1
|
Gogayeva OK. Algorithms of Perioperative Management of High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Polymorbidity. UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2023. [DOI: 10.30702/ujcvs/23.31(01)/g005-1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
The aim. To analyze the effectiveness of the developed algorithms for the perioperative management of high-risk cardiac surgery patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and polymorbidity.
Materials and methods. We analyzed perioperative management of 354 high-risk cardiac surgery patients with CAD with EuroSCORE II predicted mortality >5%, among which 194 (54.8%) underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, and 160 (45.2%) had surgical myocardial revascularization with accompanying valvular pathology correction or left ventricular postinfarction aneurysm resection. All the patients were discharged after cardiac surgery performed at the Department of Surgical Treatment of CAD of the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine in the period from 2009 to 2019. As part of the study, general clinical examinations, electrocardiography, echocardiography, coronary angiography, cardiosurgical treatment were provided, and perioperative patient management protocols were developed and implemented.
Results. Based on the conducted detailed analysis, it was established that the success of surgical revascularization of the myocardium depends not only on cardiac factors, but also on the compensation of concomitant diseases, the work of an experienced cardiac team consisting of a cardiologist, an interventionist, an anesthesiologist, a cardiac surgeon, and an intensivist. Treatment and prevention measures should be personalized and aimed at timely response to changes in laboratory and hemodynamic indicators of patients at all stages of their management, as well as stabilization of concomitant diseases. An important point in the preoperative preparation of cardiac surgery patients is verification of concomitant diseases with the aim of their timely compensation. The implemented algorithm for searching for comorbid conditions made it possible to improve the diagnosis of initial disorders of glucose metabolism, abnormal uric acid levels and cerebrovascular disease. Lowering the glucose level according to the developed algorithm of management of patients with impaired glucose metabolism in the perioperative period made it possible to reduce the number of postoperative wound infections by 3.4% and arrhythmological complications by 19.4%. Correction of drug therapy taking into account the glomerular filtration rate made it possible to avoid postoperative hemodialysis. Preventive prescription of therapeutic doses of proton pump inhibitors against the background of dual antiplatelet therapy, according to the developed protocol, led to a decrease in postoperative gastroduodenal complications from 5.1% to 0.3%.
Conclusions. Implementation of the system of personalized treatment and preventive management of patients in the perioperative period made it possible to reduce postoperative complications from 16.7% to 4% (p=0.0190).
Collapse
|
2
|
Mauldon H, Dieberg G, Smart N, King N. Effect of Age on Clinical Outcomes Following On-/Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 35:797-814. [PMID: 33118746 PMCID: PMC7598957 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective There is currently much debate about which patients would benefit more after on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this meta-analysis and meta-regression is to investigate the effect of age on short-term clinical outcomes after these approaches. Methods To identify potential studies, systematic searches were carried out in the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The search strategy included the key concepts of “cardiopulmonary bypass” AND “coronary artery bypass grafting” AND “off pump” OR “on pump”. This was followed by a meta-analysis and meta-regression investigating the effect of age on the incidences of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality. Results Thirty-seven studies including 15,324 participants were analysed. Overall, there was a significant odds reduction for patients receiving off-pump CABG suffering a stroke (odds ratio [OR] 0.770, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.594, 0.998, P=0.048); however, when patients were subdivided according to different age bands, this difference disappeared. There were also no significant differences in the odds of mortality (OR 0.876, 95% CI 0.703, 1.093, P=0.241) or MI (OR 0.937, 95% CI 0.795, 1.105, P=0.439). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant relationship between age and stroke (P=0.652), age and mortality (P=548), and age and MI (P=0.464). Conclusion Patients undergoing CABG are becoming older and may suffer from multiple comorbidities increasing their risk profile. However, with respect to short-term clinical outcomes, the patient’s age does not help in determining whether off- or on-pump is superior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Mauldon
- University of Plymouth Ringgold Standard Institution Plymouth United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland University of Plymouth, Ringgold Standard Institution, Plymouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Gudrun Dieberg
- University of New England Ringgold Standard Institution Armidale Australia University of New England, Ringgold Standard Institution, Armidale, Australia
| | - Neil Smart
- University of New England Ringgold Standard Institution Armidale Australia University of New England, Ringgold Standard Institution, Armidale, Australia
| | - Nicola King
