The role of patient preferences in adherence to treatment in chronic disease: a narrative review

The 'totality of evidence' and 'extrapolation' of SB17, a ustekinumab biosimilar

INTRODUCTION

SB17 is a ustekinumab (UST) biosimilar targeting interleukin-12/23 for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The development of UST biosimilars like SB17 may help address the high cost of innovator biologics, offering affordable alternatives without compromising efficacy or safety.

AREAS COVERED

This review encompasses the totality of evidence supporting SB17's similarity to UST, its regulatory approval, and indication extrapolation. It also discusses SB17's lower immunogenicity relative to UST.

EXPERT OPINION

The approval of UST biosimilars represents a significant advancement in managing chronic IMIDs including psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, providing cost-effective, efficacious alternatives. A randomized double-blind 28-week study involving over 500 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis demonstrated SB17's equivalence to UST, with more than 80% of patients achieving over 90% improvement in psoriasis severity indices. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between SB17 and UST. Despite their potential to transform clinical outcomes, economic burdens, and drug utilization patterns, the adoption of UST biosimilars faces challenges, including concerns about equivalence and regulatory inconsistencies. Addressing these issues through education, consistent regulatory frameworks, real-world data, and ongoing monitoring is crucial for their successful integration into clinical practice.

Preferences for Biologic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Survey of Canadians with Severe Asthma

Purpose

The safety and efficacy of biologics for severe asthma have been demonstrated in clinical trials, and subsequent economic evaluations have established their value from a population perspective. Insight into patient preferences for attributes of biologic treatments can inform treatment-related decisions and promote adherence. However, such data are limited in Canada, and no willingness-to-pay (WTP) data exists. This study aimed to quantify the strength of preferences of those with severe asthma for attributes of biologic treatments.

Patients and Methods

Canadians with severe asthma completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 15 choice tasks and six biologic treatment attributes (improving daily activities, controlling other health conditions, frequency of administration, monthly out-of-pocket costs, reducing attack frequency, and reducing rescue inhaler use). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and WTP (the marginal rate of substitution of attributes for money) were estimated using a conditional logistic regression.

Results

Ninety-seven eligible and unique participants completed the survey (70.1% female; mean [SD] age: 54.6 [14.4]; 48.4% ever used biologics). A dramatic (vs slight) improvement in daily activities increased the odds of a biologic being preferred by 78% (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48, 2.14), and a $100 increase in monthly out-of-pocket costs decreased the odds by 64% (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.67). On average, WTP was an extra $129 CAD in monthly out-of-pocket costs for a dramatic (vs slight) improvement in daily activities. WTP for a hypothetical biologic treatment was an extra $430 CAD in monthly out-of-pocket costs.

Conclusion

Canadians with severe asthma prefer biologic treatments that dramatically improve daily activities and have lower out-of-pocket costs. This DCE is the first to include a cost attribute and estimate WTP. These data can help inform decision-making when considering access to new biologic treatments for severe asthma and clinicians when helping patients select treatments for severe asthma.

Humanistic Charting: Empowering Person-centered Emergency Care Through Reimagining the Electronic Health Record

Objectives

The rise in health care standardization has increased the focus on documentation, subsequently leading to the depersonalization of patient care. Humanistic Charting attempts to enhance person-centered care (PCC) by streamlining the integration of a patient's narrative into the electronic health record (EHR), while reducing a clinician's administrative workload. The Humanistic Charting Tool (HCT) transitions the collection and documentation of person-centric data to patients, empowering them to convey their values, preferences, and individuality.

Methods

We carried out a pilot study in an academic emergency department (ED) at the University of California, San Francisco, between February and April 2023, involving 6 clinicians and 29 adult patients using the HCT. Clinicians reviewed HCT entries prior to patient encounters. The feasibility and impact of HCT were assessed using surveys and interviews pre- and postuse. The statistical significance of patient and clinician responses was assessed with 2-sided paired t tests.

Results

The HCT was met with high patient satisfaction, with notable improvements in patient-rated care experience metrics post-HCT implementation, such as respect for patient preferences and clinician availability. The HCT received excellent Net Promoter Scores from both patients (52) and clinicians (83). Clinicians observed that the HCT promoted a humanistic care approach and helped alleviate burnout.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, the HCT has demonstrated encouraging feasibility and promise in helping enhance PCC within the challenging ED environment. Clinicians have noted its advantages in providing deeper insights into patient histories and improving the quality of interactions, having the potential to aid in counteracting biases. This pilot study demonstrates the HCT's potential to help foster humanism and PCC in emergency settings and supports the potential for broader applicability in health care systems.

Longitudinal Insights from Blended Hearing Care: Service Modality Choices, Support Received, and Satisfaction Ratings

Background/Objectives: Sensorineural hearing loss (HL) is a highly prevalent chronic health condition. It can be managed through hearing care, including the use of hearing aids (HAs). Still, a majority of individuals with HL remain undiagnosed or untreated. Virtual care delivery may support uptake and adherence to interventions. In blended care, individuals can choose interchangeably between in-person and virtual services. This study aimed to investigate how real-world individuals accessed blended hearing care (through in-person, virtual, or hybrid services), the amount of support they received, and their satisfaction with services and products. Methods: An exploratory, retrospective analysis was performed on longitudinal observational data collected through Australia's longest-running blended hearing care model. A total of 25,058 appointment records were available, matched to HA purchase records and clinical notes where possible, as well as 916 satisfaction ratings. Results: The majority of individuals attended in-person appointments (75%); 25% were virtual or hybrid appointments. The number of appointments attended depended on how HAs were purchased (in-person, virtually, or hybrid), but all modalities were complemented by ample unscheduled email and telephone support. Of those who purchased HAs repeatedly, 49% changed preferred sales channel (in-person versus virtual) over time. Satisfaction ratings were highest for virtual services. Conclusions: This first report of real-world, longitudinal evidence on blended hearing care showed strong attendance of in-person appointments, while hybrid services-including informal; unscheduled support-may have responded to individuals' changing needs and preferences over time. The findings offer practice-based evidence for blended care models and recommendations for further research.

Patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment: a preference heterogeneity assessment

BACKGROUND

Long-acting antiretroviral therapy (LA-ART) is an emerging alternative to daily oral ART pills that may improve HIV treatment adherence. We studied preference heterogeneity for LA-ART among people with HIV (PWH) in western Washington State and Atlanta, Georgia to determine how preference heterogeneity was related to individual characteristics.

METHODS

We recruited 699 PWH to complete a survey including 17 choice-tasks, each of which included two hypothetical LA-ART alternatives and current daily oral therapy. Each hypothetical alternative was defined by mode (long-acting [LA] oral pills, subcutaneous injections, intramuscular injections, and implants), frequency, treatment location (home, clinic, or pharmacy), injection pain, pre-treatment time undetectable, pre-treatment reaction testing, and late-dose leeway. We fitted a latent class model to the data and investigated associations between class membership and individual characteristics.

