Meta-Analysis of the SLCO1B1 c.521T>C Variant Reveals Slight Influence on the Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of Statins

Influence of pharmacogenetics on the diversity of response to statins associated with adverse drug reactions

Background

Statins are one of the most prescribed medications in developed countries as the treatment of choice for reducing cholesterol and preventing cardiovascular diseases. However, a large proportion of patients experience adverse drug reactions, especially myotoxicity. Among the factors that influence the diversity of response, pharmacogenetics emerges as a relevant factor of influence in inter-individual differences in response to statins and can be useful in the prevention of adverse drug effects.

Content

A systematic review was performed of current knowledge of the influence of pharmacogenetics on the occurrence and prevention of statin-associated adverse reactions and clinical benefits of preemptive pharmacogenetics testing.

Summary

Genetic variants SLCO1B1 (rs4149056) for all statins; ABCG2 (rs2231142) for rosuvastatin; or CYP2C9 (rs1799853 and rs1057910) for fluvastatin are associated with an increase in muscle-related adverse effects and poor treatment adherence. Besides, various inhibitors of these transporters and biotransformation enzymes increase the systemic exposure of statins, thereby favoring the occurrence of adverse drug reactions.

Outlook

The clinical preemptive testing of this pharmacogenetic panel would largely prevent the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Standardized methods should be used for the identification of adverse effects and the performance and interpretation of genotyping test results. Standardization would allow to obtain more conclusive results about the association between SLCO1B1, ABCG and CYP2C9 variants and the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. As a result, more personalized recommendations could be established for each statin.

Influencia de la farmacogenética en la diversidad de respuesta a las estatinas asociada a las reacciones adversas

Introducción

Las estatinas son unos de los medicamentos más prescritos en los países desarrollados por ser el tratamiento de elección para reducir los niveles de colesterol ayudando así a prevenir la enfermedad cardiovascular. Sin embargo, un gran número de pacientes sufre reacciones adversas, en especial miotoxicidad. Entre los factores que influyen en la diversidad de respuesta, la farmacogenética puede jugar un papel relevante especialmente en la prevención de los efectos adversos asociados a estos medicamentos.

Contenido

Revisión de los conocimientos actuales sobre la influencia de la farmacogenética en la aparición y prevención de las reacciones adversas asociadas a estatinas, así como del beneficio clínico del test farmacogenético anticipado.

Resumen

Variaciones genéticas en SLCO1B1 (rs4149056) para todas las estatinas; en ABCG2 (rs2231142) para rosuvastatina; o en CYP2C9 (rs1799853 y rs1057910) para fluvastatina están asociadas a un incremento de las reacciones adversas de tipo muscular y a una baja adherencia al tratamiento. Además, diversos fármacos inhibidores de estos transportadores y enzimas de biotransformación incrementan la exposición sistémica de las estatinas favoreciendo la aparición de las reacciones adversas.

Perspectiva

La implementación clínica del análisis anticipado de este panel de farmacogenética evitaría en gran parte la aparición de reacciones adversas. Además, la estandarización en la identificación de los efectos adversos, en la metodología e interpretación del genotipo, permitirá obtener resultados más concluyentes sobre la asociación entre las variantes genéticas del SLCO1B1, ABCG y CYP2C9 y la aparición de reacciones adversas y establecer recomendaciones para alcanzar tratamientos más personalizados para cada estatina.

CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes may affect the efficacy of statins on lowering small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of patients with coronary artery disease

Background

Dyslipidemia is a major cause of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the profile to be reduced to prevent disease progression. Small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (sdLDL-C) has been proven to be a more effective biomarker than LDL-C for ASCVD primary and secondary prevention. CYP2C19 is an important drug metabolism gene. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between sdLDL-C and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors and explore the influence of CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes on the sdLDL-C lowering efficacy of statins.

Methods

This study recruited 182 patients with CAD and 200 non-CAD controls. Baseline laboratory indices of fasting blood were detected, including blood lipids, glucose, and creatinine. In addition, LDL-C subfractions were separated and quantified. Gene polymorphisms of SLCO1B1 and CYP2C19 were detected in patients with CAD. The LDL-C subfractions levels of patients with CAD were followed up after statin drug treatment.

Results

Total cholesterol, LDL-C, LDLC-2, LDLC-3, LDLC-4, LDLC-5, LDLC-6, LDLC-7, and sdLDL-C levels of patients with CAD were significantly higher than those in non-CAD controls. Meanwhile, sdLDL-C (AUC = 0.838) and LDLC-4 (AUC = 0.835) performed outstandingly in distinguishing patients with CAD from controls. Based on CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes, 113 patients with CAD were divided into the extensive metabolizer (EM, n = 49), intermediate metabolizer (IM, n = 52), and poor metabolizer (PM, n = 12) groups. The patients with IM and PM metabolizer phenotypes had better sdLDL-C lowering efficacy after taking statin drugs than patients with EM phenotype (P = 0.0268, FDR = 0.0536). The SLCO1B1 genotype had no significant impact on the efficacy of statins (P = 0.1611, FDR = 0.1611).

