Effusion-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma of the breast: time for it to be defined as a distinct clinico-pathological entity

Breast implant illness: A United Kingdom patient-centred approach

INTRODUCTION

Silicone breast implants are widely prevalent. An increasing group of patients detail self-reported somatic and psychological symptoms that have been ascribed as breast implant illness (BII) and seek capsulectomy and implant removal. To guide consultations and shared decision making, more outcome data relating to this intervention are required.

AIM

To present a multicentre study of patient-centred (n = 100) outcome data, following total capsulectomy with implant removal for BII.

METHOD

A questionnaire survey was cross-referenced with medical records. Collected data included demographics, operation details, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, overall self-perceived percentage improvement in BII symptoms and breast shape satisfaction ratings after explantation.

RESULTS

The 10 most frequently self-reported symptoms were fatigue (81%), pains/aches (72%), brain/memory fog (56%), mood disturbances (36%), neuropathic pain (28%), hair loss (28%), headaches (25%), gastric symptoms/intolerances (24%), eczema/rash (18%) and vision disturbance (17%). A high proportion of patients (98%) experienced a 62 ± 4% average symptom improvement; most self-reported symptoms (21/28) improved significantly after explantation with total capsulectomy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients had high overall self-perceived BII percentage improvement (76 ± 3%) and satisfaction with breast shape numerical rating score (8 ± 0.30) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Despite BII not being a defined disease entity, symptom association with silicone breast implants continues for a growing number of patients. It is important to recognise that in this patient group, capsulectomy and implant removal may not be curative, however we have demonstrated that symptom improvement can occur. It is very difficult to prove a causal link between breast implants and BII; to do so will require extensive prospective data collection.

Breast lymphomas, breast implants and capsules The timeline of BIA-ALCL with respect to surgical consent: the UK perspective

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare type of T-Cell (non-Hodgkin's) lymphoma associated with the use of silicone breast implants. Recent widespread awareness has focused not only on the management of this condition but also in regards to potential litigation of surgeons, clinics, and breast implant manufacturers. Allegations of causation and inappropriate patient consent are being raised. The purpose of this article is to establish the timeline of relevant discoveries regarding this condition and associated implications with regards to appropriate informed patient consent.

Is It Possible To Differentiate Types Of Breast Implants By Imaging In The Era Of Implant Associated Lymphoma?

Objectives Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has been recognised in the latest years and there is an ongoing extensive research. Although the exact mechanism and cause are still not clear, we now know that the disease is more associated with textured implants. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study investigating the radiological differential of various implants has been conducted. In this essay, we aimed to demonstrate dicriminating in vitro and in vivo imaging features, if any, of variuos types of breast implant devices using mammography, ultrasound, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). METHODS Five different implant devices from various manufacturers with different surface materials which are smooth, microtextured, regular macrotextured, lightweight macrotextured, polyurethane coated were involved. In vitro mammography was performed with a digital mammogram (Amulet Innovality, Fuji, Japan) and in vitro and in vivo sonography was performed with Esaote MyLab9 using a 7.5 MHz linear probe. In vitro MRI was performed with 1.5T magnet (Symphony TIM upgrade and Aera, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), with 7 channel breast coil (Sense coil, Innova, Germany). MRI studies included fat sat T2 weighted sequences (T2WS), non-fat sat T2WS and silicone only sequences. Results Each imaging technique had different contributions for dealing with this challenge. Mammography and MRI were limited on identifying the double bands of the capsule. On mammogram, we could only differentiate the lightweight macrotextured implant as the borosilicate microspheres were represented by tiny, round lucencies within the gel. Ultrasound imaging with the proper technique was very helpful for identfying the surface. On in vitro sonogram, the inner capsule (implant shell) was identified as parallel double echogenic bands. Bands of the smooth implant were better delineated compared to the textured implants. The double echogenic bands of the polyurethane coated implant were not even identified separetely. Reverberation artefact caused by the smooth implant was the main discriminating in vivo sonographic feature of smooth implants. On in vitro MRI, we could identify the hyperintense polyurethane coated capsule on fat sat T2WS and non-fat sat T2WS. The tiny hypointense microspheres of the lightweight implant was also identified on the silicone only sequence of the in vitro MRI. Conclusion In this study, we have showed that breast implant material and type may be differed by the help of in vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics on different radiological modalities. These different imaging features could be used for recognising and labelling the implant type, especially macro textured implants which are reported to be more associated with breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) compared to other types. We believe evaluating these imaging characteristics during daily practice will help radiologists to become aware of the implant type and possible complications or diseases associated with that type.

[Revised WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, 2017 (4th edition):lymphoid tumors]

The paper is devoted to changes in the 4^th edition of the WHO classification of lymphoid tumors in the 2017 revision, to the principles of the structure and features of the classification. It discusses changes in the identification of new clinical and morphological categories and in the abolition of some previously existing ones. New information about lymphoid tumors, their immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics of classification importance are briefly outlined. The absolute need for molecular genetic studies for the diagnosis of certain lymphoproliferative diseases is underlined. The characteristics of lymphoid pretumor states are given.

