Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease with cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic features improves risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia

Integrated Genomics Reveal Potential Resistance Mechanisms of PANoptosis-Associated Genes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is marked by the proliferation of abnormal myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow and blood, leading to low cure rates despite new drug approvals from 2017 to 2018. Current therapies often fail due to the emergence of drug resistance mechanisms, such as those involving anti-apoptotic pathways and immune evasion, highlighting an urgent need for novel approaches to overcome these limitations. Programmed cell death (PCD) is crucial for tissue homeostasis, with PANoptosis-a form of PCD integrating pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis-recently identified. This process, regulated by the PANoptosome complex, could be key to overcoming AML drug resistance. Targeting multiple PCD pathways simultaneously may prove more effective than single-target therapies. Research suggests that disrupting anti-apoptotic mechanisms, such as those involving Bcl-2, can enhance drug sensitivity in AML. This study hypothesizes that PANoptosis-associated resistance genes (PARGs) play a critical role in AML drug resistance by modulating immune responses and offers a multi-faceted approach to tackle this challenge. Using RNA sequencing data from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases, we performed differential expression analysis to identify significantly dysregulated PARGs in AML. Regression analysis identified prognostic PARGs, bridging a key gap in understanding how these genes contribute to treatment resistance. We then verified their expression in AML cell lines and cell samples treated with cytarabine using RT-qPCR. Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct PARG expression patterns, and functional enrichment analysis highlighted their involvement in immune-related pathways. The combination of bioinformatics and experimental validation underscores how these genes may mediate immune modulation in drug resistance, providing a robust framework for further study. Our findings suggest that PARGs contribute to AML resistance by modulating immune responses and provide potential targets for therapeutic intervention. This study highlights the potential of targeting PARGs to improve treatment outcomes in AML. By analyzing the expression changes of these genes in response to standard clinical treatments, we provide a framework for developing multi-target therapeutic strategies that simultaneously disrupt multiple programmed cell death pathways. Such an approach directly addresses the limitations of current treatments by offering a method to enhance drug sensitivity and mitigate resistance, potentially improving survival rates. Our findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive understanding of PCD mechanisms and pave the way for innovative treatments that could significantly impact AML management.

Combination of disease burden before allogeneic transplantation and early post-transplant minimal residual disease predicts survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The burden disease before allogeneic transplantation (HSCT) or the early post-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) are both predictive parameters for relapse and post-HSCT survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Nonetheless, the combination of both can provide more accurate information to identify high risk patients. To analyze the impact of pre-HSCT disease burden (MRD- vs. MRD + vs. active disease (AD), the early post-transplant MRD (posMRD + vs. posMRD-), and the combination of both pre- and post-HSCT disease status of the post-HSCT outcomes in AML patients. We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with AML who underwent HSCT in a single institution, patients were classified according to pre-HSCT disease status, and post-HSCT MRD. MRD was measured by multiparameter flow cytometry using a cut-off of 0.1% for MRD+. The post-HSCT outcomes were analyzed based on the pre-transplant status, post-transplant status, and by combining both parameters. Patients with AD and MRD + before HSCT had worse 3y-event free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) than MRD- patients, due to a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Also, patients with posMRD + had worse outcomes than posMRD- group. In the combined analysis, patient with MRD-/posMRD- had the best EFS and OS (3y-EFS 66.5%, 3y-OS 70.0%). Patients with MRD+/posMRD- have worse prognosis (3y-EFS 39.0%, 3y-OS 54.0%) and specially the group with AD/MRD- (3y-EFS 13.5%, 3y-OS 22.0%) and posMRD + regardless pre-HSCT disease status(3y-EFS 26.5%, 3y-OS 28.0%) had dismal OS and EFS. The combination of pre-HSCT disease burden and post-HSCT MRD measurements help us for identifying high-risk subgroups. Any level of pre-transplant disease (MRD+, and especially patients with active AD) is a risk factor, even when MRD- was achieved post-transplant. Patients with post-transplant MRD + also had an adverse prognosis. These should be target groups for implementing tailored pre- and post-transplant strategies to improve outcomes.

Reappraising the prognostic relevance of cytogenetic risk in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic relevance of cytogenetic risk in 9826 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during the first or second complete remission. The 5-year probabilities of overall survival (OS) were 66%, 61%, and 47% (P < 0.001), the cumulative incidences of relapse were 14%, 19%, and 32% (P < 0.001), and the cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 23%, 23%, and 25% (P = 0.208) in patients with favorable (n = 1418), intermediate (n = 6747), and poor cytogenetic risk (n = 1661), respectively. The significant effect of cytogenetic risk on OS was strong in all subgroups stratified by age, sex, performance status, disease status, donor type, conditioning intensity, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and transplantation period (P < 0.001 for all). The evaluation of trends in posttransplant outcomes for patients in each cytogenetic risk category indicated that the risk of relapse declined in patients with favorable and intermediate cytogenetics and that the risk of NRM decreased in those with intermediate and poor cytogenetics. Therefore, patients with intermediate cytogenetics experienced the best OS improvement. These results confirm cytogenetic risk as a universal prognostic factor in patients with AML undergoing allogeneic HCT while highlighting the requirement for further improvements in posttransplant OS by reducing NRM in patients with favorable cytogenetics and by reducing relapse in patients with poor cytogenetics.

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?

Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing is used in many haematological cancers to estimate relapse risk and to direct therapy. Sometimes MRD-test results are used for regulatory approval. However, some people including regulators wrongfully believe results of MRD-testing are highly accurate and of proven efficacy in directing therapy. We review MRD-testing technologies and evaluate the accuracy of MRD-testing for predicting relapse and the strength of evidence supporting efficacy of MRD-guided therapy. We show that at the individual level MRD-test results are often an inaccurate relapse predictor. Also, no convincing data indicate that increasing therapy-intensity based on a positive MRD-test reduces relapse risk or improves survival. We caution against adjusting therapy-intensity based solely on results of MRD-testing.

Lower intensity therapy with cladribine/low dose cytarabine/venetoclax in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia compares favorably with intensive chemotherapy among patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the best consolidative modality in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Along with factors directly pertaining to SCT, pretransplantation disease control, performance status, and prior treatment-related complications are important factors that affect posttransplantation survival outcomes.

METHODS

The authors compared the survival outcomes of patients ≥60 years of age treated on the phase 2 clinical trial of venetoclax (Ven) added to cladribine (CLAD) and low dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with azacitidine (CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm) (NCT03586609) who underwent allogeneic SCT in first remission to a retrospective cohort of patients ≥60 years of age who underwent SCT after intensive chemotherapy. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as the use of cytarabine >1 g/m2 and anthracyclines during induction/consolidation.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients at median age of 68 years in the CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm were compared to 42 patients at a median age of 62 years in the intensive therapy arm. The 2-year relapse-free survival was superior with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (88% vs. 65%; p = .03) whereas the 2-year overall survival (OS) was comparable (84% vs. 70%; p = .14). On a competing event analysis, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (2.9% vs. 17.2%, Gray's p = .049) whereas nonrelapse mortality was comparable (16.2% vs. 17.1%; p = .486).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, treatment with CLAD/LDAC/Ven was associated with favorable outcomes in older patients who underwent subsequent allogeneic SCT. The OS was comparable to that with intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic SCT, but the CIR rate was significantly lower.

Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in Matched Donor Stem Cell Transplantation: Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide Combinations Versus Methotrexate/Tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is highly effective in preventing graft versus host disease (GVHD) for haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). There is limited data on the role of PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis in matched-sibling and fully matched-unrelated donor (MSD/MUD) allo-HSCT.

METHODS

Our single-center retrospective study aims to compare outcomes of PTCy alone or in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus (PTCy/MMF/TAC) relative to methotrexate and tacrolimus (MTX/TAC). The primary endpoint of our study was GVHD-free, relapse free survival (GRFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD. We identified 74 adult patients who underwent MSD/MUD allo-HSCT at our institution from 2015 to 2023.

RESULTS

Within our cohort, 33.8% (n = 25) received MTX/TAC, while 54.0% (n = 40) received PTCy/MMF/TAC, and 12.2% (n = 9) received PTCy alone. Patients receiving PTCY had the longest time to neutrophil engraftment relative to MTX/TAC (15 days vs. 12 days, P = .010). PTCy/MMF/TAC was associated with improved GRFS relative to MTX/TAC (hazard ratio [HR] = HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, P = .031), which persisted when controlling for age. Incidence of chronic GVHD was lower in the PTCy/MMF/TAC group compared to MTX/TAC (1-year 9.0% vs. 30.1%, HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.59, P = .005). However, OS and DFS were comparable across all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate decreased rates of severe chronic GVHD resulting in improved GRFS when using PTCy/TAC/MTX as GVHD prophylaxis compared to MTX/TAC in MSD/MUD.

Survival after allogeneic transplantation according to pretransplant minimal residual disease and conditioning intensity in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Background

The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a powerful prognostic factor. The interaction of pretransplant MRD and the conditioning intensity has not yet been clarified.

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze the transplant outcomes of patients with AML who underwent HSCT in complete remission (CR), comparing patients with positive MRD (MRD+) and negative MRD (MRD-) before HSCT, and the interaction between conditioning intensity and pre-HSCT MRD.

Study design

We retrospectively analyzed the transplant outcomes of 118 patients with AML who underwent HSCT in CR in a single institution, comparing patients with MRD+ and MRD- before HSCT using a cutoff of 0.1% on MFC, and the interaction between conditioning intensity and pre-HSCT MRD.

Results

Patients with MRD+ before HSCT had a significantly worse 2-year (2y) event-free survival (EFS) (56.5% vs. 32.0%, p = 0.018) than MRD- patients, due to a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 2 years (49.0% vs. 18.0%, p = 0.002), with no differences in transplant-related mortality (TRM) (2y-TRM, 19.0% and 25.0%, respectively, p = 0.588). In the analysis stratified by conditioning intensity, in patients who received MAC, those with MRD- before HSCT had better EFS (p = 0.009) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.070) due to lower CIR (p = 0.004) than MRD+ patients. On the other hand, the survival was similar in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) patients regardless of the MRD status.

Conclusions

Patients with MRD+ before HSCT have worse outcomes than MRD- patients. In patients who received MAC, MRD- patients have better EFS and OS due to lower CIR than MRD+ patients, probably because they represent a more chemo-sensitive group. However, among RIC patients, results were similar regardless of the MRD status.

Azacitidine Post-transplant Maintenance Improves Disease Progression in High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) with hypomethylating agents has yielded conflicting results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single center retrospective matched-control analysis with the study group (5-azacitidine [AZA] group) including adults with FLT3-negative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received post-transplant AZA maintenance off clinical trial (n = 93). A matched control group was comprised of contemporaneous AML/MDS patients who did not receive any maintenance (n = 357). Primary endpoint was disease progression.

RESULTS

The AZA and control groups had comparable patient and disease characteristics except for older age (median: 61 vs. 57 years, P = .01) and lower hematopoietic comorbidity index (median: 2 vs. 3, P = .04) in the AZA group. The 3-year cumulative incidence of progression in the AZA and control groups was 29% vs. 33% (P = .09). The protective effect of AZA on progression was limited to patients with high-risk AML/MDS (HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8, P = .009). This led to improved progression-free survival both in high-risk AML and MDS patients with maintenance (HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1-0.6, P = .004 and HR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.9, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

AZA maintenance was associated with a lower progression rate in patients with high-risk FLT3-negative AML or MDS, and AZA maintenance should be considered for post-alloHCT maintenance in this subset.

Improving long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy for patients with AML

Intensive chemotherapy in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and supportive care can induce long-term remissions in around 50% of acute myeloid leukemia patients eligible for intensive treatment. Several treatment optimization trials helped to refine schedule and dosing of the historic "7 + 3" combination. Together with the addition of novel agents, increased efficacy and tolerability led to improved long-term outcomes. Unsatisfactory outcomes in fit elderly patients and unfavorable genetic subgroups have raised the question of whether less-intensive venetoclax-based approaches may be beneficial as an alternative. Although tempting and worth exploring, this issue will remain controversial until the results of randomized comparisons appear. To date, intensive chemotherapy remains the only evident curative treatment option for long-term disease eradication in a fixed treatment time. With the advent of more novel agents and advances in minimal residual disease (MRD) detection and maintenance approaches, the face of intensive treatment could change in many ways. Several are being explored in clinical trials, such as (1) combinations of more than 1 novel agent with the intensive backbone, (2) head-to-head comparisons of novel agents, (3) replacement or dose reduction of cytotoxic components such as anthracyclines, and (4) MRD-guided escalation and de-escalation strategies. The combination of intensive treatment with individualized tailored innovative strategies will most certainly reduce treatment-related toxicities and increase the chances for long-term remission in the future.

Recent advances in allogeneic transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

RECENT FINDINGS

Important improvements have been observed throughout the allo-HSCT procedure and patient management. Universal donor availability and reduced risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have been achieved with the introduction of posttransplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis. It has contributed, together with advances in conditioning regimens, GVHD treatment and supportive care, to a reduced overall toxicity of the procedure. Relapse is now the most frequent cause of transplant failure. With increased knowledge of the biological characterization of AML, better prediction of transplant risks and more profound and standardized minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, pharmacological, and immunological strategies to prevent relapse are been developed.

SUMMARY

Allo-HSCT remains the standard of care for high-risk AML. Increased access to transplant, reduced toxicity and relapse are improving patient outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize MRD monitoring, refine conditioning regimens, and explore new GVHD management and relapse prevention therapies.

Cell-free DNA measurable residual disease as a predictor of postallogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes

The measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment provides an attractive predictor of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplnat (alloHCT) outcomes. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been applied to diagnosis, early detection, and disease burden monitoring in various tumors, but its utility as an MRD test in myeloid malignancies has not been systematically evaluated. We sought to determine the differential sensitivity between bone marrow (BM) and cfDNA MRD and to assess the effect of cfDNA MRD on alloHCT outcomes. The technical and clinical validation cohorts, including 82 patients participating in clinical trials (Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network-0201 and 0402), were used. Ultradeep error-corrected targeted sequencing was performed on plasma and BM-derived DNA. We demonstrated that 94.6% (range, 93.9-95.3) of cfDNA was derived from hematopoietic tissue. The mutant allele fraction was congruent between BM and cfDNA (rho = 0.8; P < .0001); however, cfDNA seemed to be more sensitive in detecting clones with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of <0.26%. cfDNA-MRD clearance by day 90 after alloHCT (D90) was associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS, median survival not reached vs 5.5 months; P < .0001) and overall survival (OS, median survival not reached vs 7.3 months; P < .0001) when compared with patients with persistent MRD. Irrespective of pre-alloHCT MRD, D90 cfDNA MRD was associated with inferior 2-year OS (16.7% vs 84.8%; P < .0001) and RFS (16.7% vs 80.7%; P < .0001). cfDNA seems to be an accurate, minimally invasive alternative to BM aspirates in MRD assessment and confers important prognostic implications in patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing alloHCT.

