Extended scope of nursing practice: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained nurses and pre-registration house officers in pre-operative assessment in elective general surgery

A French Preoperative Cholesteatoma Management: Current Preoperative Consultation and Tendencies

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the information delivery during preoperative consultations for cholesteatoma removal surgery in 2024. The secondary objective was to identify any factors influencing the information delivered. Methods: This study was a practice survey which included 33 closed-ended questions and 1 open-ended question. Seven questions concerned the participants' characteristics and 2 questions concerned the physiopathology of cholesteatoma. Nine questions focused on surgical information, six questions focused on the procedure modalities and ten questions focused on the risks of complications from the intervention. Results: Eighty-two surgeons answered the survey. In 75% of the cases, an information form written by a professional society was provided. The risk of recurrence or residual post-operative cholesteatoma was systematically stated in 78% of cases (n = 64), while the risk of aesthetic sequelae was only stated in 1% (n = 1). Participants working in a university hospital were more likely to inform patients about the risks of vertigo (p = 0.04), aesthetic risks (p = 0.04), poor functional outcomes (p = 0.04), surgical revision (p = 0.05) and the risk of peripheral facial paralysis (p = 0.05). Surgeons who mainly practiced otology were more likely to inform patients about the risks of recurrence and/or residual cholesteatoma (p = 0.02) and taste disturbances (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Cholesteatoma surgery was well explained to patients during the preoperative consultation, mostly with written support, even if the information given was not the same for all complication risks. It could be useful to create an information form dedicated to cholesteatoma surgery to improve comprehensive information and maintain a trustworthy relationship with patients.

Recruitment, consent and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a review of trials published in the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library (1997-2020)

OBJECTIVES

To review the consent, recruitment and retention rates for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) funded by the UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and published in the online NIHR Journals Library between January 1997 and December 2020.

DESIGN

Comprehensive review.

SETTING

RCTs funded by the NIHR and published in the NIHR Journals Library.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information relating to the trial characteristics, sample size, recruitment and retention.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the recruitment rate (number of participants recruited per centre per month). Secondary outcomes were the target sample size and whether it was achieved; consent rates (percentage of eligible participants who consented and were randomised) and retention rates (percentage of randomised participants retained and assessed with valid primary outcome data).

RESULTS

This review identified 388 individual RCTs from 379 reports in the NIHR Journals Library. The final recruitment target sample size was achieved in 63% (245/388) of the RCTs. The original recruitment target was revised in 30% (118/388) of trials (downwards in 67% (79/118)). The median recruitment rate (participants per centre per month) was found to be 0.95 (IQR: 0.42-2.60); the median consent rate was 72% (IQR: 50%-88%) and the median retention rate was estimated at 88% (IQR: 80%-97%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in the consent, recruitment and retention rates in publicly funded RCTs. Although the majority of (6 out of 10) trials in this review achieved their final target sample; 3 out of 10 trials revised their original target sample size (downwards in 7 out of 10 trials). Investigators should bear this in mind at the planning stage of their study and not be overly optimistic about their recruitment projections.

Nurse-run preanaesthesia assessment clinics: an initiative towards improving the quality of perioperative care at the ambulatory care centre

Introduction

Nurse-run preanaesthesia assessment is well established in ambulatory surgery. However, in the Middle East the implementation of such a service is new and needed careful preparation. Aim of this audit is to assess the feasibility and the quality of preoperative assessments by the specially trained nurses, patient and nurse satisfaction and overall perioperative quality of recovery.

Methods

The nurses were selected and trained first in an accredited programme. Then an implementation period of 3 month was used for them to gain experience. Hereafter, we performed a four-step audit on the quality of preassessment, the patient’s satisfaction, the quality of recovery and adverse events if any. Finally, we also monitored the nurse’s satisfaction of their new advanced role.