Breast Implant-Associated Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing evidence in recent years that breast implants can, in rare cases, be associated with the development of an anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).

METHODS

This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed for articles that appeared from the time of the initial description of breast-implant-associated ALCL onward (1997 to January 2018), and by a further search in German nationwide databases.

RESULTS

516 pathologically confirmed cases of breast-implant-associated (BIA) ALCL were documented around the world until February 2018; seven of these arose in Germany and were reported to the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM). In approximately 80% of the affected women, the BIA-ALCL manifested itself as a late-developing seroma at the implant site; in the rest, as a solid tumor with or without an accompanying seroma. The mean implant exposure time ranged from 7 to 13 years on average. 16 fatalities have been reported worldwide. Among the 7 cases reported in Germany, four women had undergone breast reconstruction with implants after breast cancer surgery, and two had undergone breast augmentation surgery. In all patients, the entire capsule-and-implant unit was resected. One patient underwent chemotherapy and one further patient underwent chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The risk that a woman with breast implants will develop a primary anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is estimated at 0.35 to 1 case per million persons per year. The incidence of implant-associated ALCL is thus very low, yet nevertheless markedly higher than that of other primary lymphomas of the breast. Because of the low case numbers, recommendations for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of this entity have not been adequately evaluated. Treatment with primary curative intent for BIA-ALCL confers a much better prognosis than when performed for a systemic ALCL. Whenever a patient with a breast implant presents with a late-developing seroma, BIA-ALCL should be included in the differential diagnosis. This diagnosis is reportable.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, an under-recognised entity

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare form of T-cell lymphoma, recently linked to the use of certain types of breast implants. Although rare, BIA-ALCL is being increasingly recognised and radiologists can play an important role in its early diagnosis. BIA-ALCL is thought to be related to chronic inflammation from indolent infection of the biofilm surrounding implants leading to malignant transformation of activated T cells in genetically susceptible individuals. Clinical features include breast enlargement or asymmetry, discomfort, heaviness and/or a palpable mass in the context of long-standing implant(s). Ultrasound is the primary imaging modality, and the presence of more than a trace of peri-implant fluid should prompt consideration of aspiration for cytology, flow cytometry and microbiological analysis. This article reviews the clinical, imaging and pathology features of BIA-ALCL. In addition, the current recommended management guidelines for suspected cases are discussed.

Risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in patients submitted to breast implantation: A systematic review

Although breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare disease, its incidence has been increasing. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of BIA-ALCL in women with breast implants. A systematic search was carried out in Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, LIVIVO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey databases. The risk assessment of bias was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The rarity of BIA-ALCL was a major limitation. Although we have found evidence of an increased risk of BIA-ALCL, further studies are needed to understand why some large samples did not present any case of the disease.

Achieving Reliable Diagnosis in Late Breast Implant Seromas: From Reactive to Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Late onset of fluid collection surrounding breast implants may represent a serious issue when considering the possibility of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, a newly recognized type of T-cell malignancy. However, many other factors, including trauma and infections, may be implicated in the formation of non-neoplastic periprosthetic delayed effusions. An appropriate management of late seromas, consisting of ultrasound-guided fluid drainage, cultures, cytology, and immunocytochemical and T-cell clonality studies, should be performed to achieve a correct and prompt diagnosis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Criticisms in the diagnosis of late peri-implant effusions are here discussed in detail.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a review

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma is a newly recognized provisional entity in the 2017 revision of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. It is an uncommon, slow growing T-cell lymphoma with morphology and immunophenotype similar to anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma. However, the presentation and treatment are unique. Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma often presents as a unilateral effusion confined to the capsule of a textured-surface breast implant, a median time of 9 years after the initial implants have been placed. Although it follows an indolent clinical course, breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has the potential to form a mass, to invade locally through the capsule into breast parenchyma or soft tissue and/or to spread to regional lymph nodes. In most cases, an explantation with a complete capsulectomy removing all disease, without chemotherapy is considered to be curative and confers an excellent event free and overall survival. Here we provide a comprehensive review of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, including history, epidemiology, clinical features, imaging and pathology findings, pathologic handling, pathogenic mechanisms, model for progression, therapy and outcomes as well as an analysis of causality between breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

The A, B and C's of Silicone Breast Implants: Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Biofilm and Capsular Contracture

Breast implantation either for cosmetic or reconstructive e purposes is one of the most common procedures performed in plastic surgery. Biofilm infection is hypothesised to be involved in the development of both capsular contracture and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Capsular contracture is one of the principal reasons for breast revision surgery and is characterised by the tightening and hardening of the capsule surrounding the implant, and ALCL is an indolent lymphoma found only in women with textured implants. We describe the types of breast implants available with regard to their surface characteristics of surface area and roughness and how this might contribute to capsular contracture and/or biofilm formation. The pathogenesis of capsular contracture is thought to be due to biofilm formation on the implant, which results in on-going inflammation. We describe the current research into breast implant associated ALCL and how implant properties may affect its pathogenesis, with ALCL only occurring in women with textured implants.