- University of Plymouth Ringgold Standard Institution Plymouth United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland University of Plymouth, Ringgold Standard Institution, Plymouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carroll C, Tattersall A. Research and Policy Impact of Trials Published by the UK National Institute of Health Research (2006-2015). VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:727-733. [PMID: 32540230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Health technology assessment aims to inform and support healthcare decision making, and trials are part of that process. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a sample of trials in a meaningful but robust fashion. METHODS All randomized controlled trials funded and published by the UK National Institute of Health Research in the Health Technology Assessment journal series and other peer-reviewed journals were identified for 2006 to 2015. Citation analysis was performed for all trials, and quantitative content analysis was undertaken on a purposive sample to determine whether impact could be categorized as "instrumental" (ie, having a clear influence on key research and policy publications). RESULTS The search identified 133 relevant trials. The citation rate per trial was 102.97. Of the 133 trials, 129 (98%) were cited in 1 or more systematic reviews or meta-analyses (mean per trial = 7.18, range = 0-44). Where they were cited, the trials were used in some form of synthesis 63% of the time. Ninety-one of the 133 (68%) trials were found to be cited in 1 or more guidance or policy document (mean per trial = 2.75, range = 0-26) and had an instrumental influence 41% of the time. The publication of these trials' results in journals other than the Health Technology Assessment journal appears to enhance the discoverability of the trial data. Altmetric.com proved to be very useful in identifying unique policy and guidance documents. CONCLUSION These trials have impressive citation rates, and a sizeable proportion are certainly being used in key publications in a genuinely instrumental manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Carroll
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Andy Tattersall
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaudino M, Fremes SE, Ruel M, Di Franco A, Di Mauro M, Chikwe J, Frati G, Girardi LN, Taggart DP, Biondi-Zoccai G. Prevalence and Impact of Treatment Crossover in Cardiac Surgery Randomized Trials: A Meta-Epidemiologic Study. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8:e013711. [PMID: 31663420 PMCID: PMC6898839 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.013711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Crossover dilutes treatment effect and reduces statistical power of intention-to-treat analysis. We examined incidence and impact on cardiac surgery randomized controlled trial (RCT) outcomes of crossover from experimental to control interventions, or vice versa. Methods and Results MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched, and RCTs (≥100 patients) comparing ≥2 adult cardiac surgical interventions were included. Crossover from the initial treatment assignment and relative risks (RRs) for each trial's primary end point and mortality at longest available follow-up were extracted. All RRs were calculated as >1 favored control group and <1 favored experimental arm. Primary outcome was the effect estimate for primary end point of each RCT, and secondary outcome was all-cause mortality; both were appraised as RR at the longest follow-up available. Sixty articles reporting on 47 RCTs (25 440 patients) were identified. Median crossover rate from experimental to control group was 7.0% (first quartile, 2.0%; third quartile, 9.7%), whereas from control to experimental group, the rate was 1.3% (first quartile, 0%; third quartile, 3.6%). RRs for primary end point and mortality were higher in RCTs with higher crossover rate from experimental to control group (RR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.94-1.07] versus RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.97] and RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.11] versus RR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.82-1.07], respectively). Crossover from control to experimental group did not alter effect estimates for primary end point or mortality (RR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.63-1.05] versus RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86-1.04] and RR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.73-1.07] versus RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09], respectively). Conclusions Crossover from experimental to control group is associated with outcomes of cardiac surgery RCTs. Crossover should be minimized at designing stage and carefully appraised after study completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY
| | - Stephen E Fremes
- Schulich Heart Centre Division of Cardiac Surgery Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre University of Toronto Ontario Canada
| | - Marc Ruel
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute University of Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | | | | | - Joanna Chikwe
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Stony Brook School of Medicine New York NY.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Mount Sinai Hospital New York NY
| | - Giacomo Frati
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Sapienza University of Rome Latina Italy.,Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (I.R.C.C.S.) Neuromed Pozzilli Italy
| | - Leonard N Girardi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY
| | - David P Taggart
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences University of Oxford United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies Sapienza University of Rome Latina Italy.,Mediterranea Cardiocentro Napoli Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reddy HG, Choi JH, Maynes EJ, Carlson LA, Gordon JS, Horan DP, Khan J, Weber MP, Bodzin AS, Morris RJ, Massey HT, Tchantchaleishvili V. Concomitant vs staged orthotopic liver transplant after cardiac surgical procedures. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2019; 33:231-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
