1
|
Niu S, Ao L, Gao Y, Zhou F, He W, Tao J, Guo S, Wang B, Ai X, Li H, Ma X, Zhang X, Huang J, Zhang X. Suitability of the MP1000 Platform for Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 64:2-8. [PMID: 38694878 PMCID: PMC11058071 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is widely used because of the many advantages of a robotic approach. The da Vinci Si robot is one of the most commonly used surgical robot systems, but it may be associated with higher costs owing to the use of consumable surgical supplies. Our aim was to conduct a preliminary investigation of the capability of the MP1000 system for RARP. Methods In this prospective, multicentre, single-blinded study, we randomly assigned 42 patients scheduled to undergo RARP between April and September 2021 to a da Vinci Si group (control) or an MP1000 group (intervention). Patients underwent RARP performed using the assigned robotic system and were followed up at 3-mo intervals. The primary outcome was the rate of conversion to open/laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were installation and operation times, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative surgical margin status, hospital stay, incontinence, complications, safety indicators, and surgeon ergonomics. Key findings and limitations All procedures were successfully completed without conversion to open/laparascopic surgery or major complications. Secondary outcomes, including oncological and ergonomic indicators, did not differ significantly between the groups over the study period. One patient in the control group experienced dysuria (Clavien-Dindo grade 3). No patients had incontinence at 3 mo. A limitation of the study is the small sample size. Conclusions and clinical implications RARP with the MP1000 system is feasible, safe, and effective in the management of localised prostate cancer. Patient summary We assessed the effectiveness and safety of the new MP1000 robot system for robot-assisted removal of the prostate in comparison to the da Vinci Si robot. We found no difference in effectiveness or safety among 42 patients with prostate cancer who were assigned randomly to one of the two systems. We conclude that the MP1000 is a suitable robot for this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoxi Niu
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Liyan Ao
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
- Graduate School of Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wang He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jin Tao
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baojun Wang
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xing Ai
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Hongzhao Li
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Xuepei Zhang
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, van Leenders GJLH, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Tilki D. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02254-1. [PMID: 38614820 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa. METHODS The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie Darraugh
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jan Oldenburg
- Akershus University Hospital (Ahus), Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, UFR Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rinaldi M, Porreca A, Di Lena S, Di Gianfrancesco L, Zazzara M, Scarcia M, Ludovico GM. A matched-analysis on short-term and long-term (up to 5 years of follow-up) urinary incontinence outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with and without anterior and posterior reconstruction: data on 1358 patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:121-127. [PMID: 37648873 PMCID: PMC10776693 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03766-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report a comparative monocentric study with a short and long-term follow-up with the aim to assess differences about urinary continence outcomes in patients treated with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) with two different techniques: with anterior and posterior reconstruction and without any kind of reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2016 to September 2021, at the Department of Urology of the "F. Miulli" Hospital of Acquaviva delle Fonti, in Italy, 850 eligible patients underwent extraperitoneal RARP with anterior and posterior reconstruction and 508 without reconstructions. RESULTS In patients undergoing RARP with reconstructions 1 month after surgery the urinary continence was preserved in 287/850 patients (33.8%), 3 months after surgery in 688/850 (81%), 6 months in 721/850 (84.8%), 12 months in 734/850 (86.3%), 18 months in 671/754 (89%), 24 months in 696/754 (92.3%), 36 months in 596/662 (90%), 48 months in 394/421 (93.6%), 60 months in 207/212 (97.6%). In patients undergoing RARP without reconstruction 1 month after surgery urinary continence was preserved in 99/508 (19.4%), after 3 months in 276/508 (54.3%), 6 months in 305/508 (60%), 12 months in 329/508 (64.7%), 18 months in 300/456 (65.7%), 24 months in 295/456 (64.7%), 36 months in 268/371 (72.3%), 48 months in 181/224 (81%), 60 months in 93/103 (90.3%). CONCLUSION In our case study, the RARP with anterior and posterior reconstruction technique is associated with a statistically significant higher rate (up to 48 months of follow-up) and a faster recovery of urinary continence compared to the technique without reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Rinaldi
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Luca Di Gianfrancesco
- Department of Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Zazzara
- Urology Department, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle fonti (BA), Italy
| | - Marcello Scarcia
- Urology Department, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle fonti (BA), Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farraj H, Alriyalat S. Urinary Incontinence Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Literature Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e53058. [PMID: 38410341 PMCID: PMC10896250 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer ranks as one of the most prevalent cancers among men in the United States, contributing significantly to cancer-related mortality. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a cornerstone in the management of localized prostate cancer. This literature review delves into the outcomes of RARP, specifically its impact on urinary incontinence (UI) compared to other surgical methods. We also present the importance of patient perception versus medical reports. Recent studies and trials have unveiled that postoperative UI and erectile dysfunction (ED) remain common concerns following prostatectomy. However, studies have shown that RARP has lower occurrences of UI and ED compared to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). While the choice of surgical method may not drastically affect these outcomes, the review emphasizes that urinary incontinence extends beyond physical symptoms. It profoundly impacts patients' psychological well-being, social interactions, and overall quality of life. Differences in symptom recording and interpretation between patients and healthcare professionals can significantly influence the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. Enhanced patient-physician communication and patient-centered care are essential to providing a holistic approach to prostate cancer management. The choice of surgical methods may not significantly impact postoperative urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Continued research and advancements in treatment and patient care are crucial for improving outcomes and the overall well-being of prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzeh Farraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, JOR
| | - Sulieman Alriyalat
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, JOR
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sanchez-Encinas M, Rey-Biel J, Alias D, Noguero-Meseguer R, Granell J, Muguruza I, Herrero A, Ayala JL, Barba R. Performance of a multidisciplinary robotic surgery program at a university hospital (2012-2022). J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2869-2874. [PMID: 37804394 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01726-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has become widely adopted for its ability to expand the indications for minimally invasive procedures. This technology aims to improve precision, accuracy, and outcomes while reducing complications, blood loss, and recovery time. Successful implementation of a robotic surgery program requires careful initial design and a focus on maintenance and expansion to maximize its benefits. This article presents a comprehensive study conducted at a University Hospital on the robotic surgery program from December 2012 to December 2022. Data from hospital databases, including patient demographics, surgical department, surgical time, operating room occupancy, and primary diagnosis, were analyzed. The analysis covered various time periods (surgical sessions, weeks, months, and years) to assess the program's evolution over time. Over the 10-year period, a total of 1847 robotic-assisted interventions were performed across five surgical services. Urology accounted for 57% of the cases, general surgery 17%, gynecology 16%, otorhinolaryngology 6%, and thoracic surgery 4%. The most frequently performed procedures included robotic prostatectomies (643 cases), hysterectomies (261 cases), and colposacropexies (210 cases). The weekly volume of interventions showed a notable increase, rising from 2 cases per week in 2013-2014 cases in 2022. Moreover, the average surgical duration per intervention exhibited a progressive decrease from 275 min in 2013 to 184 min in 2022. This study highlights the potential of a well-managed robotic surgery program as a viable alternative to conventional surgical approaches. Effective coordination and resource utilization contribute to the program's efficiency. The findings underscore the successful integration of robotic-assisted surgery in diverse surgical specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Sanchez-Encinas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
- International Doctorate School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933, Madrid, Spain
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Rey-Biel
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Maxilofacial Surgery, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Alias
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosario Noguero-Meseguer
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Granell
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Muguruza
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jose Luis Ayala
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Barba
- International Doctorate School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933, Madrid, Spain.