Clinical Impact of the 2016 Update to the WHO Lymphoma Classification

OPINION STATEMENT

The 2016 revision of the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms includes new entities along with a clearer definition of provisional and definitive subtypes based on better understanding of the molecular drivers of lymphomas. These changes impact current treatment paradigms and provide a framework for future clinical trials. Additionally, this update recognizes several premalignant or predominantly indolent entities and underscores the importance of avoiding unnecessarily aggressive treatment in the latter subsets.

Current Approaches Including Novel Nano/Microtechniques to Reduce Silicone Implant-Induced Contracture with Adverse Immune Responses

Capsular contracture, which is the pathologic development of fibrous capsules around implants, is a major complication of reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgeries. Capsular contracture can cause implant failure with breast hardening, deformity, and severe pain. The exact mechanisms underlying this complication remain unclear. In addition, anaplastic large cell lymphoma is now widely recognized as a very rare disease associated with breast implants. Foreign body reactions are an inevitable common denominator of capsular contracture. A number of studies have focused on the associated immune responses and their regulation. The present article provides an overview of the currently available techniques, including novel nano/microtechniques, to reduce silicone implant-induced contracture and associated foreign body responses.

Diagnosis of anaplastic large cell lymphoma on late peri-implant breast seroma: Management of cytological sample by an integrated approach

INTRODUCTION

Peri-implant breast seroma is a late clinical presentation of reconstructive surgery or augmentation mammoplasty with breast implants. Pre-operative cytological evaluation of the peri-implant breast seroma is a common clinical approach, showing mainly an inflammatory reaction or more rarely a breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Herein, we reported the role of cytology in the evaluation of peri-implant breast seroma and its critical pre-operative implications.

METHODS

Eight cases of peri-implant breast seroma from files at Luigi Vanvitelli University were identified between January and December 2017. In all cases, seroma was aspirated; cytospins were performed and stained by Papanicolaou stain; finally, in all cases, a cell block was obtained for immunocytochemical evaluation and, in one case, for FISH to detect ALK1-gene translocation.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 48 years and the mean time between the implant placement and the occurrence of peri-implant breast seroma was 18 months. Microscopic examination showed breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in one case, aspecific inflammatory reaction in six cases and silicon-associated reaction in one case.

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-implant breast seroma may be caused by several pathological conditions with different clinical behaviour. A proper cytological approach to peri-implant breast seroma allows a correct differential diagnosis between inflammatory conditions and breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and an appropriate management of the patient.

Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma Associated with Breast Implants: A Case Report of a Transgender Female

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare peripheral T cell lymphoma. BIA-ALCL is a disease of the fibrous capsule surrounding the implant and occurs in patients after both breast reconstruction and augmentation. More than 300 cases have been reported so far, including two in a transgender patient. Here we describe BIA-ALCL presented with a mass in a transgender patient and the first case of BIA-ALCL in the Czech Republic. In 2007, a 33-year-old transgender male to female underwent bilateral breast augmentation as a part of his transformation to female. In June 2014, the patient developed a 5-cm tumorous mass in her left breast. Magnetic resonance imaging of the chest revealed a ruptured implant and a tumorous mass penetrating into the capsule and infiltrating the pectoral muscle. An R0 surgery was indicated-the implant, silicone gel and capsule were removed, and the tumorous mass was resected together with a part of the pectoral muscle. Histology revealed anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. The patient underwent standard staging procedures for lymphoma including a bone marrow trephine biopsy, which confirmed stage IE. The patient was treated with the standard chemotherapy for systemic ALCL-6 cycles of CHOP-21. The patient was tumor-free at the 2-year follow-up. BIA-ALCL has been reported mostly in women who received implants for either reconstructive or aesthetic augmentation. This is the third report of BIA-ALCL in a transgender person, the first in the Czech Republic. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Application of Breast Ultrasound Elastography to Differentiate Intracapsular Collection from Silicone-Induced Granuloma of Breast Implant Capsule Complementarily to Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

To determine whether there is correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and breast elastography to differentiate seroma/hematoma from silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC).

Methods:

Prospective study of 99 patients with breast implants submitted to breast MRI during the period from February 1 to May 1, 2017. Patients who present MRI findings of seroma/hematoma or SIGBIC were submitted to a complementary ultrasound elastography study to evaluate the correlation of the results. The criteria adopted for the diagnosis of granuloma by MRI were heterogeneous hypersignal in the T2-weighted sequences, late contrast enhancement, and black drop sign. Lesions that did not enhance after the use of contrast were considered as seroma/hematoma. By elastography, the results were considered positive for granuloma when presented as hard lesions, whereas seroma/hematoma presented as soft lesions.