Results

The quality of preanaesthesia assessment was high as with 95% compliance to the accepted standards. In the patient satisfaction survey, all 152 patients were either highly satisfied or satisfied with the nurse-run service. The nurses were also highly satisfied and felt that they were either highly or moderately valued. All the patients who were operated at the ambulatory care services were followed up postoperatively by telephone calls which revealed that most of them were highly satisfied. No major or minor adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

Our specially trained nurses perform preoperative assessments on high standard without adverse events, while patient and staff satisfaction is very high. Future projects will focus on reducing the rate of cancellation of surgeries, investigating the cost-effectiveness of this approach as well as training the specialised nurses for paediatric preoperative anaesthesia assessments. This model of care could induce further nurse-run models of care in the Middle East.

Absence of Association between Preoperative Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates and Postoperative Outcomes following Elective Gastrointestinal Surgeries: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Preoperative risk stratification and optimising care of patients undergoing elective surgery are important to reduce the risk of postoperative outcomes. Renal dysfunction is becoming increasingly prevalent, but its impact on patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery is unknown although much evidence is available for cardiac surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries.

Methods

This prospective study included consecutive adult patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries attending preassessment screening (PAS) clinics at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB) between July and August 2016. Primary outcome measure was 30-day overall complication rates and secondary outcomes were grade of complications, 30-day readmission rates, and postoperative care setting.

Results

This study included 370 patients, of which 11% (41/370) had eGFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m². Patients with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² were more likely to have ASA grade 3/4 (p < 0.001) and >2 comorbidities (p < 0.001). Overall complication rates were 15% (54/370), with no significant difference in overall (p=0.644) and major complication rates (p=0.831) between both groups. In adjusted models, only surgery grade was predictive of overall complications. Preoperative eGFR did not impact on overall complications (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.45–1.54; p=0.2).

Conclusions

Preoperative eGFR does not appear to impact on postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgeries, even when stratified by surgery grade. These findings will help preassessment clinics in risk stratification and optimisation of perioperative care of patients.

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare a Nurse Practitioner to Medical Staff in the Preparation of Patients for Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterisation: The Study of Nursing Intervention in Practice (SNIP)

BACKGROUND

A number of initiatives have employed nurses in roles traditionally associated with the medical profession but few have been evaluated in prospective randomised studies. This paper reports the results of a randomised controlled trial to assess the performance of a nurse practitioner (NP), trained to prepare patients for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation.

METHODS

Eligible and consenting patients were randomised to preparation by either the NP or junior medical staff (JMS). The safety outcome measure was the rate of in-hospital major adverse clinical events including death, myocardial infarction and emergency bypass coronary surgery. Other outcome measures included rate of minor adverse events, cardiologist assessment of case preparation and presentation, patient satisfaction and duration of pre-admission clinic.

RESULTS

From April 1997 to May 1998 a series of 355 patients scheduled for elective, day-case, diagnostic cardiac catheterisation were screened. Of these, 345 patients were eligible for the study. A total of 339 patients consented to participate and were randomised. Major adverse clinical events occurred in 0/175 (0%) patients in the NP group and 2/161 (1.2%) patients in the JMS group. (Risk difference = -1.2%, upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval = +2.0%) The cardiologist's evaluation that the patient's preparation was acceptable was high in both groups: NP group 98.3% vs. JMS group 98.8%: P = 1.0). Patient satisfaction, assessed by questionnaire, was greater in the NP group (P = 0.04). The median duration of the pre-admission clinic visit was lower in the NP group 165 min vs. 185 min in the JMS group, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The preparation of patients for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation can be safely performed by an appropriately trained NP. This approach may be associated with improved patient satisfaction and reduced clinic duration times.

Preoperative Assessment of Patients Undergoing Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery: Does Body Mass Index Matter?