More than two courses of pre-transplant consolidation therapy benefits patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the first complete remission who underwent human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling allografts: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although the need for consolidation chemotherapy after successful induction therapy is well established in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the value of consolidation chemotherapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the effect of the number of pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapies on outcomes of human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling stem cell transplantation (MSDT) for patients with AML in CR1 in multicenters across China. In our study, we analyzed data of 373 AML patients in CR1 from three centers across China.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 969 days, patients with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had higher probabilities of leukemia-free survival (LFS) (85.6% vs . 67.0%, P < 0.001) and overall survival (89.2% vs . 78.5%, P  = 0.007), and better cumulative incidences of relapse (10.5% vs . 19.6%, P  = 0.020) and non-relapse mortality (4.2% vs . 14.9%, P  = 0.001) than those with ≤ 2 courses of consolidation chemotherapy. Pre-transplantation minimal residual disease-negative patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT with ≥ 3 courses of consolidation chemotherapy had a higher probability of LFS (85.9% vs . 67.7%, P  = 0.003) and a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (9.6% vs . 23.3%, P  = 0.013) than those with ≤ 2 courses.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that patients with AML in CR1 who received MSDT might benefit from pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy.

Conditioning regimens for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: Real-world data from the Japanese registry studies

Conditioning regimens play a crucial role in preventing relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In early times, myeloablative conditioning was used exclusively, but it was associated with significant toxicity. However, the advent of reduced-intensity conditioning has allowed allogeneic HCT to be performed more safely, leading to an expansion of our choices for conditioning regimens. As the transplantation methods have become highly diversified, it is reasonable to determine an optimal conditioning regimen in consideration of patient-, disease-, and transplantation-related factors. In this context, large-scale registry-based studies provide real-world data to allow for a detailed evaluation of the utility of individual conditioning regimens in specific clinical settings. The Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy has been conducting a nationwide survey for HCT since 1993 that currently covers >99% of all the transplantation centers nationwide, and >1,000 allogeneic HCTs performed for adults with AML are registered per year. We have been using the registry data to implement a number of studies focusing on adults with AML, and the large number of patients registered consecutively from nearly all transplantation centers nationwide represent real-world practice in Japan. This article reviews and discusses the results obtained from our registry-based studies pertaining to various conditioning regimens.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation impact on secondary acute myeloid leukemia outcome. A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may help physicians to identify a subgroup of patients at high risk of relapse for de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but its relevance among patients affected by secondary AML (sAML) is still unknown. We assessed the impact of MRD among 318 adult patients with sAML who received an allogeneic HCT in first complete remission. At the time of HCT, a total of 208 (65%) patients achieved MRD negativity, while 110 (35%) had positive MRD. 2-year overall survival (OS) was 58.8 % (95% CI 52.2-64.9) with leukemia-free survival (LFS) of 50.0 % (95% CI 43.7-56.1), relapse incidence of 34.2% (95% CI 28.4-40.1) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) of 23.3 % (95% CI 19-27.7) for the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis, HCT recipients with KPS ≥ 90 experienced less disease recurrence (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.4-0.94) with better LFS (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.89) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86). There were no differences in major clinical endpoints between patients with MRD-positive and MRD-negative status at the time of HCT. Pre-transplantation assessment of MRD was not informative on post-HCT outcomes in this retrospective registry-based analysis among patients affected by sAML.

Pretransplantation minimal residual disease monitoring by multiparameter flow cytometry predicts outcomes of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Is minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) prognostic for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients before allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT)? And if so, what level of MRD eradication can be used to help guide the timing of HSCT? Can haplo-HSCT improve the prognosis of AML patients with MRD positive? To figure out these questions, we initiated this retrospective study.

METHODS

96 AML patients were included retrospectively and divided into 5 groups, according to pre-transplantation MRD levels (from 5 × 10^-2 to <1 × 10^-4), to analyze the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Secondly, we compared the prognosis of MRD-negative (MRD^neg) and MRD-positive (MRD^pos) AML patients (cutoff value = 1 × 10^-3) who underwent allo-HSCT, and further analyzed the prognosis of MRD^pos patients after received different transplantation modalities.

RESULTS

It is found that the 2-year OS and DFS of MRD negative group were better than the MRD positive group, and that the deeper the eradication of MRD before transplantation, the better the prognosis of patients. The CIR in patients received HLA-identical transplantation, was higher in the MRD^pos than in the MRD^neg. Haploid transplantation reduced the CIR disparity between MRD^pos and MRD^neg group. Subsequently, in AML patients who remain MRD positive before HSCT, we show that haplo-HSCT offered a better prognosis than HLA-identical transplantation (MSDT and MUDT).

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that achieving MFC-MRD <10^-3 (10^-4 or even better) before allo-HSCT could reduce the relapse of AML and improve OS and DFS significantly, while haplo-HSCT may be preferred for patients not achieving MRD negativity.

The differential effect of disease status at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation on outcomes in acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia

This study aimed to compare the effect of disease status at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) on post-transplant outcomes between acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Japanese nationwide registry data for 6901 patients with AML and 2469 patients with ALL were analyzed. In this study, 2850 (41%), 937 (14%), 62 (1%), and 3052 (44%) AML patients and 1751 (71%), 265 (11%), 23 (1%), and 430 (17%) ALL patients underwent transplantation in first complete remission (CR1), second CR (CR2), third or subsequent CR (CR3 +), and non-CR, respectively. The probabilities of overall survival at 5 years for patients transplanted in CR1, CR2, CR3 + , and non-CR were 58%, 61%, 41%, and 26% for AML patients and 67%, 45%, 20%, and 21% for ALL patients, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that the risks of relapse and overall mortality were similar for AML patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2 (P = 0.672 and P = 0.703), whereas they were higher for ALL patients transplanted in CR2 than for those transplanted in CR1 (P < 0.001 for both). The risks of relapse and overall mortality for those transplanted in CR3 + and non-CR increased in a stepwise manner for both diseases, with the relevance being stronger for ALL than for AML patients. These results suggest a significant difference in the effect of disease status at HCT on post-transplant outcomes in AML and ALL. Further investigation to incorporate measurable residual disease data is warranted.