Results:

Of the 99 patients evaluated, 15 were included in the study. Of the 15 patients, 9 had solid intracapsular MRI masses, whereas 6 presented collections without contrast enhancement. The complementary elastography study showed correlation with MRI results in all cases of SIGBIC and seroma/hematoma, being elastography able to differentiate lesions from solid to cystic.

Conclusions:

Elastography of intracapsular masses in breast implants presented results compatible with those found by MRI to differentiate solid lesions from collections.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A review and assessment of cutaneous manifestations

One newly recognized form of T-cell lymphoma is breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (biALCL), which appears in close proximity to breast implants. The number of reported cases of biALCL is increasing and warrants careful attention by clinicians to more effectively diagnose and treat affected individuals.

As pertinent to dermatologists, the objective of this paper is to present the associated cutaneous features of this clinical entity along with the pathogenesis, management, and clinical outcomes.

biALCL is a T-cell lymphoma in which malignant T-cells are characterized by large pleomorphic and anaplastic morphology and immunoreactivity for CD30, similar to primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphomas (pcALCL). It has a favorable clinical outcome like nonimplant-associated pcALCL and involves the fibrous capsule around the implant, which creates an immunologically privileged site with a peri-implant effusion (seroma). More rare presentations are of a solitary mass.

Appropriate management of biALCL is the complete surgical removal of the implant and total capsulectomy. Dermatologists should be aware of the occurrence of this entity in patients who have breast implants because patients may present specifically for breast-related cutaneous findings or have incidental cutaneous changes noted during a skin examination.

The recognition and timely diagnosis of biALCL is critical to prevent progression to more advanced disease, ensure adequate treatment with removal of the implant, and avoid unnecessary aggressive systemic chemotherapy.

Practical Implications of the 2016 Revision of the World Health Organization Classification of Lymphoid and Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia

A major revision of the WHO classification of lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia was released in 2016. A key motivation for this update was to include new information available since the 2008 version with clinical relevance for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of patients. With > 100 entities described, it is important for the clinician to understand features that may be important in daily practice, whereas researchers need to incorporate the new classification scheme into study development and analysis. In this review, we highlight the key aspects of the 2016 update with particular importance to routine patient care and clinical trial design.

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL): A Case Report

BACKGROUND Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL) are a rare type of primary breast lymphoma. The association between breast implants and ALCL was first described in 1997 and since then 34-173 cases have been presented. The annual incidence of breast implant-associated ALCL (BI-ALCL) is 0.1-0.3 per 100 000 women who undergo breast reconstruction, and cases are often underreported due to the rarity of these tumors. BI-ALCL arises from the inflammatory T cells surrounding the fibrous capsule, and most tumors are in situ. CASE REPORT Here, we present the case of a 51-year-old woman with ALCL following bilateral silicone breast implants. The patient presented with breast enlargement and tenderness 9 years following reconstructive surgery. Imagining studies showed fluid collection surrounding the affected breast implant. Staging studies and histocytopathology examination confirmed the presence BI-ALCL without capsular invasion or metastasis. Complete surgical excision was performed. The patient continues to be in complete remission. CONCLUSIONS Due to the rarity of these tumors, establishing the diagnosis of BI-ALCL can be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Clinicians should be aware of the relationship between breast implants and BI-ALCL.

Silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC): similarities and differences with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and their differential diagnosis

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare disease and accounts for 0.5% of cases of breast cancer. Most primary breast lymphomas develop from B cells, and the involvement of T cells is rare. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a recently discovered T-cell lymphoma associated with breast implants. Only a few cases have been reported to date. It is believed that the incidence of ALCL is increasing because of the increasing number of breast implants. The clinical presentation is variable and can manifest as a palpable mass in the breast or armpit, breast pain, or capsular contracture. Because of the rarity of the disease and the lack of knowledge to date, clinical diagnosis is often delayed, with consequent delays in treatment. The cause and pathogenesis have not been fully elucidated, and there are no evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, or follow-up of this disease. We present a review of cases of patients with silicone breast implants, including ALCL, a rare type of breast cancer that is still under study, and silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule and its differential diagnosis, and discuss if a silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule could be the precursor of the disease.

Breast implants and possible association with ALCL: A retrospective study including a histological analysis of 296 explanted breast tissues and current literature

AIM

To identify a possible connection between anaplastic large cell lymphoma and different types of breast implants.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 296 breast tissues of 227 women with different breast implant types undergoing surgical revision or explantation between January 2000 and June 2015. Histological and selected immunohistochemical analyses of CD30-&ALK-1-markers of the breast capsules were performed.