BACKGROUND

At Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB), no specific protocol to stratify patients by body mass index (BMI) exists. This study sought to evaluate outcomes following gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery attending preassessment screening clinic (PAS) from August to September 2016 at the QEHB were identified. Primary outcome was postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were major complications and 30-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

Of 368 patients preassessed, 31% (116/368) were overweight and 35% (130/368) were obese. Median age was 57 (range: 17-93). There was no difference of BMI between the low risk and high risk clinics. Patients in high risk clinic had significantly higher rates of comorbidities, major surgical grades, and malignancy as the indication for surgery. Overall complication rates were 14% (52/368), with 3% (10/368) having major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades III-IV). Whilst BMI was associated with comorbidity (p = 0.03) and ASA grade (p < 0.001), it was not associated with worse outcomes. Patients attending high risk clinic had significantly higher rates of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery grade was found to be an independent risk factor of complication rates. Use of BMI as an independent factor for preassessment level is not justified from our cohort.

Implementing a patient-initiated review system for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective, comparative service evaluation

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) usually entails regular hospital reviews with a specialist often when the patient is well rather than during a period of exacerbation. An alternative approach where patients initiate appointments when they need them can improve patient satisfaction and resource use whilst being safe. This service evaluation reports a system-wide implementation of a patient-initiated review appointment system called Direct Access (DA) for people with RA. The aim was to establish the impact on patient satisfaction of the new system versus usual care as well as evaluate the implementation processes.

METHODS

As all patients could not start on the new system at once, in order to manage the implementation, patients were randomly allocated to DA or to usual care. Instead of regular follow-up appointments, DA comprised an education session and access to a nurse-led telephone advice line where appointments could be accessed within two weeks. Usual care comprised routine follow-ups with the specialist. Data were collected on patient satisfaction, service use and outcomes of any contact to the advice line.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eleven patients with RA were assessed as being suitable for DA. In terms of patient satisfaction, between-group differences were found in favour of DA for accessibility and convenience, ease of contacting the nurse and overall satisfaction with the service. Self-reported visits to the general practitioner were also significantly lower. DA resulted in a greater number of telephone contacts (incidence rate ratio = 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 2.68). Hospital costs of the two different service models were similar. Mean waiting time for an appointment was 10.8 days

CONCLUSION

This service evaluation found that DA could be implemented and it demonstrated patient benefit in a real-world setting. Further research establishing the broader cost-consequences across the whole patient pathway would add to our findings.

Nurse-led versus doctor-led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

The organization of elective surgical services has changed in recent years, with increasing use of day surgery, reduced hospital stay and preoperative assessment (POA) performed in an outpatient clinic rather than by a doctor in a hospital ward after admission. Nurse specialists often lead these clinic-based POA services and have responsibility for assessing a patient's fitness for anaesthesia and surgery and organizing any necessary investigations or referrals. These changes offer many potential benefits for patients, but it is important to demonstrate that standards of patient care are maintained as nurses take on these responsibilities.

OBJECTIVES

We wished to examine whether a nurse-led service rather than a doctor-led service affects the quality and outcome of preoperative assessment (POA) for elective surgical participants of all ages requiring regional or general anaesthesia. We considered the evidence that POA led by nurses is equivalent to that led by doctors for the following outcomes: cancellation of the operation for clinical reasons; cancellation of the operation by the participant; participant satisfaction with the POA; gain in participant knowledge or information; perioperative complications within 28 days of surgery, including mortality; and costs of POA. We planned to investigate whether there are differences in quality and outcome depending on the age of the participant, the training of staff or the type of surgery or anaesthesia provided.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and two trial registers on 13 February 2013, and performed reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of participants (adults or children) scheduled for elective surgery requiring general, spinal or epidural anaesthesia that compared POA, including assessment of physical status and anaesthetic risk, undertaken or led by nursing staff with that undertaken or led by doctors. This assessment could have taken place in any setting, such as on a ward or in a clinic. We included studies in which the comparison assessment had taken place in a different setting. Because of the variation in service provision, we included two separate comparison groups: specialist doctors, such as anaesthetists; and non-specialist doctors, such as interns.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological approaches as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration, including independent review of titles, data extraction and risk of bias assessment by two review authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two eligible studies, both comparing nurse-led POA with POA led by non-specialist doctors, with a total of 2469 participants. One study was randomized and the other quasi-randomized. Blinding of staff and participants to allocation was not possible. In both studies, all participants were additionally assessed by a specialist doctor (anaesthetist in training), who acted as the reference standard. In neither study did participants proceed from assessment by nurse or junior doctor to surgery. Neither study reported on cancellations of surgery, gain in participant information or knowledge or perioperative complications. Reported outcomes focused on the accuracy of the assessment. One study undertook qualitative assessment of participant satisfaction with the two forms of POA in a small number of non-randomly selected participants (42 participant interviews), and both groups of participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the care received. This study also examined economic modelling of costs of the POA as performed by the nurse and by the non-specialist doctor based on the completeness of the assessment as noted in the study and found no difference in cost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, no evidence is available from RCTs to allow assessment of whether nurse-led POA leads to an increase or a decrease in cancellations or perioperative complications or in knowledge or satisfaction among surgical participants. One study, which was set in the UK, reported equivalent costs from economic models. Nurse-led POA is now widespread, and it is not clear whether future RCTs of this POA strategy are feasible. A diagnostic test accuracy review may provide useful information.