A systematic literature review of disease burden and clinical efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly progressive hematological malignancy that is difficult to cure. The prognosis is poor and treatment options are limited in case of relapse. A comprehensive assessment of current disease burden and the clinical efficacy of non-intensive therapies in this population are lacking. We conducted two systematic literature reviews (SLRs). The first SLR (disease burden) included observational studies reporting the incidence and economic and humanistic burden of relapsed/refractory (RR) AML. The second SLR (clinical efficacy) included clinical trials (phase II or later) reporting remission rates (complete remission [CR] or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi]) and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with RR AML or patients with de novo AML who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. For both SLRs, MEDLINE®/Embase® were searched from January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2020. Clinical trial registries were also searched for the clinical efficacy SLR. After screening, two independent reviewers determined the eligibility for inclusion in the SLRs based on full-text articles. The disease burden SLR identified 130 observational studies. The median cumulative incidence of relapse was 29.4% after stem cell transplant and 46.8% after induction chemotherapy. Total per-patient-per-month costs were $28,148-$29,322; costs and health care resource use were typically higher for RR versus non-RR patients. Patients with RR AML had worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores than patients with de novo AML across multiple instruments, and lower health utility values versus other AML health states (i.e. newly diagnosed, remission, consolidation, and maintenance therapy). The clinical efficacy SLR identified 50 trials (66 total trial arms). CR/CRi rates and mOS have remained relatively stable and low over the last 2 decades. Across all arms, the median rate of CR/CRi was 18.3% and mOS was 6.2 months. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of patients with AML will develop RR AML, which is associated with significant humanistic and economic burden. Existing treatments offer limited efficacy, highlighting the need for more effective non-intensive treatment options.

Prognostic value of measurable residual disease at allogeneic transplantation for adults with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission

Pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD) has been shown to be associated with relapse incidence following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains less clear whether pretransplant MRD status affects transplant outcomes in core binding factor AML (CBF-AML). We retrospectively evaluated the effect of pretransplant MRD, which was measured by a polymerase chain reaction of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts, on transplant outcomes for a cohort of 959 adult patients with t(8;21) or inv(16) AML treated by allogeneic HCT during complete remission (CR), between 2000 and 2018. Multivariate analysis showed the absence of pretransplant MRD was significantly associated with lower relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; P < 0.001), treatment failure (HR, 0.66; P = 0.004), and overall mortality (HR, 0.72; P = 0.037) among patients with t(8;21). However, pretransplant MRD negativity was not associated with relapse (HR, 0.73; P = 0.420), treatment failure (HR, 0.64; P = 0.063), or overall mortality (HR, 0.69; P = 0.149) among patients with inv(16). In subgroup analysis, pretransplant MRD status significantly affected relapse and LFS only in patients with t(8;21) undergoing allogeneic HCT during CR2. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the different prognostic values of pretransplant MRD for CBF-AML, highlighting the need to develop effective therapeutic strategies for such MRD-positive patients.

Time point-dependent concordance and prognostic significance of flow cytometry and real time quantitative PCR for measurable/minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometry (FCM) and PCR are reliable methods for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1). The aim of this study was to analyze the concordant rate of these two methods and their prognostic significance.

METHODS

PCR and FCM were simultaneously used for MRD analysis at four different time points on 450 BM samples from 124 patients with AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22.1). The four monitoring time points included post-induction (first), after the first consolidation (second) and the second consolidation (third), and at the end of chemotherapy or before Allo/Auto stem cell transplantation (fourth).

RESULTS

The concordant rates of the two methods were 33.06%, 25.81%, 49.59%, and 75.31%, respectively, and the main discordant cases were FCM-/PCR+ cases. At all monitoring time points, the MRD level ≥ 10^-4 by FCM indicated a poor 3-year Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) (p < 0.001). More than 2-log MRD reduction by PCR after induction and more than 3-log reduction by PCR after the first consolidation remained the significant predictors of better RFS (p < 0.001). After the second consolidation, the negative MRD by PCR (<10-5) was also associated with improved RFS (p = 0.002). A > 1-log increase in PCR can effectively predict recurrence after molecular remission (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, MRD≥0.01% by. FCM and less than 2-log MRD reduction by PCR after induction remained the significant predictors of poor RFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FCM+ always indicates a poor prognosis. Sequential monitoring by PCR is of significance for evaluating prognosis. Our findings suggest a complementary role of two analyses in optimizing risk stratification in clinical practice.

Eradication of Measurable Residual Disease in AML: A Challenging Clinical Goal

In non-promyelocytic (non-M3) AML measurable residual disease (MRD) detected by multi-parameter flow cytometry and molecular technologies, which are guided by Consensus-based guidelines and discover very low leukemic cell numbers far below the 5% threshold of morphological assessment, has emerged as the most relevant predictor of clinical outcome. Currently, it is well-established that MRD positivity after standard induction and consolidation chemotherapy, as well as during the period preceding an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT), portends to a significantly inferior relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, it has become absolutely clear that conversion from an MRD-positive to an MRD-negative state provides a favorable clinical outcome similar to that associated with early MRD negativity. Thus, the complete eradication of MRD, i.e., the clearance of the few leukemic stem cells-which, due to their chemo-radiotherapy resistance, might eventually be responsible of disease recurrence-has become an un-met clinical need in AML. Nowadays, this goal might potentially be achieved thanks to the development of novel innovative treatment strategies, including those targeting driver mutations, apoptosis, methylation patterns and leukemic proteins. The aim of this review is to analyze these strategies and to suggest any potential combination able to induce MRD negativity in the pre- and post-HSCT period.

Impact of frontline treatment approach on outcomes of myeloid blast phase CML

Background

The natural course of untreated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is progression to an aggressive blast phase. Even in the current era of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcomes of blast phase CML remain poor with no consensus frontline treatment approach.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the response rates and survival outcomes of 104 consecutive patients with myeloid blast phase CML (CML-MBP) treated from 2000 to 2019 based on 4 different frontline treatment approaches: intensive chemotherapy (IC) + TKI (n = 20), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + TKI (n = 20), TKI alone (n = 56), or IC alone (n = 8). We also evaluated the impact of TKI selection and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) on patient outcomes.

Results

Response rates were similar between patients treated with IC + TKI and HMA + TKI. Compared to treatment with TKI alone, treatment with IC/HMA + TKI resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (57.5% vs 33.9%, p < 0.05), a higher complete cytogenetic response rate (45% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001), and more patients proceeding to ASCT (32.5% vs 10.7%, p < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, long-term outcomes were similar between the IC + TKI and HMA + TKI groups. Combination therapy with IC/HMA + TKI was superior to therapy with TKI alone, including when analysis was limited to those treated with a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. When using a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI, IC/HMA + TKI led to lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 44% vs 86%, p < 0.05) and superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 28% vs 0%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (OS; 34% vs 8%, p = 0.23) compared to TKI alone. Among patients who received IC/HMA + TKI, EFS and OS was superior for patients who received a 2nd/3rd generation TKI compared to those who received imatinib-based therapy. In a landmark analysis, 5-year OS was higher for patients who proceeded to ASCT (58% vs 22%, p = 0.12).

Conclusions

Compared to patients treated with TKI alone for CML-MBP, treatment with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI led to improved response rates, CIR, EFS, and OS, particularly for patients who received a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. Combination therapy with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI, rather than a TKI alone, should be considered the optimal treatment strategy for patients with CML-MBP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-021-01106-1.

Highlighting the Prognostic Importance of Measurable Residual Disease Among Acute Myeloid Leukemia Risk Factors

Objective:

The optimal timing of measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has not been well defined yet. We aimed to investigate the impact of MRD in pre- and post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) periods on prognostic parameters.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy-seven AML patients who underwent AHSCT in complete morphological remission were included. MRD analyses were performed by 10-color MFC and 10^-4 was defined as positive. Relapse risk and survival outcomes were assessed based on pre- and post-AHSCT MRD positivity.