RESULTS

The womens' average age was 42.91±12.66 years (median: 43.83 years) during implantation and 51.40±11.40 years (median: 52.37 years) during revision or explantation of the implants. Average implant residing time was 8.49±8.90 years (median: 5.83 years). In 51% implantation was for reconstructive, in 48% for aesthetic reasons, in 1% for other reasons. At 59% the main reason for explantation or removal was capsular fibrosis (n = 173). In 296 breast capsules we could not find pathological lymphoma cells according to ALCL, retrospectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study we detected high incidences of various cells in relationship to the implant's type and residing time, which will be published in further articles. We could not find ALCL-cells in breast capsules of explanted or revised breast implants during 2000-2015, retrospectively.There should be a heightened awareness of a possible relationship between the development of cancer and breast implants. To date there are case reports about a possible association between the development of ALCL and breast implants. The number of cases are few and our knowledge of the pathogenesis is little. Further investigation is needed to understand the possible link between breast implants and ALCL found in the breast.

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma associated with silicone breast implant, HLA-DRB1*11:01, and HLA-DQB1*03:01 manifesting as macrophage activation syndrome and with severe neurological symptoms: a case report

BACKGROUND

Silicone implants have been successfully used for breast augmentation and reconstruction in millions of women worldwide. The reaction to the silicone implant is highly variable; it can lead to local inflammatory symptoms, and sometimes to systemic symptoms and disease. Over 80 cases of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma have been reported in patients with silicone breast implants and have been accepted as a new clinical entity. To the best of our knowledge, an intravascular large B-cell lymphoma associated with a silicone breast implant has not been reported previously.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old Caucasian woman who presented with high fever was found to have splenomegaly on physical examination. A laboratory diagnosis revealed pancytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperferritinemia. She developed signs of altered sensorium, hemiparesis, aphasia, and cauda equina syndrome. On further evaluation, she fulfilled the necessary five out of eight criteria for diagnosis of macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Dexamethasone administration was followed by prompt improvement; however, 3 days later she again manifested high fever, which persisted despite administration of immunoglobulin and cyclosporine A. Her silicone breast implant was considered a possible contributor to her macrophage activation syndrome and was therefore removed. A histological examination of the capsule tissue showed an extensive lymphohistiocytic/giant cell foreign body reaction suggestive of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. However, the histological examination unexpectedly also revealed an intravascular large B-cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The genetic background of our patient with silicone breast implants might have predisposed her to three rare and difficult to diagnose syndromes/diseases: macrophage activation syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants, and intravascular large B-cell lymphoma. The simultaneous manifestation of all three syndromes suggests causal interrelationships. Human leukocyte antigen testing in all women who undergo silicon breast implantation could in the future enable us to better evaluate the risk of potential side effects.

The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms

A revision of the nearly 8-year-old World Health Organization classification of the lymphoid neoplasms and the accompanying monograph is being published. It reflects a consensus among hematopathologists, geneticists, and clinicians regarding both updates to current entities as well as the addition of a limited number of new provisional entities. The revision clarifies the diagnosis and management of lesions at the very early stages of lymphomagenesis, refines the diagnostic criteria for some entities, details the expanding genetic/molecular landscape of numerous lymphoid neoplasms and their clinical correlates, and refers to investigations leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies. The major changes are reviewed with an emphasis on the most important advances in our understanding that impact our diagnostic approach, clinical expectations, and therapeutic strategies for the lymphoid neoplasms.

Silicone implants and lymphoma: The role of inflammation

The risk of hematological malignancies is mainly determined by genetic background, age, sex, race and ethnicity, geographic location, exposure to certain chemicals and radiation; along with the more recently proposed immune factors such as chronic inflammation, immunodeficiencies, autoimmunity, and infections. Paradigmatic examples include the development of lymphoma in Sjögren's syndrome and Hashimoto thyroiditis, gastric MALT lymphoma in Helicobacter pylori infection, or lymphomas associated with infections by Epstein-Barr virus, human herpes virus 8 (HHV 8) and leukemia/lymphoma virus 1 (HTLV-1). A growing number of reports indicates an increased risk of lymphoma, particularly of the anaplastic large cell (ALCL) type. The implants, specifically those used in the past, elicit chronic stimulation of the immune system against the prosthetic material. This is particularly the case in genetically susceptible hosts. We suggest that polyclonal activation may result in monoclonality in those at risk hosts, ultimately leading to lymphoma. We suggest that patients with an inflammatory response against silicone implants be monitored carefully.

Lymphomas Associated with Breast Implants: A Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Recently there have been concerns raised about anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) associated with breast implants.

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this article was to review and analyze the published literature specifically for hematopoietic malignancies associated with breast implants and postulate a hypothesis for their etiology and pathogenesis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched using key words "lymphoma" and "breast implants" for published papers and abstracts on implant-associated hematopoietic malignancies.

