1
|
Samuel D, De Martin E, Berg T, Berenguer M, Burra P, Fondevila C, Heimbach JK, Pageaux GP, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Toso C. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation. J Hepatol 2024; 81:1040-1086. [PMID: 39487043 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian H, Zhou L, Dai JW, Li Y, Gu CY, Kong DQ, Yu ZQ, Liu XF, Yin J. Real-world evidence of avatrombopag for the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia intolerant or ineffective to eltrombopag/hetrombopag. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:2414-2424. [PMID: 39367620 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/06/2024]
Abstract
Due to the limited real-world research on the application of avatrombopag (AVA) for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in China, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of AVA in clinical practice. We included 121 adult ITP patients treated with AVA across three medical centres. Based on the reasons for choosing AVA, these patients were divided into eltrombopag (ELT)/hetrombopag (HET) intolerance group (IG), and ELT/HET unresponsive group (UG). Compared with UG, more patients in IG had a history of liver disease and received fewer treatments before AVA. Amongst all patients, 83% had platelet response (≥30 × 109/L) after AVA and 62% achieved complete response (≥100 × 109/L, CR). Sixty-two percent in IG and 56% in UG were able to discontinue more than one concomitant ITP medication. A total of 17 patients underwent multiple switches of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), resulting in an 88% platelet response rate. Sixty-three patients discontinued AVA, 27% were due to unaffordability. AVA was well tolerated in most patients. In the ITP population, AVA proved effective and safe, particularly in patients intolerant or unresponsive to ELT/HET. Patients benefited from TPO-RAs switches, particularly those undergoing multiple switches. However, many patients struggled with the long-term financial burden of AVA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Tian
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| | - Lu Zhou
- Hematology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jia-Wen Dai
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, CAMS Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Yun Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| | - Cheng-Yuan Gu
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| | - Dan-Qing Kong
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| | - Zi-Qiang Yu
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Fan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, CAMS Key Laboratory of Gene Therapy for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Jie Yin
- National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ferdinande K, Raevens S, Decaestecker J, De Vloo C, Seynhaeve L, Hoof L, Verhelst X, Geerts A, Devreese KMJ, Degroote H, Van Vlierberghe H. Unravelling the coagulation paradox in liver cirrhosis: challenges and insights. Acta Clin Belg 2024; 79:451-461. [PMID: 39981790 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2025.2469906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025]
Abstract
Patients with liver disease experience complex haemostatic changes leading to a state of 'rebalanced haemostasis' that may shift towards bleeding or thrombosis due to complications like kidney dysfunction, bacterial infection, or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Traditional coagulation tests inadequately capture haemostasis in cirrhosis, whereas advanced assays like thrombin generation assay and viscoelastic testing offer better insights but remain limited in clinical outcome prediction or guiding pre-procedural prophylaxis.Contrary to the traditional view of cirrhosis as a bleeding disorder, recent evidence highlights a paradox of higher venous thromboembolism incidence in hospitalised cirrhotic patients. Misconceptions about 'auto-anticoagulation' and concerns about anticoagulation safety hinder consistent thromboprophylaxis. Emerging data suggest that low molecular weight heparin is safe and effective in cirrhotic patients, supporting more evidence-based thromboprophylaxis. For thrombotic events or conditions like atrial fibrillation, therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended, and may offer additional benefits, such as attenuating liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. However, anticoagulation is not established as a core therapy in cirrhosis, given safety concerns in advanced disease.Bleeding remains a significant challenge in cirrhosis, with management focusing on specific aetiologies, including portal hypertension or procedural injuries. In pre-procedural planning, there is a trend of unnecessary blood product use, often based on an assumed bleeding risk. Rational pre-procedural planning should minimize unnecessary transfusions, optimise modifiable risks, and include a plan for managing potential bleeding.This review aims to clarify the 'coagulation paradox' in cirrhosis, promoting a nuanced, individualized approach to managing bleeding and thrombosis in chronic liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ferdinande
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Delta Roeselare, Belgium
| | - S Raevens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J Decaestecker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Delta Roeselare, Belgium