RESULTS

Our sample had three classes which were defined by their treatment preferences. Two classes preferred LA-ART over current treatment: the LA-Implant class (29%) and the LA-Oral-or-Injection class (35%). In contrast, the Daily-or-LA-Oral class (36%) preferred current treatment or LA oral pills taken at home. Compared to the third class, participants from the other two were younger, more educated, less adherent to current ART, and less averse to injections. Further, LA-Implant participants were less likely to be virally suppressed and had easier clinic access. LA-Oral-or-Injection participants had a higher prevalence of psychotic disorders.

CONCLUSION

These results provide a deeper understanding of the preference landscape for LA-ART and can aid in the development of interventions better aligned with individual preferences.

Tinidazole vs metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tinidazole shows potential as a first-line treatment for bacterial vaginosis (BV). However, its superiority to metronidazole remains uncertain. Therefore, this meta-analysis compares tinidazole versus metronidazole in patients with BV.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies comparing tinidazole and metronidazole in patients with BV. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled across trials. Outcomes of interest were BV cure at the first and the second follow-up appointment, and adverse events such as nausea and bad or metallic taste.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective observational study, reporting data on 1,036 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Among them, 511 (49%) received tinidazole and 525 (51%) received metronidazole. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 weeks. There was no significant difference between groups for BV cure at the first follow-up appointment (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14; I2 = 76%), cure at the second follow-up appointment (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.38; I2 = 88%), nausea (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.39-2.04; I2 = 83%), and bad or metallic taste (RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.12-4.45; I2 = 89%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with BV, tinidazole and metronidazole exhibit similar efficacy and safety, with equivalent cure rates and incidence of adverse events.

Treatment Preferences of Physicians Treating Adult Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in the United States and Canada: A Discrete Choice Experiment

INTRODUCTION

Factors influencing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment preferences have been studied among patients but not physicians in the United States (US) and Canada. This study assessed treatment preferences of physicians treating adult patients with ADHD in both countries.

METHODS

An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted (October 4-20, 2023) among physicians from Dynata's US and Canadian panel who treated adult patients with ADHD. Preference weights for efficacy (improvement in ADHD symptoms) and safety [risks of adverse events (AEs)] attributes were estimated using a conditional logistic regression model, and were used to calculate the willingness to trade-off and relative importance of the attributes.

RESULTS

Among 510 US and 347 Canadian physicians (64.1% and 69.2% male, respectively), improvement in ADHD symptoms had a significant positive impact, and the risks of AEs (except the risk of feeling jittery in Canada) had a significant negative impact on physician preferences for ADHD treatments. US physicians were willing to tradeoff 0.44, 0.35, 0.20, 0.17, and 0.17 percentage points of improvement in ADHD symptoms to avoid a one-percentage-point risk of insomnia, nausea, feeling jittery, anxiety, and dry mouth, respectively; among Canadian physicians, these were 0.31, 0.21, 0.12, 0.20, and 0.07, respectively. The relative importance of the efficacy versus safety attributes (i.e., the risks of AEs included in the DCE taken together) was 45.5% versus 54.5% in the US and 56.3% versus 43.7% in Canada.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy was the most important single attribute for physicians treating adult patients with ADHD in both the US and Canada; however, the risks of AEs taken together had greater relative importance than efficacy alone among US but not Canadian physicians. These findings highlight potential discrepancies in physician and patient preferences based on existing evidence and underscore the importance of shared decision-making, which may in turn increase patients' treatment satisfaction.

Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Towards a Decision Aid Assessing Preferences of Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The Dilemma of Choosing

Background

Treatment guidelines recommend metformin as initial drug in many people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low risk of cardiovascular disease, with the possibility to switch to or add other drug classes. A decision aid (DA) could be useful to incorporate a patient's preferences in the decision of which drug class to choose. We developed such a DA and assessed the perspectives of people with T2D towards its comprehensibility and usability.

Methods

The DA consists of a paper-based leaflet followed by a web-based preference elicitation exercise. The leaflet aims at informing patients about drug characteristics (eg, efficacy, safety). The relative importance of these drug characteristics for each participant are then assessed in a web-based exercise, which results in a ranking of the preferred drug classes. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted among Dutch patients with T2D who were or had ever been under pharmacological treatment for T2D. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted.

Results

Fifteen patients participated (median age 64 years, nine women, and most had T2D >10 years). Risk of hypoglycaemia was most often the characteristic to which patients attached the highest importance (n=5). A glucagon-like peptide-1-antagonist weekly injection fitted best the preferences of most patients (n=8). The interviews revealed improvements for text, pictograms and figures, and formatting, and increased comprehension of how patients completed the DA. Regarding usability, missing information was identified, as well as patients' perspectives about the usefulness of the DA and its role in shared-decision making.

Conclusion

The DA was considered promising for shared-decision making but further improvements regarding its comprehensibility and usability are needed, for which this study provides clear guidance.

Incidence and risk factors of discontinuation of tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A population-based cohort study

To investigate the incidence of the discontinuation among tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This retrospective population-based cohort study included 5,008 RA patients who initiated treatment with either tofacitinib or bDMARDs (etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, or abatacept) between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2020. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression and subsequent time-dependent regression to assess the risk of drug discontinuation, with adjustments for potential variables. The highest drug discontinuation rate was observed with etanercept (43.27%), while the lowest was with tofacitinib (21.8%). Tofacitinib was associated with a significantly lower risk of discontinuation compared to etanercept (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.80) and other bDMARDs. Higher steroid dosage and the presence of concomitant connective tissue diseases were significant risk factors for drug discontinuation. Conversely, the use of methotrexate was associated with a reduced risk of discontinuation. Tofacitinib demonstrated a lower risk of drug discontinuation compared to TNFi, with the risk factors for discontinuation including higher steroid dosage and concomitant connective tissue diseases. The study highlights the importance of considering several potential risk factors in drug discontinuation. Key Points • Non-TNFi biologic agents demonstrated better drug retention than TNFi among patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, with tofacitinib showing the lowest discontinuation rate (21.8%), underscoring its potential for superior drug retention in rheumatoid arthritis management. • Several factors were associated with drug discontinuation: higher steroid dosage and concomitant connective tissue diseases were linked to a higher discontinuation rate, whereas the concomitant use of methotrexate was associated with a lower risk of discontinuation.

Patient preferences on pen injectors for assisted reproductive technology: a discrete choice experiment in France

BACKGROUND

The preference of patients in the choice of pen injectors for Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) is an important issue for treatment adherence. This study, based on discrete choice experiment (DCE), aimed to elicit patients' preferences of the characteristics of all pen injectors available in France.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A DCE with 12 choice sets was developed to measure the preferences of 6 attributes: pre-injection steps, injection device, dose release, post-injection display, dose reduction method, and dose counter. A mixed logistic model was used to determine the preference ranks and calculate utility score.