Perceptions of the advanced nurse practitioner role in a hospital setting

AIM

To explore perceptions of junior doctors, nurses and advanced nurse practitioners (ANP) in relation to the role of the ANP.

METHOD

A qualitative cross-sectional design was used, embedded in an interpretative philosophy. A non-probability sample of six junior doctors, six ward nurses and six ANPs took part in focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews. A mixture of phenomenological and grounded theory approaches were used to collect the data.

FINDINGS

Four major themes were identified - diverse definitions of the ANP role between medical and surgical wards in the hospital at day compared to hospital at night work; role vagueness and ambiguity; communication and education needs; and constraints and barriers. The study found varied perceptions and understanding of the role of the ANP within the hospital at day. Conversely, the hospital at night concept seemed correctly perceived - the role appeared well-established, organised and orchestrated the appropriate responses as required in both medicine and surgery. During the hospital at day, nurses on medical wards were more inclined to use the medical staff as their first responders. The absence of the bleep filtering system in medicine during the day was identified as one of the main barriers. A definitive understanding of the role during the hospital at day has been recognised as the second main barrier. A constraint well known to the ANP team was the inability to provide a bleep filter system in medicine during the day.

CONCLUSION

The study finds the need for improved education, clinical support and system management during the hospital at day, with more of an emphasis within medical wards.

Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcome reporting bias and dissemination bias in trials funded by the National Health System (NHS) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) program.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective cohort study of HTA monographs and corresponding journal publications including all clinical effectiveness randomized controlled trials published as HTA monographs between 1999 and 2005 by the NHS HTA program.

RESULTS

There was a higher median P-value (P=0.33, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.02-0.54) among trials without a journal publication compared with those with a journal publication (P=0.14, IQR: 0.007-0.43), although the difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney U test, z=-0.70; P=0.48). A higher proportion of statistically significant findings were reported in journal articles when compared with the outcomes reported in the HTA monographs. Trials published in general medical journals tended to have smaller P-values (median: 0.05, IQR: 0.001-0.22) than those published in more specialist journals (median: 0.33 IQR: 0.008-0.58), although this result was not significant (Mann-Whitney U test, z=-1.63; P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Among journal-published trials, there were a greater proportion of statistically significant findings included in the journal reports compared with those in the HTA monographs.

Can an advanced nurse practitioner take on the role of senior house officer within a specialised area of practice: an evaluation

This study looked at the impact of advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) taking on the role of senior house officer (SHO) within obstetrics and gynaecology. It was anticipated that such a change would have benefits for patients and for service delivery. The project took place in the gynaecology department of a district general hospital. All patients who would normally be under the care of the SHOs with one medical team received this care from one or other of two ANPs. Focus groups were used to look at the impact of the changes on other staff within the unit. Patient questionnaires were used to assess the opinions of patients about the care they received. Length of stay, readmissions and cancellations were used to assess the impact on patient care. The change in role of the ANPs has had lasting benefits in terms of better communication and multidisciplinary working and the development of an informal referral system that allowed patients to be seen more quickly and appropriately. There were no ill effects on patient care.