Results:

The median age of the patients was 46 (range: 18-71) years, and 41 (53.2%) were male while 36 (46.8%) were female. The median follow-up after AHSCT was 12.2 months (range: 0.2-73.0). The 2-year overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 37.0%, with a significant difference between patients who were MRD-negative and MRD-positive before AHSCT, estimated as 63.0% versus 16.0%, respectively (p=0.005). MRD positivity at +28 days after AHSCT was also associated with significantly inferior 2-year OS when compared to MRD negativity (p=0.03). The risk of relapse at 1 year was 2.4 times higher (95% confidence interval: 1.1-5.6; p=0.04) in the pre-AHSCT MRD-positive group when compared to the MRD-negative group regardless of other transplant-related factors, including pre-AHSCT disease status (i.e., complete remission 1 and 2). Event-free survival (EFS) was significantly shorter in patients who were pre-AHSCT MRD-positive (p=0.016). Post-AHSCT MRD positivity was also related to an increased relapse risk. OS and EFS were significantly inferior among MRD-positive patients at +28 days after AHSCT (p=0.03 and p=0.019).

Conclusion:

Our results indicate the importance of MRD before and after AHSCT independently of other factors.

A phase 3 randomized study of 5-azacitidine maintenance vs observation after transplant in high-risk AML and MDS patients

This study investigated the efficacy and safety of azacitidine maintenance in the posttransplant setting based on the encouraging phase 1/2 reports for azacitidine maintenance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Between 2009 and 2017, a total of 187 patients aged 18 to 75 years were entered into a randomized controlled study of posttransplant azacitidine if they were in complete remission. Patients randomized to the treatment arm (n = 93) were scheduled to receive azacitidine, given as 32 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously for 5 days every 28 days for 12 cycles. The control arm (n = 94) had no intervention. Eighty-seven of the 93 patients started azacitidine maintenance. The median number of cycles received was 4; a total of 29 patients relapsed on study, and 23 patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity, patient's preference, or logistical reasons. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 2.07 years in the azacitidine group vs 1.28 years in the control group (P = .43). There was also no significant difference for overall survival, with a median of 2.52 years vs 2.56 years in the azacitidine and control groups (P = .85), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no improvement in RFS or overall survival with the use of azacitidine as maintenance compared with the control group (hazard ratios of 0.73 [95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.1; P = .14] and 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.29; P = .43]) [corrected]. This randomized trial with azacitidine maintenance showed that a prospective trial in the posttransplant setting was feasible and safe but challenging. Although RFS was comparable between the 2 arms, we believe the strategy of maintenance therapy merits further study with a goal to reduce the risk of relapse in patients with AML/MDS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00887068.

Measurable residual disease status and outcome of transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in second complete remission: a study by the acute leukemia working party of the EBMT

Measurable residual disease (MRD) prior to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete morphological remission (CR1) is an independent predictor of outcome, but few studies address CR2. This analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry assessed HCT outcomes by declared MRD status in a cohort of 1042 adult patients with AML CR2 at HCT. Patients were transplanted 2006–2016 from human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched siblings (n = 719) or HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donors (n = 293). Conditioning was myeloablative (n = 610) or reduced-intensity (n = 432) and 566 patients (54%) had in-vivo T cell depletion. At HCT, 749 patients (72%) were MRD negative (MRD NEG) and 293 (28%) were MRD positive (MRD POS). Time from diagnosis to HCT was longer in MRD NEG than MRD POS patients (18 vs. 16 months (P < 0.001). Two-year relapse rates were 24% (95% CI, 21–28) and 40% (95% CI, 34–46) in MRD NEG and MRD POS groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 57% (53–61) and 46% (40–52%), respectively (P = 0.001), but there was no difference in terms of overall survival. Prognostic factors for relapse and LFS were MRD NEG status, good risk cytogenetics, and longer time from diagnosis to HCT. In-vivo T cell depletion predicted relapse.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: Lessons learnt from a tertiary care center in India

There is paucity of data on outcomes of MSD-HSCT in children with relapsed or high-risk AML from developing countries, which have unique challenges including adverse host factors and resource constraints. We retrospectively reviewed records of children (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent MSD-HSCT for AML at our center from 2009 to 2019 to evaluate clinical outcome and its predictors using Cox proportional hazards model. There were 46 children (36 boys and 10 girls) with mean age 10.7 ± 4.8 years. Indication for HSCT was relapsed AML in CR2 (n = 37), primary refractory (n = 3), or relapsed refractory disease (n = 3); high-risk (n = 1) or secondary (n = 2) AML in CR1. Five-year EFS and OS were 33.3 ± 7.2% and 36.3 ± 7.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, CR1 duration less than 12 months, presence of active disease at transplant, and use of bone marrow stem cell graft were associated with poorer EFS and OS. There was one (2.2%) TRM, while disease relapse occurred in 20/40 patients who underwent HSCT in remission. Though the 5-year EFS and OS were inferior to results reported from high-income countries, relapse (and not TRM) was the major cause of treatment failure. A well-sustained CR1, achievement of disease remission, and use of peripheral blood allograft seem imperative to a successful transplant. Targeted therapy along with HSCT may be the option for those with early relapse.

Consolidation Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Defining a Benchmark

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Augmented Reduced-Intensity Regimen Does Not Improve Postallogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PURPOSE

Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens have extended the curative potential of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation to older adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplasia (MDS) but are associated with a high risk of disease relapse. Strategies to reduce recurrence are urgently required. Registry data have demonstrated improved outcomes using a sequential transplant regimen, fludarabine/amsacrine/cytarabine-busulphan (FLAMSA-Bu), but the impact of this intensified conditioning regimen has not been studied in randomized trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-four patients (median age, 59 years) with high-risk AML (n = 164) or MDS (n = 80) were randomly assigned 1:1 to a fludarabine-based RIC regimen or FLAMSA-Bu. Pretransplant measurable residual disease (MRD) was monitored by flow cytometry (MFC-MRD) and correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

There was no difference in 2-year overall survival (hazard ratio 1.05 [85% CI, 0.80 to 1.38] P = .81) or cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (hazard ratio 0.94 [95%CI, 0.60 to 1.46] P = .81) between the control and FLAMSA-Bu arms. Detectable pretransplant MFC-MRD was associated with an increased CIR (2-year CIR 41.0% v 20.0%, P = .01) in the overall trial cohort with a comparable prognostic impact when measured by an unsupervised analysis approach. There was no evidence of interaction between MRD status and conditioning regimen intensity for relapse or survival. Acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism at 3 months abrogated the adverse impact of pretransplant MRD on CIR and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The intensified RIC conditioning regimen, FLAMSA-Bu, did not improve outcomes in adults transplanted for high-risk AML or MDS regardless of pretransplant MRD status. Our data instead support the exploration of interventions with the ability to accelerate acquisition of full donor T-cell chimerism as a tractable strategy to improve outcomes in patients allografted for AML.