RESULTS

The study involved 155 women who had previous experience with the use of injector pens with an average age of 34.1 years. Statistically significant results showed that the most essential characteristics were dose confirmation (p < 0.0001), dose counter with digits (p < 0.0001), multi-use pen (p < 0.0001) and ready-to-use pens (p < 0.0001). Estimation of the utilities showed statistically significant difference in favor of Gonal-f®/Pergoveris® (reference modalities) versus other pens, and the largest difference was with Rekovelle® [95% CI:-1,37;-0.85], and Bemfola® [95% CI:-2.25;-1,52].

CONCLUSIONS

This study show that respondent preferred pen that are ready to use, can be used multiple times, have dose injection confirmation, and display the dose with digits.

Patterns of HIV Treatment Preferences Among People With Diverse Demographic, Social, and Behavioral Characteristics Who Are Living With HIV in the United States

BACKGROUND

New dosage form and frequency options may improve HIV treatment outcomes and reduce disparities in access and use.

METHODS

People with HIV in the United States completed a demographic and discrete choice experiment survey of preference for 13 hypothetical HIV treatment options: daily and weekly oral tablets; 1-, 3-, or 6-monthly injections by self or a health care provider (HCP); yearly implant; or combinations. Best-Worst Scaling and a latent class model were used to analyze overall preference choices and for groups of individuals with similar patterns of preferences; the model also predicted uptake of products.

RESULTS

Among the diverse 829 respondents, weekly oral tablets and 6-monthly injections by an HCP were significantly more favored than daily oral tablets. Convenience of the treatment and being tired of taking pills were the top drivers of preference responses. Latent class analysis identified 4 groups of respondents with distinct preference patterns; approximately two-thirds belonged to groups strongly preferring products other than daily oral tablets. The modelled uptake of a weekly pill, yearly implant, 6-monthly HCP injection, oral daily pill, and 3-monthly HCP injections were 24%, 24%, 24%, 18%, and 11%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of HIV medication preference can inform development of new forms of HIV therapy products because the majority of patients do not prefer the currently most available treatment option of daily oral tablets. Looking beyond population-level preferences and into similar groups of people with HIV increases the ability to develop patient-centered products to fill gaps in care and increase treatment effectiveness.

The effects of free prescriptions on community pharmacy selection: A discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND

Little is known about preferences for community pharmacies, particularly the influence of prescription co-payments, and for New Zealand's priority populations, Māori and Pacific Peoples. Improving understanding of community pharmacy preferences will enable tailoring services to meet community needs.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate New Zealanders' preferences for community pharmacies when collecting prescriptions. Additionally, variations in preferences for community pharmacy attributes between different latent and demographic groups were examined.

METHODS

Focus group discussions with various community groups were thematically analyzed to develop six attributes: location, wait time, customer service, prescription co-payments, parking availability, and nearby businesses. Participants were asked to complete an online survey involving 12 choice tasks, where they had to choose their preferred option of 3 unlabeled pharmacies along with demographic questions. A mixed multinomial logit model and latent classes analysis were used to assess and compare the participant preferences.

RESULTS

The sample of 553 participants, representative of the New Zealand population, resulted in 19,908 observations for analysis. The most attractive pharmacy attribute was its proximity, being within a 10-min travel distance from home or work. The importance of prescription co-payments is evident, with free prescriptions being the second most attractive attribute level and $15 NZD prescription co-payments being the least appealing. Different classes placed importance on different attributes, the largest of which prioritized prescription co-payments. Including demographic characteristics did not improve model accuracy nor predict class membership.

CONCLUSIONS

Under current policy, the most effective way for pharmacies to attract business is by offering free prescriptions. However, the trend of adopting lower-cost models may reduce the quality of care they deliver. Policy decision-makers must decide if they are comfortable with this potential impact.

Delving into Uncontrolled or Severe Asthma: Perspectives from Patients and Healthcare Professionals in a Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Despite the effectiveness of inhalation therapy, uncontrolled or severe asthma remains prevalent challenges in respiratory care Narrative Medicine (NM) offers a linguistic approach to comprehending illness experiences, thereby providing a framework for advancing healthcare.

Aim

The primary aim of this study was to gather narratives from individuals grappling with severe or uncontrolled asthma and their Healthcare Professionals (HCPs), in order to explore the intricate interplay among quality of care, quality of life, psychological and social determinants, and adherence patterns.

Methods

A cross-sectional NM study was conducted in Italy from February to December 2023, encompassing 135 patients with uncontrolled or severe asthma (54.7% male; mean age: 56.7 years) and 47 HCPs (64.9% male; mean age: 54.3 years). A mixed-method approach was adopted to scrutinize themes, language nuances, emotional expressions, and narrative classifications.

Results

Patients with uncontrolled or severe asthma reported an average illness duration of 4.46 years, with exacerbations occurring over the past 20.9 months. Pulmonologists (83% of HCPs) played a predominant role in diagnosing and treating the disease in 96.1% of patients. Additionally, participants with severe asthma reported higher healthcare needs. The most reported emotions were fatigue (25.96%) and a sense of suffocation (11.53%). Upon commencing treatment, while experiencing physical improvement, patients predominantly expressed feelings of "submission/dependence" on medication (28%), followed by "fear" (21%) and "serenity/joy" (21%). HCPs, primarily pulmonologists (83%), emphasized the importance of raising awareness among specialists and General Practitioners (GPs), disseminating information, optimizing prescriptions, implementing phenotyping, tailoring therapy, and considering paediatric needs.

Conclusion

These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of patient perspectives, facilitate personalized interventions, and underscore the factors influencing therapeutic adherence in uncontrolled or severe asthma.

Patient Preferences with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema: A Multinational Discrete Choice Experiment Study

INTRODUCTION

New anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are emerging for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME)/neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This study aimed to explore the treatment attributes patients find important when deciding on treatment options.

METHODS

This noninterventional survey study assessed treatment preferences through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among patients with DME/nAMD in the USA, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, and the UK. The DCE design was informed by a targeted literature review and qualitative interview research and included five treatment attributes: mode of administration, frequency of examinations, frequency of injections or refills, likely change in visual acuity, and eye-related side effects. Conditional logit models were used to analyze the choice data.

RESULTS

Overall, 537 patients completed the DCE (DME, n = 173; nAMD, n = 364). Patients reported preferring "injection" over "implant surgery and refills" and better visual outcomes over "stabilization," which were also the most important attributes driving preference (35.1% and 31.5%, respectively). They also showed a preference for less-frequent treatment and examinations and for "mild-moderate, frequent" over "severe, rare" side effects. These findings were generally consistent across the two conditions, although significant differences were found depending on anti-VEGF treatment duration (nAMD, DME) and number of reported barriers (nAMD).