| | - C De Vloo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Delta Roeselare, Belgium
| | - L Seynhaeve
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Delta Roeselare, Belgium
| | - L Hoof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - X Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - A Geerts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K M J Devreese
- Coagulation Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - H Degroote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Brussels, Belgium
| | - H Van Vlierberghe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ahmed S, Bashir Q, Bassett RL, Ullah F, Aung F, Valdez B, Alousi AM, Hosing C, Kebriaei P, Khouri I, Marin D, Nieto Y, Olson A, Oran B, Qazilbash MH, Rezvani K, Mehta R, Shpall EJ, Ciurea S, Andersson BS, Champlin RE, Popat UR. Eltrombopag improves platelet engraftment after haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: Results of a Phase II study. Am J Hematol 2024; 99:562-569. [PMID: 38314663 PMCID: PMC10947843 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Slow platelet recovery frequently occurs after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with bone marrow graft and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Improved platelet recovery may reduce the need for transfusions and improve outcomes. We investigated the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, at enhancing platelet recovery post-haplo-HSCT. The prospective study included patients ≥18 years of age who received haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy. Patients received eltrombopag 300 mg/day starting on Day +5. The primary objective was to estimate platelet engraftment (>50 000/μL by Day 60). In a post hoc analysis, they were compared to a contemporary matched control group who did not receive eltrombopag. One hundred ten patients were included in the analysis (30 eltrombopag and 80 control). Seventy-three percent and 50% of patients in the eltrombopag group and control group, respectively, attained >50 000/μL platelet count by Day 60 (p = .043). No eltrombopag-related grade ≥4 adverse events were observed. Median time to platelet recovery (>20 000/μL) was 29 days with eltrombopag and 31 days for controls (p = .022), while its cumulative incidence was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-100%) with eltrombopag versus 67.5% (95% CI: 57%-78%) for controls (p = .014). Number of platelet transfusions received, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD rate, relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality were similar between groups. Overall, eltrombopag is safe and improves platelet recovery in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Roland L. Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Fauzia Ullah
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Fleur Aung
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ben Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amin M. Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Issa Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amanda Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth J. Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stefan Ciurea
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Borje S. Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard E. Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Uday R. Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aiza-Haddad I, Cisneros-Garza LE, Morales-Gutiérrez O, Malé-Velázquez R, Rizo-Robles MT, Alvarado-Reyes R, Barrientos-Quintanilla LA, Betancourt-Sánchez F, Cerda-Reyes E, Contreras-Omaña R, Dehesa-Violante MB, Flores-García NC, Gómez-Almaguer D, Higuera-de la Tijera MF, Lira-Pedrin MA, Lira-Vera JE, Manzano-Cortés H, Meléndez-Mena DE, Muñoz-Ramírez MR, Pérez-Hernández JL, Ramos-Gómez MV, Sánchez-Ávila JF. Guidelines for the management of coagulation disorders in patients with cirrhosis. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024; 89:144-162. [PMID: 38600006 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Coagulation management in the patient with cirrhosis has undergone a significant transformation since the beginning of this century, with the concept of a rebalancing between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors. The paradigm that patients with cirrhosis have a greater bleeding tendency has changed, as a result of this rebalancing. In addition, it has brought to light the presence of complications related to thrombotic events in this group of patients. These guidelines detail aspects related to pathophysiologic mechanisms that intervene in the maintenance of hemostasis in the patient with cirrhosis, the relevance of portal hypertension, mechanical factors for the development of bleeding, modifications in the hepatic synthesis of coagulation factors, and the changes in the reticuloendothelial system in acute hepatic decompensation and acute-on-chronic liver failure. They address new aspects related to the hemorrhagic complications in patients with cirrhosis, considering the risk for bleeding during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, as well as the usefulness of different tools for diagnosing coagulation and recommendations on the pharmacologic treatment and blood-product transfusion in the context of hemorrhage. These guidelines also update the knowledge regarding hypercoagulability in the patient with cirrhosis, as well as the efficacy and safety of treatment with the different anticoagulation regimens. Lastly, they provide recommendations on coagulation management in the context of acute-on-chronic liver failure, acute liver decompensation, and specific aspects related to the patient undergoing liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Aiza-Haddad
