1
|
Shehata MA, Saad AM, Kamel S, Stanietzky N, Roman-Colon AM, Morani AC, Elsayes KM, Jensen CT. Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2724-2756. [PMID: 37280374 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03966-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the two most common commercially available deep-learning algorithms for CT. METHODS We used PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science to conduct systematic searches for studies assessing the most common commercially available deep-learning CT reconstruction algorithms: True Fidelity (TF) and Advanced intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE) in the abdomen of human participants since only these two algorithms currently have adequate published data for robust systematic analysis. RESULTS Forty-four articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. 32 studies evaluated TF and 12 studies assessed AiCE. DLR algorithms produced images with significantly less noise (22-57.3% less than IR) but preserved a desirable noise texture with increased contrast-to-noise ratios and improved lesion detectability on conventional CT. These improvements with DLR were similarly noted in dual-energy CT which was only assessed for a single vendor. Reported radiation reduction potential was 35.1-78.5%. Nine studies assessed observer performance with the two dedicated liver lesion studies being performed on the same vendor reconstruction (TF). These two studies indicate preserved low contrast liver lesion detection (> 5 mm) at CTDIvol 6.8 mGy (BMI 23.5 kg/m2) to 12.2 mGy (BMI 29 kg/m2). If smaller lesion detection and improved lesion characterization is needed, a CTDIvol of 13.6-34.9 mGy is needed in a normal weight to obese population. Mild signal loss and blurring have been reported at high DLR reconstruction strengths. CONCLUSION Deep learning reconstructions significantly improve image quality in CT of the abdomen. Assessment of other dose levels and clinical indications is needed. Careful choice of radiation dose levels is necessary, particularly for small liver lesion assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa A Shehata
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | | | - Serageldin Kamel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - Nir Stanietzky
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | | | - Ajaykumar C Morani
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - Corey T Jensen
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koetzier LR, Mastrodicasa D, Szczykutowicz TP, van der Werf NR, Wang AS, Sandfort V, van der Molen AJ, Fleischmann D, Willemink MJ. Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. Radiology 2023; 306:e221257. [PMID: 36719287 PMCID: PMC9968777 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Filtered back projection (FBP) has been the standard CT image reconstruction method for 4 decades. A simple, fast, and reliable technique, FBP has delivered high-quality images in several clinical applications. However, with faster and more advanced CT scanners, FBP has become increasingly obsolete. Higher image noise and more artifacts are especially noticeable in lower-dose CT imaging using FBP. This performance gap was partly addressed by model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Yet, its "plastic" image appearance and long reconstruction times have limited widespread application. Hybrid iterative reconstruction partially addressed these limitations by blending FBP with MBIR and is currently the state-of-the-art reconstruction technique. In the past 5 years, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques have become increasingly popular. DLR uses artificial intelligence to reconstruct high-quality images from lower-dose CT faster than MBIR. However, the performance of DLR algorithms relies on the quality of data used for model training. Higher-quality training data will become available with photon-counting CT scanners. At the same time, spectral data would greatly benefit from the computational abilities of DLR. This review presents an overview of the principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications of DLR, including metal artifact reduction algorithms. In addition, emerging applications and prospects are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Timothy P. Szczykutowicz
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Niels R. van der Werf
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Adam S. Wang
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Veit Sandfort
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Aart J. van der Molen
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Dominik Fleischmann
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| | - Martin J. Willemink
- From the Department of Radiology (L.R.K., D.M., A.S.W., V.S., D.F.,
M.J.W.) and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (D.M., D.F., M.J.W.), Stanford
University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305-5105;
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, School of
Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wis (T.P.S.); Department of Radiology,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.); Clinical
Science Western Europe, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands (N.R.v.d.W.);
and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the
Netherlands (A.J.v.d.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeon PH, Lee CL. Deep learning image reconstruction for quality assessment of iodine concentration in computed tomography: A phantom study. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2023; 31:409-422. [PMID: 36744361 DOI: 10.3233/xst-221356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technology aiming to improve image quality with minimal radiation dose has been applied not only to pediatric scans, but also to computed tomography angiography (CTA). OBJECTIVE To evaluate image quality characteristics of filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction [Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)], and DLR (AiCE) using different iodine concentrations and scan parameters. METHODS Phantoms with eight iodine concentrations (ranging from 1.2 to 25.9 mg/mL) located at the edge of a cylindrical water phantom with a diameter of 19 cm were scanned. Data were reconstructed with FBP, AIDR 3D, and AiCE using various scan parameters of tube current and voltage using a 320 row-detector CT scanner. Data obtained using different reconstruction techniques were quantitatively compared by analyzing Hounsfield units (HU), noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). RESULTS HU values of FBP and AIDR 3D were constant even when the iodine concentration was changed, whereas AiCE showed the highest HU value when the iodine concentration was low, but the HU value reversed when the iodine concentration exceeded a certain value. In the AIDR 3D and AiCE, the noise decreased as the tube current increased, and the change in noise when the iodine concentration was inconsistent. AIDR 3D and AiCE yielded better noise reduction rates than with FBP at a low tube current. The noise reduction rate of AIDR 3D and AiCE compared to that of FBP showed characteristics ranging from 7% to 35%, and the noise reduction rate of AiCE compared to that of AIDR 3D ranged from 2.0% to 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS The evaluated reconstruction techniques showed different image quality characteristics (HU value, noise, and CNR) according to dose and scan parameters, and users must consider these results and characteristics before performing patient scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pil-Hyun Jeon