CONCLUSION

Patient preferences for treatment are driven by several factors. Considering these preferences is essential when designing/introducing new therapies. Individual treatment preferences should be identified and given key consideration when helping patients select from an expanding array of treatment options.

Patient preference on once-daily oral versus injectable androgen deprivation therapy for Asian patients with advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The study aimed at investigating prostate cancer patients' choice of androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) and possible factors that would affect their preferences of ADT.

METHODS

This was a single-centre cross-sectional study investigating the usage and preferences of ADT. Consecutives prostate cancer patients who were receiving injectable luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist were recruited from the prostate cancer clinic in a tertiary academic hospital. Patients who received bilateral orchidectomy or those who could not consent to the study were excluded. Disease characteristics, treatment information and patient background were documented. The survey collected information related to their change in ADT regimen, preferences on drug usage (routes and frequency of administration) and their reasons. A hypothetical set of three drug formularies was designed. Questions regarding patient preference and the contributing reasons raised in the format of questionnaire.

RESULTS

100 patients completed the survey. Most patients started with more frequent injections (3-monthly, 54%; 1-monthly, 38%) and switched to 6-monthly injections (89%) at the time of the survey. Primary reasons for the change were healthcare opinion (72%) and less frequent treatment (51%). Three options of ADT (oral daily, 1-monthly and 6-monthly injection) with the same efficacies and side effect profile were offered: 61% preferred 6-monthly injection, 1% preferred 1-monthly injection and 38% preferred oral regimen. When patients were informed of lower cardiovascular side effects in 1-monthly injection or daily oral drug, patients' preference was 56% (6-monthly), 6% (1-monthly), and 39% (oral). Patients with polypharmacy (more than 5 regular medications) were more inclined to choose injections (p = 0.025). Patient age, educational background, employment status, marriage status and disease status were not found to be statistically significant contributing factors to patient preference.

CONCLUSION

6-monthly ADT injection was the preferred ADT despite greater cardiovascular risks. Among 1-monthly or daily oral LHRH antagonist, more patients prefer oral option. Convenience factor was highly valued.

Breaking barriers: Innovative approaches for skin delivery of RNA therapeutics

RNA therapeutics represent a rapidly expanding platform with game-changing prospects in personalized medicine. The disruptive potential of this technology will overhaul the standard of care with reference to both primary and specialty care. To date, RNA therapeutics have mostly been delivered parenterally via injection, but topical administration followed by intradermal or transdermal delivery represents an attractive method that is convenient to patients and minimally invasive. The skin barrier, particularly the lipid-rich stratum corneum, presents a significant hurdle to the uptake of large, charged oligonucleotide drugs. Therapeutic oligonucleotides need to be engineered for stability and specificity and formulated with state-of-the-art delivery strategies for efficient uptake. This review will cover various passive and active strategies deployed to enhance permeation through the stratum corneum and achieve effective delivery of RNA therapeutics to treat both local skin disorders and systemic diseases. Some strategies to achieve selectivity between local and systemic administration will also be discussed.

An exploration of footwear preferences, attitudes and beliefs in people with knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Although footwear can improve pain and function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA), perspectives about footwear in this population have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative study explored preferences, attitudes and beliefs about footwear in adults with knee OA.

METHODS

Twenty individuals with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA (aged 45-79 years, 65% women) participated in semi-structured interviews about factors which influence footwear selection, the effect of footwear on knee symptoms, and footwear modifications. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four themes, with sub-themes, were identified: i) there are specific footwear characteristics people look for, with comfort as their top priority; ii) shoe appearance is important; iii) footwear can aggravate or ease symptoms; and iv) people with knee OA find footwear in a variety of ways. Participants related built-in arch support, a cushioned insole and low/no heel, without addition of foot orthoses, to comfort, and were willing to pay more for comfort and quality. Appearance was also a consideration, and participants indicated they would tolerate short periods of symptom aggravation for aesthetic shoes. Participants felt that footwear choice affected their knee symptoms and risk of slipping/twisting. Participants reported that their footwear choices were determined through trial-and-error, and sometimes on advice from health professionals or shoe store salespersons.

CONCLUSIONS

There are specific footwear features important to individuals with knee OA. Knowledge of these features can be used by health professionals to inform footwear discussions with knee OA patients and serve as considerations when developing footwear targeted for this population.

Patient perspectives on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis: Symptom prioritization in the era of highly effective modulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Rhinologic symptom prioritization and areas that influence CRS treatment choices, including pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), remain understudied.

METHODS

Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled at eight centers into a prospective, observational study (2019-2023). Participants were administered the 22-SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey and a modified SNOT-22 instrument examining symptom importance. We determined importance rankings for individual symptoms and SNOT-22 symptom importance subdomains in two sets of subgroups-those pursuing ESS versus continuing medical management (CMT), and those on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) versus not on ETI.

RESULTS

Among 69 participants, the highest priorities were nasal congestion (n = 48, 69.6% important), post-nasal discharge (32, 46.4%), facial pain (29, 43.3%), waking up tired (27, 39.1%), and fatigue (26, 37.7%). Those electing surgery (n = 23) prioritized sleep and psychological dysfunction symptoms compared to those pursuing CMT (n = 49) (sleep median score = 19.0 [interquartile range: 12.0, 25.0] vs. 4.5 [0.0, 12.8]; p < 0.0001; psychological = 17.0 [7.0, 26.0] vs. 7.0 [0.0, 15.8]; p = 0.002). ETI users had comparable SNOT-22 total symptom importance scores to non-ETI users (p = 0.14). Non-ETI users (n = 34) showed a trend toward prioritizing sleep symptoms compared to ETI users (n = 35) (13.0 [2.8, 22.3] vs. 6.0 [2.0, 17.0]; p = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal congestion and post-nasal discharge were top priorities reported by PwCF + CRS. Those electing surgery prioritized sleep and psychological symptoms, highlighting their importance in pre-operative discussions. Non-ETI users' prioritization of sleep improvement may highlight their unique disease impact and therapeutic needs; however, additional investigation is required.