6
|
Ye F, Winchester D, Jansen M, Lee A, Silverstein B, Stalvey C, Khuddus M, Mazza J, Yale S. Assessing Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Recent Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Clin Med Res 2019; 17:11-19. [PMID: 31160474 PMCID: PMC6546278 DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
There is no recent comprehensive overview of contemporary clinical trials assessing short and long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This paper reviews factors from recent clinical trials that influenced prognosis in patients with ACS. Cochrane and PubMed databases were screened systematically for clinical trials published in the English literature reporting on ACS prognosis. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text. Studies meeting inclusion criteria evaluated the impact of modern practice on prognosis. In vitro and animal models studies, conference abstracts, imaging studies, and review articles were excluded. Disagreement in inclusion criteria was resolved by consensus. A large study of 8,859 patients showed no difference in all-cause mortality between 31 days and 2 years in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared to those with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). Other studies showed a significant increase in all-cause mortality in patients with STEMI within the first 30 days, with NSTEMI patients exhibiting a higher mortality rate compared to those with SIHD during the 2-year follow-up period. Our review found that women have a poorer short-term prognosis compared to men. Additionally, reports from patients receiving comprehensive and coordinated care showed longer survival rates. In view of the improved prognosis demonstrated for patients suffering from ACS, assessing prognosis in patients represents a formidable task in modern practice. Our review highlights the need for further evidence-based studies evaluating long-term outcomes on diagnostic and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Ye
- Graduate Medical Education, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL USA
| | - David Winchester
- Department of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL USA
| | | | - Arthur Lee
- The Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Gainesville, FL USA
| | | | - Carolyn Stalvey
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL USA
| | | | - Joseph Mazza
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI USA
| | - Steven Yale
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Litton E, Bass F, Delaney A, Hillis G, Marasco S, McGuinness S, Myles PS, Reid CM, Smith JA, Bagshaw SM, Keri-Anne Cowdrey HB, Frengley R, Ferrier J, Gilder E, Henderson S, Larobina M, Merthens J, Morgan M, Navarra L, Rudas M, Turner L, Reid K, Wise M, Young N, Young P, McGiffin D, Duncan J, Kaczmarek M, Seevanayagam S, Shaw M, Shardey G, Skillington P, Chorley T, Baker L, Zhang B, Bright C, Baker R, Canning N, Gilfillan, Kruger R, Fayers T, Kyte M, Doran C, Smith J, Baxter H, Seah P, Scaybrook S, James A, Goodwin K, Dignan R, Hewitt N, Gerrard K, Curtis L, Smith J, Baxter H, Tiruvoipati R, Broukal N, Wolfenden H, Muir, Worthington M, Wong C, Tatoulis J, Wynne R, Marshman D, Sze D, Wilson M, Turner L, Passage J, Kolybaba M, Fermanis G, Newbon P, Passage J, Kolybaba M, Newcomb A, Mack J, Duve K, Jansz P, Hunter T, Bissaker P, Dennis N, Burke N, Yadav S, Cooper K, Chard R, Halaka M, Tran L, Huq M, Billah B, Reid CM. Six-Month Outcomes After High-Risk Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Preoperative Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Use: An Inception Cohort Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32:2067-2073. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Cook JA, Campbell MK, Gillies K, Skea Z. Surgeons' and methodologists' perceptions of utilising an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design: a qualitative study. Trials 2018; 19:478. [PMID: 30189868 PMCID: PMC6127897 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2832-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely recognised to be the most rigorous way to test new and emerging clinical interventions. When the interventions under study are two different surgical procedures, however, surgeons are required to be trained and sufficiently proficient in the different surgical approaches to take part in such a trial. It is often the case that even where surgeons can perform both trial surgical procedures, they have a preference and/or have more expertise in one of the procedures. The expertise-based trial design, where participating surgeons only provide the procedure in which they have appropriate expertise, has been proposed to overcome this problem. When expertise-based designs should be best used remains unclear; such approaches may be more suited to addressing specific questions. The aim of this qualitative study was to improve understanding about the range of views that surgeons and methodologists have regarding the use of the expertise-based RCT design. METHODS Twelve individual interviews with surgeons and methodologists with experience of surgical trials were conducted. Interviews were semi-structured and conducted face-to-face or by telephone. