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty adults (≥18 years), minimum 12-week poststroke, not receiving UL rehabilitation, scoring 9-25 on the Motricity Index (elbow and shoulder), with sufficient cognitive and communicative abilities to participate.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were trained to use the platform, followed by 1 week of graded game-play exposure and 6-week training, aiming for a minimum 45 min, 5 days/week.

OUTCOMES

Safety was determined by assessing pain and poststroke fatigue at 8 and 12 weeks, and adverse events (AEs). Impairment, activity and participation outcomes were measured. Intervention feasibility was determined by the amount of specialist training and support required to complete the intervention, time and days spent training, and number of UL movements performed. Acceptability was assessed by a satisfaction questionnaire and semistructured interviews.

RESULTS

Participants (14 women; mean (SD) age 60.0 (11.3) years) were a median of 4.9 years poststroke (minimum-maximum: 1-28 years). Twenty-seven participants completed the intervention. The odds of having shoulder pain were lower at 8 weeks (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.83, p=0.010) and 12 weeks (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.86, p=0.014) compared with baseline. Fugl-Meyer upper extremity, Motor Activity Log and passive range of movement improved. No other gains were recorded. Poststroke fatigue did not change. Thirty mild and short-term AEs and one serious (unrelated) AE were reported by 19 participants. Participants trained with the platform for a median of 17.4 hours over 7 weeks (minimum-maximum: 0.3-46.9 hours), equating to a median of 149 min per week. The median satisfaction score was 36 out of 40.

CONCLUSION

The Neurofenix platform is a safe, feasible and well accepted way to support UL training for people at least three months poststroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN60291412.

Evidence for a Window of Enhanced Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex Following Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

In preclinical models, behavioral training early after stroke produces larger gains compared with delayed training. The effects are thought to be mediated by increased and widespread reorganization of synaptic connections in the brain. It is viewed as a period of spontaneous biological recovery during which synaptic plasticity is increased.

OBJECTIVE

To look for evidence of a similar change in synaptic plasticity in the human brain in the weeks and months after ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to activate synapses repeatedly in the motor cortex. This initiates early stages of synaptic plasticity that temporarily reduces cortical excitability and motor-evoked potential amplitude. Thus, the greater the effect of cTBS on the motor-evoked potential, the greater the inferred level of synaptic plasticity. Data were collected from separate cohorts (Australia and UK). In each cohort, serial measurements were made in the weeks to months following stroke. Data were obtained for the ipsilesional motor cortex in 31 stroke survivors (Australia, 66.6 ± 17.8 years) over 12 months and the contralesional motor cortex in 29 stroke survivors (UK, 68.2 ± 9.8 years) over 6 months.

RESULTS

Depression of cortical excitability by cTBS was most prominent shortly after stroke in the contralesional hemisphere and diminished over subsequent sessions (P = .030). cTBS response did not differ across the 12-month follow-up period in the ipsilesional hemisphere (P = .903).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide the first neurophysiological evidence consistent with a period of enhanced synaptic plasticity in the human brain after stroke. Behavioral training given during this period may be especially effective in supporting poststroke recovery.

The effects of kinesthetic and visual motor imagery on interjoint coordination in the hemiplegic index finger: an experimental study using the index of temporal coordination

Abstract Upper limb hemiparesis is a common impairment following stroke and can affect interjoint coordination. Motor imagery training is one treatment strategy. However, motor imagery can use visual or kinesthetic modalities and there has been a lack of research comparing the effectiveness of these modalities when treating the upper limb. The aim of this study was to compare visual and kinesthetic motor imagery in improving interjoint coordination in the hemiparetic index finger. Fifteen stroke survivors with upper limb hemiparesis were allocated to groups using kinesthetic or visual motor imagery, or a control group using guided relaxation. Reaching and grasping movements of the upper limb were captured using optoelectronic motion capture. Interjoint coordination of the hemiparetic index finger was analysed using the index of temporal coordination. No significant differences were found for interjoint coordination following treatment in either condition. Future work should focus on comparing kinesthetic and visual motor imagery in the rehabilitation of more proximal upper limb joints.

Intermittent Skill Training Results in Moderate Improvement in Functional Outcome in a Mouse Model of Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Focused training of the impaired limb has been shown to improve its functional outcome in animal models. However, most human stroke survivors exhibit persistent motor deficits, likely due to differences in rehabilitation intensity between experimental (animal) and clinical (human) settings.

OBJECTIVE

The current study investigated the effect of training intensity on behavioral outcome in a mouse model of stroke.