Incorporating postmenopausal women's perspectives into osteoporosis clinical guidelines: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the inclusion of individuals' perspectives in the development of osteoporosis Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for primary fracture prevention in postmenopausal women.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We performed a comprehensive systematic search across guideline databases and (CPGs) developing organizations websites. Using the AGREE II tool, we assessed the quality of the guidelines, with particular emphasis on the inclusion of patients, or representatives in the development process. We also examined if women's perspectives were considered at the recommendations level and explored the potential association between the inclusion of patients' values and preferences with the quality of the CPGs.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 491 eligible CPGs, of which 33 were finally included. The majority of the CPGs were developed by scientific societies (63.6%), primarily from Europe (39.4%) and North America (30.3%). One in every four (24.2%) guidelines explicitly included individuals' perspectives in their development, and one in ten (12.1%) included research evidence about this aspect to support their recommendations. The domains with the lowest mean scores in the quality assessment were applicability (42.4%), rigor of development (44.7%), and stakeholder involvement (45.7%), and 61% were recommended for use according to our assessment. Guidelines of higher quality were more likely to include women's perspective in their development (mean difference 39.31, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of women's perspectives into the process of developing guidelines for primary fracture prevention in osteoporosis remains inadequate. Our findings serve as a call for guideline developers to improve this situation, and for users, and policymakers to be aware of these limitations, when using or implementing guidelines in this field.

Patient and provider medication preferences affect treatment outcomes among adolescents and young adults with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic in the United States has not spared youth or young adults, as evidenced by a six-fold increase in opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnoses in the last two decades. Given this dramatic rise, a call for greater uptake and accessibility of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) among youth and young adults has ensued, resulting in an increasing number of MOUD treatment pathways for this vulnerable population.

METHODS

This secondary data analysis seeks to characterize patient and provider preferences for MOUD treatment pathways, and test for associations between baseline MOUD treatment preferences and opioid use and treatment adherence outcomes. Participants included 288 youth and young adults (age 15-21 years), recruited from a residential treatment program in Maryland. The study assessed patient preferences at baseline (n = 253) and provider preferences at patient treatment discharge (n = 224). Mixed-effects negative binomial regression models were conducted for opioid use outcomes, and logistic regressions were conducted for treatment adherence outcomes.

RESULTS

Results indicate that congruence of treatment with patients' (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 0.65) and providers' (IRR = 0.66) preferences was significantly associated with reduced self-reported days of opioid use in the past 90 days, but only for patients receiving extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX). Results also indicated that patients were less likely to switch medication treatment pathways (e.g., from XR-NTX to buprenorphine, or vice versa) during follow-up if they received their preferred treatment at baseline, a finding which held true for both XR-NTX (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.32) and buprenorphine (OR = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of MOUD congruent with patient and provider preferences was associated with reduced opioid use and greater treatment adherence in this sample of youth and young adults with OUD.

Patient Acceptability and Preferences for Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Product Attributes: A Scoping Review

Background

There is no consistent framework for patient-centric drug product design, despite the common understanding that drug product acceptability and preferences influence adherence and, therefore, drug product effectiveness. The aim of this review was to assess current understanding of patient acceptability and preferences for solid oral dosage form (SODF) drug product attributes, and the potential impact of these attributes on patient behaviors and outcomes.

Patients and Methods

A scoping review was conducted. Embase, Ovid MEDLINE®, and PubMed® were searched for full-text articles published between January 2013 and May 2023. Following screening and assessment against predefined inclusion criteria, data were analyzed thematically.

Results

Nineteen studies were included. Four overarching domains of drug product attributes were identified and summarized in a framework: appearance, swallowability, palatability, and handling. Each domain was informed by specific drug product attributes: texture, form, size, shape, color, marking, taste, mouthfeel, and smell. The most frequently studied domains were swallowability and appearance, while the most studied attributes were size, shape, and texture. Smell, marking, and mouthfeel were the least studied attributes. Texture intersected all domains, while form, shape, and size intersected appearance, swallowability, and handling. Swallowability and size appeared to be the key domain and attribute, respectively, to consider when designing drug products. Few studies explored the impact of drug product attributes on behaviors and outcomes.

Conclusion

While existing studies of drug product attributes have focused on appearance and swallowability, this review highlighted the importance of two less well-understood domains-palatability and handling-in understanding patients' acceptability and preferences for SODF drug products. The framework provides a tool to facilitate patient-centric design of drug products, organizing and categorizing physical drug product attributes into four overarching domains (appearance, swallowability, palatability, and handling), encouraging researchers to comprehensively assess the impact of drug product attributes on patient acceptability, preferences, and outcomes.

The illness burden of severe asthma contrasted to people with mild-to-moderate asthma: a qualitative study

Background

Disabling symptoms of asthma including breathlessness, cough, wheeze and chest tightness largely impact quality of life; however, how these symptoms impact people with asthma of different severity levels remains unknown. This study aimed to compare and characterise patients' symptom experience and the burden caused, their quality of life, and the medication preferences of people with severe asthma against those of people with mild-to-moderate asthma.

Methods

This was a multisite qualitative study involving two focus groups and semistructured interviews of adults with severe asthma undertaken in Australia and UK. Interviews were also undertaken in people with mild-to-moderate asthma. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results

Participants in both severe asthma and mild-to-moderate asthma groups had a mean±sd age of 57±12 years. Between the severe asthma and mild-to-moderate asthma groups, 62% of participants were female and 86% lived with family. Themes were identified: 1) what is asthma and most bothersome symptoms: both groups reported breathlessness as the most bothersome symptom; 2) impacts on life: disease-related impact differed as people with severe asthma reported significant burden in their quality of life, which encompassed emotional, physical, social and financial wellbeing; and 3) personalised and responsive care: severe asthma interviewees preferred injectable biological therapy as a mode of treatment administration.

Conclusions

People with asthma are burdened by breathlessness and cough and other disabling symptoms resulting in impaired quality of life. Understanding the experiences of people with asthma of different severities can improve the patient-clinician partnership.

Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many health care providers to make changes in their treatment, with telemedicine being expanded on a large scale. An earlier study investigated the acceptance of telephone calls but did not record satisfaction with treatment or patients' preferences. This warranted a follow-up study to investigate acceptance, satisfaction, and preferences regarding telemedicine, comprising of phone consultations, among health care recipients.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim was to assess the acceptance and satisfaction of telemedicine during the subsequent months of 2021-2022, after the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Furthermore, we aimed to assess patients' preferences and whether these differed in patients who had already experienced telemedicine in the past, as well as correlations between acceptance and satisfaction, pain intensity, general condition, perception of telemedicine, and catastrophizing. Finally, we aimed to investigate whether more governmental restrictions were correlated with higher acceptance.

METHODS

An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted between January 27, 2021, and February 4, 2022, enrolling patients undergoing outpatient pain therapy in a tertiary university clinic. We conducted a descriptive analysis of acceptance and satisfaction with telemedicine and investigated patients' preferences. Further, we conducted a descriptive and correlational analysis of the COVID-19 stringency index. Spearman correlation analysis and a chi-square test for categorical data were used with Cramer V statistic to assess effect sizes.