RESULTS

The authors found 83 published cases reported of lymphomas associated with breast implants in the medical literature. The reported cases involved various subtypes of lymphomas and the majority were ALCL, of which 66 were confirmed as ALK negative; however there was no association with any particular type of implant. The more aggressive cases and reported low death rate appeared to be related to the presence of breast masses at the time of presentation rather than effusion. The remaining reports were occasional case reports of T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, primary effusion lymphoma and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the many thousands of women that have breast implants every year; the compiled data show that there is a very small risk of developing lymphoma. Increased awareness of association between implants and ALCL is needed globally and prospective patients considering breast implants should be fully informed of the risk. As the behavior of ALCL in these cases was indolent as compared with other primary breast lymphomas, it could suggest an abnormal reactive process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is substantial evidence that a type of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is associated with breast implants. However, the course in patients with breast implants seems to be unusually benign compared with other systemic ALCL. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze recently published cases of breast implant-associated ALCL, with an emphasis on diagnosis, staging, treatment, and outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a systematic literature review of reported cases of ALCL in patients with breast implants. Publications were identified with a search algorithm and forward searches. Case-based data were abstracted independently and reconciled by multiple investigators.

RESULTS

Of 248 identified articles, only 102 were relevant to breast implant-associated ALCL, and 27 were included in this study. Fifty-four cases of ALCL in patients with breast implants were identified. Detailed clinical information was lacking in many cases. Most presented with a seroma (76 percent), and approximately half were associated with the capsule (48 percent). Most presented as stage IE (61 percent). All but one case were ALK-negative. Most received chemotherapy (57 percent) and radiation therapy (48 percent), and 11 percent received stem cell transplants. Approximately one-quarter recurred, and 9 percent died.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the publication of guidance related to breast implant-associated ALCL in 2010, a number of cases have been reported. Despite the typically benign course, many of the cases have been treated with radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Increasing awareness of this disease entity among clinicians would be helpful, along with standardizing an approach to diagnosis, staging, and treatment.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, V.

Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Updated Results from a Structured Expert Consultation Process

Background:

Despite increased cases published on breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), important clinical issues remain unanswered. We conducted a second structured expert consultation process to rate statements related to the diagnosis, management, and surveillance of this disease, based on their interpretation of published evidence.

Methods:

A multidisciplinary panel of 12 experts was selected based on nominations from national specialty societies, academic department heads, and recognized researchers in the United States.

Results:

Panelists agreed that (1) this disease should be called “BIA-ALCL”; (2) late seromas occurring >1 year after breast implantation should be evaluated via ultrasound, and if a seroma is present, the fluid should be aspirated and sent for culture, cytology, flow cytometry, and cell block to an experienced hematopathologist; (3) surgical removal of the affected implant and capsule (as completely as possible) should occur, which is sufficient to eradicate capsule-confined BIA-ALCL; (4) surveillance should consist of clinical follow-up at least every 6 months for at least 5 years and breast ultrasound yearly for at least 2 years; and (5) BIA-ALCL is generally a biologically indolent disease with a good prognosis, unless it extends beyond the capsule and/or presents as a mass. They firmly disagreed with statements that chemotherapy and radiation therapy should be given to all patients with BIA-ALCL.

Conclusions:

Our assessment yielded consistent results on a number of key, incompletely addressed issues regarding BIA-ALCL, but additional research is needed to support these statement ratings and enhance our understanding of the biology, treatment, and outcomes associated with this disease.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) of breast in a patient without a breast implant

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the breast is an uncommon entity accounting for approximately 0.5% of malignant breast neoplasms and around 3% of extranodal lymphomas. Most cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) of the breast have been associated with breast implants, and a few ALCL aris.ing de novo in patients without breast implants have been reported. We report a case of a 19-year-old female who presented with a lump in the right breast of 3 months' duration. Examination revealed an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 and a 6.5 cm2 lump in the right breast. Lumpectomy revealed large neoplastic cells positive for CD30, EMA, CD5, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), suggestive of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The patient underwent lumpectomy followed by 6 cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone 3 weekly. On follow up, this patient had an event-free survival of 23 months. We are reporting this case of ALCL (ALK positive) in a patient with no breast implant previously, and hence, it is of clinical importance.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) and breast implants: breaking down the evidence

Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a distinct disease classification provisionally sub-divided into ALCL, Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)(+) and ALCL, ALK(-) entities. More recently, another category of ALCL has been increasingly reported in the literature and is associated with the presence of breast implants. A comprehensive review of the 71 reported cases of breast implant associated ALCL (iALCL) is presented indicating the apparent risk factors and main characteristics of this rare cancer. The average patient is 50 years of age and most cases present in the capsule surrounding the implant as part of the periprosthetic fluid or the capsule itself on average at 10 years post-surgery suggesting that iALCL is a late complication. The absolute risk is low ranging from 1:500,000 to 1:3,000,000 patients with breast implants per year. The majority of cases are ALK-negative, yet are associated with silicone-coated implants suggestive of the mechanism of tumorigenesis which is discussed in relation to chronic inflammation, immunogenicity of the implants and sub-clinical infection. In particular, capsulotomy alone seems to be sufficient for the treatment of many cases suggesting the implants provide the biological stimulus whereas others require further treatment including chemo- and radiotherapy although reported cases remain too low to recommend a therapeutic approach. However, CD30-based therapeutics might be a future option.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: review of a distinct clinicopathologic entity