- Research Institute-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Roth K, Kaier K, Stachon P, von Zur Mühlen C, Jungmann P, Grimm J, Klar M, Juhasz-Böss I, Taran FA. Evolving trends in the surgical therapy of patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: analysis of a nationwide registry with special emphasis on perioperative outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:1635-1640. [PMID: 37395751 PMCID: PMC10519861 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07127-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in women, with increasing incidence in the last decades. Surgical therapy is the mainstay of the initial management. The present study analyzed the evolving trends of surgical therapy in Germany in patients diagnosed with EC recorded in a nationwide registry. METHODS All patients with the diagnosis of EC undergoing open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2007 and 2018 were identified by international classification of diseases (ICD) or specific operational codes (OPS) within the database of the German federal bureau of statistics. RESULTS A total of 85,204 patients underwent surgical therapy for EC. Beginning with 2013, minimal-invasive surgical therapy was the leading approach for patients with EC. Open surgery was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), of prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), and of prolonged hospital stay (13.7 ± 10.2 days vs. 7.2 ± 5.3 days, p < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic surgery. A total of 1551 (0.04%) patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were converted to laparotomy. Procedure costs were highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopy and laparoscopy (8286 ± 7533€ vs. 7083 ± 3893€ vs. 6047 ± 3509€, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The present study revealed that minimal-invasive surgery has increasingly become the standard surgical procedure for patients with EC in Germany. Furthermore, minimal-invasive surgery had superior in-hospital outcomes compared to laparotomy. Moreover, the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is increasing, with a comparable in-hospital safety profile to conventional laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Roth
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Stachon
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantin von Zur Mühlen
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Center of Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Heart Center Freiburg University, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Jungmann
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Grimm
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingolf Juhasz-Böss
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iacovazzo C, Buonanno P, Massaro M, Ianniello M, de Siena AU, Vargas M, Marra A. Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Intra- and Post-Operative Complications. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1297. [PMID: 37763064 PMCID: PMC10532788 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robotic surgery is attracting ever-growing interest for its potential advantages such as small incisions, fine movements, and magnification of the operating field. Only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the differences in perioperative outcomes between the two approaches. METHODS We screened the main online databases from inception to May 2023. We included studies in English enrolling adult patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. We used the following exclusion criteria: surgery with the involvement of thoracic esophagus, and patients affected by severe heart, pulmonary and end-stage renal disease. We compared intra- and post-operative complications, length of hospitalization, and costs between laparoscopic and robotic approaches. RESULTS A total of 18 RCTs were included. We found no differences in the rate of anastomotic leakage, cardiovascular complications, estimated blood loss, readmission, deep vein thrombosis, length of hospitalization, mortality, and post-operative pain between robotic and laparoscopic surgery; post-operative pneumonia was less frequent in the robotic approach. The conversion to open surgery was less frequent in the robotic approach, which was characterized by shorter time to first flatus but higher operative time and costs. CONCLUSIONS The robotic gastrointestinal surgery has some advantages compared to the laparoscopic technique such as lower conversion rate, faster recovery of bowel movement, but it has higher economic costs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Heesterman BL, Aben KKH, de Jong IJ, Pos FJ, van der Hel OL. Radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy with androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:398. [PMID: 37142955 PMCID: PMC10157926 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10842-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To summarize recent evidence in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functional and oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number registry on 29 march 2021. Comparative studies, published since 2016, that reported on treatment with RP versus dose-escalated EBRT and ADT for high-risk non-metastatic PCa were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to appraise quality and risk of bias. A qualitative synthesis was performed. RESULTS Nineteen studies, all non-randomized, met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessment indicated low (n = 14) to moderate/high (n = 5) risk of bias. Only three studies reported functional outcomes and/or HRQoL using different measurement instruments and methods. A clinically meaningful difference in HRQoL was not observed. All studies reported oncological outcomes and survival was generally good (5-year survival rates > 90%). In the majority of studies, a statistically significant difference between both treatment groups was not observed, or only differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival were reported. CONCLUSIONS Evidence clearly demonstrating superiority in terms of oncological outcomes of either RP or EBRT combined with ADT is lacking. Studies reporting functional outcomes and HRQoL are very scarce and the magnitude of the effect of RP versus dose-escalated EBRT with ADT on HRQoL and functional outcomes remains largely unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berdine L Heesterman
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Igle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olga L van der Hel
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schirò S, Milanese G, Maddalo M, Ziglioli F, Maestroni UV, Manna C, Ledda RE, Negrini G, Mastrapasqua F, Cobelli R, Tamburino G, Conti ME, Luceri S, Leo L, Ghetti C, Sverzellati N. MR-based simplified extraprostatic extension evaluation: comparison of performances of different predictive models. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:2975-84. [PMID: 36512046 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09240-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To test reproducibility and predictive value of a simplified score for assessment of extraprostatic tumor extension (sEPE grade). METHODS Sixty-five patients (mean age ± SD, 67 years ± 6.3) treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer who underwent 1.5-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) 6 months before surgery were enrolled. sEPE grade was derived from mpMRI metrics: curvilinear contact length > 15 mm (CCL) and capsular bulging/irregularity. The diameter of the index lesion (dIL) was also measured. Evaluations were independently performed by seven radiologists, and inter-reader agreement was tested by weighted Cohen K coefficient. A nested (two levels) Monte Carlo cross-validation was used. The best cut-off value for dIL was selected by means of the Youden J index to classify values into a binary variable termed dIL*. Logistic regression models based on sEPE grade, dIL, and clinical scores were developed to predict pathologic EPE. Results on validation set were assessed by the main metrics of the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and by decision curve analysis (DCA). Based on our findings, we defined and tested an alternative sEPE grade formulation. RESULTS Pathologic EPE was found in 31/65 (48%) patients. Average κw was 0.65 (95% CI 0.51-0.79), 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.84), 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.84), and 0.43 (95% CI 0.22-0.63) for sEPE grading, CLL ≥ 15 mm, dIL*, and capsular bulging/irregularity, respectively. The highest diagnostic yield in predicting EPE was obtained by combining both sEPE grade and dIL*(ROC-AUC 0.81). CONCLUSIONS sEPE grade is reproducible and when combined with the dIL* accurately predicts extraprostatic tumor extension. KEY POINTS • Simple and reproducible mpMRI semi-quantitative scoring system for extraprostatic tumor extension. • sEPE grade accurately predicts extraprostatic tumor extension regardless of reader expertise. • Accurate pre-operative staging and risk stratification for optimized patient management.
Collapse
|
10
|
Carrerette FB, Rodeiro DB, Filho RT, Santos PA, Lara CC, Damião R. Randomized controlled trial comparing open anterograde anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy with retrograde technique. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:151-157. [PMID: 36942119 PMCID: PMC10023527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Radical prostatectomy is the recommended treatment for localized prostate cancer; however, it is an invasive procedure that can leave serious morbidity. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was introduced with the aim of reducing postoperative morbidity and facilitating rapid recovery compared to the traditional Walsh's open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Therefore, a protocol was developed to perform an open prostatectomy comparable to that performed by robotics, but without involving novel instrumentation. Methods A total of 220 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy. They were divided into two groups: anterograde technique (115 patients) and the retrograde method (105 patients). The study outcomes were observed 3 months after surgery. Results No differences were found in terms of surgical time, hospital stay, and suction drainage. However, reduced bleeding was observed in the anterograde technique (p=0.0003), with rapid anastomosis duration (p=0.005). Among the patients, 60.9% undergoing the anterograde technique were continent 3 months after surgery compared to 42.9% treated by the retrograde method (p=0.007). Additionally, fewer complications in terms of the number (p=0.007) and severity (p=0.0006) were observed in the anterograde technique. Conclusion The anterograde method displayed increased efficiency in reducing complications, compared to the retrograde technique.