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed systematically using an interpretive approach. RESULTS Both surgeons and methodologists saw potential advantages in the expertise-based design particularly in terms of surgeons' participation and in trials where the procedures being evaluated were significantly different. The main disadvantages identified were methodological (e.g. the potential for surgeons carrying out one of the trial procedure being systematically different) and operational (e.g. the need to 'transfer' patients between surgeons with potential consequences for the surgeon/patient relationship). CONCLUSION This study suggests that the expertise-based trial design has significant potential to increase surgeon participation in trials in some settings. In other settings the standard design was generally seen as the preferable design. Particularly suitable conditions for an expertise-based design include those where the surgical procedures under evaluation are substantially different, where they are routinely delivered by different health professionals/surgeons with clear proficiencies in each; and contexts in which a multiple-surgeon model is in use and trust between the patient and surgeons can be suitably protected. The standard design was seen by most participants as the default design. Several logistical and methodological concerns remain to be addressed before the expertise-based design is likely to be more widely adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Cook
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Rd, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. .,Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Rd, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| | - Marion K Campbell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Zoë Skea
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rogers CA, Reeves BC, Byrne J, Donovan JL, Mazza G, Paramasivan S, Andrews RC, Wordsworth S, Thompson J, Blazeby JM, Welbourn R. Adaptation of the By-Band randomized clinical trial to By-Band-Sleeve to include a new intervention and maintain relevance of the study to practice. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1207-1214. [PMID: 28703939 PMCID: PMC5519950 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Revised: 02/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Recruitment into surgical RCTs can be threatened if new interventions available outside the trial compete with those being evaluated. Adapting the trial to include the new intervention may overcome this issue, yet this is not often done in surgery. This paper describes the challenges, rationale and methods for adapting an RCT to include a new intervention. Methods The By‐Band study was designed in the UK in 2009–2010 to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band and Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for severe obesity. It contained a pilot phase to establish whether recruitment was possible, and the grant proposal specified that an adaptation to include sleeve gastrectomy would be considered if practice changed and recruitment was successful. Information on changing obesity surgery practice, updated evidence and expert opinion about trial design were used to inform the adaptation. Results The pilot phase recruited over 13 months in 2013–2014 and randomized 80 patients (79 anticipated). During this time, major changes in obesity practice in the UK were observed, with gastric band reducing from 32·6 to 15·8 per cent and sleeve gastrectomy increasing from 9·0 to 28·1 per cent. The evidence base had not changed markedly. The British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society and study oversight committees supported an adaptation to include sleeve gastrectomy, and a proposal to do so was approved by the funder. Conclusion Adaptation of a two‐group surgical RCT can allow evaluation of a third procedure and maintain relevance of the RCT to practice. It also optimizes the use of existing trial infrastructure to answer an additional important research question. Registration number: ISRCTN00786323 (http://www.isrctn.com/). Something to consider
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - B C Reeves
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - J Byrne
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - J L Donovan
- Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - G Mazza
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S Paramasivan
- Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R C Andrews
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Taunton, UK.,University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - S Wordsworth
- Health Economic Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Thompson
- School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J M Blazeby
- Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Welbourn
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust, Taunton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
郭 弈, 任 崇, 高 长, 肖 苍, 张 华. [Long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged over 75 years]. NAN FANG YI KE DA XUE XUE BAO = JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2017; 37:75-78. [PMID: 28109102 PMCID: PMC6765747 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.01.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in patients aged over 75 years and analyze the risk factors affecting the outcomes of the procedure. METHODS Clinical data were reviewed for 97 consecutive patients aged 75 years or above receiving OPCAB at our center between November, 2000 and November, 2013. The perioperative data including length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of postoperative complications and mortality rate of the patients were analyzed. The follow-up data of the patients were also analyzed including all-cause mortality rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE, including myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, and repeated revascularization). RESULTS The perioperative mortality rate was 3.09% (3/97) in these patients. Of the 97 patients analyzed, 91 (93%) were available for follow-up for 29-192 months (with a median of 95.61∓34.07 months). The 10-year survival rate of the patients was 62% with a 10-year MACCE-free survival rate of 47.4%. During the follow-up, 6 (6.8%) patients underwent repeated revascularization procedures, 12 (12.37%) had cerebrovascular accidents and 5 (5.15%) had myocardial infarction. Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension (OR=1.388, P=0.043) and diabetes (OR=1.692, P=0.017) were independent predictors of MACCE, and incomplete revascularization did not increase the risk of postoperative MACCE. CONCLUSION OPCAB is safe and effective in elderly patients with good long-term outcomes. Hypertension and diabetes are independent risk factors of MACCE, and adequate control of blood pressure and blood glucose can reduce the incidence of postoperative MACCE. Incomplete revascularization is not detrimental to the long-term outcomes of OPCAB in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 弈 郭