Primary breast anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is rare but is more commonly seen in patients with implants; fewer than 50 cases of breast implant-associated ALCL have been reported in the English language literature. Breast implant-associated ALCL is not a disease of the breast parenchyma, but instead is a disease of the fibrous capsule surrounding the implant. The patients usually present with an effusion around the implant and, rarely, with a solid mass. Morphologically, the neoplastic cells are large, epithelioid, and pleomorphic, with abundant cytoplasm, vesicular irregular nuclei, and frequent mitoses. Occasional "hallmark" cells may be present. The lesional cells typically show strong and diffuse immunoreactivity for CD30 and often express T-cell markers, cytotoxic-associated antigens, and epithelial membrane antigen. Almost all reported cases are negative for anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Molecular genetic analyses have demonstrated T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. The differential diagnosis essentially includes poorly differentiated carcinoma, other lymphomas, and chronic inflammation. Once a diagnosis of lymphoma is established, it is important to exclude systemic anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative ALCL involving the breast, primary cutaneous ALCL, and other CD30(+) lymphoproliferative disorders. The patients with effusion-associated ALCL often have an indolent course and excellent prognosis, responding well to excision of the fibrous capsule around the implant (capsulectomy) and implant removal. In contrast, patients who present with a distinct mass may have a more aggressive course and poor prognosis, requiring chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.

Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Report of 2 Cases and Review of the Literature

Although primary breast lymphomas are exceedingly rare, cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (iALCL) continue to be reported. The authors describe their experience with 2 patients and review the literature. Both patients presented with periprosthetic fluid collection. Neither had evidence of systemic disease nor received systemic therapy. Both were disease free after bilateral capsulectomies and implant removal without implant replacement, and disease did not recur. During the literature review, 63 cases of iALCL (including our 2 patients) were identified. The median time from implant placement to diagnosis was 9 years. Both saline and silicone implants were associated with iALCL. Of the 26 cases for which implant surface was reported, the surface was textured in 24. Of the 58 patients with an identifiable presentation, 39 had periprosthetic fluid collection, including 7 with an associated mass; 13 had an isolated mass at presentation, including 1 with axillary adenopathy. Forty patients had capsulectomy, 7 of whom underwent implant replacement. Of the 44 patients with known treatment, 33 received chemotherapy and 23 received radiation. Of the 49 patients with known anaplastic large cell lymphoma, 15 had disease recurrence, and 4 patient deaths were reported. Of the 18 patients presenting with a mass, 11 had disease recurrence, including all 4 patients who died. This study represents the largest review of patients with iALCL described to date. Although most cases have an indolent clinical course, the variety of presentations defined as "seroma" vs "capsular involvement" emphasizes the importance of investigating a definitive method of diagnosis, management, and treatment of this disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5.

Primary breast lymphoma

Primary breast lymphoma is a rare form of extranodal lymphoma, defined by the presence of a primary lesion within the breast with or without regional nodal involvement but no other extra-mammary sites of involvement. It comprises diverse histologic subtypes, but diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common. In this review, we describe in detail the clinical features, diagnosis and staging, pathogenesis, risk factors and therapy of primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We consider choice and number of cycles of chemotherapy, the indications for radiotherapy and discuss the need for central nervous system prophylaxis. We also provide a brief overview of the less commonly encountered histologic subtypes including marginal zone, follicular, Burkitt and breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. We conclude with a suggested treatment approach and potential areas of future research.

Control of scaffold degradation in tissue engineering: a review

Tissue engineering has shown a great promise as a solution to the high demand for tissue and organ transplantations. Biomaterial scaffolds serve to house and direct cells to grow, exposing them to an adequate perfusion of nutrients, oxygen, metabolic products, and appropriate growth factors to enhance their differentiation and function. The degradation of biomaterial scaffolds is a key factor to successful tissue regeneration. In this article, the existing degradation control approaches in the context of scaffold tissue engineering were reviewed and a new paradigm of thinking called active control of scaffold degradation, proposed elsewhere by us, was also revisited and discussed in light of its benefit and requirement of this new technology.

Implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma of the breast: Insight into a poorly understood disease

Implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is the subject of much debate in the field of plastic surgery. Only a few published cases have been reported and the rarity of the disease may make proving causality exceedingly difficult. Despite this, it is of utmost importance that full attention be devoted to this subject to ensure the safety and well-being of patients. The authors report one new case of implant-associated ALCL that recently presented to their institution. Implant-associated ALCL is a poorly understood disease. It should likely be considered its own clinical entity and categorized into two subtypes: one presenting as a seroma and the other as a distinct mass or masses. When reported, only textured implants have been associated with ALCL. The United States Food and Drug Administration and American Society of Plastic Surgeons have initiated a registry and have collected critical data to gain further understanding of this disease.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma can be a diagnostic challenge for pathologists

BACKGROUND

Primary anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) occurring in women with breast implants is very rare. It is usually described as tumor cells infiltrating the periprosthetic capsule. These are most often revealed by a periprosthetic recurrent isolated effusion (seroma cavity), occurring late after implantation of the prosthesis. ALCL is more rarely a tumor or periprosthetic capsular contracture.