Collapse
|
11
|
de Figueiredo SMP, Tastaldi L, Mao RMD, Phillips S, Lu R. Short-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair during robotic prostatectomy - An analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Am J Surg 2023; 225:383-387. [PMID: 36115703 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concomitant robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) has been reported. Nevertheless, data on its safety is lacking and some surgeons avoid performing both operations concurrently due to the potential risk of mesh related complications in the setting of a fresh vesicourethral anastomosis. We aimed to investigate differences in 30-day outcomes between patients undergoing RALP+RIHR and those undergoing RIHR alone. METHODS Patients who have undergone concomitant RALP and RIHR with 30-day follow-up available were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Using a propensity score algorithm, they were matched with a cohort of patients undergoing RIHR alone based on confounders such as body mass index, age, ASA class, smoking, hernia size and recurrent status and prior pelvic operation. The groups were compared for 30-day rates of surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site occurrences requiring operative intervention (SSOPI) and hernia recurrence. RESULTS 24 patients underwent RALP + RIHR and were matched to 72 patients who underwent RIHR alone (3:1). Median age was 64 years, 33% were obese and 17% smokers. No significant differences were found on 30-day rates of overall complications (21% RALP + RIHR vs. 15% RIHR, p = 0.53) and surgical site occurrences (12% RALP + RIHR vs.11% RIHR, p = 0.85). No patient in the RALP + RIHR group had a 30-day SSI, SSOPI or early recurrence. CONCLUSION RALP+RIHR appears not to result in increased rates of wound complications, overall complications or early recurrence when compared to patient undergoing RIHR alone. Prospective, controlled studies with larger number of patients are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
| | - Luciano Tastaldi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| | - Rui-Min Diana Mao
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| | - Sharon Phillips
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Richard Lu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Caicedo JI, Santander J, Taborda A, Medina C, Zuluaga L, Trujillo CG, Castillo CB, Londoño Trujillo D, Plata M. Strategies to improve cost effectiveness of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in emerging economies. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:243-50. [PMID: 35668314 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
To assess the cost-effectiveness of the robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) compared to open radical prostatectomy (ORP) for localized prostate cancer from a healthcare perspective in Colombia. A systematic review was conducted in Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, to identify relevant publications up to January 2020 to summarize clinical outcomes related to effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy. A tree decision model was designed given the clinical outcomes and possibilities of complication and success. Outcomes were defined as complications according to Clavien - Dindo classification and success measured as urethral stricture rate. Cost was divided into two categories: surgical procedure and complications. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated and a deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of the uncertainty on the conclusions of the model. A 90-day horizon was defined. Direct medical costs associated with RALRP were $6.511 ($ 5.127- $8.138), and for ORP were $4.476 ($2.170-$ 6.511). The average cost for complication management was rated at $ 327 for RALRP and $ 382 for ORP, based on an augmented risk of post-operative urethral stricture in the ORP group (2.4% vs 10.8%). ICER was calculated in USD $18.987. The cost of RALRP has to be reduced to around USD 5.345 to achieve an ICER under 1 GDP making the intervention feasible. Using a 3 GDP per capita threshold, the implementation of RALRP could be cost-effective for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in emerging economies. Bolder measures including the use of one needle carrier, three robotic arms, and a shorten hospitalization program of 24 h, can save around $1000 for each patient, achieving the goal cost of $5345 needed for a favorable ICER.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bernhard JC, Robert G, Ricard S, Rogier J, Degryse C, Michiels C, Margue G, Blanc P, Alezra E, Estrade V, Capon G, Bladou F, Ferriere JM. Nurse-led coordinated surgical care pathways for cost optimization of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: medico-economic analysis of the UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study. World J Urol 2023; 41:325-333. [PMID: 35727334 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04066-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) reduces morbidity, enabling development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and day-case protocols. Additional financial costs limit its integration into clinical practice. We evaluated the medico-economic impact of RAPN using a nurse-led coordinated pathway of care (NLC-RAPN). METHODS All tumor RAPNs performed in 2017 were prospectively included in nurse-led protocols: NP-RAAC (ERAS) or Ambu-Rein (day case). Clinico-biological and pathological data were prospectively collected within the French Research Network for Kidney Cancer database (NCT03293563). Estimated costs were compared to "average" patients at the national level operated by open partial nephrectomy (OPN) or RAPN, using data from the 2017 French hospital discharge database and the national cost scale. RESULTS The NLC-RAPN cohort (n = 151) included 27 (18%) outpatients and the average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 2.4 days. In the national control cohorts for OPN (n = 2475) and RAPN (n = 3529), the average LOS were 8.0 and 5.2 days, respectively. The mean incomes per group were €7607 for NLC-RAPN, €9813 for OPN, and €8215 for RAPN. The mean daily cost of stay was €659 for NLC-RAPN, €838 for OPN, and €725 for RAPN. The overall cost for NLC-RAPN was €6594, €8733 for OPN, and €8763 for RAPN. The best operational margin was obtained for day-case NLC-RAPN (€1967). CONCLUSION Combining RAPN with nurse-led coordinated pathways of care led to a shorter hospital stay and reduced costs versus OPN. This may facilitate the economic sustainability of robotic assistance for hospitals where the extra cost is not covered by the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Christophe Bernhard
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
- UroCCR, French Research Network On Kidney Cancer, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Solène Ricard
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
- UroCCR, French Research Network On Kidney Cancer, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julien Rogier
- Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Degryse
- Department of Anesthesiology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Michiels
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gaëlle Margue
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Peggy Blanc
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Alezra
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vincent Estrade
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Grégoire Capon
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Franck Bladou
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Marie Ferriere
- Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Robertson C, Shaikh S, Hudson J, Roberts PG, Beard D, Mackie T, Matthew C, Ramsay C, Gillies K, Campbell M. The RoboCOS Study: Development of an international core outcome set for the comprehensive evaluation of patient, surgeon, organisational and population level impacts of robotic assisted surgery. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0283000. [PMID: 36996257 PMCID: PMC10062593 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of robot-assisted surgery is costly and requires whole system transformation, which makes the assessment of benefits (or drawbacks) complex. To date, there has been little agreement on which outcomes should be used in this regard. The aim of the RoboCOS study was to develop a core outcome set for the evaluation of robot-assisted surgery that would account for its impact on the whole system. METHODS Identification of a long-list of potentially relevant outcomes through systematic review of trials and health technology assessments; interviews with individuals from a range of stakeholder groups (surgeons, service managers, policy makers and evaluators) and a focus group with patients and public; prioritisation of outcomes via a 2-round online international Delphi survey; consensus meeting. RESULTS 721 outcomes were extracted from the systematic reviews, interviews and focus group which were conceptualised into 83 different outcome domains across four distinct levels (patient, surgeon, organisation and population) for inclusion in the international Delphi prioritisation survey (128 completed both rounds). The consensus meeting led to the agreement of a 10-item core outcome set including outcomes at: patient level (treatment effectiveness; overall quality of life; disease-specific quality of life; complications (including mortality); surgeon level (precision/accuracy; visualisation); organisation (equipment failure; standardisation of operative quality; cost-effectiveness); and population (equity of access). CONCLUSION The RoboCOS core outcome set, which includes the outcomes of importance to all stakeholders, is recommended for use in all future evaluations of robot-assisted surgery to ensure relevant and comparable reporting of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Robertson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Shafaque Shaikh
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Jemma Hudson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Garfjeld Roberts
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Surgical Interventions Trials Unit, Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Cameron Matthew
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Marion Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mathieu R, Doizi S, Bensalah K, Lebacle C, Legeais D, Madec FX, Phe V, Pignot G, Irani J. Les complications chirurgicales en urologie adulte : chirurgie de la prostate. Prog Urol 2022; 32:953-965. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
16
|
Sigle A, Jilg CA, Weishaar M, Schlenker B, Stief C, Gratzke C, Grabbert M. Development and Implementation of an Advanced Program for Robotic Treatment of Prostate Cancer-Is Surgical Quality Transferable? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14. [PMID: 36358680 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a surgical treatment option for prostate cancer (PC). Quality in RARP depends on the surgeon´s operative volume and expertise. When implementing RARP, it is standard practice to hire a pre-trained surgeon. The aim of our study was to investigate the transferability of quality in RARP. Patients and Methods: We analyzed two consecutive retrospective cohorts of 100 and 108 men, respectively, who underwent RARP at two different centers and on whom surgery was performed by the same surgeon. Results: There were more men with high-grade PC in Cohort 1: 25/100 (25.0%) vs. 9/108 (8.3%), p < 0.01, and infiltration of the seminal vesicles was more frequent (23/100 (23.0%) vs. 10/108 (9.2%), p < 0.01). In Cohort 2, the duration of surgery was shorter and blood loss was lower: 149 (134−174) vs. 172 min (150−196), p < 0.01 and 300 (200−400) vs. 131 (99−188) mL, p < 0.01. No difference was found in the proportion of positive surgical margins in the T2 cohort (8.8% vs. 8.2%, p = 1.00). Conclusion: The procedural and oncological outcome parameters of Cohort 2 do not appear to be inferior to the results obtained for the first cohort. The quality of RARP is transferable if a pre-trained surgeon is hired.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Review and assess cost-effectiveness studies of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localised prostate cancer compared with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). DESIGN Systematic review. SETTING PubMed, Embase, Scopus, International HTA database, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database and various HTA websites were searched (January 2005 to March 2021) to identify the eligible cost-effectiveness studies. PARTICIPANTS Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-minimization analyses examining RARP versus ORP or LRP were included in this systematic review. INTERVENTIONS Different surgical approaches to treat localized prostate cancer: RARP compared with ORP and LRP. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES A structured narrative synthesis was developed to summarize results of cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness results (eg, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER]). Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria Extended checklist. Application of medical device features were evaluated. RESULTS Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, 11 of which were cost-utility analyses. Higher quality-adjusted life-years and higher costs were observed with RARP compared with ORP or LRP in 11 studies (91%). Among four studies comparing RARP with LRP, three reported RARP was dominant or cost-effective. Among ten studies comparing RARP with ORP, RARP was more cost-effective in five, not cost-effective in two, and inconclusive in three studies. Studies with longer time horizons tended to report favorable cost-effectiveness results for RARP. Nine studies (75%) were rated of moderate or good quality. Recommended medical device features were addressed to varying degrees within the literature as follows: capital investment included in most studies, dynamic pricing considered in about half, and learning curve and incremental innovation were poorly addressed. CONCLUSIONS Despite study heterogeneity, RARP was more costly and effective compared with ORP and LRP in most studies and likely to be more cost-effective, particularly over a multiple year or lifetime time horizon. Further cost-effectiveness analyses for RARP that more thoroughly consider medical device features and use an appropriate time horizon are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021246811.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Song