Day 0 bone marrow pathology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a novel prognostic factor in myeloid malignancies

Residual disease (RD) is one of the risk factors for relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in hematological malignancies. Although recent advances in the technology for detecting minimal/measurable RD, such as multiparameter flow cytometry and quantitative PCR, enable risk stratifications of disease relapse, these examinations still have limitations in routine clinical practice. In this study, we assessed RD in bone marrow (BM) specimens on day 0 of allogeneic HSCT by immunostaining of case-specific leukemic blast markers and analyzed the relationship between day 0 BM status and HSCT outcomes. We analyzed 82 adult HSCT recipients with myeloid malignancies. BM histology of day 0 revealed almost empty marrow with a small number of residual BM cells. However, residual blasts could be detected by immunostaining even for only a few cells. When patients were divided into two groups according to the existence of RD on day 0, those with positive RD showed significantly lower overall survival rate (27% vs. 73%, P<0.001) and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (46% vs. 9%, P=0.006) at one year compared to those with negative RD. Furthermore, even if they were not in remission at the point of the pre-conditioning evaluation, the patients who achieved negative RD on day 0 showed comparable prognosis with those who maintained remission before conditioning. This study shows the efficacy of day 0 BM pathology of allogeneic HSCT as a prognostic factor that can contribute to clinical decisions on post-transplant strategies.

Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing for acute leukemia in EBMT transplant centers: a survey on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Detectable measurable residual disease (MRD) is a key prognostic factor in both acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Thus, we conducted a survey in EBMT transplant centers focusing on pre- and post-allo-HCT MRD. One hundred and six centers from 29 countries responded. One hundred had a formal strategy for routine MRD assessment, 91 for both ALL and AML. For ALL (n = 95), assessing MRD has been routine practice starting from 2010 (range, 1990-2019). Techniques used for MRD assessment consisted of PCR techniques alone (n = 27), multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC, n = 16), both techniques (n = 43), next-generation sequencing (NGS) + PCR (n = 2), or PCR + MFC + NGS (n = 7). The majority of centers assessed MRD every 2-3 months for 2 (range, 1-until relapse) years. For AML, assessing MRD was routine in 92 centers starting in 2010 (range 1990-2019). Assessment of MRD was by PCR (n = 23), MFC (n = 13), both PCR and MFC (n = 39), both PCR and NGS (n = 3), and by all three techniques (n = 14). The majority assesses MRD for AML every 2-3 months for 2 (range, 1-until relapse) years. This survey is the first step in the aim to include MRD status as a routine registry capture parameter in acute leukemia.

[Effect of consolidation before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-favorable acute myeloid leukemia patients with first complete remisson and negative minimal residual disease]

Objective: To probe the prognostic value of consolidation chemotherapy in non-favorable acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who were candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with first complete remission (CR(1)) and negative minimal residual disease (MRD(-)) . Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 155 patients with non-favorable AML who received allo-HSCT in CR(1)/MRD(-) from January 2010 to March 2019. The survival data were compared between patients who received and those not received pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy. Results: A total of 102 patients received pre-transplant consolidation chemotherapy (consolidation group) , and 53 cases directly proceeded to allo-HSCT when CR(1)/MRD(-) was achieved (nonconsolidation group) . The median ages were 39 (18-56) years old and 38 (19-67) years old, respectively. Five-year post-transplant overall survival [ (59.3±7.5) % vs (62.2±6.9) %, P=0.919] and relapse-free survival [ (53.0±8.9) % vs (61.6±7.0) %, P=0.936] were not significantly different between the two groups (consolidation vs nonconsolidation) . There was a weak relationship between consolidation therapy and cumulative incidence of relapse [consolidation: (21.9±5.4) % vs nonconsolidation: (18.3±6.0) %, P=0.942], as well as non-relapse mortality [consolidation: (22.4±4.3) % vs nonconsolidation: (28.4±6.5) %,P=0.464]. Multivariate analysis indicated that pre-transplant consolidation and the consolidation courses (< 2 vs ≥2 courses) did not have an impact on allo-HSCT outcomes. Conclusion: Allo-HSCT for candidate patients without further consolidation when CR(1)/MRD(-) was attained was feasible.

Haploidentical transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia patients with minimal/measurable residual disease at transplantation

There have been conflicting results regarding the impact of minimal/measurable disease at transplant on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) outcomes after haploidentical transplantation (haplo-SCT). We assessed the impact of pre-transplant disease status on post-transplant outcomes of 143 patients treated with haplo-SCT using fludarabine-melphalan (FM) conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). With a median follow-up of 29 months, the two-year PFS for all patients was 41%. Compared to patients in complete remission (CR) at transplant, those with active disease (n = 29) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (n = 39) had worse PFS. They had hazard ratios (HR) of 3.5 (95% CI: 2.05-6.1; P < .001) and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.3-3.9; P = .002), respectively. Among patients who were in CR at transplant, there were no differences in PFS between those who had minimal residual disease (MRD) positive (n = 24), and MRD negative (n = 41) (HR 1.85, 95%CI: 0.9-4.0; P = .1). In multivariable analysis for patients in CR, only age was predictive for outcomes, while MRD status at transplant did not influence the treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that haplo-SCT with FM conditioning regimen and PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis has a protective effect, and may potentially abrogate the inferior outcomes of MRD positivity for patients with AML. Patients with positive MRD may benefit from proceeding urgently to a haplo-SCT, as this does not appear to negatively impact transplant outcomes.

The impact of anti-thymocyte globulin on the outcomes of Patients with AML with or without measurable residual disease at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been shown to predict transplant outcomes. We investigated the effect of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) relapse by pretransplant MRD status. AML patients undergoing allo-HCT in first complete remission from either a matched sibling or unrelated donor during the 2006-2017 period were selected. Outcomes of 1509 patients (MRD⁺, n = 426) were studied. ATG was used in 561 (52%) and 239 (58%) patients within the MRD^- and MRD⁺ cohorts, respectively. In MRD^- patients, ATG did not affect relapse incidence (RI) (HR = 0.80, p = 0.17), but was associated with reduced incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, grade II-IV and chronic GVHD, reduced nonrelapse mortality (HR = 0.66, p = 0.05), improved leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.74, p = 0.02), overall survival (HR = 0.69, p = 0.01), and GVHD-relapse free survival (HR = 0.62, p < 0.01). In MRD⁺ patients, ATG was associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD (total, HR 0.56 p = 0.03; extensive, HR 0.40 P = 0.01), without an impact on other allo-HCT outcome parameters, including RI(HR = 1.02, p = 0.92). The use of ATG was associated with reduced risk for GVHD. ATG did not increase RI, even in high-risk AML patients who were MRD⁺ before allo-HCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with a history of multiple relapses of acute myeloid leukemia

The prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is dismal after experiencing multiple relapses. This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for 192 adults with AML in third or subsequent complete remission (CR3+), 300 in second relapse (REL2), and 50 in third or subsequent relapse (REL3+) who were enrolled in a Japanese nationwide transplantation registry. The study population included patients undergoing umbilical cord blood transplantation, but not those undergoing haploidentical HCT. Patients transplanted in CR3+ had better survival than those transplanted in REL2 and REL3+ (48%, 21%, and 12% at 4 years; P < 0.001), and this was due to a reduction in post-transplant relapse (23%, 57%, and 52%; P < 0.001). The corresponding cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 33%, 26%, and 36% (P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed significantly lower relapse and overall mortality for those in CR3+ and significantly lower non-relapse mortality for those in REL2. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for overall mortality were 2.02 (1.56-2.64) for REL2+ versus CR3+ (P < 0.001) and 2.12 (1.40-3.19) for REL3+ versus CR3+ (P < 0.001). Our analysis demonstrates the curative potential of allogeneic HCT for patients with a history of multiple AML relapses and suggests the potential benefits and risks of reinduction attempt before transplantation, highlighting the need for an individualized approach in determining whether to give reinduction therapy in this setting.