- Clínica de Enfermedades Hepáticas, Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - L E Cisneros-Garza
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - O Morales-Gutiérrez
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - M T Rizo-Robles
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Alvarado-Reyes
- Departamento de Hepatología, Hospital San José Tec Salud, Monterrey, Mexico
| | | | | | - E Cerda-Reyes
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central Militar, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - R Contreras-Omaña
- Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Gastroenterología (CIEHG) Pachuca, Hidalgo, México
| | | | - N C Flores-García
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey Nuevo Leon, México
| | | | - M F Higuera-de la Tijera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M A Lira-Pedrin
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Endoscopía Digestiva, Motilidad y Hepatología, Centro Médico Corporativo Galeana, Tijuana, México
| | - J E Lira-Vera
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - D E Meléndez-Mena
- Hospital General de Especialidades «Maximino Ávila Camacho», IMSS, UMAE, Puebla, México
| | - M R Muñoz-Ramírez
- Departamento de Hepatología, Hospital San José Tec Salud, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - J L Pérez-Hernández
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital General de México «Dr. Eduardo Liceaga», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M V Ramos-Gómez
- Departamento Hepatología, ISSSTE, Centro Médico Nacional «20 de noviembre», Ciudad de México, México
| | - J F Sánchez-Ávila
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey Nuevo Leon, México
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Remoortel H, Scheers H, Avau B, Georgsen J, Nahirniak S, Shehata N, Stanworth SJ, De Buck E, Compernolle V, Vandekerckhove P. Cost-Effectiveness of Thrombopoietin Mimetics in Patients with Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023:10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w. [PMID: 37145291 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01271-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics are a potential alternative to platelet transfusion to minimize blood loss in patients with thrombocytopenia. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics, compared with not using TPO mimetics, in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. METHODS Eight databases and registries were searched for full economic evaluations (EEs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were synthesized as cost per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY) or as cost per health outcome (e.g. bleeding event avoided). Included studies were critically appraised using the Philips reporting checklist. RESULTS Eighteen evaluations from nine different countries were included, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics compared with no TPO, watch-and-rescue therapy, the standard of care, rituximab, splenectomy or platelet transfusion. ICERs varied from a dominant strategy (i.e. cost-saving and more effective), to an incremental cost per QALY/health outcome of EUR 25,000-50,000, EUR 75,000-750,000 and EUR > 1 million, to a dominated strategy (cost-increasing and less effective). Few evaluations (n = 2, 10%) addressed the four principal types of uncertainty (methodological, structural, heterogeneity and parameter). Parameter uncertainty was most frequently reported (80%), followed by heterogeneity (45%), structural uncertainty (43%) and methodological uncertainty (28%). CONCLUSIONS Cost-effectiveness of TPO mimetics in adult patients with thrombocytopenia ranged from a dominant strategy to a significant incremental cost per QALY/health outcome or a strategy that is clinically inferior and has increased costs. Future validation and tackling the uncertainty of these models with country-specific cost data and up-to-date efficacy and safety data are needed to increase the generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Van Remoortel
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Hans Scheers
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Avau
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Jørgen Georgsen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, South Danish Transfusion Service and Tissue Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Susan Nahirniak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Transfusion and Transplantation Medicine, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nadine Shehata
- Departments of Medicine, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simon J Stanworth
- Transfusion Medicine, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Emmy De Buck
- Centre for Evidence-Based Practice, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Compernolle
- Blood Services, Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Vandekerckhove