Day surgery in Finland: a prospective cohort study of 14 day-surgery units

BACKGROUND

Day surgery is an established practice for elective operative care, and is considered safe and cost-effective in several procedures and for several patients. At present, day-surgery accounts for approximately 50% of elective surgery in Finland. The aim of this study was to prospectively describe the present situation at Finnish day-surgery units, focusing on the quality of care.

METHODS

Fourteen large- to medium-sized day surgery and short-stay units were recruited, and all patient cases performed during a 2-month study period were registered and analyzed. Quality of care was assessed by analyzing the rates and reasons for overnight admission, readmission, reoperation, and cancellations. Satisfaction of care was inquired from day-surgery patients during a 2-week period. Head anesthesiologists were interviewed about functional policies.

RESULTS

Of 7915 reported cases, 84% were day surgery. Typically, several specialties were represented at the units, with orthopedics accounting for nearly 30% of all day-surgery procedures. Patient selection criteria were in line with the present-day recommendations, although the proportion of older patients and the ASA physical status 3 patients were still relatively low. The rate of unplanned overnight admissions was 5.9%. Return hospital visits were reported in 3.7% and readmissions in 0.7% of patients 1-28 days post-operatively. Patient satisfaction was high.

CONCLUSION

Along with the growing demand for day surgery, Finnish public hospitals have succeeded in providing good-quality care, and there still seems to be potential to increase the share of day surgery. Easily accessible benchmarking tools are needed for quality control and learning from peers.

Critical appraisal of the literature on economic evaluations of substitution of skills between professionals: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

Substitution of skills has been introduced to increase health service efficiency, but little evidence is available about its cost-effectiveness. This systematic review aims to identify economic evaluations of substitution between professionals, to assess the quality of the study methods applied and to value the results for decision making.

METHODS

Publications between January 1996 and November 2006 were searched in Medline, Cochrane, Cinahl, database of Health Technology Assessments, EPOC and Embase. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cost-benefit analysis, interrupted time series design and systematic reviews were selected. The methodological quality of the papers was reviewed, using the critical appraisal of Drummond and the EPOC list.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were finally included of 7605 studies: three cost-effectiveness studies, three cost-minimization studies and five studies related to partial economic evaluations. Small numbers of participating professionals and several limitations in the cost valuation and the measurement of costs were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Several potential limitations influence the validity and generalizability. Full economic evaluations per se are of limited value for making decisions about substitution of skills. The tenuous relationship between structural, process and outcome variables is not sufficient investigated. For meaningfully placing the costs and consequences of substitution of skills in the context of health care and generating relevant data for decision making, it is strongly recommended to combine an economic evaluation (RCT) with an observational longitudinal study.

Improving quality and safety of hospital care: a reappraisal and an agenda for clinically relevant reform

Improving quality and safety of hospital care is now firmly on the health-care agenda. Various agencies within different levels of government are pursuing initiatives targeting hospitals and health professionals that aim to identify, quantify and lessen medical error and suboptimal care. Although not denying the value of such 'top-down' initiatives, more attention may be needed towards 'bottom-up' reform led by practising physicians. This article discusses factors integral to delivery of safe, high-quality care grouped under six themes: clinical workforce, teamwork, patient participation in care decisions, indications for health-care interventions, clinical governance and information systems. Following this discussion, a 20-point action plan is proposed as an agenda for future reform capable of being led by physicians, together with some cautionary notes about relying too heavily on information technology, use of non-clinical quality personnel and quantitative evaluative approaches as primary strategies in improving quality.