Association of Persistent Minimal Residual Disease with Poor Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background:

Several studies have shown that detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an independent prognostic factor. This study aimed to evaluate the significance of dynamic MRD pretransplantation on outcome of AML patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 145 consecutive AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT in complete remission status between June 2013 and June 2016. MRD was determined with multiparameter flow cytometry after the first and second courses of chemotherapy and pre-HSCT.

Results:

In matched sibling donor transplantation (MSDT) settings, patients with positive MRD had higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) than those without MRD after the first (32.3 ± 9.7% vs. 7.7 ± 3.1%, χ² = 3.661, P = 0.055) or second course of chemotherapy (57.1 ± 3.6% vs. 12.5 ± 2.7%, χ² = 8.759, P = 0.003) or pre-HSCT (50.0 ± 9.7% vs. 23.0 ± 3.2%, χ² = 5.547, P = 0.019). In haploidentical SCT (haplo-SCT) settings, the MRD status at those timepoints had no significant impact on clinical outcomes. However, patients with persistent positive MRD from chemotherapy to pre-HSCT had higher CIR than those without persistent positive MRD both in MSDT and haplo-SCT settings. Patients with persistent positive MRD underwent MSDT had the highest relapse incidence, followed by those with persistent positive MRD underwent haplo-SCT, those without persistent MRD underwent haplo-SCT, and those without persistent MRD underwent MSDT (66.7 ± 9.2% vs. 38.5 ± 6.0% vs. 18.8 ± 8.7% vs. 12.0 ± 1.0%, χ² = 20.763, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that persistent positive MRD before transplantation was associated with higher CIR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.200–2.382, P = 0.003), worse leukemia-free survival (HR = 1.812, 95% CI: 1.168–2.812, P = 0.008), and overall survival (HR = 2.354, 95% CI: 1.528–3.627, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that persistent positive MRD before transplantation, rather than positive MRD at single timepoint, could predict poor outcome both in MSDT and haplo-SCT settings.

Monozygotic twins diagnosed simultaneously with RAM immunophenotype acute myeloid leukemia

AML with the RAM immunophenotype is associated with extremely poor prognosis. We report a rare case of monozygotic twins presenting simultaneously at the age of 2 years with RAM AML. Each twin underwent a myeloablative 7/10 unrelated umbilical cord blood transplant. Pretransplant Twin A's bone marrow was negative for MRD by flow cytometry (<0.01%) unlike Twin B's bone marrow (0.07%). Twin A is alive in remission 3 years from transplant. Twin B developed primary graft failure, but subsequently rescued with a haploidentical stem cell transplant. However, she relapsed and died 13 months from diagnosis. The twins' clinical courses demonstrate that upfront intensive chemotherapy to achieve negative MRD, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant as postremission intensification strategy, should be considered in this high-risk AML.

Allotransplants for Patients 65 Years or Older with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The outcome of persons > 65 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor. A transplant from an HLA-identical sibling or an HLA-matched unrelated donor can cure some of these patients but is associated with a substantial transplant-related mortality and a high relapse risk. We analyzed 185 subjects > 65 years with high-risk AML receiving conventional (n = 42) or reduced-intensity (n = 143) pretransplant conditioning and a transplant from an HLA-identical sibling (n = 66) or a 10/10 loci HLA-matched unrelated donor (n = 119). Two-year survival was 37%. Subjects with serious adverse events during before chemotherapy for their leukemia had a poor outcome after stem cell transplantation. Patients who had active leukemia or measurable residual disease (MRD) before transplantation had a worse outcome. Delayed hematologic recovery after induction or consolidation chemotherapy, high-risk AML genetics, donor-recipient HLA-DRβ3/4/5-DP mismatches, and history of cardiovascular disease were also correlated with survival in multivariate analyses. The 57 MRD-negative patients with few other adverse prognostic factors had an excellent outcome (2-year overall survival, 76%), whereas the 58 patients with detectable leukemia and more than 1 other additional factor fared poorly (2-year overall survival, 8%). These data indicate it is possible to identify persons > 65 years with high-risk AML likely to benefit from an allotransplant. Validation of this prediction is needed.

Impact of Consolidation Cycles Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) consolidation cycles before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia is not fully standardized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study evaluated the impact of HDAC consolidation cycles before allogeneic HCT in 194 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission between 1998 and 2014. The patients were reclassified into 3 groups-no consolidation (C0, n = 20), 1 consolidation (C1, n = 115), and ≥ 2 consolidations (C2, n = 59)-by pre-HCT consolidation cycle.

RESULTS

The 3-year relapse-free survival rates was 45.9%, 66.9%, and 73.3% for the C0, C1, and C2 groups, respectively (P = .064), while the 3-year overall survival rates were 35.0%, 55.2%, and 67.5%, respectively (P = .106). The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the C2 group (38.7%) than in the C0 (22.2%) or C1 (17.7%) group (P = .018). However, the incidence of chronic GVHD showed no difference between the groups. Multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed the following independent factors: adverse cytogenetic risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, P = .046), C2 versus C0 (HR = 0.41, P = .037), pre-HCT status beyond CR1 versus CR1 (HR = 5.78, P < .001), and presence of chronic GVHD (HR = 0.45, P = .004).

CONCLUSION

One or two cycles of HDAC consolidation therapy led to better subsequent HCT outcomes compared to the no-consolidation therapy group.

Measurable residual disease, conditioning regimen intensity, and age predict outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: A registry analysis of 2292 patients by the Acute Leukemia Working Party European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in morphological first complete remission (CR1) pre-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may have measurable residual disease (MRD) by molecular and immunophenotyping criteria. We assessed interactions of MRD status with HCT conditioning regimen intensity in patients aged <50 years (y) or ≥50y. This was a retrospective study by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients were >18y with AML CR1 MRD NEG/POS and recipients of HCT in 2000-2015. Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (MAC), reduced intensity (RIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA). Outcomes included leukemia free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), chronic graft-vs-host (cGVHD), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2292 eligible patients were categorized into four paired groups: <50y MRD POS MAC (N = 240) vs RIC/NMA (N = 58); <50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 665) vs RIC/NMA (N = 195); ≥50y MRD POS MAC (N = 126) vs RIC/NMA (N = 230), and ≥50y MRD NEG MAC (N = 223) vs RIC/NMA (N = 555). In multivariate analysis RIC/NMA was only inferior to MAC for patients in the <50y MRD POS group, with worse RI (HR 1.71) and LFS (HR 1.554). Patients <50Y MRD NEG had less cGVHD after RIC/NMA HCT (HR 0.714). GRFS was not significantly affected by conditioning intensity in any group. Patients aged <50y with AML CR1 MRD POS status should preferentially be offered MAC allo-HCT. Prospective studies are needed to address whether patients with AML CR1 MRD NEG may be spared the toxicity of MAC regimens. New approaches are needed for ≥50y AML CR1 MRD POS.