RESULTS

Our survey was completed by 60 patients. Telemedicine acceptance and satisfaction were high, with an average score of 7.6 (SD 3.3; on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale from 0=not at all to 10=completely), and 8.8 (SD 1.8), respectively. Respondents generally preferred on-site consultations to telemedicine (n=35, 58% vs n=24, 40%). A subgroup analysis revealed that respondents who already had received phone consultation, showed a higher preference for telemedicine (n/N=21/42, 50% vs n/N=3/18, 17%; χ22 [N=60]=7.5, P=.02, Cramer V=0.354), as well as those who had been treated for more than 3 months (n/N=17/31, 55% vs n/N=7/29, 24%; χ22 [N=60]=6.5, P=.04, Cramer V=0.329). Acceptance of telemedicine showed a moderate positive correlation with satisfaction (rs{58}=0.41, P<.05), but there were no correlations between the COVID-19 stringency index and the other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high acceptance of and satisfaction with telemedicine, patients preferred on-site consultations. Preference for telemedicine was markedly higher in patients who had already received phone consultations or had been treated for longer than 3 months. This highlights the need to convey knowledge of eHealth services to patients and the value of building meaningful relationships with patients at the beginning of treatment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the modality of patient care should be discussed individually.

Development of a Management App for Postviral Fibromyalgia-Like Symptoms: Patient Preference-Guided Approach

BACKGROUND

Persistent fibromyalgia-like symptoms have been increasingly reported following viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. About 30% of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome fulfill the fibromyalgia criteria. This complex condition presents significant challenges in terms of self-management. Digital health interventions offer a viable means to assist patients in managing their health conditions. However, the challenge of ensuring their widespread adoption and adherence persists. This study responds to this need by developing a patient-centered digital health management app, incorporating patient preferences to enhance usability and effectiveness, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This research aims to develop a digital health self-management app specifically for patients experiencing postviral fibromyalgia-like symptoms. By prioritizing patient preferences and engagement through the app's design and functionality, the study intends to facilitate better self-management practices and improve adherence.

METHODS

Using an exploratory study design, the research used patient preference surveys and usability testing as primary tools to inform the development process of the digital health solution. We gathered and analyzed patients' expectations regarding design features, content, and usability to steer the iterative app development.

RESULTS

The study uncovered crucial insights from patient surveys and usability testing, which influenced the app's design and functionality. Key findings included a preference for a symptom list over an automated chatbot, a desire to report on a moderate range of symptoms and activities, and the importance of an intuitive onboarding process. While usability testing identified some challenges in the onboarding process, it also confirmed the importance of aligning the app with patient needs to enhance engagement and satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating patient feedback has been a significant factor in the development of the digital health app. Challenges encountered with user onboarding during usability testing have highlighted the importance of this process for user adoption. The study acknowledges the role of patient input in developing digital health technologies and suggests further research to improve onboarding procedures, aiming to enhance patient engagement and their ability to manage digital health resources effectively.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/32193.

Real-world use and perceptions of shared decision-making for allergy and asthma care in a US population

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM), the process of engaging patients in their healthcare decisions, is an integral component of personalized medicine. The use of SDM in real-world allergy and asthma care in the United States (US) is unknown. Cross-sectional surveys of allergists and patients in a US population were conducted to assess the use and perceptions of SDM and SDM tools in real-world allergy and asthma care.

Methods

Allergists (N = 101) who were members of the American College of Allergy Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) and who were also Dynata (a marketing research firm) research partners or in the Allergy & Asthma Network customer database completed an online survey from February-March 2022. Adult patients (N = 110) with asthma, allergy, and/or eczema in the United States who were participants of online research panels hosted by Dynata completed on online survey from February 1-7, 2022.

Results

Based on their own definition, 98% of the allergists reported familiarity with SDM, and 79% reported using it frequently. Allergists reported using SDM with an average of 44% of their patients. The most commonly used tool was the Immunotherapy SDM toolkit (40%); 43% had not used any SDM tool. Among allergists not using SDM or using it infrequently (n = 19), 42% considered it too time-consuming and 37% believed their patients have low health literacy. Of the surveyed patients, 25% reported their provider used SDM "frequently" or "occasionally" when being treated for allergies, asthma, or eczema, and 22% reported using SDM tools with their provider at some point. The most commonly used tool was the Asthma and Allergy Symptom Test (60%). Among patients whose allergists used SDM infrequently or never (n = 56), 70% reported they would be likely to ask their allergist to use SDM more often.

Conclusion

Survey responses revealed a disconnect between allergists and patients regarding SDM use. Barriers to SDM are consistent with those across the healthcare industry. Patients clearly expressed their desire for SDM.

Development of a patient-centred medication management model for polymedicated home-dwelling older adults after hospital discharge: results of a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate medication management among polymedicated, home-dwelling older adults after discharge from a hospital centre in French-speaking Switzerland and then develop a model to optimise medication management and prevent adverse health outcomes associated with medication-related problems (MRPs).

DESIGN

Explanatory, sequential, mixed methods study based on detailed quantitative and qualitative findings reported previously.

SETTING

Hospital and community healthcare in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

The quantitative strand retrospectively examined 3 years of hospital electronic patient records (n=53 690 hospitalisations of inpatients aged 65 years or older) to identify the different profiles of those at risk of 30-day hospital readmission and unplanned nursing home admission. The qualitative strand explored the perspectives of older adults (n=28), their informal caregivers (n=17) and healthcare professionals (n=13) on medication management after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Quantitative results from older adults' profiles, affected by similar patient-related, medication-related and environment-related factors, were enhanced and supported by qualitative findings. The combined findings enabled us to design an interprofessional, collaborative medication management model to prevent MRPs among home-dwelling older adults after hospital discharge. The model comprised four interactive fields of action: listening to polymedicated home-dwelling older adults and their informal caregivers; involving older adults and their informal caregivers in shared, medication-related decision-making; empowering older adults and their informal caregivers for safe medication self-management; optimising collaborative medication management practices.

CONCLUSION

By linking the retrospective and prospective findings from our explanatory sequential study involving multiple stakeholders' perspectives, we created a deeper comprehension of the complexities and challenges of safe medication management among polymedicated, home-dwelling older adults after their discharge from hospital. We subsequently designed an innovative, collaborative, patient-centred model for optimising medication management and preventing MRPs in this population.

Frequency and clinical outcomes of pharmacist-driven switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants in an underserved patient population: A retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medications have improved safety, efficacy, and laboratory monitoring requirements compared to warfarin. However, available data are limited on the frequency and clinical outcomes of pharmacist-driven warfarin-to-DOAC switches. We aimed to quantify the frequencies and rationale of warfarin-to-DOAC switches in an underserved population. We also assessed clinical outcomes and compliance with recommended laboratory monitoring after switches.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult (age 18 years or older) patients on warfarin who were assessed by a clinical pharmacist for switch appropriateness to a DOAC. Study data were collected via manual chart review and included demographics, comorbid illnesses, switch status, the rationale for or against switching, incidence of thromboses and bleeds within 6 months of the switch assessment, and the time to the first complete blood count and renal and hepatic function tests after the switch. Statistical analysis utilized descriptive statistics, including the mean and SD, median and interquartile range, and frequencies and percentages.

