ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma with DUSP22 rearrangement has distinctive disease characteristics with better progression-free survival: a LYSA study

Diverse and reprogrammable mechanisms of malignant cell transformation in lymphocytes: pathogenetic insights and translational implications

While normal B- and T-lymphocytes require antigenic ligands to become activated via their B- and T-cell receptors (BCR and TCR, respectively), B- and T-cell lymphomas show the broad spectrum of cell activation mechanisms regarding their dependence on BCR or TCR signaling, including loss of such dependence. These mechanisms are generally better understood and characterized for B-cell than for T-cell lymphomas. While some lymphomas, particularly the indolent, low-grade ones remain antigen-driven, other retain dependence on activation of their antigen receptors seemingly in an antigen-independent manner with activating mutations of the receptors playing a role. A large group of lymphomas, however, displays complete antigen receptor independence, which can develop gradually, in a stepwise manner or abruptly, through involvement of powerful oncogenes. Whereas some of the lymphomas undergo activating mutations of genes encoding proteins involved in signaling cascades downstream of the antigen-receptors, others employ activation mechanisms capable of substituting for these BCR- or TCR-dependent signaling pathways, including reliance on signaling pathways physiologically activated by cytokines. Finally, lymphomas can develop cell-lineage infidelity and in the extreme cases drastically rewire their cell activation mechanisms and engage receptors and signaling pathways physiologically active in hematopoietic stem cells or non-lymphoid cells. Such profound reprograming may involve partial cell dedifferentiation or transdifferentiation towards histocytes, dendritic, or mesodermal cells with various degree of cell maturation along these lineages. In this review, we elaborate on these diverse pathogenic mechanisms underlying cell plasticity and signaling reprogramming as well as discuss the related diagnostic and therapeutic implications and challenges.

Aggressive T-cell lymphomas: 2024: Updates on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

INTRODUCTION

Aggressive T-cell lymphomas continue to have a poor prognosis. There are over 30 different subtypes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), and we are now beginning to understand the differences between the various subtypes beyond histologic variations.

MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF VARIOUS SUBTYPES OF PTCL

Gene expression profiling and other molecular techniques have enabled deeper understanding of differences in various subtypes as reflected in the latest 5th WHO classification of PTCL. It is becoming increasingly clear that therapeutic approaches that target specific cellular pathways are needed to improve the clinical outcomes of PTCL.

TARGETED THERAPIES

There are many targeted agents currently in various stages of clinical trials for PTCL that take advantage of the differential expression of specific proteins or receptors in PTCL tumors. This includes the CD30 directed antibody drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin. Other notable targets are phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, CD25, and chemokine receptor 4. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are promising for ALK expressing tumors.

IMMUNOTHERAPIES

Allogeneic stem cell transplant continues to be the curative therapy for most aggressive subtypes of PTCL. The use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of PTCL is still controversial, with best results seen in cases of extranodal natural killer cell/T-cell lymphoma. Bispecific antibody-based treatments and chimeric antigen receptor cell-based therapies are in clinical trials.

SOHO State-of-the-Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Although a rare subset of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) account for a disproportionate proportion of patient mortality. Conventional therapies are derived from experience treating aggressive B-cell lymphomas and center around CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, due to the unique biology and diverse subtypes of PTCL, most patients fail to durably respond to this approach and 5-year survival is only 20% to 30%. There have been multiple attempts to improve outcomes for patients with PTCL. Among the more successful strategies are the use of consolidative autologous stem cell transplant, the augmentation of CHOP with etoposide (CHOEP), and the use of brentuximab vedotin in CD30-positive PTCL. Advances in the understanding of histology-specific biology has cultivated enthusiasm to evaluate hypomethylating agents, histone deacetylate inhibitors, and phosphoinositol-3-kinase inhibitors in the frontline setting. Improvements in monitoring disease response and prognostication including the use of cell-free DNA, mutational profiling, and interim PET/CT imaging are also on the horizon. For patients with acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, the use of mogamulizumab-based therapy in the frontline setting may lead to advances in care. The true impact of these new-era therapies will only be elucidated as clinical practices incorporate the rapidly changing evidence.

Pathobiology of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas: current understanding and future directions

Predominantly nodal is the most common clinical presentation of peripheral T- (and NK-) cell lymphomas (PTCL), which comprise three main groups of diseases: (i) systemic anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL), whether positive or negative for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); (ii) follicular helper T-cell lymphomas (TFHL); and (iii) PTCL, not otherwise specified (NOS). Recent advances in the genomic and molecular characterization of PTCL, with enhanced understanding of pathobiology, have translated into significant updates in the latest 2022 classifications of lymphomas. ALK-negative ALCL is now recognized to be genetically heterogeneous, with identification of DUSP22 rearrangements in approximately 20-30% of cases, correlated with distinctive pathological and biological features. The notion of cell-of-origin as an important determinant of the classification of nodal PTCL is best exemplified by TFHL, considered as one disease or a group of related entities, sharing oncogenic pathways with frequent recurrent epigenetic mutations as well as a relationship to clonal hematopoiesis. Data are emerging to support that a similar cell-of-origin concept might be relevant to characterize meaningful subgroups within PTCL, NOS, based on cytotoxic and/or Th1 versus Th2 signatures. The small group of primary nodal Epstein-Barr virus-positive lymphomas of T- or NK-cell derivation, formerly considered PTCL, NOS, is now classified separately, due to distinctive features, and notably an aggressive course. This review summarizes current knowledge of the pathology and biology of nodal-based PTCL entities, with an emphasis on recent findings and underlying oncogenic mechanisms.