- Global Health Economics and Outcome Research, Intuitive Surgical, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lucia Cheng
- Global Health Economics and Outcome Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Yanli Li
- Global Health Economics and Outcome Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Usha Kreaden
- Biostatistics & Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Susan R Snyder
- Georgia State University School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cantarero-prieto D, Lera J, Lanza-leon P, Barreda-gutierrez M, Guillem-porta V, Castelo-branco L, Martin-moreno JM. The Economic Burden of Localized Prostate Cancer and Insights Derived from Cost-Effectiveness Studies of the Different Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4088. [PMID: 36077625 PMCID: PMC9454560 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer has huge health and societal impacts, and there is no clear consensus on the most effective and efficient treatment strategy for this disease, particularly for localized prostate cancer. We have reviewed the scientific literature describing the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for localized prostate cancer in OECD countries. We initially identified 315 articles, studying 13 of them in depth (those that met the inclusion criteria), comparing the social perspectives of cost, time period, geographical area, and severity. The economic burden arising from prostate cancer due to losses in productivity and increased caregiver load is noticeable, but clinical decision-making is carried out with more subjective variability than would be advisable. The direct cost of the intervention was the main driver for the treatment of less severe cases of prostate cancer, whereas for more severe cases, the most important determinant was the loss in productivity. Newer, more affordable radiotherapy strategies may play a crucial role in the future treatment of early prostate cancer. The interpretation of our results depends on conducting thorough sensitivity analyses. This approach may help better understand parameter uncertainty and the methodological choices discussed in health economics studies. Future results of ongoing clinical trials that are considering genetic characteristics in assessing treatment response of patients with localized prostate cancer may shed new light on important clinical and pharmacoeconomic decisions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Jha N, Shankar PR, Al-Betar MA, Mukhia R, Hada K, Palaian S. Undergraduate Medical Students' and Interns' Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Adv Med Educ Pract 2022; 13:927-937. [PMID: 36039185 PMCID: PMC9419901 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s368519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly important role in healthcare and health professions education. This study explored medical students' and interns' knowledge of artificial intelligence (AI), perceptions of the role of AI in medicine, and preferences around the teaching of AI competencies. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, the authors used a previously validated Canadian questionnaire and gathered responses from students and interns at KIST Medical College, Nepal. Face validity and reliability of the tool were assessed by administering the questionnaire to 20 alumni as a pilot sample (Cronbach alpha = 0.6). Survey results were analyzed quantitatively (p-value = 0.05). RESULTS In total 216 students (37% response rate) participated. The median AI knowledge score was 11 (interquartile range 4), and the maximum possible score was 25. The score was higher among final year students (p = 0.006) and among those with additional training in AI (p = 0.040). Over 49% strongly agreed or agreed that AI will reduce the number of jobs for doctors. Many expect AI to impact their specialty choice, felt the Nepalese health-care system is ill-equipped to deal with the challenges of AI, and opined every student of medicine should receive training on AI competencies. CONCLUSION The lack of coverage of AI and machine learning in Nepalese medical schools has resulted in students being unaware of AI's impact on individual patients and the healthcare system. A high perceived willingness among respondents to learn about AI is a positive sign and a strong indicator of futuristic successful curricula changes. Systematic implementation of AI in the Nepalese healthcare system can be a potential tool in addressing health-care challenges related to resource and manpower constraints. Incorporating topics related to AI and machine learning in medical curricula can be a useful first step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha Jha
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, KIST Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal
| | - Pathiyil Ravi Shankar
- IMU Centre for Education, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur Federal Territory, Malaysia
| | - Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar
- Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rupesh Mukhia
- Department of Surgery, KIST Medical College, Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal
| | - Kabita Hada
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, KIST Medical College, Lalitpur, Bagmati, Nepal
| | - Subish Palaian
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Axt S, Dörflinger A, Johannink J, Kirschniak A, Rolinger J, Wilhelm P. Evaluation of different setting configurations with a new developed telemedical interface of a parallel kinematic robotic system – An experimental development study. Int J Med Robot 2022; 18:e2377. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Axt
- Department of General Visceral and Transplant Surgery Tübingen University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Andreas Dörflinger
- Department of General Visceral and Transplant Surgery Tübingen University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Jonas Johannink
- Department of General Visceral and Transplant Surgery Tübingen University Hospital Tübingen Germany
| | - Andreas Kirschniak
- General and Visceral Surgery Maria Hilf Hospital Mönchengladbach Germany
| | - Jens Rolinger
- General and Visceral Surgery Maria Hilf Hospital Mönchengladbach Germany
| | - Peter Wilhelm
- General and Visceral Surgery Maria Hilf Hospital Mönchengladbach Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wilson BC, Eu D. Optical Spectroscopy and Imaging in Surgical Management of Cancer Patients. Transl Biophotonics 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/tbio.202100009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C. Wilson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network 101 College Street Toronto Ontario Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Canada
| | - Donovan Eu
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery‐Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network University of Toronto Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery National University Hospital System Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lindenberg MA, Retèl VP, van der Poel HG, Bandstra F, Wijburg C, van Harten WH. Cost-utility analysis on robot-assisted and laparoscopic prostatectomy based on long-term functional outcomes. Sci Rep 2022; 12:7658. [PMID: 35538174 PMCID: PMC9090736 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10746-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) is one of the standard treatment options for prostate cancer. However, controversy still exists on its added value. Based on a recent large-sample retrospective cluster study from the Netherlands showing significantly improved long-term urinary functioning after RARP compared to Laparoscopic RP (LRP), we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of RARP compared to LRP. A decision tree was constructed to measure the costs and effects from a Dutch societal perspective over a ~ 7 year time-horizon. The input was based on the aforementioned study, including patient-reported consumption of addition care and consumed care for ergonomic issues reported by surgeons. Intervention costs were calculated using a bottom-up costing analysis in 5 hospitals. Finally, a probabilistic-, one-way sensitivity- and scenario analyses were performed to show possible decision uncertainty. The intervention costs were €9964 for RARP and €7253 for LRP. Total trajectory costs were €12,078 for RARP and €10,049 for LRP. RARP showed higher QALYs compared to LRP (6.17 vs 6.11). The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was €34,206 per QALY gained, in favour of RARP. As a best-case scenario, when RARP is being centralized (> 150 cases/year), total trajectory costs decreased to €10,377 having a higher utilization, and a shorter procedure time and length of stay resulting in an ICUR of €3495 per QALY gained. RARP showed to be cost-effective compared to LRP based on data from a population-based, large scale study with 7 years of follow-up. This is a clear incentive to fully reimburse RARP, especially when hospitals provide RARP centralized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, PO Box 217, 7500, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, PO Box 217, 7500, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Carl Wijburg
- Department of Urology Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, MB-HTSR, PO Box 217, 7500, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Faria EF, Rosim RP, de Matos Nogueira E, Tobias-Machado M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer From the Brazilian Public System Perspective. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 29:60-65. [PMID: 34801887 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the gold standard for the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer, presenting better results than radiotherapy especially for high-risk patients. Although it has clinical and technical benefits compared with open and laparoscopic techniques, the robotic-assisted RP is not publicly funded in Brazil. The objective of this study was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the robotic-assisted RP from the Brazilian public system perspective. METHODS A state transition model was built to simulate the life of a patient undergoing RP. A total of 3 arms were compared: robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgeries. The assumed time horizon was 20 years; discounts were applied to both costs and health outcomes. Events and transition probabilities were obtained in the literature, and costs were obtained in official government databases. The results were reported as incremental cost-utility ratios. RESULTS Robotic-assisted surgery was found to be costlier but more effective than both open and laparoscopic techniques, resulting in Brazilian reals 4518 per quality-adjusted life-year and Brazilian reals 3631 per quality-adjusted life-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study gives relevant inputs for decision making regarding the inclusion of robotic-assisted RP in the Brazilian public formularies. The study demonstrates that the technology is cost-effective even when considering willingness-to-pay thresholds lower than the traditionally used ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marcos Tobias-Machado