Economic aspects of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic

Studies continue to demonstrate that preoperative evaluation clinics help to prepare patients for surgery in a manner that minimizes cost and optimizes outcomes. These clinics are becoming common in both teaching and community hospitals. Many full service preoperative assessment clinics utilize specially trained nurses who are under the direction of an anesthesiologist. These clinics are associated with favorable outcomes, dramatic decreases in preoperative testing, infrequent subspecialty consultation and shorter lengths of stay. The current literature is reviewed and organizational and clinical changes that improve efficiency and patient care are highlighted.

A formative evaluation of the potential role of nurse practitioners in a central London HIV outpatient clinic

In-house audit demonstrated that 49% (173/352) of patients attending routine HIV outpatient care are asymptomatic and have needs that could potentially be met by other health care professionals. We therefore evaluated the potential development and acceptability of nurse practitioner roles in contributing to HIV outpatient care. Data were collected through 26 consultation observations, 25 patient interviews, 2 patient focus groups, 22 provider interviews and 8 provider focus groups. Service users were key members of the evaluation team. With increasing HIV incidence and the change in focus of doctor-patient consultations from acute to chronic disease management, there are concerns about the sustainability of easily available routine HIV outpatient appointments using the same model of care that has prevailed over the past 20 years. Nurse practitioner models of care were considered acceptable for asymptomatic patients, including those who do not have complex issues related to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Key considerations for the role include training, supervision, referral pathways, and a clear understanding of the limitations of nursing practice. There is an emphasis on the need to consider 'new ways of working' throughout the service, rather than merely substituting or transferring clinical roles between professionals. Funding pending, nurse practitioner roles are planned for implementation in late 2004. Evaluation will determine impact on service utilization, health and economic outcomes.

Genetic nurse counsellors can be an acceptable and cost-effective alternative to clinical geneticists for breast cancer risk genetic counselling. Evidence from two parallel randomised controlled equivalence trials

This study compared genetic nurse counsellors with standard services for breast cancer genetic risk counselling services in two regional genetics centres, in Grampian region, North East Scotland and in Cardiff, Wales. Women referred for genetic counselling were randomised to an initial genetic counselling appointment with either a genetic nurse counsellor (intervention) or a clinical geneticist (current service, control). Participants completed postal questionnaires before, immediately after the counselling episode and 6 months later to assess anxiety, general health status, perceived risk and satisfaction. A parallel economic evaluation explored factors influencing cost-effectiveness. The two concurrent randomised controlled equivalence trials were conducted and analysed separately. In the Grampian trial, 289 patients (193 intervention, 96 control) and in the Wales trial 297 patients (197 intervention and 100 control) returned a baseline questionnaire and attended their appointment. Analysis suggested at least likely equivalence in anxiety (the primary outcome) between the two arms of the trials. The cost per counselling episode was 11.54 UK pounds less for nurse-based care in the Grampian trial and 12.50 UK pounds more for nurse-based care in Cardiff. The costs were sensitive to the grade of doctor (notionally) replaced and the extent of consultant supervision required by the nurse. In conclusion, care based on genetic nurse counsellors was not significantly different from conventional cancer genetic services in both trial locations.

The educational preparation of nursing staff undertaking pre-assessment of surgical patients--a discussion of the issues

This article discusses the education and training needs of nursing staff undertaking the pre-assessment of surgical patients in the context of role development within health care. The authors undertook this piece of work as part of a project to inform the development of a competency framework for use by registered nurses working in the field of pre-assessment screening and preparation of surgical patients. A selective review of the literature on the education and training needs of pre-assessment nurses, and nurses undertaking expanded roles has been undertaken and some of the emerging issues are debated. The nature of current preparation for these roles and the apparent lack of any consistent approach to education and training for staff adjusting their scope of professional practice is debated. A brief review of the nature of competence and some of the different models including occupational competence models are presented. Finally, the implications of these for the development of a strategy for the acquisition and demonstration of knowledge and skills in pre-assessment nursing staff are presented.

Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: creating bias and unreliability?