What is new in the classification of peripheral T cell lymphomas?

In this review focus article, we highlight the main modifications introduced in the latest 2022 International Consensus Classification and World Health Organization classification (ICC and WHO-HAEM5) of mature T (and NK) cell neoplasms (PTCLs) and consequent implications for diagnostic practice. The changes result from recent advances in the genomic and molecular characterization of PTCLs and enhanced understanding of their pathobiology. Specifically, consideration is given to the following groups of diseases: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated neoplasms; follicular helper T cell lymphoma; anaplastic large cell lymphomas; primary intestinal T and NK cell lymphomas and lymphoproliferative disorders; and PTCL, not otherwise specified.

Anaplastic large cell lymphomas with equivocal DUSP22 FISH results: recommendations for clinical reporting and diagnostic evaluation

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), one of the most common T-cell lymphomas, shows unifying pathological features but is clinically and genetically heterogeneous. One genetic subgroup, characterized by recurrent DUSP22 rearrangements (R), has distinct morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features and can be identified in routine pathology practice using a breakapart (BAP) fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe. However, some cases show equivocal BAP-FISH findings (BAP-FISHEQ) and the features of these cases are poorly understood. Here, we sought to characterize DUSP22 BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs further. First, we applied an immunohistochemistry (IHC) algorithm using TIA1, pSTAT3Y705, and LEF1, which can predict DUSP22-R with high accuracy. Among 37 BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs, 18 (49%) were IHC-algorithm positive (IHCPOS), 8 (21%) were IHC-algorithm negative (IHCNEG), and 11 (30%) were IHCEQ. In 32 BAP-FISHEQ cases, we also applied a dual-color, dual-fusion (D-FISH) probe for t(6;7)(p25.3;q32.3), which accounts for 45% of DUSP22-R ALCLs. Among BAP-FISHEQ cases, D-FISH was positive in 10/18 IHCPOS cases (56%), 0/9 IHCEQ cases (0%), and 0/5 IHCNEG cases (0%). Median survival in BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs was 105 months, intermediate between BAP-FISHPOS ALCLs (median survival not reached) and BAP-FISHNEG ALCLs (19 months). Thus, DUSP22 BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs are clinicopathologically heterogeneous, likely due to an admixture of cases with an unbalanced DUSP22-R and cases with focal deletions without rearrangement. For clinical reporting, we recommend that DUSP22 BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs be reported as equivocal, and not be grouped with BAP-FISHPOS ALCLs. Clinical adoption of an IHC algorithm, possibly supplemented by t(6; 7) D-FISH, could facilitate genetic subtyping in about two-thirds of BAP-FISHEQ ALCLs.

Cytogenetics in the management of mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms: Guidelines from the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH)

Mature T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms (MTNKNs) are a highly heterogeneous group of lymphomas that represent 10-15 % of lymphoid neoplasms and have usually an aggressive behavior. Diagnosis can be challenging due to their overlapping clinical, histological and immunophenotypic features. Genetic data are not a routine component of the diagnostic algorithm for most MTNKNs. Indeed, unlike B-cell lymphomas, the genomic landscape of MTNKNs is not fully understood. Only few characteristic rearrangements can be easily identified with conventional cytogenetic methods and are an integral part of the diagnostic criteria, for instance the t(14;14)/inv(14) or t(X;14) abnormality harbored by 95 % of patients with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, or the ALK gene translocation observed in some forms of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. However, advances in molecular and cytogenetic techniques have brought new insights into MTNKN pathogenesis. Several recurrent genetic alterations have been identified, such as chromosomal losses involving tumor suppressor genes (SETD2, CDKN2A, TP53) and gains involving oncogenes (MYC), activating mutations in signaling pathways (JAK-STAT, RAS), and epigenetic dysregulation, that have improved our understanding of these pathologies. This work provides an overview of the cytogenetics knowledge in MTNKNs in the context of the new World Health Organization classification and the International Consensus Classification of hematolymphoid tumors. It describes key genetic alterations and their clinical implications. It also proposes recommendations on cytogenetic methods for MTNKN diagnosis.

[Classification of peripheral T-cell lymphomas : News and open questions]

Recently, two new classifications were released: the International Consensus Classification (ICC) drafted by the Clinical Advisory Committee and the short version of the 5th Edition of the WHO classification of hematolymphoid tumors. In light of new clinical, morphological, and molecular data, both classifications also revised the classification of peripheral T‑cell lymphomas. In addition to relatively minor changes in terminology and disease definitions, both new classifications mirror the considerable gain of knowledge on the genetic alterations of different T‑cell lymphoma entities. The present review summarizes the most important changes for T‑cell lymphomas in both classifications, the differences between the classifications, and diagnostically relevant issues.