METHODS

Mice were trained preoperatively on a skilled reaching task. After training, mice received a unilateral photothrombotic stroke. Postoperatively, animals received either daily rehabilitative training (traditional intensity), intermittent rehabilitative training (every other day), or no rehabilitative training (control). Assessment of the impaired limb occurred after 14 training sessions (14 days for the Traditional group; 28 days for the Intermittent group).

RESULTS

Assessment of the impaired limb illustrated that traditional, daily training resulted in significantly better performance than no training, while intermittent training offered moderate performance gains. Mice receiving intermittent training performed significantly better than control mice but did not exhibit reaching performance as strong as that of animals trained daily.

CONCLUSIONS

The intensity of rehabilitation is important for optimal recovery. Although intermediate intensity offers some benefit, it is not intensive enough to mimic the performance gains traditionally observed in animal models. These results suggest that intensive training, which is often unavailable for human stroke survivors, is necessary to achieve an optimal functional outcome. The lower bounds of training intensity for functional benefit still need to be determined.

A Comparison of the Armeo to Tabletop-assisted Therapy Exercises as Supplemental Interventions in Acute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Single Blind Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of an additional therapeutic upper limb exercise (ULE) intervention in early phase post-stroke rehabilitation and to assess outcomes of therapy using the Armeo Spring (ARMEO) versus Therapist-assisted Table Top (TAT) interventions.

DESIGN

Randomized, single-blind trial.

SETTING

Stroke acute inpatient rehabilitation unit.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five participants early after first stroke, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score >8, Modified Ashworth score (MAS) of <3.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to TAT or ARMEO ULE in addition to the required 3 hours of 1:1 standard of care provided in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Completed number of treatments; withdrawals; serious/adverse events; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor; FIM efficiency; FMA; MAS; elbow active (A) and passive (P) range of motion (ROM); and therapist effort measured by the Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE).

RESULTS

Post-intervention FIM and FMA scores increased but did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between the intervention groups (P = .585, .962, partial n² = .001, .001, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in post-intervention MAS elbow flexion and extension (P = .332, .252, partial n² = .009, .007, respectively) and A/P ROM elbow extension between training groups (P = .841, .731, partial n² = .001, .003, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in post-intervention A/P ROM elbow flexion between groups (P = .031, .018, partial n² = .123, .146). Post-intervention RPE did not show any statistically significant differences between the training groups (P = .128, partial n² = .063). Total elbow range showed larger adjusted mean gains for the ARMEO. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that additional therapeutic ULE in the early phase of post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation is feasible and that both interventions showed positive changes in selected outcomes.

Rehabilitation of the upper arm early after stroke: Video games versus conventional rehabilitation. A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Few rehabilitation methods have proven their efficacy in increasing sensori-motor recovery and/or function of the upper limb (UL) after stroke. Video games (VGs) are promising tools in this indication.

OBJECTIVE

To compare UL rehabilitation by using VGs and conventional rehabilitation (CR) in patients with sub-acute stroke.

DESIGN

Single-blind, multicentric trial, with central randomization and stratification by center.

SETTING

Physical and rehabilitation medicine departments of 2 university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults within 3 months after a first vascular cerebral accident, with UL Fugl Meyer Score (UL-FMS)<30/66 and without major cognitive impairment.

INTERVENTION

A 45-min additional session of conventional occupational therapy (OT) or a VG-based OT session as add-on therapy to usual rehabilitation programs, 5 days/week for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome: UL-FMS. Secondary outcome: Box and Block Test (BBT), Wolf Motor Function test (WMFT), Motor Activity Log (MAL), Barthel Index and quality of life (SF-36).

RESULTS

We included 51 patients (20 women) at a mean (SD) of 27.2 (19.4) days post-stroke (mean age 58 years [range 24-83]), 26 in the CR group and 25 in the VG group (23 in each group at 6-month follow-up). The mean duration of the additional rehabilitation session was similar in both groups: 29.3 (4.3) vs 28.0 (4.4) min in CR and VG groups. Shoulder pain occurred in 4 patients in the VG group versus 7 in the CR group. At day 45, gain in UL-FMS did not significantly differ between the groups (CR mean 17.8 [14.6] vs VG 24.1 [14.8]; P=0.10), whereas gain in BBT was doubled in the VG group (CR 7.4 [12.2] vs VG 15.7 [16.3]; P=0.02). At 6-month follow-up, the study was inconclusive about between-group differences in UL-FMS, BBT and other criteria. Post-hoc analysis showed that gains in UL-FMS or BBT were significantly higher in the VG than CR group for patients included within 30 days post-stroke.