BACKGROUND

The randomized controlled trial is viewed by many researchers as the 'gold standard' research design. It is used increasingly to evaluate the effectiveness of socially complex activities such as nursing interventions. This use is seen by many commentators as problematic, while others are concerned about the quality of many published trial reports. One area of concern is that of intervention bias: the impact that a sentient intervention, such as a nursing one, may have consciously or unconsciously on study outcomes. This paper reports on an analysis of intervention definitions and possible intervention bias in 47 reports of randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions published in 2000 or 2001.

AIMS

This study evaluates four characteristics of the included reports: intervention sample size, intervention definition, involvement of intervention nurses in other aspects of the trial, and the claimed generalizability of results.

METHODS

Reports of randomized controlled trials published in 2000 or 2001 were identified. Full-text versions of 47 papers were obtained and information about the four characteristics was extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Problems relating to possible intervention bias were identified in each of the papers. Inadequate intervention definition was the commonest problem, leading to difficulties in calculating the 'intervention dose' and in replicating or generalizing from the studies.

DISCUSSION

None of the included studies met the requirements of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. Four types of intervention bias were identified, and their possible implications for the reporting of trials of nursing interventions are discussed. This was a small-scale study, limited by time and resources. Its results are suggestive of a major problem of intervention bias but larger-scale investigations are necessary to quantify its extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention bias is potentially a problem in randomized controlled trials. Lack of detail about interventions in published papers could be corrected by stricter adherence to guidelines such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, but this will not correct the underlying problem of inadequate study design that appears to be widespread in randomized controlled trials of nursing interventions.

Comparing doctor- and nurse-led care in a sexual health clinic: patient satisfaction questionnaire

BACKGROUND

A new model of comprehensive care nurse-led clinics has enabled experienced genitourinary medicine nurses to co-ordinate the first-line, comprehensive care of female patients presenting with sexually transmitted infections and other sexual health conditions and issues.

AIM

This paper describes the development of a patient satisfaction questionnaire to compare the satisfaction of women attending nurse-led or doctor-led clinics at a central London genitourinary medicine clinic.

METHODS

A previously validated questionnaire was adapted using the findings of qualitative interviews exploring patient expectations of the service. The draft questionnaire was tested for internal consistency, sub-scale homogeneity, construct validity and stability. The final version consisted of a 34 item, five-point Likert scale, which was found to be both reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.91) and stable (test-retest 0.95). There was some evidence of construct validity. The questionnaire was then distributed to a convenience sample of 132 women attending a nurse-led clinic and 150 seen at a doctor-led clinic.

RESULTS

There was a 90% response rate. The median total satisfaction scores, out of a total of five, were 4.47 and 4.30 for the nurse-led and doctor-led groups, respectively (P = 0.05). Significantly higher scores on the sub-scales measuring quality and competence of technical care (P < 0.001), provision of information (P = 0.01) and overall satisfaction (P = 0.01) were seen for the nurse-led group. No significant differences were found in the sub-scales measuring service attributes and specific attributes of interpersonal relationships.

CONCLUSION

The rigorous development, piloting and testing phases of this satisfaction questionnaire led to reliable and valid results. This study demonstrated that nurse-led clinics within this service are an acceptable alternative to the existing doctor-led clinics.

Pre-operative screening: criteria for referring to anaesthetists

Nurses assess patients pre-operatively using screening questionnaires and locally-developed protocols. Our objectives were to determine which questions might identify patients who should be seen by an anaesthetist before the day of surgery. A review of the literature and a preliminary questionnaire to establish questions to be tested was followed by a modified, two-round Delphi questionnaire to determine the level of agreement by anaesthetists. There was agreement for referring patients who gave a positive response to questions that query: restricted exercise tolerance; previous anaesthetic problems; family history of anaesthetic problem; pathology affecting neck movement; angina; arrhythmia; heart failure; asthma; epilepsy; insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; liver disease and unspecified kidney disease. There was equivocal agreement on questions that report a myocardial infarction over one year ago, cerebrovascular accident, non insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and thyroid disease. Nurses should use these criteria during pre-operative assessment to decide the timing of evaluation by an anaesthetist.