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Belgian Red Cross, Mechelen, Belgium
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grabe-Heyne K, Henne C, Odeyemi I, Pöhlmann J, Ahmed W, Pollock RF. Evaluating the cost-utility of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus radical cystectomy in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the UK. J Med Econ 2023; 26:411-421. [PMID: 36897006 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2189860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Approximately 75% of bladder cancer (BC) cases present as non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC). In patients with high-risk NMIBC, the mainstay treatment is intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), with immediate radical cystectomy (RC) as an alternative treatment option. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cost-utility of BCG versus RC in patients with high-risk NMIBC from the UK healthcare payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A six-state Markov model was developed that covered controlled disease, recurrence, progression to muscle-invasive BC, metastatic disease, and death. The model included adverse events of BCG and RC and monitoring and palliative care. Drug costs were obtained from the British National Formulary. Intravesical delivery, RC, and monitoring costs were sourced from the National Tariff Payment System and the literature. Utility data were obtained from the literature. Analyses were run over a 30-year time horizon, with future costs and effects discounted at 3.5% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS The base case analysis comparing BCG with RC showed that BCG would increase life expectancy by 0.88 years versus RC, from 7.74 to 8.62 years. BCG resulted in an increase of 0.76 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus RC, from 5.63 to 6.39 QALYs. Patients incurred lower lifetime costs if treated with BCG (£47,753) than with RC (£64,264). Cost savings were mainly driven by the lower cost of BCG versus RC, and palliative care costs. Sensitivity analyses showed that results were robust to assumptions. LIMITATIONS The evidence base informing efficacy estimates of BCG is heterogeneous as different BCG administration schedules were reported in the literature, while incidence and cost data on some BCG-associated adverse events were sparse. CONCLUSIONS Intravesical BCG led to increased QALYs and reduced costs versus RC for patients with high-risk NMIBC from the UK healthcare payer perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Isaac Odeyemi
- Department of Health Professions, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effectiveness and Safety of Avatrombopag in Liver Cancer Patients with Severe Thrombocytopenia: Real-World Data and Challenges. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:9138195. [PMID: 36405248 PMCID: PMC9668468 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9138195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Avatrombopag has been approved in patients who have severe thrombocytopenia (<50 × 109/L) and chronic liver disease (CLD) while receiving invasive procedures. The real-world application and effectiveness of avatrombopag in the subgroup patients with liver cancer remain unknown. Methods Liver cancer patients (including primary liver cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastasis) who had severe thrombocytopenia and received avatrombopag were retrospectively enrolled. Avatrombopag dose, peak and absolute platelet count increase, combination treatment with other thrombopoietic agents, responder (peak count ≥50 × 109/L with absolute increase ≥20 × 109/L) rate, and anticancer treatment effect were analyzed. Thrombosis and bleeding events were assessed. Results In total, 93 patients were enrolled, with 72 and 21 in the CLD and non-CLD groups, respectively. Patients with CLD had hepatitis B or C, larger spleen volume, and a higher cirrhosis degree. Baseline platelet counts were similar between two groups (median, 37.0 × 109/L vs. 39.0 × 109/L; P=0.594), while patients without CLD had higher peak platelet (median, 134.0 × 109/L vs. 74.0 × 109/L; P=0.015) and absolute increase (median, 101.0 × 109/L vs. 41.0 × 109/L; P=0.020) after avatrombopag treatment. The responder rate was higher in patients without CLD (100% vs. 76.4%; P=0.010). Combined avatrombopag with other thrombopoietic agents significantly increased platelet count; repeated use of avatrombopag produced similar effects with that of initial treatment. Concerning anticancer treatment effect, patients who responded to avatrombopag had a higher disease control rate. No thrombosis or hemorrhagic events were observed, even in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Conclusion Avatrombopag was safe and effective and ensured successful implementation of anticancer treatment in liver cancer patients with severe thrombocytopenia, accompanied with or without CLD.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang YS, Wang W, Zhang S, Zhang SY, Shen AZ, Wang W, Song HC, Yao HZ, Song RP, Meng FZ, Li L, Nashan B, Wang JZ, Liu LX. Clinical efficacy of avatrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in the treatment of chronic liver disease-associated severe thrombocytopenia: A real-world study. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:1009612. [PMID: 36267268 PMCID: PMC9577549 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1009612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the clinical efficacy of avatrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, versus subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) in the treatment of severe thrombocytopenia (TCP) associated with chronic liver disease (CLD).Methods: Clinical data of 250 patients with severe TCP associated with CLD were collected in a single hospital from January 2019 to January 2022. The main parameters measured were the therapeutic response rate, changes in platelets (PLTs), and adverse events. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to avoid possible selection bias.Results: After PSM, a total of 154 patients were enrolled in the study: 77 in the avatrombopag group and 77 in the rh-TPO group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the effect of increasing the PLT count (Waldχ2 = 1.659, p = 0.198; Waldχ2 = 0.220, p = 0.639). In addition, no interaction between time and different medications was found (Waldχ2 = 0.540, p = 0.910; Waldχ2 = 1.273, p = 0.736). Interestingly, in the subgroup analysis, both before and after PSM, avatrombopag showed better clinical efficacy than rh-TPO in the treatment of TCP associated with CLD in Child‒Pugh Class A (88.89% vs. 63.41%, p =0.003; 81.33% vs. 61.76%, p = 0.043). Fewer patients reported dizziness in the avatrombopag group than in the rh-TPO group both before and after PSM (7.8% vs. 25.0%; 7.8% vs. 24.7%, p < 0.05).Conclusion: Both before and after PSM, avatrombopag showed better clinical efficacy than rh-TPO in the treatment of TCP associated with CLD in Child‒Pugh Class A and showed a lower incidence of dizziness in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Shuai Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Sai Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Shen-Yu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Ai-Zong Shen
- Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Hua-Chuan Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Huan-Zhang Yao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Rui-Peng Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Fan-Zheng Meng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Bjoern Nashan
- Department of Organ transplant center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Ji-Zhou Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hefei, Anhui, China
- *Correspondence: Ji-Zhou Wang, ; Lian-Xin Liu,
| | - Lian-Xin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Hefei, Anhui, China
- *Correspondence: Ji-Zhou Wang, ; Lian-Xin Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Orme ME, Bentley R, Marcella S, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Perard R, Wedemeyer H, Yoshiji H, Agarwal K, Dusheiko G. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Efficacy and Safety of Lusutrombopag for Severe Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Undergoing Invasive Procedures. Adv Ther 2022; 39:4169-4188. [PMID: 35836089 PMCID: PMC9402754 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02235-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lusutrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA). Clinical trials have shown lusutrombopag's efficacy in reducing need for preoperative platelet transfusion in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and severe thrombocytopenia. This analysis assessed efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag in patients with severe thrombocytopenia and CLD undergoing planned invasive procedures. METHODS An electronic database search (through 1 December 2020) identified three randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials comparing lusutrombopag with placebo in patients with CLD and platelet count below 50 × 109/L scheduled to undergo a procedure with a perioperative bleeding risk. A random-effects meta-analysis examined treatment effect, with Cochrane Collaboration's tool assessing risk of bias. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 343 (lusutrombopag 3 mg, n = 173; placebo, n = 170) patients. More patients met the criteria for treatment response (platelet count at least 50 × 109/L and increase of at least 20 × 109/L from baseline anytime during the study) with lusutrombopag versus placebo (risk ratio [RR] 6.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.69, 11.07; p < 0.0001). The primary efficacy outcome, proportion of patients requiring no platelet transfusion and no rescue therapy for bleeding for at least 7 days post procedure, was achieved by more patients treated with lusutrombopag versus placebo (RR 3.42; 95% CI 1.86, 6.26; p = 0.0001). The risk of any bleeding event was significantly lower with lusutrombopag compared to placebo (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32, 0.95; p = 0.03); conversely, thrombosis event rates were similar between lusutrombopag and placebo (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.19, 3.24; p = 0.74). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed that treatment of severe thrombocytopenia with lusutrombopag in patients with CLD prior to a planned invasive procedure was efficacious and safe in increasing platelet counts, avoiding the need for platelet transfusions, and reducing risk of bleeding, thereby enhancing the certainty of evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle E Orme
- ICERA Consulting Ltd., 17 Redbridge Close, Swindon, Wiltshire, UK.
| | | | | | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Abteilung Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie (IMuG), mit Zentrale Aufnahme und Erstversorgung (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | | | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hitoshi Yoshiji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara Prefecture, Japan
| | - Kosh Agarwal
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Geoffrey Dusheiko
- University College London Medical School and King's College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lisman T, Caldwell SH, Intagliata NM. Haemostatic alterations and management of haemostasis in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2022; 76:1291-1305. [PMID: 35589251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cirrhosis frequently acquire complex changes in their haemostatic system including a decreased platelet count and decreased levels of various haemostatic proteins. Although historically patients with cirrhosis were thought to have a haemostasis-related bleeding tendency, it is now widely accepted that the haemostatic system of patients with cirrhosis remains in balance as a result of simultaneous changes in pro- and anti-haemostatic systems. The concept of rebalanced haemostasis has led to changes in clinical management, although firm evidence from well-designed clinical studies is largely lacking. For example, many invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and a prolonged prothrombin time are now performed without prophylaxis with fresh frozen plasma. Conversely, clinicians have become more aware of the need for anti-thrombotic therapy, even in those patients with abnormal routine coagulation tests. This paper will outline recent advances in pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of both bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with cirrhosis. Among other topics, we will discuss the haemostatic status of acutely ill patients with cirrhosis, the various causes of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, and how best to prevent or treat bleeding. In addition, we will discuss the hypercoagulable features of patients with cirrhosis, new insights into the pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis, and how best to prevent or treat thromboses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ton Lisman
- Surgical Research Laboratory and Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Stephen H Caldwell
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Coagulation in Liver Disease, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville VA, United States
| | - Nicolas M Intagliata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Coagulation in Liver Disease, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mastrorilli G, Fiorentino F, Tucci C, Lombardi G, Aghemo A, Colombo GL. Cost Analysis of Platelet Transfusion in Italy for Patients with Chronic Liver Disease and Associated Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Elective Procedures. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022; 14:205-220. [PMID: 35422645 PMCID: PMC9005228 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s354470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Platelet transfusions (PT) are commonly used as prophylaxis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and severe thrombocytopenia (TCP) before invasive procedures, in order to reduce risk of bleeding. The aim of this cost analysis was to generate a comprehensive estimate of costs of platelet transfusions in Italy, focusing on patients with severe TCP due to CLD undergoing an elective procedure. Methods The research was conducted in different phases: 1) assessment of a pre-specified framework for the identification of processes related to PT; 2) estimation of resource consumption through Delphi technique and collection of unit costs through literature; 3) development of a cost analysis to estimate the overall average costs per PT, focusing on a representative patient with CLD and severe TCP. Robustness of results was tested in a sensitivity analysis. Results Despite the lack of some cost components estimation and uncertainty related to event probability, the analysis showed a total cost of 5297 € for each PT in patients with CLD and severe TCP. The total cost was largely driven by direct costs (4863 €) associated with platelet collection, transfusion, and management of refractoriness, which accounted for 92% of total. Conclusion In an environment of limited resources, it is crucial for the healthcare service to have accurate and inclusive information on transfusion costs, incorporating not only the cost of blood products but also those related to collection and management. The analysis showed that platelet collection and administration costs add substantially to the cost of platelet products themselves. As expected, the highest cost was the transfusion process itself (44% of total), followed by refractoriness (43% of total). Since limited literature exists concerning these cost estimates, this analysis represents a step forward in understanding the economic burden of patients with CLD and severe TCP scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carmen Tucci
- Real World Solutions, IQVIA Solutions Italy s.r.l., Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Lombardi
- Real World Solutions, IQVIA Solutions Italy s.r.l., Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: Gloria Lombardi, Real World Solutions, IQVIA Solutions Italy s.r.l., Via Fabio Filzi 29, Milan, 20124, Italy, Tel +39 331 6801813, Email