- ICAVC - Cancer Institute Dr. Arnaldo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Urology, ABC Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Labban M, Dasgupta P, Song C, Becker R, Li Y, Kreaden US, Trinh QD. Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e225740. [PMID: 35377424 PMCID: PMC8980901 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The cost-effectiveness of different surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy remains a subject of debate. Emergence of recent critical clinical data and changes in surgical equipment costs due to their shared use by different clinical specialties necessitate an updated cost-effectiveness analysis in a centralized, largely government-funded health care system such as the UK National Health Service (NHS). OBJECTIVE To compare robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic-assisted radical prostatectomy (LRP) using contemporary data on clinical outcomes, costs, and surgical volumes in the UK. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This economic analysis used a Markov model developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of RARP, LRP, and ORP to treat localized prostate cancer. The model was constructed from the perspective of the UK NHS. The model simulated 65-year-old men who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer and were followed up for a 10-year period. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. EXPOSURES Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, LRP, and ORP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs (direct medical costs and costs outside the NHS), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS Compared with LRP, RARP cost £1785 (US $2350) less and had 0.24 more QALYs gained; thus, RARP was a dominant option compared with LRP. Compared with ORP, RARP had 0.12 more QALYs gained but cost £526 (US $693) more during the 10-year time frame, resulting in an ICER of £4293 (US $5653)/QALY. Because the ICER was below the £30 000 (US $39 503) willingness-to-pay threshold, RARP was more cost-effective than ORP in the UK. The most sensitive variable influencing the cost-effectiveness of RARP was the lower risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Scenario analysis indicated RARP would remain more cost-effective than ORP as long as the BCR hazard ratios comparing RARP vs ORP were less than 0.99. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that in the UK, RARP has an ICER lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold and thus is likely a cost-effective surgical treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer compared with ORP and LRP. The results were mainly driven by the lower risk of BCR for RARP. These findings may differ in other health care settings where different thresholds and costs may apply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- MRC (Medical Research Council) Centre for Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital Campus, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chao Song
- Global Health Economics and Outcome Research, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Yanli Li
- Global Health Economics and Outcome Research, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, California
| | - Usha Seshadri Kreaden
- Biostatistics & Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical Inc, Sunnyvale, California
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chen K, Zhang J, Beeraka NM, Sinelnikov MY, Zhang X, Cao Y, Lu P. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery: Recent Evidence with Comparative Clinical Outcomes. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1827. [PMID: 35407434 PMCID: PMC8999956 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent times, robot-assisted surgery has been prominently gaining pace to minimize overall postsurgical complications with minimal traumatization, due to technical advancements in telerobotics and ergonomics. The aim of this review is to explore the efficiency of robot-assisted systems for executing breast surgeries, including microsurgeries, direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforators-based surgery, latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction, and nipple-sparing mastectomy. Robot-assisted surgery systems are efficient due to 3D-based visualization, dexterity, and range of motion while executing breast surgery. The review describes the comparative efficiency of robot-assisted surgery in relation to conventional or open surgery, in terms of clinical outcomes, morbidity rates, and overall postsurgical complication rates. Potential cost-effective barriers and technical skills were also delineated as the major limitations associated with these systems in the clinical sector. Furthermore, instrument articulation of robot-assisted surgical systems (for example, da Vinci systems) can enable high accuracy and precision surgery due to its promising ability to mitigate tremors at the time of surgery, and shortened learning curve, making it more beneficial than other open surgery procedures.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ghandour Z, Siciliani L, Straume OR. Investment and quality competition in healthcare markets. J Health Econ 2022; 82:102588. [PMID: 35065851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
We study the strategic relationship between hospital investment and provision of service quality. We use a spatial competition framework and allow investment and quality to be complements or substitutes in patient benefit and provider cost. We assume that each hospital commits to a certain investment before deciding on service quality, and that investment is observable and contractible while quality is observable but not contractible. We show that, under a fixed DRG-pricing system, providers' lack of ability to commit to quality leads to under- or overinvestment, relative to the first-best solution. Underinvestment arises when the price-cost margin is positive, and quality and investments are strategic complements, which has implications for optimal contracting. Differently from the simultaneous-move case, the regulator must complement the payment with one more instrument to address under/overinvestment. We also analyse the welfare effects of different policy options (separate payment for investment, higher per-treatment prices, or DRG-refinement policies).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Ghandour
- Department of Economics/NIPE, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
| | - Luigi Siciliani
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Odd Rune Straume
- Department of Economics/NIPE, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Department of Economics, University of Bergen Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Al-Hawari T, Alrejjal A, Mumani AA, Momani A, Alhawari H. A Framework for Multi-response Optimization of Healthcare Systems Using Discrete Event Simulation and Response Surface Methodology. Arab J Sci Eng 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-06633-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Beyer K, Moris L, Lardas M, Omar MI, Healey J, Tripathee S, Gandaglia G, Venderbos LD, Vradi E, van den Broeck T, Willemse PP, Antunes-Lopes T, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Monagas S, Esperto F, Flaherty S, Devecseri Z, Lam TB, Williamson PR, Heer R, Smith EJ, Asiimwe A, Huber J, Roobol MJ, Zong J, Mason M, Cornford P, Mottet N, MacLennan SJ, N'Dow J, Briganti A, MacLennan S, Van Hemelrijck M. Updating and Integrating Core Outcome Sets for Localised, Locally Advanced, Metastatic, and Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update from the PIONEER Consortium. Eur Urol 2022; 81:503-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
29
|
Kupski T, Małek M, Mor I. The association of a risk group with positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology examination after robotic radical prostatectomy. Cent European J Urol 2022; 74:491-495. [PMID: 35083067 PMCID: PMC8771131 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of a positive margin in the intraoperative and final pathology depending on the risk group for biochemical recurrence in biopsy specimens after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP) with sparing of the neurovascular bundles (NS). Material and methods The study was prospective and non-randomised. The intraoperative and final pathology examinations were performed in 65 consecutive patients treated with RaRP between 11.2019–08.2020. In the intraoperative examination, the site of the dissected neurovascular bundles and any suspicious places were examined. Patients were divided into 3 risk groups [according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) biochemical recurrence-risk stratification]. Due to the uncertain prognostic value of microscopic positive margins, 3 groups were identified: R0, Rmicro and R1. Results In the intraoperative examination, the distribution of risk groups in R0, Rmicro and R1 groups is similar (p = 0.132). In the postoperative study, the distribution of risk groups in each margin group is different, and is statistically significant (p <0.001). It has been shown that an increase in the risk group is an indicator of the occurrence of a positive margin in the final histopathological result regardless of the inclusion of Rmicro into R1 or into R0 by 2.68 and 6.52 times, respectively. Conclusions The preoperative risk group is an important factor for the occurrence of a positive margin, but only in the final examination and not in the intraoperative one. An intraoperative examination of the neurovascular bundles only is pointless and should be extended to the examination of the apex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Kupski
- Mazovia Hospital Warsaw, Department of Urology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Małek
- Mazovia Hospital Warsaw, Department of Urology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Igal Mor
- Mazovia Hospital Warsaw, Department of Urology, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trofa DP, Constant M, Crutchfield CR, Dantzker NJ, Saltzman BM, Lynch TS, Ahmad CS. Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211055726. [PMID: 34881347 PMCID: PMC8646802 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211055726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendons are common graft choices, but no study has analyzed the existing literature to assess whether one graft is superior to the other. Purpose To systematically report on the outcomes of UCL reconstruction using palmaris and hamstring autografts. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods A combination of the terms "ulnar collateral ligament," "valgus instability," "Tommy John surgery," "hamstring," and "palmaris longus" were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. RTS and return-to-same-level (RSL) rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were included for analysis. We used the modified Coleman Methodology Score and risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized studies to assess the quality of the included studies. Results This review included 6 studies (combined total of 2154 elbows) that directly compared palmaris and hamstring graft use in UCL reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 80.4 months, and the mean patient age across all studies was 21.8 years. The mean RSL across all studies and grafts was 79.0%, and the mean RTS was 84.1%, consistent with results previously reported in the literature. The mean RTS and RSL rates for the palmaris graft group were 84.6% and 82%, respectively; the hamstring graft group showed mean RTS and RSL rates of 80.8% and 80.8%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in RSL between the 2 graft groups (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46). The combined complication rate of the included studies was 18.2%, with failure rates ranging from 0% to 7.1%. Conclusion Results of this review indicated that both palmaris and hamstring tendon grafts are viable options for primary UCL reconstruction. Graft choice should be determined by a combination of patient and surgeon preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Trofa
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Constant
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Connor R Crutchfield
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas J Dantzker
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bryan M Saltzman
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - T Sean Lynch
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher S Ahmad
- Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Torrent-Sellens J, Jiménez-Zarco AI, Saigí-Rubió F. Do People Trust in Robot-Assisted Surgery? Evidence from Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:12519. [PMID: 34886244 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
(1) Background: The goal of the paper was to establish the factors that influence how people feel about having a medical operation performed on them by a robot. (2) Methods: Data were obtained from a 2017 Flash Eurobarometer (number 460) of the European Commission with 27,901 citizens aged 15 years and over in the 28 countries of the European Union. Logistic regression (odds ratios, OR) to model the predictors of trust in robot-assisted surgery was calculated through motivational factors, using experience and sociodemographic independent variables. (3) Results: The results obtained indicate that, as the experience of using robots increases, the predictive coefficients related to information, attitude, and perception of robots become more negative. Furthermore, sociodemographic variables played an important predictive role. The effect of experience on trust in robots for surgical interventions was greater among men, people between 40 and 54 years old, and those with higher educational levels. (4) Conclusions: The results show that trust in robots goes beyond rational decision-making, since the final decision about whether it should be a robot that performs a complex procedure like a surgical intervention depends almost exclusively on the patient’s wishes.
