Impact of ibrutinib dose intensity on patient outcomes in previously treated Waldenström macroglobulinemia

Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition: an Effective Strategy to Manage Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) has evolved over the past decade. With the seminal discoveries of MYD88 and CXCR warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) mutations in WM cells, our understanding of the disease biology and treatment has improved. The development of a new class of agents, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), has substantially impacted the treatment paradigm of WM. Herein, we review the current and emerging BTKi and the evidence for their use in WM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials have established the role of covalent BTKi in the treatment of WM. Their efficacy is compromised among patients who harbor CXCR4WHIM mutation or MYD88WT genotype. The development of BTKC481 mutation-mediated resistance to covalent BTKi may lead to disease refractoriness. Novel, non-covalent, next-generation BTKi are emerging, and preliminary results of the early phase clinical trials show promising activity in WM, even among patients refractory to a covalent BTKi. Covalent BTK inhibitors have demonstrated meaningful outcomes in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed refractory (R/R) WM, particularly among those harboring the MYD88L265P mutation. The next-generation BTKi demonstrate improved selectivity, resulting in a more favorable toxicity profile. In WM, BTKi are administered until progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Consequently, the potential for acquired resistance, the emergence of cumulative toxicities, and treatment-related financial burden are critical challenges associated with the continuous therapy approach. By circumventing BTK C481 mutations that alter the binding site to covalent BTKi, the non-covalent BTKi serve as alternative agents in the event of acquired resistance. Head-to-head comparative trials with the conventional chemoimmunotherapies are lacking. The findings of the RAINBOW trial (NCT046152), comparing the dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) regimen to the first-generation, ibrutinib are awaited, but more studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the comparative efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy and BTKi. Complete response is elusive with BTKi, and combination regimens to improve upon the efficacy and limit the treatment duration are also under evaluation in WM.

Immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia who pause their BTKi therapy

Patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection and have poor immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination. This study assessed whether a closely monitored pause in Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy might result in an improved humoral response to a 3rd COVID-19 vaccine dose. Improved response was observed in WM patients who paused their BTKi, compared to a group who did not pause their BTKi. However, the response was attenuated after BTKi recommencement. This data contributes to our understanding of vaccination strategies in this patient group and may help inform consensus approaches in the future.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal protein. Clinical features include anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and rarely hyperviscosity.

DIAGNOSIS

Presence of IgM monoclonal protein associated with ≥10% clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells in bone marrow confirms the diagnosis. The L265P mutation in MYD88 is detectable in more than 90% of patients and is found in most IgM MGUS patients. MYD88 is not required for the diagnosis.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, β2 microglobulin, LDH, and monoclonal IgM concentrations are characteristics that are predictive of outcomes.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Not all patients who fulfill WM criteria require therapy; these patients can be observed until symptoms develop. Rituximab-monotherapy is inferior to regimens that combine it with bendamustine, an alkylating agent, a proteosome inhibitor, or a BTK inhibitor. The preferred Mayo Clinic induction is either rituximab and bendamustine (without rituximab maintenance) or zanubrutinib.

MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE

Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, thalidomide, everolimus, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, bendamustine, and venetoclax have all been shown to have activity in relapsed WM. Given WM's natural history, the reduction of therapy toxicity is an important part of treatment selection.

Managing Waldenström's macroglobulinemia with BTK inhibitors

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is one of the treatment standards for patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) and for patients with WM who are unsuitable for immunochemotherapy (ICT). It offers deep and durable responses with a manageable safety profile that is generally favorable compared with ICT regimens. However, the limitations of the first approved BTK inhibitor (BTKi), ibrutinib, include reduced efficacy in patients lacking the characteristic WM mutation (MYD88^L265P) and toxicities related to off-target activity. The risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other cardiovascular side effects are a notable feature of ibrutinib therapy. Several next-generation covalent BTKis with greater selectivity for BTK are at various stages of development. In November 2021, zanubrutinib became the first of these agents to be approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of WM. Head-to-head trial data indicate that it has comparable efficacy to ibrutinib for patients with WM overall, although it may be more effective in patients with CXCR4 mutations or wild-type MYD88. In the clinical trial setting, its greater selectivity translates into a reduced risk of cardiovascular side effects, including AF. Acalabrutinib, which is pre-approval in WM, appears to offer similar advantages over ibrutinib in terms of its safety profile. Beyond the next-generation covalent BTKis, non-covalent BTKis are an emerging class with the potential to provide a therapeutic option for patients who relapse on covalent BTKis. In the future, BTKis may be increasingly utilized within combination regimens. Several ongoing trials in WM are investigating the potential for BTKi use in combination with established and novel targeted agents.

BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases: mechanisms and clinical studies

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an essential component of multiple signaling pathways that regulate B cell and myeloid cell proliferation, survival, and functions, making it a promising therapeutic target for various B cell malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Five small molecule inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy and have been approved to treat different types of hematological cancers, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, tirabrutinib, and orelabrutinib. The first-in-class agent, ibrutinib, has created a new era of chemotherapy-free treatment of B cell malignancies. Ibrutinib is so popular and became the fourth top-selling cancer drug worldwide in 2021. To reduce the off-target effects and overcome the acquired resistance of ibrutinib, significant efforts have been made in developing highly selective second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and various combination approaches. Over the past few years, BTK inhibitors have also been repurposed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Promising data have been obtained from preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. In this review, we summarized current progress in applying BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory disorders, highlighting available results from clinical studies.

Diagnosis and management of Waldenström macroglobulinaemia-A British Society for Haematology guideline

SCOPE

The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the management of patients with Waldenström macroglobulinaemia. In individual patients, circumstances may dictate an alternative approach.

METHODOLOGY

This guideline was compiled according to the British Society for Haematology (BSH) process at http://www.b-s-h.org.uk/guidelines/proposing-and-writing-a-new-bsh-guideline/. Recommendations are based on a review of the literature using Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Central, Web of Science searches from beginning of 2013 (since the publication of the previous guidelines) up to November 2021. The following search terms were used: Waldenström('s) macroglobulin(a)emia OR lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, IgM(-related) neuropathy OR cold h(a)emagglutinin disease OR cold agglutinin disease OR cryoglobulin(a)emia AND (for group a only) cytogenetic OR molecular OR mutation OR MYD88 OR CXCR4, management OR treatment OR transfusion OR supportive care OR plasma exchange OR plasmapheresis OR chemotherapy OR bendamustine OR bortezomib OR ibrutinib OR fludarabine OR dexamethasone OR cyclophosphamide OR rituximab OR everolimus, bone marrow transplantation OR stem cell transplantation. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) nomenclature was used to evaluate levels of evidence and to assess the strength of recommendations. The GRADE criteria can be found at http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org. Review of the manuscript was performed by the British Society for Haematology (BSH) Guidelines Committee Haemato-Oncology Task Force, the BSH Guidelines Committee and the Haemato-Oncology sounding board of BSH. It was also on the members section of the BSH website for comment. It has also been reviewed by UK Charity WMUK; these organisations do not necessarily approve or endorse the contents.

Differential Diagnosis of Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and Early Management: Perspectives from Clinical Practice

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a clonal B-lymphocyte neoplasm characterized by the presence of IgM monoclonal protein and ≥10% bone marrow involvement with lymphoplasmacytic cells. Several mature B-cell and plasma cell disorders can potentially produce monoclonal IgM immunoglobulin and hence, careful consideration of the differential diagnosis is vital. Clinico-pathological features, immunophenotype, and MYD88 mutation status help distinguish WM from other plasma cell and lymphoproliferative disorders. Treatment is only indicated in patients symptomatic from adenopathy or organomegaly, neuropathy, hyper viscosity, cryoglobulinemia, cold agglutinin disease, cytopenia's or amyloidosis. Alkylators (cyclophosphamide, bendamustine) in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies and novel targeted agents including Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors like ibrutinib are the mainstay of frontline treatment in symptomatic WM.

Current and novel BTK inhibitors in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

The current therapeutic approach in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) is being driven by insights in disease biology and genomic landscape. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays a key role in signaling pathways for the survival of WM clone. BTK inhibition has changed the treatment landscape of the disease. Ibrutinib has resulted in deep and durable responses both as an upfront and salvage treatment with a manageable toxicity profile. However, the need for fewer off-target effects and deeper responses has resulted in the clinical development of second-generation BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib has resulted in clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including deep and durable responses, with a low discontinuation rate due to treatment-related toxicities. Cardiovascular adverse events seem to be milder compared with ibrutinib. Interestingly, the efficacy of zanubrutinib in WM is significant both for MYD88^L265P and MYD88^WT patients. Although the randomized, phase III ASPEN clinical trial did not meet its primary endpoint in terms of showing a superiority of zanubrutinib in deep responses compared with ibrutinib, secondary efficacy and safety endpoints underscore the potential clinical role of zanubrutinib in the treatment algorithm of WM independent of the MYD88 mutational status. Combination regimens and non-covalent BTK inhibitors are emerging as promising treatment strategies. Long-term data will determine whether next-generation BTK inhibitors are more potent and safer compared with ibrutinib, and whether they are able to overcome resistance to ibrutinib, either alone or in combination with inhibitors of other interrelated molecular pathways.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal protein. Clinical features include anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and rarely hyperviscosity.

DIAGNOSIS

Presence of IgM monoclonal protein associated with ≥10% clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells in bone marrow confirms the diagnosis. The L265P mutation in MYD88 is detectable in more than 90% of patients and is found in the majority of IgM MGUS patients.