The significance of peri-transplantation minimal residual disease assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry on outcomes for adult AML patients receiving haploidentical allografts

A retrospective study (n = 460) was performed to assess the relationship between minimal residual disease (MRD) and transplant outcomes in a haplo-stem cell transplantation (SCT) setting. Patients from the pre-MRDneg group and the pre-MRDpos group had comparable outcomes. Compared to post-MRDneg patients, post-MRDpos patients had a higher incidence of relapse (100.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), lower incidences of overall survival (OS) (16.9% vs. 78.2%, p < 0.001) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (0% vs. 76.5%, p < 0.001), and comparable probability of NRM (13.4% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.560). In a second set of analyses, all adult AML patients undergoing haplo-SCT were classified into the MRD^neg/MRD^neg group, the MRD decreasing group, and the MRD increasing group according to MRD dynamics by flow cytometry peri-SCT. Compared to the other two groups, patients from the MRD increasing group had higher cumulative incidences of relapse (MRD increasing, 100.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 9.6%; MRD decreasing, 19.2%; p < 0.001) and worse probabilities of OS (MRD increasing, 28.5%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 76.3%; MRD decreasing, 76.0%; p < 0.001) and LFS (MRD increasing, 0.0%; MRD^neg/MRD^neg, 73.9%; MRD decreasing, 74.0%; p < 0.001). The results indicated that haploidentical allografts might have a beneficial anti-leukemia effect in eradicating pretransplantation MRD, and MRD assessment peri-SCT is useful for risk stratification from a practical perspective.

Results of program acute myeloid leukemia therapy use in National Medical Research Center for Hematology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

AIM

To analyze treatment results of 172 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged 18-60 years in National Medical Research Center for Hematology of MHRF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inductive and consolidation program for 139 (80%) patients was based on a standardized protocol: 4 courses "7+3" with different anthracycline use (2 courses of daunorubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone) and continuous use of cytarabine on the second inductive course. In 20% of patients cytarabine courses at the dose of 1 g/m2 2 times a day for 1-3 days combined with idarubicin and mitoxantrone were used as two consolidation courses. Allogenic bone marrow transplantation was performed in the first complete remission (CR) period in 40% of patients.

RESULTS

The frequency of CR achievement in all patients was 78.6%, refractory forms were observed in 13.9% of patients, early mortality - in 7.5% of patients. Seven-year overall survival (OS) rate was 40.7%, relapse free survival (RFS) - 43.2%. When estimating effectiveness depending on cytogenetic risk group it was demonstrated that 5-year OS and RFS in patients with translocation (8; 21) cannot be considered as satisfying, it accounted for 50 and 34%, respectively. At the same time in patients with 16th chromosome inversion (inv16) these characteristics accounted for 68.6 and 63.5%. Acquired results forced reconsidering of the consolidation program in AML patients of this subgroup. The median time to allogenic blood stem cells transplantation (allo-BSCT) in patients with first CR was 6.5 months that was taken as a reference point in landmark analysis of patients in whom allo-BSCT was not performed. Landmark analysis showed that in AML patients of favorable prognosis group allo-BSCT does not significantly reduce the probability of relapse (0 and 36%) and does not influence RFS (33 and 64%). In patients of border-line and poor prognosis allo-BSCT significantly reduces relapse probability (26 and 66%; 20 and 100%) and significantly increases a 7-year RFS (68.7 and 30%; 45.6 and 0%). Allo-BSCT also results in significant RFS increase and reduces the probability of relapse (25 и 78%) in patients in whom CR was achieved only after the second induction course. At the same time allo-BSCT does not influence patients who achieved CR after the first treatment course: 55 and 50%.

CONCLUSION

Multivariate analysis showed that cytogenetic risk group (HR=2.3), time of CR achievement (HR=2.9), and allo-BSCT transplantation (HR=0.16) are independent factors for disease relapse prognosis after achieving CR.

Methods and role of minimal residual disease after stem cell transplantation

Relapse is the major cause of treatment failure after stem cell transplantation. Despite the fact that relapses occurred even if transplantation was performed in complete remission, it is obvious that minimal residual disease is present though not morphologically evident. Since adaptive immunotherapy by donor lymphocyte infusion or other novel cell therapies as well as less toxic drugs, which can be used after transplantation, the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has become a clinical important variable for outcome. Besides the increasing options to treat MRD, the most advanced technologies currently allow to detect residual malignant cells with a sensitivity of 10^-5 to 10^-6.Under the patronage of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) the 3rd workshop was held on 4/5 November 2016 in Hamburg/Germany, with the aim to present an up-to-date status of epidemiology and biology of relapse and to summarize the currently available options to prevent and treat post-transplant relapse. Here the current methods and role of minimal residual disease for myeloid and lymphoid malignancies are summarized.

[Efficacy and safety of IA regimen containing different doses of idarubicin in de-novo acute myeloid leukemia for adult patients]

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of IA regimen which contains idarubicin (IDA) 8 mg/m(2), 10 mg/m(2) or 12 mg/m(2) as induction chemotherapy for adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) . Methods: A total of 1 215 newly diagnosed adult AML patients, ranging from May 2011 to March 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and other 36 clinical blood centers in China were enrolled in the multicenter, single-blind, non-randomized, clinical controlled study. To compare the response rate of complete remission (CR) , adverse events between different dose idarubicin combined with cytarabine (100 mg/m(2)) as induction chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients of adult AML. Results: Of 1 207 evaluable AML patients were assigned to this analysis of CR rate. The CR rates of IDA 8 mg/m(2) group, IDA 10 mg/m(2) group and IDA 12 mg/m(2) group were 73.6% (215/292) , 84.1% (662/787) and 86.7% (111/128) , respectively (P<0.001) . After adjusted for age, blast ratio of bone marrow, FAB classification and risk stratification, the odds ratios (95% CI) of IDA 10 mg/m(2) group and IDA 12 mg/m(2) group were 0.49 (0.34-0.70) and 0.36 (0.18-0.71) , as compared with the IDA 8 mg/m(2) group (P<0.001, P=0.003) . In the intermediate and favorable groups, CR rates was 76.5% (163/213) , 86.9% (506/582) and 86.1% (68/79) in different doses of IDA (P=0.007) . Interestingly, IA regimen with IDA 10 mg/m(2) was the only beneficial factor affecting CR in this group after adjusted for age, blast ratio of bone marrow and FAB classification[OR=0.47 (95% CI 0.31-0.71) , P<0.001]. CR rates in adverse group was 50.0% (18/36) , 60.6% (43/71) and 81.8% (18/22) respectively (P=0.089) . However, the odds ratios (95% CI) of IDA 12 mg/m(2) when compared with the IDA 8 mg/m(2) was 0.22 (0.06-0.80) , after adjusted for age, blast ratio of bone marrow and FAB classification. The median time (days) of neutrophil count less than 0.5×10(9)/L in IDA 8 mg/m(2) group, IDA 10 mg/m(2) group and IDA 12 mg/m(2) group were 14 (11-18) , 15 (11-20) and 18 (14-22) , respectively (P=0.012) and of platelet count lower than 20×10(9)/L were 14 (7-17) , 15 (11-20) and 17 (15-21) , respectively (P=0.001) . The incidences of lung infection in the three groups were 9.8%, 13.5% and 25.2%, respectively (P<0.001) . Conclusions: For young adult patients (aged 18-60 years) with AML in China, intensifying induction therapy with idarubicin 10 mg/m(2) is clinically superior to IDA 8 mg/m(2) and IDA 12 mg/m(2) in favorable intermediate AML subgroup. However, idarubicin 12 mg/m(2) is more suitable to adverse AML subgroup.