Collapse
|
32
|
Clarke CS, Vindrola-Padros C, Levermore C, Ramsay AIG, Black GB, Pritchard-Jones K, Hines J, Smith G, Bex A, Mughal M, Shackley D, Melnychuk M, Morris S, Fulop NJ, Hunter RM. How to Cost the Implementation of Major System Change for Economic Evaluations: Case Study Using Reconfigurations of Specialist Cancer Surgery in Part of London, England. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021; 19:797-810. [PMID: 34009523 PMCID: PMC8547208 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00660-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have been published regarding the impact of major system change (MSC) on care quality and outcomes, but few evaluate implementation costs or include them in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). This is despite large potential costs of MSC: change planning, purchasing or repurposing assets, and staff time. Implementation costs can influence implementation decisions. We describe our framework and principles for costing MSC implementation and illustrate them using a case study. METHODS We outlined MSC implementation stages and identified components, using a framework conceived during our work on MSC in stroke services. We present a case study of MSC of specialist surgery services for prostate, bladder, renal and oesophagogastric cancers, focusing on North Central and North East London and West Essex. Health economists collaborated with qualitative researchers, clinicians and managers, identifying key reconfiguration stages and expenditures. Data sources (n = approximately 100) included meeting minutes, interviews, and business cases. National Health Service (NHS) finance and service managers and clinicians were consulted. Using bottom-up costing, items were identified, and unit costs based on salaries, asset costs and consultancy fees assigned. Itemised costs were adjusted and summed. RESULTS Cost components included options appraisal, bidding process, external review; stakeholder engagement events; planning/monitoring boards/meetings; and making the change: new assets, facilities, posts. Other considerations included hospital tariff changes; costs to patients; patient population; and lifetime of changes. Using the framework facilitated data identification and collection. The total adjusted implementation cost was estimated at £7.2 million, broken down as replacing robots (£4.0 million), consultancy fees (£1.9 million), staff time costs (£1.1 million) and other costs (£0.2 million). CONCLUSIONS These principles can be used by funders, service providers and commissioners planning MSC and researchers evaluating MSC. Health economists should be involved early, alongside qualitative and health-service colleagues, as retrospective capture risks information loss. These analyses are challenging; many cost factors are difficult to identify, access and measure, and assumptions regarding lifetime of the changes are important. Including implementation costs in CEA might make MSC appear less cost effective, influencing future decisions. Future work will incorporate this implementation cost into the full CEAs of the London Cancer MSC. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Claire Levermore
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angus I G Ramsay
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Georgia B Black
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kathy Pritchard-Jones
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Partners Academic Health Science Network, London, UK
| | - John Hines
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- London Cancer, University College London, Cancer Collaborative, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Axel Bex
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Muntzer Mughal
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Shackley
- Greater Manchester Cancer, (hosted by) Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mariya Melnychuk
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Naomi J Fulop
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael M Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cheng LJ, Soon SS, Tan TW, Tan CH, Lim TSK, Tay KJ, Loke WT, Ang B, Chiong E, Ng K. Cost-effectiveness of MRI targeted biopsy strategies for diagnosing prostate cancer in Singapore. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:909. [PMID: 34479565 PMCID: PMC8414680 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06916-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of six diagnostic strategies involving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy for diagnosing prostate cancer in initial and repeat biopsy settings from the Singapore healthcare system perspective. METHODS A combined decision tree and Markov model was developed. The starting model population was men with mean age of 65 years referred for a first prostate biopsy due to clinical suspicion of prostate cancer. The six diagnostic strategies were selected for their relevance to local clinical practice. They comprised MRI targeted biopsy following a positive pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) [Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥ 3], systematic biopsy, or saturation biopsy employed in different testing combinations and sequences. Deterministic base case analyses with sensitivity analyses were performed using costs from the healthcare system perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained as the outcome measure to yield incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS Deterministic base case analyses showed that Strategy 1 (MRI targeted biopsy alone), Strategy 2 (MRI targeted biopsy ➔ systematic biopsy), and Strategy 4 (MRI targeted biopsy ➔ systematic biopsy ➔ saturation biopsy) were cost-effective options at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$20,000, with ICERs ranging from US$18,975 to US$19,458. Strategies involving MRI targeted biopsy in the repeat biopsy setting were dominated. Sensitivity analyses found the ICERs were affected mostly by changes to the annual discounting rate and prevalence of prostate cancer in men referred for first biopsy, ranging between US$15,755 to US$23,022. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed Strategy 1 to be the least costly, and Strategies 2 and 4 being the preferred strategies when WTP thresholds were US$20,000 and US$30,000, respectively. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS This study found MRI targeted biopsy to be cost-effective in diagnosing prostate cancer in the biopsy-naïve setting in Singapore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Jen Cheng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Swee Sung Soon
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore
| | - Teck Wei Tan
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Tim Loke
- Urology Service, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bertrand Ang
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kwong Ng
- Agency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, 16 College Road, Singapore, 169854, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Durand M, Bentellis I, Shaikh A, Barthe F, Imbert de la Phalecque L, Tibi B, Ahallal Y, Elleboode B, Guepratte C, Acloque D, Lechevallier E, Chevallier D. Évaluation médico-economique de l’impact de mesures d’adaptation au virage de la chirurgie robot-assistée en urologie. Prog Urol 2021; 32:205-216. [PMID: 34154963 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The development of robot-assisted urological surgery is held back by the lack of robust medico-economic analyses and their heterogeneity. We conducted a medico-economic study to evaluate the implementation of measures to optimize the transition to robotic surgery. METHOD We carried out a single-center, controlled study from the point of view of the public healthcare establishment for 4 years. Economic data collection was based on a micro-costing method and revenues from stay-related groups. Clinical data corresponded to mean lengths of stay, operating duration, complications and stays in intensive care. The measures to optimize the transition to robotic, implemented mid-study period, enabled before/after comparison. RESULTS Altogether, 668 patients undergoing robotic surgery were included. Robotic activity increased significantly from periods 1 to 2 to 256% (P=<0.001) as did the overall proportion of robotic by 45% to 85% (P=<0.001). The mean lengths of stay fell significantly, 6.8 d vs. 5.1 d (P<0.001). Costs and revenues increased significantly, resulting in a persistent deficit for the activity €226K vs. €382K (P=<0.001). With increased volume of activity, the deficit per operation and the cost per minute of robotic operating room fell significantly, €3,284 vs. €1,474/procedure (P=<0.001) and €27 vs €24/min (P=<0.029), tending towards a break-even point (=zero deficit) at 430 operations per year. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted surgery can be significantly optimized by implementing measures for the robotic turn to reach a break-even point at 430 operations per year. A better multidisciplinary case mix could lower the break-even volume of activity in short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Durand
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice; Inserm U1081 - CNRS UMR 7284 Université de Nice Côte d'Azur.
| | - I Bentellis
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| | - A Shaikh
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| | - F Barthe
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| | | | - B Tibi
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| | - Y Ahallal
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| | | | | | - D Acloque
- Service de contrôle de Gestion, CHU de Nice
| | - E Lechevallier
- Service d'Urologie et Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital de la Conception, APHM - Aix-Marseille Université - Campus Timone - Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, boulevard J Moulin, 13385 Marseille
| | - D Chevallier
- Service d'Urologie, Andrologie, Transplantation Rénale, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lindenberg MMA, Retèl VVP, Kieffer JJM, Wijburg CC, Fossion LLMCL, van der Poel HHG, van Harten WWH. Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2658-2666. [PMID: 34140189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals. METHODS Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume. RESULTS 1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01). CONCLUSION RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie M A Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Valesca V P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobien J M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carl C Wijburg
- Department of Urology - Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wim W H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
MacLennan S, Williamson PR. The need for core outcome sets in urological cancer research. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2832-2835. [PMID: 34295767 PMCID: PMC8261447 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Methodology Committee, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Paula R Williamson
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Van den Broeck T, Oprea-Lager D, Moris L, Kailavasan M, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Gandaglia G, Gillessen Sommer S, Grummet JP, Grivas N, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason M, O'Hanlon S, Pecanka J, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Mottet N. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 80:531-545. [PMID: 33962808 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review on the association between surgeon or hospital volume and oncological and nononcological outcomes following RP for PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. All comparative studies for nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP published between January 1990 and May 2020 were included. For inclusion, studies had to compare hospital or surgeon volume, defined as caseload per unit time. Main outcomes included oncological (including prostate-specific antigen persistence, positive surgical margin [PSM], biochemical recurrence, local and distant recurrence, and cancer-specific and overall survival) and nononcological (perioperative complications including need for blood transfusion, conversion to open procedure and within 90-d death, and continence and erectile function) outcomes. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were undertaken. Both a narrative and a quantitative synthesis were planned if the data allowed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Sixty retrospective comparative studies were included. Generally, increasing surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with lower rates of mortality, PSM, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. Combining group size cut-offs as used in the included studies, the median threshold for hospital volume at which outcomes start to diverge is 86 (interquartile range [IQR] 35-100) cases per year. In addition, above this threshold, the higher the caseload, the better the outcomes, especially for PSM. RoB and confounding were high for most domains. CONCLUSIONS Higher surgeon and hospital volumes for RP are associated with lower rates of PSMs, adjuvant or salvage therapies, and perioperative complications. This association becomes apparent from a caseload of >86 (IQR 35-100) per year and may further improve hereafter. Both high- and low-volume centres should measure their outcomes, make them publicly available, and improve their quality of care if needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to determine whether the number of prostate cancer operations (radical prostatectomy) performed in a hospital affects the outcomes of surgery. We found that, overall, hospitals with a higher number of operations per year have better outcomes in terms of cancer recurrence and complications during or after hospitalisation. However, it must be noted that surgeons working in hospitals with lower annual operations can still achieve similar or even better outcomes. Therefore, making hospital's outcome data publicly available should be promoted internationally, so that patients can make an informed decision where they want to be treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen Sommer
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Thomas B L Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôspital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zamora-ortiz P, Carral-alvaro J, Valera Á, Pulloquinga JL, Escarabajal RJ, Mata V. Identification of Inertial Parameters for Position and Force Control of Surgical Assistance Robots. Mathematics 2021; 9:773. [DOI: 10.3390/math9070773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Surgeries or rehabilitation exercises are hazardous tasks for a mechanical system, as the device has to interact with parts of the human body without the hands-on experience that the surgeon or physiotherapist acquires over time. For various gynecological laparoscopic surgeries, such as laparoscopic hysterectomy or laparoscopic pelvic endometriosis, Uterine Manipulators are used. These medical devices allow the uterus to be suitably mobilized. A gap needs to be filled in terms of the precise handling of this type of devices. In this sense, this manuscript first describes the mathematical procedure to identify the inertial parameters of uterine manipulators. These parameters are needed to establish an accurate position and force control for an electromechanical system to assist surgical operations. The method for identifying the mass and the center of mass of the manipulator is based on the solution of the equations for the static equilibrium of rigid solids. Based on the manipulator inertial parameter estimation, the paper shows how the force exerted by the manipulator can be obtained. For this purpose, it solves a matrix system composed of the torques and forces of the manipulator. Different manipulators have been used, and it has been verified that the mathematical procedures proposed in this work allow us to calculate in an accurate and efficient way the force exerted by these manipulators.