CASE

We report a 66-year-old woman, initially diagnosed by cytological examination of breast effusion, in whom ALCL appeared two and a half months after the removal of a ruptured implant. Repeated biopsies of the periprosthetic capsule performed in parallel showed fibrous tissue, without tumor proliferation. Only meticulous histological examination of the total capsulectomy identified tumor cells as a thin and discontinuous layer along the inner surface of the capsule without capsular invasion.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the histological pattern of this new clinical entity is important. A total capsulectomy with a good sampling for microscopic examination should be conducted for any suspicion of breast implant-associated ALCL. Cytology-histology correlation is essential.

Lymphoma affecting the breast: a pictorial review of multimodal imaging findings

Hematological malignancies rarely affect the breast, and the majority of those that do are lymphomas. In this review, we describe the clinical aspects and multimodal imaging findings of breast lymphoma. We also illustrate the key clinical and radiological findings that allow it to be distinguished from various other malignant and benign diseases of the breast. Breast lymphoma manifests as a breast mass, a change in the subcutaneous tissue or the skin, or enlargement of the associated lymph node on radiological examination. Radiological findings associated with other breast malignancies, such as calcifications, spiculations, or architectural distortions are extremely rare. Skin and subcutaneous changes frequently accompany T-cell lymphoma. Multimodal breast imaging characteristics may aid in the diagnosis of breast lymphoma.

Breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a case report and reconstructive option

Since 1995, the association between Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) and breast implant capsules has been of increasing concern. Up to 40 cases have been reported worldwide. The majority of cases favour an indolent course, similar to that of primary cutaneous ALCL, with a 10-year survival rate of greater than 90%. Many recommendations have been made for diagnosis, treatment and adjuvant therapy but the issue of reconstruction post capsulectomy and removal of implants has not yet been addressed. We present a case report and management option.

Peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas in the WHO classification: pearls and pitfalls

Peripheral T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas are functionally, pathologically, and clinically complex. Most nodal T-cell lymphomas belong to the adaptive immune system, whereas many extranodal T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas are derived from innate immune cells. The pathological manifestations often reflect the functional attributes of the neoplastic cells. Several forms of peripheral T-cell lymphoma are derived from T-follicular helper cells (T(FH)), and include angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, the follicular variant of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, and primary cutaneous small/medium CD4-positive T-cell lymphoma. T(FH)-derived neoplasms are often associated with atypical and clonal B-cell proliferations, which take a number of forms, sometimes mimicking classical Hodgkin's lymphoma, and sometimes showing marked plasmacytic differentiation. Most extranodal T-cell lymphomas are cytotoxic and often arise in mucosal-associated sites. They can be derived from either αβ or γδ cytotoxic T cells, and include subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphomas, both Type I and Type II. Type I enteropathy-associated lymphomas occur in association with celiac disease, whereas Type II lymphomas are more often sporadic. For some T-cell lymphomas, such as hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, immunophenotypic heterogeneity is seen within a single disease entity. New data are emerging on the molecular pathogenesis of T-cell and NK-cell lymphoma, but most tumor types remain poorly characterized.

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with breast implants: a report of 13 cases

We report 13 cases of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) associated with breast implants. Patient age ranged from 39 to 68 years, and the interval from implant to ALCL was 4 to 29 years. All tumors were composed of large, pleomorphic cells that were CD30 and ALK1, and all 7 cases assessed had monoclonal T-cell receptor γ-chain rearrangements. Two patient subgroups were identified. Ten patients presented with effusion surrounded by fibrous capsule without a grossly identifiable tumor mass. Nine patients had stage I and 1 had stage II disease. Eight patients underwent implant removal and capsulectomy. Four patients received chemotherapy and 4 radiation therapy. All patients were alive without disease at last follow-up. A second subgroup of 3 patients had effusion and a distinct mass adjacent to the implant. One patient had stage I and 2 stage II disease. One patient had a 3-year history of lymphomatoid papulosis, and 1 patient had a 1-year history of CD30 T-cell lymphoma adjacent to the breast before the diagnosis of ALCL associated with breast implant. Two patients received chemotherapy and 1 radiation therapy. Two patients died 2 and 12 years after diagnosis, respectively. We conclude that the clinical behavior of ALCL associated with breast implants is heterogeneous. Patients who present with effusion without a distinct mass have an indolent disease course, similar to CD30 lymphoproliferative disorder of skin. In contrast, patients who present with a distinct mass may have advanced stage or possibly systemic disease and have a poorer prognosis.