RISK STRATIFICATION

Age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, β₂ microglobulin, LDH and monoclonal IgM concentrations are characteristics that are predictive of outcomes.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Not all patients who fulfill WM criteria require therapy; these patients can be observed until symptoms develop. Rituximab-monotherapy is inferior to regimens that combine it with bendamustine, an alkylating agent, a proteosome inhibitor, or ibrutinib. Purine nucleoside analogues are active but usage is declining in favor of less toxic alternatives. The preferred Mayo Clinic induction is rituximab and bendamustine.

MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY DISEASE

Bortezomib, fludarabine, thalidomide, everolimus, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and bendamustine have all been shown to have activity in relapsed WM. Given WM's natural history, reduction of therapy toxicity is an important part of treatment selection.

Zanubrutinib for the treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Introduction: Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a heterogeneous, incurable condition which often relapses after chemoimmunotherapy. Novel therapies such as Bruton tyrosine-kinase (BTK) inhibitors have shown to be efficacious in treating WM but with an established, significant toxicity profile seen in the first-generation inhibitor Ibrutinib. Zanubrutinib is a selective, potent BTK inhibitor with the potential to reduce toxicity and improve efficacy. Areas covered: This review examines the activity of Zanubrutinib in treating treatment-naïve and relapsed refractory WM and it's toxicity profile when compared to Ibrutinib. Outcomes from the AU003 and ASPEN studies will be examined in detail including a particular focus on MYD88^WT and CXCR4^WHIM disease. Strengths and weaknesses of this treatment approach will be highlighted and future directions for research will be identified. Expert opinion: Zanubrutinib induces deeper responses and have greater activity in MYD88^WT and CXCR4^WHIM WM. Zanubrutinib also has a favorable toxicity profile when compared to Ibrutinib. This may potentially translate to lower discontinuation rates, improved quality of life and ultimately longer progression-free survival in patients with WM.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia

INTRODUCTION

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent lymphoma with uniquely distinct and heterogenous clinical and genomic profiles. Clonal lymphoplasmacytic cells secrete monoclonal IgM. More than 90% of patients harbor a mutation in MYD88 gene, leading to the constitutive activation of downstream pathways, involving BTK-mediated signaling. The use of BTK inhibitors has changed the treatment landscape of WM and has paved the way for new approaches to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

WM is an orphan disease and ibrutinib is the only FDA/EMA approved agent. Currently established agent combinations will be reviewed with a focus on emerging therapeutic options. These include second generation inhibitors, agents that target other molecules in the BCR signaling pathway, CXCR4 inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD38 antibodies. The current research goal is to establish a combination that can induce deep and durable responses with minimal associated toxicity. In addition, agents that can overcome ibrutinib resistance or act in a synergistic manner with BTKi are under investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

The optimal therapeutic approach for WM patients is not currently established. The question of whether a combinatory (or synergistic) regimen to overcome resistance and allow for fixed- duration treatment will allow for deep/durable responses is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

The current role of BTK inhibitors in the treatment of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

INTRODUCTION

Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare, indolent lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by heterogeneous clinical and genomic profile. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is central to the signaling pathways required for clonal WM cell survival, and BTK inhibitors currently have an imperative role in the treatment of WM.

AREAS COVERED

The central role of BTK in WM will be described, and the rationale behind the development of BTKi. Clinical trial data that led to the approval of ibrutinib (the first-in-class BTKi) will be reviewed. Despite its potency and safe toxicity profile, ibrutinib does not induce deep remissions, and responses are mutational-status dependent. The mechanisms that lead to resistance to this agent are being investigated. Ibrutinib treatment has to be continuous; consequently, patients face the effects of long-term toxicity. In that context, second-generation inhibitors are in clinical development with fewer off-target effects and an efficacy profile, which will be determined based on long-term follow-up data.

EXPERT OPINION

The optimal therapeutic approach for WM patients remains to be established. The question of whether a combinatory (or synergistic) regimen to overcome resistance and allow for a fixed treatment duration will allow for deep and durable response is being addressed in ongoing clinical trials.

Evaluating ibrutinib in the treatment of symptomatic Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia

Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with indolent course and prolonged disease course. The first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ibrutinib, has shown significant activity and a distinct adverse event profile among both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory WM patients. Interestingly, clinical responses to ibrutinib have been shown to be dependent on patients' MYD88 and CXCR4 mutational status. The recent outcomes of the Phase III iNNOVATE trial showed that the combination of ibrutinib with rituximab resulted in a significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with rituximab monotherapy, which provides a novel therapeutic option in the clinical practice especially for the rituximab-refractory WM patients. However, the need for continuous drug administration along with the unique toxicity manifestations may render the patient management challenging. Furthermore, our understanding of the underlying resistant mechanisms to ibrutinib is currently being evolved.

Rituximab and ibrutinib in the treatment of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia

The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib represents a highly effective single substance in the treatment of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Ibrutinib monotherapy is a valid therapeutic option either in the relapsed or refractory setting or in patients first line, particulary when they are ineligible for chemotherapy. However, the treatment success depends on the genotype. Recent data suggest that ibrutinib in combination with rituximab may partially overcome this genotype dependency.