CONCLUSION

In general, we cannot conclude that video gaming and conventional OT led to different long-term sensorimotor recovery of the UL after sub-acute stroke. However, when applied within the first month after stroke, video gaming was more efficient than conventional rehabilitation on both sensorimotor recovery and gross grasping function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01554449).

Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists

OBJECTIVES

To survey the reported content, frequency and duration of upper limb treatment provided by occupational and physiotherapists for people after stroke in the UK.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional online survey was used. Description and analysis of the data were based on items from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Who, Where, What and How much).

SETTING

The online survey was distributed via professional and social networks to UK-based therapists.

PARTICIPANTS

Respondents were occupational or physiotherapists currently working clinically in the UK with people after stroke. Over the 6 week data collection period, 156 respondents opened the survey, and 154 completed it. Respondents comprised 85 physiotherapists and 69 occupational therapists.

RESULTS

Respondents reported treating the upper limb a median of three times a week (range: 1 to 7) for a mean of 29 min (SD: 18). Most (n=110) stated this was supplemented by rehabilitation assistants, family and/or carers providing additional therapy a median of three times a week (range 1 to 7). Functional training was the most commonly reported treatment for people with mild and moderate upper limb deficits (>40%). There was much less consistency in treatments reported for people with severe upper limb deficits with less than 20% (n=28) reporting the same treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a contemporaneous description of reported therapy in the UK for people with upper limb deficits after stroke and a detailed template to inform standard therapy interventions in future research. Several evidence-based therapies were reported to be used by respondents (eg, constraint induced movement therapy), but others were not (eg, mental imagery). The findings also highlight that the current reported provision of upper limb therapy is markedly less than what is likely to be effective. This underlines an urgent need to configure and fund services to empower therapists to deliver greater amounts of evidence-based treatment for people with upper limb deficits after stroke.

Thumb and finger movement is reduced after stroke: An observational study

Hand motor impairment is common after stroke but there are few comprehensive data on amount of hand movement. This study aimed to compare the amount of thumb and finger movement over an extended period of time in people with stroke and able-bodied people. Fifteen stroke subjects and 15 able-bodied control subjects participated. Stroke subjects had impaired hand function. Movement of the thumb and index finger was recorded using stretch sensors worn on the affected hand (stroke subjects) or the left or right hand (control subjects) for ∼4 hours during the day. A digit movement was defined as a monotonic increase or decrease in consecutive sensor values. Instantaneous digit position was expressed as a percentage of maximal digit flexion. Mixed linear models were used to compare the following outcomes between groups: (1) average amplitude of digit movement, (2) digit cadence and average digit velocity, (3) percentage of digit idle time and longest idle time. Amplitude of digit movement was not different between groups. Cadence at the thumb (between-group mean difference, 95% CI, p value: -0.6 movements/sec, -1.0 to -0.2 movements/sec, p = 0.003) and finger (-0.5 movements/sec, -0.7 to -0.3 movements/sec, p<0.001) was lower in stroke than control subjects. Digit velocity was not different between groups. Thumb idle time was not different between groups, but finger idle time was greater in stroke than control subjects (percentage of idle time: 6%, 1 to 11%, p = 0.02; longest idle time: 375 sec, 29 to 721 sec, p = 0.04). Rehabilitation after stroke should encourage the performance of functional tasks that involve movements at faster cadences, and encourage more frequent movement of the digits with shorter periods of inactivity.

Rehabilitation Interventions for Upper Limb Function in the First Four Weeks Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic interventions reported in the research literature and synthesize their effectiveness in improving upper limb (UL) function in the first 4 weeks poststroke.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases and trial registries were searched from inception until June 2016, in addition to searching systematic reviews by hand.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled trials, and interventional studies with pre/posttest design were included for adults within 4 weeks of any type of stroke with UL impairment. Participants all received an intervention of any physiotherapeutic or occupational therapeutic technique designed to address impairment or activity of the affected UL, which could be compared with usual care, sham, or another technique.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility of full texts, and methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 104 trials (83 RCTs, 21 nonrandomized studies) were included (N=5225 participants). Meta-analyses of RCTs only (20 comparisons) and narrative syntheses were completed. Key findings included significant positive effects for modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) (standardized mean difference [SMD]=1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], .21-1.97) and task-specific training (SMD=.37; 95% CI, .05-.68). Evidence was found to support supplementary use of biofeedback and electrical stimulation. Use of Bobath therapy was not supported.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of mCIMT and task-specific training was supported, as was supplementary use of biofeedback and electrical simulation, within the acute phase poststroke. Further high-quality studies into the initial 4 weeks poststroke are needed to determine therapies for targeted functional UL outcomes.