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju-Si, Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Lae Lee
- Health & Medical Equipment Business Unit, Samsung Electronics, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thapaliya S, Brady SL, Somasundaram E, Anton CG, Coley BD, Towbin AJ, Zhang B, Dillman JR, Trout AT. Detection of urinary tract calculi on CT images reconstructed with deep learning algorithms. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:265-271. [PMID: 34605964 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03274-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep learning Computed Tomography (CT) reconstruction (DLR) algorithms promise to improve image quality but the impact on clinical diagnostic performance remains to be demonstrated. We aimed to compare DLR to standard iterative reconstruction for detection of urolithiasis by unenhanced CT in children and young adults. METHODS This was an IRB approved retrospective study involving post-hoc reconstruction of clinically acquired unenhanced abdomen/pelvis CT scans. Images were reconstructed with six different manufacturer-standard DLR algorithms and reformatted in 3 planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) at 3 mm intervals. De-identified reconstructions were loaded as independent examinations for review by 3 blinded radiologists (R1, R2, R3) tasked with identifying and measuring all stones. Results were compared to the clinical iterative reconstruction images as a reference standard. IntraClass correlation coefficients and kappa (k) statistics were used to quantify agreement. RESULTS CT data for 14 patients (mean age: 17.3 ± 3.4 years, 5 males and 9 females, weight class: 31-70 kg (n = 6), 71-100 kg (n = 7), > 100 kg (n = 1)) were reconstructed into 84 total exams. 7 patients had urinary tract calculi. Interobserver agreement on the presence of any urinary tract calculus was substantial to almost perfect (k = 0.71-1) for all DLR algorithms. Agreement with the reference standard on number of calculi was excellent (ICC = 0.78-0.96) and agreement on the size of the largest calculus was fair to excellent (ICC = 0.51-0.97) depending on reviewer and DLR algorithm. CONCLUSION Deep learning reconstruction of unenhanced CT images allows similar renal stone detectability compared to iterative reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samjhana Thapaliya
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Samuel L Brady
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elanchezhian Somasundaram
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Christopher G Anton
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Brian D Coley
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alexander J Towbin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Bin Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Andrew T Trout
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 5031, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bie Y, Yang S, Li X, Zhao K, Zhang C, Zhong H. Impact of deep learning-based image reconstruction on image quality compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo in renal and adrenal computed tomography. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 30:409-418. [PMID: 35124575 PMCID: PMC9108564 DOI: 10.3233/xst-211105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate image quality of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in contrast-enhanced renal and adrenal computed tomography (CT) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V). METHODS We prospectively recruited 52 patients. All images were reconstructed with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR at low, medium, and high reconstruction strengths. CT number, noise, noise reduction rate, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured and calculated within the region of interest (ROI) on subcutaneous fat, bilateral renal cortices, renal medulla, renal arteries, and adrenal glands. For qualitative analyses, the differentiation of the renal cortex and medulla, conspicuity of the adrenal gland boundary, sharpness, artifacts, and subjective noise were assessed. The overall image quality was calculated on a scale from 0 (worst) to 15 (best) based on the five values above and the score≥9 was acceptable. RESULTS CT number does not significantly differ between the reconstruction datasets. Noise does not significantly differ between ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L, but it is significantly lower using ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H. The noise reduction rate relative to ASiR-V 30% is significantly different between the DLIR groups and ASiR-V 70%, and DLIR-H yields the highest noise reduction rate (61.6%). SNR and CNR are higher for DLIR-M, DLIR-H, and ASiR-V 70% than for ASiR-V 30% and DLIR-L. DLIR-H shows the best SNR and CNR. The overall image quality yields the same pattern for DLIR-H, with the highest score. Percentages of cases with overall image quality score≥9 are 100% (DLIR-H), 94.23% (DLIR-M), 90.38% (ASiR-V70%), 67.31% (DLIR-L), and 63.46% (ASiR-V30%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS DLIR significantly improved the objective and subjective image quality of renal and adrenal CTs, yielding superior noise reduction compared with ASiR-V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Bie
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shuo Yang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xingchao Li
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Kun Zhao
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Changlei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Hai Zhong
- Department of Radiology, the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|