Collapse
|
39
|
Mueller JL, Rozman N, Sunassee ED, Gupta A, Schuval C, Biswas A, Knight B, Kulkarni S, Brown M, Ramanujam N, Fitzgerald TN. An Accessible Laparoscope for Surgery in Low- and Middle- Income Countries. Ann Biomed Eng 2021; 49:1657-69. [PMID: 33686617 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02707-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery is the standard of care in high-income countries for many procedures in the chest and abdomen. It avoids large incisions by using a tiny camera and fine instruments manipulated through keyhole incisions, but it is generally unavailable in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to the high cost of installment, lack of qualified maintenance personnel, unreliable electricity, and shortage of consumable items. Patients in LMICs would benefit from laparoscopic surgery, as advantages include decreased pain, improved recovery time, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. To address this need, we developed an accessible laparoscopic system, called the ReadyView laparoscope for use in LMICs. The device includes an integrated camera and LED light source that can be displayed on any monitor. The ReadyView laparoscope was evaluated with standard optical imaging targets to determine its performance against a state-of-the-art commercial laparoscope. The ReadyView laparoscope has a comparable resolving power, lens distortion, field of view, depth of field, and color reproduction accuracy to a commercially available endoscope, particularly at shorter, commonly-used working distances (3-5 cm). Additionally, the ReadyView has a cooler temperature profile, decreasing the risk for tissue injury and operating room fires. The ReadyView features a waterproof design, enabling sterilization by submersion, as commonly performed in LMICs. A custom desktop software was developed to view the video on a laptop computer with a frame rate greater than 30 frames per second and to white balance the image, which is critical for clinical use. The ReadyView laparoscope is capable of providing the image quality and overall performance needed for laparoscopic surgery. This portable low-cost system is well suited to increase access to laparoscopic surgery in LMICs.
Collapse
|
40
|
McBride K, Steffens D, Stanislaus C, Solomon M, Anderson T, Thanigasalam R, Leslie S, Bannon PG. Detailed cost of robotic-assisted surgery in the Australian public health sector: from implementation to a multi-specialty caseload. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:108. [PMID: 33522941 PMCID: PMC7849115 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06105-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A barrier to the uptake of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to be the perceived high costs. A lack of detailed costing information has made it difficult for public hospitals in particular to determine whether use of the technology is justified. This study aims to provide a detailed description of the patient episode costs and the contribution of RAS specific costs for multiple specialties in the public sector. Methods A retrospective descriptive costing review of all RAS cases undertaken at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia from August 2016 to December 2018 was completed. This included RAS cases within benign gynaecology, cardiothoracic, colorectal and urology, with the total costs described utilizing various inpatient costing data, and RAS specific implementation, maintenance and consumable costs. Results Of 211 RAS patients, substantial variation was found between specialties with the overall median cost per patient being $19,269 (Interquartile range (IQR): $15,445 to $32,199). The RAS specific costs were $8828 (46%) made up of fixed costs including $4691 (24%) implementation and $2290 (12%) maintenance, both of which are volume dependent; and $1848 (10%) RAS consumable costs. This was in the context of 37% robotic theatre utilisation. Conclusions There is considerable variation across surgical specialties for the cost of RAS. It is important to highlight the different cost components and drivers associated with a RAS program including its dependence on volume and how it fits within funding systems in the public sector. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06105-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate McBride
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. .,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christina Stanislaus
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Teresa Anderson
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ruban Thanigasalam
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul G Bannon
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Baird Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chang SC, Chen HM, Wu SY. There Are No Differences in Positive Surgical Margin Rates or Biochemical Failure-Free Survival among Patients Receiving Open, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study from the National Cancer Database. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:E106. [PMID: 33396327 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Few studies have evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and largest study to examine PSM and BFS rates in patients with PC undergoing open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP. After adjustment for confounders, no significant differences in PSM or BFS were noted among the patient groups. Abstract Purpose: To estimate the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical failure–free survival (BFS) among patients with prostate cancer (PC) receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: The patients were men enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry diagnosed as having PC without distant metastasis who received RP. After adjustment for confounders, logistic regression was used to model the risk of PSM following RP. After adjustment for confounders, Cox proportional regression was used to model the time from the index (i.e., surgical) date to biochemical recurrence. Results: The adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) of PSM risk after propensity score adjustment for laparoscopic versus open, robotic versus open, and robotic versus laparoscopic RP 95% CIs were 1.25 (0.88 to 1.77; p = 0.2064), 1.16 (0.88 to 1.53; p = 0.2847), and 0.93 (0.70 to 1.24; p = 0.6185), respectively. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) of risk of biochemical failure after propensity score adjustment were 1.16 (0.93 to 1.47; p = 0.1940), 1.10 (0.83 to 1.47; p = 0.5085), and 0.95 (0.74 to 1.21; p = 0.6582). Conclusions: No significant differences in PSM or BFS were observed among patients receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic RP.