RESULTS

Among 189 eligible patients, 108 (57%) were switched from warfarin to a DOAC. The primary rationales for switching were less monitoring (64%) and labile international normalized ratio (32%). The main reason against switching was DOAC inappropriateness (53%), such as in morbid obesity (14%). Patient preference was commonly cited in both groups (54% and 36%, respectively). The overall incidence of thrombotic events (9%) and bleeds (15%) after switch assessment was low. Laboratory monitoring after switches was consistent with current recommendations.

CONCLUSION

No increase in harm was observed 6 months after switch assessment when pharmacists at a family medicine clinic switched underserved patients from warfarin to DOACs.

Healthcare Professional (HCP) and Patient Usability Evaluation and Preferences of Two Auto-injector Devices for Self-Injection of Biosimilars, SB4 and SB5: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Numerous biologic drugs, including etanercept and adalimumab, are administered subcutaneously. This study reviewed the evidence on the usability and preference of self-injection devices of SB4 and SB5 compared with the reference product injectors.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed using the search string "(Imraldi OR Hadlima OR SB5 OR Benepali OR Brenzys OR SB4) AND (preference) AND (device)" covering the period from 28 January 2016 (first introduction of SB4) to 31 May 2022. Only articles and abstracts on usability or preference-rating of SB4 and SB5 autoinjectors (AI) written in English were selected. Additional papers identified via manual search supplemented the retrieved papers.

RESULTS

A total of nine articles and one conference poster were selected (seven surveys, one observational study, and two phase II studies). Overall, participants of the studies included nurses and rheumatologists, as well as patients who were from three medical specialties where these medicines are most commonly used (rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology). The majority of patients and healthcare professionals rated ease of use and ease of grip as the most important device attributes. SB4/Pen and SB5/Pen were mostly preferred over their prefilled syringes (PFS), Enbrel/Pen, and Humira/Pen.

CONCLUSION

The analyzed data on usability and device preference indicate that SB4/Pen and SB5/Pen were preferred over the other reference product autoinjectors, thanks to their button-free design, auditory and visual injection feedback, and overall ease of use. Therefore, they were preferred over the other reference product autoinjectors. Because user-friendly devices can improve treatment adherence, pharmaceutical companies should consider patient convenience when developing medical devices.

Development and initial validation of a questionnaire to measure patient experience with oral appliance therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a questionnaire to measure patient experience with oral appliance therapy.

METHODS

The AMEE Guide No. 87 was followed in the development and validation of a patient questionnaire to assess patient experience with oral appliance therapy.

RESULTS

Our search identified 522 articles; 5 of these articles described the use and/or validation of questionnaires to measure changes in symptoms and patient-reported outcomes in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. A total of 27 questions were developed. Five patients participated in pilot testing. A final review of the questionnaire was conducted by an expert panel.

CONCLUSIONS

The creation and validation of a questionnaire to assess patient experience with oral appliance therapy may provide new methods for advancing research in the field of dental sleep medicine.

CITATION

Ng ET, Perez-Garcia A, Lagravère-Vich MO. Development and initial validation of a questionnaire to measure patient experience with oral appliance therapy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(8):1437-1445.

Assessment of patients' preferences for new anticancer drugs in China: a best-worst discrete choice experiment on three common cancer types

OBJECTIVES

Despite the advancement in anticancer drug therapies, cancer treatment decisions are often complex and preference-sensitive, making them well suited for studying shared decision-making (SDM). Our study aimed to assess preferences for new anticancer drugs among three common types of patients with cancer to inform SDM.

DESIGN

We identified five attributes of new anticancer drugs and used a Bayesian-efficient design to generate choice sets for a best-worst discrete choice experiment (BWDCE). The mixed logit regression model was applied to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute. The interaction model was used to investigate preference heterogeneity.

SETTING

The BWDCE was conducted in Jiangsu province and Hebei province in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 18 years or older, who had a definite diagnosis of lung cancer, breast cancer or colorectal cancer were recruited.

RESULTS

Data from 468 patients were available for analysis. On average, the most valued attribute was the improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p<0.001). The low incidence of severe to life-threatening side effects, prolonged progression-free survival and the low incidence of mild to moderate side effects were also positive predictors of patients' preferences (p<0.001). Out-of-pocket cost was a negative predictor of their preferences (p<0.001). According to subgroup analysis by type of cancer, the improvement in HRQoL remained the most valuable attribute. However, the relative importance of other attributes varied by type of cancer. Whether patients were newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed cancer cases played a dominant role in the preference heterogeneity within each subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study can assist in the implementation of SDM by providing evidence on patients' preferences for new anticancer drugs. Patients should be informed of the multiattribute values of new drugs and encouraged to make decisions reflecting their values.

How to Understand Personalized Medicine in Atopic Dermatitis Nowadays?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of its phenotypical, barrier, and immunological presentation. Emerging therapies are undoubtedly contributing to a new chapter in the treatment of AD, bringing an excellent possibility of individualization, and thereby creating a tailored approach. The two most promising substance groups are biological drugs (dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) (baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib). The vision that certain well-defined phenotypes and endotypes, as well as personal preferences, may guide the future treatment of AD is both tempting and appealing, but not yet reality. The accessibility of new drugs such as biologics and small molecules has opened up the discussion regarding personalized medicine, referring to the complex nature of AD as well as the experiences from clinical trials and real-world evidence. We have now reached the point of creating new strategies and AD treatment goals by increasing the amount of new information concerning the efficacy and safety of new drugs. This article has reviewed the novel treatment options for AD in the light of the heterogeneity of this disease and proposes a broader vision on the strategy of personalized treatment of AD.

Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments

ABSTRACT

Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a preference-sensitive condition for which numerous treatment options are available, each with benefits and risks. Thus, patient preferences play a critical role in decision making. This study summarized evidence from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to quantify patient preferences for CMP treatment and identified important treatment attributes. A systematic review of DCEs on patient preferences for CMP treatment was conducted. Studies were included if they used DCE to determine patient preferences for CMP. A previously described methodological assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The treatment attributes were summarized and sorted according to the frequency of citation and relative weight. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the intervention-specific attributes. A total of 15 eligible studies with 4065 participants were included. We identified "capacity to realize daily life activities," "risk of adverse events," "effectiveness in pain reduction," and "out-of-pocket cost" as important attributes. Although "treatment frequency" and "onset of treatment efficacy" were less frequently mentioned, they were also important attributes. The attribute of "risk of adverse events" was especially important for drug treatment. The "out-of-pocket cost" and "treatment location and mode" were important attributes of exercise therapy. The attributes identified in this review will inform the design of future DCE studies, facilitate the translation of measurement-based care to value-based care, and provide the rationale to promote shared decision making and patient-centered care.

Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies

BACKGROUND

This review aimed to 1) identify and assess the quality of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) examining preferences related to epilepsy treatment; 2) summarize the attributes and attribute levels measured in these studies; 3) identify how researchers selected and developed these attributes; and 4) identify which attributes are most important for epilepsy patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases from database inception to February or April 2022. We included primary discrete-choice experiments eliciting preferences for various attributes of pharmacological and surgical interventions in patients diagnosed with epilepsy or the parents/carers of children with epilepsy. We excluded non- primary studies, studies assessing preferences for nonpharmacological treatment and studies that elicit preferences using methods other than discrete choice experiments. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of studies. The quality of the included studies was assessed using two validated checklists. Study characteristics and findings were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies were included in the review. The majority of studies explored patients' preferences, and two compared the preferences of patients with physicians. The majority (n = 6) compared two medications, and one compared two surgical options to continuing medication options. The studies examined 44 attributes in total, including side effects (n = 26), efficacy expressed as being seizure free or have fewer seizures (n = 8), costs (n = 3), dosing frequency (n = 3), duration of side effects (n = 2), mortality (n = 1), long-term problems after surgery (n = 1) and surgical options (n = 1). The findings indicate that people with epilepsy have strong preferences for improving seizure control, which was ranked as the top priority in all studies. Patients also have a strong preference for the reduction of adverse effects and may be willing to make trade-offs between improved seizure control and reduction of long-term side effects that may impact their quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DCEs in measuring patients' preference for epilepsy treatment is accumulating. However, inadequate reporting of methodological details may reduce decision-makers' confidence in the findings. Suggestions for future research are provided.

Prevalence, causes, impacts, and management of needle phobia: An international survey of a general adult population

Needle phobia is an overlooked condition that affects virtually all medical procedures. Our study aimed to identify how commonly needle phobia is experienced, its underlying reasons, impacts, and potential mitigation strategies. A global survey was conducted in a general adult population using a questionnaire based on a targeted literature review that identified under-researched areas. The 21-item questionnaire was completed on a secure, web-based survey platform. Statistical analyses and models were utilized to identify relationships between participant characteristics and needle phobia. Of the 2,098 participants enrolled in the study, 63.2% (n = 1,325) reported experiencing needle phobia, and rated the intensity of their fear as 5.7 (±2.6) on average on a scale from 0 (no fear) to 10 (very strong/unreasonable fear or avoidance). According to the logistic regression model, other medical fears (odds coefficient = 2.14) and family history (1.67) were the most important factors associated with needle phobia. General anxiety (96.1%) and pain (95.5%) were the most common reasons for needle fear. Of the participants experiencing needle phobia, 52.2% stated avoiding blood draws, followed by 49.0% for blood donations, and 33.1% for vaccinations. While 24.3% of participants have seen a therapist, most have never sought help. The majority have shared their fear with nurses (61.1%) or physicians (44.4%); however, the provider helpfulness was rated as 4.9 (±3.1) on average on a scale from 0 (unhelpful) to 10 (extremely helpful). Utilizing non-invasive alternatives (94.1%) and smaller needles (91.1%) were most commonly identified as potential device-related solutions to alleviate fear; distractions (92.1%) and relaxation techniques (91.7%) were the top non-device-related approaches. Our findings highlight the prevalent nature of needle phobia and provide insights into its etiology and effects on patient care. Clinician responses were not perceived as helpful, emphasizing the need to address needle phobia, and improve patient experience.

The Quality of Life and Medication Adherence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Cross-Sectional Study

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, degenerative autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. MS is characterized by a wide range of symptoms and unpredictable prognosis, which can severely affect patient quality of life (QOL). The treatment strategy includes acute relapse treatment, disease-modifying treatment (DMT), and symptomatic therapy. Adherence to long-term DMTs is essential in order to maximize the therapeutic effects for MS and is crucial to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between QOL and adherence to DMTs in MS patients. A group of 344 patients (73% females) aged 39.1 years with relapsing-reemitting MS were included. The Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQOL) and the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ) were used. An injection of interferon (IFN)-β1b was used in 107 patients, IFN-β1a in 94 patients, and glatiramer acetate in 34 patients. The oral treatment includes teriflunomide in 14 patients, dimethyl fumarate in 86 patients, and fingolimod in nine patients. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in adherent (ADH) vs. non-adherent patients (non-ADH) in MusiQOL. The total adherence rate was 72% (MS-TAQ). An analysis of the univariate logistic regression model showed an effect of only the activities of daily living (ADL) and relationship with the healthcare system (RHCS) domains on the level of adherence to treatment recommendations. The other variables studied do not affect the level of adherence. Higher QOL levels in the ADL and RHCS domains affect medication adherence in MS patients. Our findings could help manage MS patients, promoting interventions on ADLs and good relationships with healthcare providers to improve their adherence to therapy and result in better QOL.

A Qualitative Study to Assess US Patient Preferences between new Transdermal System and Injectable Anabolic Therapies for Osteoporosis Treatment

US patients with osteoporosis included in three focus groups identified efficacy, safety, cost, and convenience as important attributes of treatment when choosing between anabolic therapies with high stated preference for the solid Microstructured Transdermal System.

OBJECTIVE

The current study evaluated patient perspective and relative importance of treatment attributes of in-home daily self-administration of abaloparatide-solid Microstructured Transdermal System (sMTS) compared with other anabolic agents (i.e. in-home daily subcutaneous self-injections, and monthly subcutaneous injections at doctor office) among a group of US patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

The current study included systematic literature reviews, experts' consultation and three online patients focus groups (n=27), including patients ≥50 years of age at high risk for fracture. Nominal Group Technique was used by asking patients to (1) Individually identify characteristics that would be important for them when choosing between anabolic treatments, (2) Share ideas and discuss perspectives with other patients, (3) Review additional attributes generated from a systematic literature review, (4) Select and rank individually the 7 most important characteristics from the list and (5) Report their acceptability and stated preference ranking between the three treatment options.

RESULTS

Twenty women and 7 men with a mean age of 65 (range 51-85 years) participated in the focus groups. Twenty-four treatment characteristics were identified through focus groups and literature review. Efficacy, safety, out-of-pocket costs, strength of evidence and the option to self-administer were ranked as the most important attributes. The majority of patients stated preference for a daily sMTS if prescribed by their doctor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that efficacy, safety, costs, and convenience are important attributes of osteoporosis treatment for US patients at high risk for fractures when choosing between anabolic therapies, with a high stated preference for sMTS.