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rose PD, Au M, Woodman RJ, Tee D, Chinnaratha MA. Pre-procedural use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists in cirrhosis and severe thrombocytopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1396-1403. [PMID: 34373229 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe thrombocytopenia in cirrhosis can preclude invasive procedures. Platelet transfusion is recommended if platelet count pre-procedure is potential alternative to platelet transfusion is thrombopoietin-receptor (TPO) agonists. AIM Evaluate TPO-agonist efficacy and safety in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS Randomized control trials (RCT) from electronic reference databases were searched from inception till December 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Primary outcome was platelet transfusion avoidance. Secondary outcomes were weighted mean difference (WMD) in platelet count from baseline to pre-procedure and rates of major adverse events (AE). Pooled Odds Ratio (OR) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS Six RCTs with 1,229 patients were included. All studies had low risk of bias. Compared with placebo, those treated with TPO-agonists had a pooled OR of 0.12(0.08-0.17), P<0.01 for platelet transfusion avoidance, and WMD in platelet count (x10 3 /µL) of 35.6(28.6-42.7), P<0.01. Major AE did not differ between groups [Pooled OR: 0.87(0.47-1.62), P=0.66]. CONCLUSION Compared to placebo, TPO-agonists used in cirrhotic patients with severe thrombocytopenia prior to elective invasive procedures had 88% reduced odds of requiring peri-procedural platelet transfusion and increased platelet count pre-procedure, with no difference in AE rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Rose
- Department of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia 5112, Australia
| | - Minnie Au
- Department of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia 5112, Australia
| | - Richard J Woodman
- Flinders Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
| | - Derrick Tee
- Department of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia 5112, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| | - Mohamad A Chinnaratha
- Department of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Haydown Road, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia 5112, Australia; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Miki N, Inoue S, Shibahara H, Kurazono K, Perard R, Tateishi R. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lusutrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease in Japan. JGH OPEN 2021; 5:879-887. [PMID: 34386595 PMCID: PMC8341178 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Thrombocytopenia is a frequent hematological condition in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients increasing the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing invasive procedures. Without an alternative, clinical guidelines recommended the use of platelet transfusion (PT) prior to procedure to prevent this bleeding risk. Lusutrombopag (LUSU), an orally active, small‐molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, was developed as an alternative to PT. The objective of this study was to evaluate a cost‐effectiveness of LUSU as a potential alternative to PT in Japan. Methods A cost‐effectiveness analysis of LUSU relative to PT was conducted by a simulation model consisting of a decision tree combined to Markov model. Quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as an indicator of efficacy, and the analysis was conducted from the Japanese public healthcare payer's perspective. The time horizon of the analysis was 50 years (a lifetime) and the discount rate was set at 2%. Results LUSU gained 6.1803 QALYs with an expected lifetime costs of 2 380 219 JPY compared to PT with 6.1712 QALYs gained and expected lifetime costs of 2 382 908 JPY. Thus, LUSU was deemed dominant compared with PT. Based on probabilistic analyses, the chance of LUSU being dominant and the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio being below 5 million JPY/QALY was estimated at 51.8% and 78.3%, respectively, demonstrating the robustness of the results. Conclusions LUSU was evaluated as an efficacious and cost‐saving treatment option for Japanese CLD patients with thrombocytopenia who required a planned invasive procedure compared with PT and economically should be considered as an alternative treatment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Thrombocytopenia and Hemostatic Changes in Acute and Chronic Liver Disease: Pathophysiology, Clinical and Laboratory Features, and Management. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10071530. [PMID: 33917431 PMCID: PMC8038677 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count <150,000/μL, is the most common complication of advanced liver disease or cirrhosis with an incidence of up to 75%. A decrease in platelet count can be the first presenting sign and tends to be proportionally related to the severity of hepatic failure. The pathophysiology of thrombocytopenia in liver disease is multifactorial, including (i) splenomegaly and subsequently increased splenic sequestration of circulating platelets, (ii) reduced hepatic synthesis of thrombopoietin with missing stimulation both of megakaryocytopoiesis and thrombocytopoiesis, resulting in diminished platelet production and release from the bone marrow, and (iii) increased platelet destruction or consumption. Among these pathologies, the decrease in thrombopoietin synthesis has been identified as a central mechanism. Two newly licensed oral thrombopoietin mimetics/receptor agonists, avatrombopag and lusutrombopag, are now available for targeted treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with advanced liver disease, who are undergoing invasive procedures. This review summarizes recent advances in the understanding of defective but at low level rebalanced hemostasis in stable cirrhosis, discusses clinical consequences and persistent controversial issues related to the inherent bleeding risk, and is focused on a risk-adapted management of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease, including a restrictive transfusion regimen.
Collapse
|