- />解放军总医院 心血管外科,北京 100853Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 崇雷 任
- />解放军总医院 心血管外科,北京 100853Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 长青 高
- />解放军总医院 心血管外科,北京 100853Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 苍松 肖
- />解放军总医院 心血管外科,北京 100853Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| | - 华军 张
- />解放军总医院 心血管外科,北京 100853Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guida GA, Chivasso P, Fudulu D, Rapetto F, Sedmakov C, Marsico R, Zakkar M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: a review. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:S795-S798. [PMID: 27942397 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The role of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting in high risk patients remains controversial. While there have been studies showing the potential benefits of it, there is still a lot to be learned from the application of this technique in this sub-group of patients. The results of the different trials and papers that we reviewed seem to indicate a benefit in the OPCAB group. Despite of the fact that trials were significantly different in methodology, especially when choosing the risk score stratification tool or the cut-off to define high risk the literature seems to suggest a benefit from the use of OPCAB surgery. Here, we present a review which focussed on early and late outcome in high risk patients undergoing on- and off-pump coronary revascularization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Fudulu
- Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Mustafa Zakkar
- Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
| | - Alan J Bryan
- Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, Bokszanski MP, Perlinski D, Raffa GM, Kowalkowska ME, Zaborowska K, Navarese EP, Kolodziejczak M, Kowalewski J, Tarelli G, Taggart DP, Anisimowicz L. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 151:60-77.e1-58. [PMID: 26433633 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and risks of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to investigate the relationship between outcomes and patient risk profile. METHODS PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings databases were searched for RCTs comparing OPCAB and CABG and reporting short-term (≤ 30 days) outcomes. Endpoints assessed were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebral stroke. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 100 studies, with a total of 19,192 subjects. There was no difference between the 2 techniques with respect to all-cause mortality and MI (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.09; P = .25; I(2) = 0% and OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.05; P = .19; I(2) = 0%, respectively). OPCAB was associated with a significant 28% reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009; I(2) = 0%). A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of all-cause mortality (P < .01), MI (P < .01), and cerebral stroke (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS OPCAB is associated with a significant reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke compared with conventional CABG. In addition, benefits of OPCAB in terms of death, MI, and cerebral stroke are significantly related to patient risk profile, suggesting that OPCAB should be strongly considered in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariusz Kowalewski
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Faculty of Health Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland; Systematic Investigation and Research on Interventions and Outcomes (SIRIO) MEDICINE Research Network, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Wojciech Pawliszak
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Pietro Giorgio Malvindi
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Marek Pawel Bokszanski
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Damian Perlinski
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Giuseppe Maria Raffa
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, IRCCS - ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy
| | - Magdalena Ewa Kowalkowska
- Systematic Investigation and Research on Interventions and Outcomes (SIRIO) MEDICINE Research Network, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department and Clinic of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Oncological Gynecology, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Zaborowska
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Eliano Pio Navarese
- Systematic Investigation and Research on Interventions and Outcomes (SIRIO) MEDICINE Research Network, Düsseldorf, Germany; Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michalina Kolodziejczak
- Systematic Investigation and Research on Interventions and Outcomes (SIRIO) MEDICINE Research Network, Düsseldorf, Germany; Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Janusz Kowalewski
- Lung Cancer and Thoracic Surgery Department, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Giuseppe Tarelli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - David Paul Taggart
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lech Anisimowicz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dr Antoni Jurasz Memorial University Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|