Collapse
|
42
|
Garfjeld Roberts P, Glasbey JC, Abram S, Osei‐Bordom D, Bach SP, Beard DJ. Research quality and transparency, outcome measurement and evidence for safety and effectiveness in robot-assisted surgery: systematic review. BJS Open 2020; 4:1084-1099. [PMID: 33052029 PMCID: PMC7709372 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has potential panspecialty surgical benefits. High-quality evidence for widespread implementation is lacking. This systematic review aimed to assess the RAS evidence base for the quality of randomized evidence on safety and effectiveness, specialty 'clustering', and outcomes for RAS research. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines. All pathologies and procedures utilizing RAS were included. Studies were limited to RCTs, the English language and publication within the last decade. The main outcomes selected for the review design were safety and efficacy, and study purpose. Secondary outcomes were study characteristics, funding and governance. RESULTS Searches identified 7142 titles, from which 183 RCTs were identified for data extraction. The commonest specialty was urology (35·0 per cent). There were just 76 unique study populations, indicating significant overlap of publications; 103 principal studies were assessed further. Only 64·1 per cent of studies reported a primary outcome measure, with 29·1 per cent matching their registration/protocol. Safety was assessed in 68·9 per cent of trials; operative complications were the commonest measure. Forty-eight per cent of trials reported no significant difference in safety between RAS and comparator, and 11 per cent reported RAS to be superior. Efficacy or effectiveness was assessed in 80·6 per cent of trials; 43 per cent of trials showed no difference between RAS and comparator, and 24 per cent reported that RAS was superior. Funding was declared in 47·6 per cent of trials. CONCLUSION The evidence base for RAS is of limited quality and variable transparency in reporting. No patterns of harm to patients were identified. RAS has potential to be beneficial, but requires continued high-quality evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Garfjeld Roberts
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesUniversity of OxfordUK
| | | | - S. Abram
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesUniversity of OxfordUK
| | | | - S. P. Bach
- Academic Department of SurgeryUK
- Diagnostics, Drugs, Devices and Biomarkers (D3B) and University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
| | - D. J. Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal SciencesUniversity of OxfordUK
- Royal College of Surgeons Surgical Intervention Trials UnitOxfordUK
- Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2020; 79:243-262. [PMID: 33172724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1376] [Impact Index Per Article: 344.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2020 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2016 and 2020. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. Risk-adapted screening should be offered to men at increased risk from the age of 45 yr and to breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers, who have been confirmed to be at risk of early and aggressive disease (mainly BRAC2), from around 40 yr of age. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is performed, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsies must be offered. There is currently no place for the routine use of tissue-based biomarkers. Whilst prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography is the most sensitive staging procedure, the lack of outcome benefit remains a major limitation. Active surveillance (AS) should always be discussed with low-risk patients, as well as with selected intermediate-risk patients with favourable International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the AS journey and the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A strong recommendation to consider moderate hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for their use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY Updated prostate cancer guidelines are presented, addressing screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. These guidelines rely on the available scientific evidence, and new insights will need to be considered and included on a regular basis. In some cases, the supporting evidence for new treatment options is not yet strong enough to provide a recommendation, which is why continuous updating is important. Patients must be fully informed of all relevant options and, together with their treating physicians, decide on the most optimal management for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Caulfield North, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm D Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Javanbakht M, Mashayekhi A, Trevor M, Branagan-Harris M, Atkinson J. Cost-utility analysis of normothermic liver perfusion with the OrganOx metra compared to static cold storage in the United Kingdom. J Med Econ 2020; 23:1284-1292. [PMID: 32729749 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1804391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising numbers of patients on the liver transplant waiting list has led to the utilization of organs from higher-risk donors that are more likely to be discarded and are prone to post-transplant complications. Storage and transportation of these livers at low temperatures can cause damage. OrganOx metra is a portable device intended to preserve and maintain the donated liver in normothermic conditions for up to 24 h prior to transplantation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-utility of normothermic machine perfusion with OrganOx metra in liver transplantation compared to the current practice of static cold storage (SCS). METHODS A de novo decision analytic model (a decision tree along with a Markov model), based on current treatment pathways, was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes. Results from a randomized clinical trial and national standard sources were used to inform the model. Costs were estimated from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to explore uncertainty surrounding input parameters. RESULTS Over a lifetime time horizon, liver transplantation with OrganOx metra was more costly and more effective than the current practice of static cold storage. The total costs per patient were £37,370 vs £46,711, and the total effectiveness per patient was 9.09 QALYs vs 10.27 QALYs for SCS and OrganOx metra groups, respectively. The estimated ICER was £7,876 per each QALY gained. Results from the PSA showed that use of OrganOx metra has 99% probability of being cost-effective at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. OrganOx metra led to the utilization of 54 additional livers with patients experiencing lower rates of early allograft dysfunction and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Use of OrganOx metra for the perfusion and transportation of livers prior to transplantation is a cost-effective strategy. KEY POINTS FOR DECISION MAKERS Introduction of OrganOx metra into NHS could increase the utilisation of donated livers with patients experiencing lower rates of early allograft dysfunction and adverse events, compared with current practice. Results of the economic analysis indicate that the OrganOx metra is highly likely to be cost-effective and result in improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Javanbakht
- Optimax Access UK Ltd, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Atefeh Mashayekhi
- Optimax Access UK Ltd, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Miranda Trevor
- School of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Michael Branagan-Harris
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Jowan Atkinson
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rozet F, Mongiat-artus P, Hennequin C, Beauval J, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-hankard G, Mathieu R, Ploussard G, Renard-penna R, Brenot-rossi I, Bruyere F, Cochet A, Crehange G, Cussenot O, Lebret T, Rebillard X, Soulié M, Brureau L, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de cancérologie de l’AFU – actualisation 2020–2022 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2020; 30:S136-251. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30752-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
46
|
Du X, Zhang Y, Boulgouris N, Brett PN, Mitchell-Innes A, Coulson C, Irving R, Begg P. Noise Exposure on Human Cochlea During Cochleostomy Formation Using Conventional and a Hand Guided Robotic Drill. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:e829-35. [PMID: 32558760 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the disturbance induced in the cochlea during cochleostomy using conventional drill and a hand guided robotic drill. STUDY DESIGN The study is based on experimental measurements using the Laser Doppler Vibrometer during the drilling processes converted to Sound Pressure Levels (SPL) for comparison. SETTING The study is based on experimental results of three sets of cochleostomies on human cadaver heads. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Robotic drilling, in comparison to the conventional drilling method, creates a consistently lower level of disturbance in cochlea across the hearing frequency range. RESULTS Robotic drilling, in comparison to the conventional drilling method, creates a consistently lower level of disturbance in cochlea across the hearing frequency range. CONCLUSIONS It is reasonable to conclude that robotic drilling has a lower possibility of creating acoustic trauma in cochlea that endangers the residual hearing of patients.
Collapse
|
47
|
Maberley DAL, Beelen M, Smit J, Meenink T, Naus G, Wagner C, de Smet MD. A comparison of robotic and manual surgery for internal limiting membrane peeling. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020; 258:773-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04613-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
48
|
Donnely E, Griffin MF, Butler PE. Robotic Surgery: A Novel Approach for Breast Surgery and Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8:e2578. [PMID: 32095394 PMCID: PMC7015621 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both the US and UK female population, a prominent cause of morbidity and cost to both health services. All surgically fit patients are offered breast reconstruction following the initial surgery, and this is traditionally an open approach: either implant-based or an autologous tissue flap. Both lead to scarring that is difficult to conceal. This paper aims to evaluate the novel minimally invasive technique of robotic-assisted surgery. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Medline (OvidSP) and Embase (OvidSP) to evaluate the current application of robotic-assisted surgery in breast surgery and reconstruction. Results: Twenty-one articles were identified and discussed, composing of level 4 and 5 evidence comparing different surgeons' experiences, techniques, and outcomes. To date, the robotic system has been utilized to harvest the latissimus dorsi muscle for use as a tissue flap (total harvest time of 92 minutes), to perform nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (total operation time 85 minutes) and lately to harvest a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap via an intraabdominal approach. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery can successfully and reproducibly perform a nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. It can minimize the size of scarring and is superior to the laparoscopic technique, with improved 3-dimensional visualization, dexterity, and range of motion able to guide around the curvature of the breast. The main limiting factors are the lack of the US Food and Drug Administration approval, cost of the robot, and specialized skills required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Donnely
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michelle F Griffin
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Peter E Butler
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Expensive technologies-including robotic surgery-experience rapid adoption without evidence of superior outcomes. Although previous studies have examined perioperative outcomes and costs, differences in out-of-pocket costs for patients undergoing robotic surgery are not well understood. OBJECTIVE To assess out-of-pocket costs and total payments for 5 types of common oncologic procedures that can be performed using an open or robotic approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective, cross-sectional, propensity score-weighted analysis was performed using deidentified insurance claims for 1.9 million enrollees from the MarketScan database from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. The final study sample comprised 15 893 US adults aged 18 to 64 years who were enrolled in an employer-sponsored health plan. Patients underwent either an open or robotic radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, partial colectomy, radical nephrectomy, or partial nephrectomy for a solid-organ malignant neoplasm. Statistical analysis was performed from December 18, 2018, to June 5, 2019. EXPOSURES Type of surgical procedure-robotic vs open. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome of interest was out-of-pocket costs associated with robotic and open surgery. The secondary outcome of interest was associated total payments. RESULTS Among 15 893 patients (11 102 men; mean [SD] age, 55.4 [6.6] years), 8260 underwent robotic and 7633 underwent open procedures; patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy were older than those undergoing open hysterectomy (mean [SD] age, 55.7 [6.7] vs 54.6 [7.2] years), and patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy had more comorbidities than those undergoing robotic radical nephrectomy (≥2 comorbidities, 658 of 861 [76.4%] vs 244 of 347 [70.3%]). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all procedures: -$137.75 (95% CI, -$240.24 to -$38.63) for radical prostatectomy (P = .006); -$640.63 (95% CI, -$933.62 to -$368.79) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$1140.54 (95% CI, -$1397.79 to -$896.54) for partial colectomy (P < .001); -$728.32 (95% CI, -$1126.90 to -$366.08) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$302.74 (95% CI, -$523.14 to -$97.10) for partial nephrectomy (P = .003). The robotic approach was similarly associated with lower adjusted total payments: -$3872.62 (95% CI, -$5385.49 to -$2399.04) for radical prostatectomy (P < .001); -$29 640.69 (95% CI, -$36 243.82 to -$23 465.94) for hysterectomy (P < .001); -$38 151.74 (95% CI, -$46 386.16 to -$30 346.22) for partial colectomy; (P < .001); -$33 394.15 (95% CI, -$42 603.03 to -$24 955.20) for radical nephrectomy (P < .001); and -$9162.52 (95% CI, -$12 728.33 to -$5781.99) for partial nephrectomy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found significant variation in perioperative costs according to surgical technique for both patients (out-of-pocket costs) and payers (total payments); the robotic approach was associated with lower out-of-pocket costs for all studied oncologic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junaid Nabi
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David F. Friedlander
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xi Chen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander P. Cole
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Medical Research Council Centre for Transplantation, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|