Conclusion

sdLDL-C and LDLC-4 outperformed other blood lipids such as LDL-C for CAD risk screening. CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes had the potential to predict the efficacy of statins in lowering sdLDL-C.

Pharmacogenomics of lipid-lowering agents: the impact on efficacy and safety

Hyperlipidemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. The lipid-lowering drugs are considered the cornerstone of primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the lack of efficacy and associated adverse effects, ranging from mild-to-moderate to potentially life-threatening, lead to therapy discontinuation. Numerous reports support the role of gene polymorphisms in drugs' pharmacokinetic parameters and their associated adverse reactions. Therefore, this study aims to understand the pharmacogenomics of lipid-lowering drugs and the impact of genetic variants of key genes on the drugs' efficacy and toxicity. Indeed, genetically guided lipid-lowering therapy enhances overall safety, improves drug adherence and achieves long-term therapy.

Relationship between genetic polymorphism of drug transporters and the efficacy of Rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin in patients with hyperlipidemia

Background

To determine the effect of genetic polymorphism of drug transporters on the efficacy of treatment with Rosuvastatin, Atorvastatin and Simvastatin in patients with hyperlipidemia.

Methods

The study consists of 180 patients, aged 40–75 years, with hyperlipidemia. All patients were divided into two equal groups: patients with different SLCO1B1 (521CC, 521CT and 521TT) and MDR1 (3435CC, 3435TC and 3435TT) genotypes. Each group was divided into rosuvastatin-treated, atorvastatin-treated and simvastatin-treated subgroups. The lipid-lowering effect of statins was assessed by tracing changes in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.

Results

The use of statins over a 4-month period led to substantial reductions in TC and LDL-C levels. The hypolipidemic effect of studied agents was seen in both groups. However, it was less pronounced in patients with 521CC genotype. No statistically significantly differences were found between carriers of 3435TT, 3435CT and 3435CC genotypes.

Conclusions

The lipid-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin was higher compared to other two statins. Patients with SLCO1B1 521CC genotype are more likely to encounter a decrease in the hypolipidemic effect of statins. Such a risk should be considered when treating this category of patients. MDR1 polymorphism had no significant effect on statin efficacy.

Comparative and quantitative assessment on statin efficacy and safety: insights into inter-statin and inter-individual variability via dose- and exposure-response relationships

Introduction: Statins are prescribed widely for cholesterol-lowering therapy, but it is known that their efficacy and safety profiles vary, despite the shared pharmacophore and pharmacological target. The immense body of related clinical and preclinical data offers a unique opportunity to explore the possible factors underlying inter-statin and inter-individual variabilities.Area covered: Clinical and preclinical data from various statins were compiled with regard to the efficacy (cholesterol-lowering effect) and safety (muscle toxicity). Based on the compiled data, dose- and exposure-response relationships were explored to obtain mechanistic and quantitative insights into the variations in the efficacy and safety profiles of statins.Expert opinion: Our analyses indicated that the inter-statin variability in the cholesterol-lowering effect may be mainly attributable to variations in potency of inhibition of the pharmacological target, rather than variations in drug exposure at the site of drug action. However, the drug exposure at the sites of drug action (i.e., the liver for efficacy and the muscle for safety) may contribute to the differences in the efficacy and safety observed in individual patients.

The influences of SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 genotypes on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, in relation to CYP3A4 inhibition

AIM

To investigate the combined effects of SLCO1B1 and ABCB1 genotypes on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its active metabolite simvastatin acid, in relation to CYP3A4 inhibition.

METHODS

We conducted a single-dose pharmacokinetic study of simvastatin in 26 healthy volunteers screened for their SLCO1B1 c.521T>C and ABCB1 c.1236C>T-2677G>T-3435C>T genotypes, with and without amlodipine pretreatment. The genetic effects and drug-interaction effect on simvastatin pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using a linear-mixed model.

RESULTS

The SLCO1B1 c.521T>C variant significantly increased exposure to simvastatin acid by around 40% (p < 0.05), similar to that caused by the amlodipine pretreatment. The ABCB1 gene showed no influence on exposure to simvastatin or simvastatin acid.

CONCLUSION

Only SLCO1B1, not ABCB1 genotype, is likely to be associated with simvastatin-induced myopathy. SLCO1B1 genotyping may be particularly beneficial in simvastatin users who are co-administered CYP3A4 inhibitors.

Candidate-Gene Study of Functional Polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 and CYP3A4/5 and the Cholesterol-Lowering Response to Simvastatin

Cholesterol‐lowering response to 40 mg simvastatin daily for 6 weeks was examined for associations with common genetic polymorphisms in key genes affecting simvastatin metabolism (CYP3A4 and CYP3A5) and transport (SLCO1B1). In white people (n = 608), SLCO1B1 521C was associated with lesser reductions of total and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Associations between SLCO1B1 521C and cholesterol response were not detected in African Americans (n = 333). Associations between CYP3A4*22 or CYP3A5*3 and cholesterol response were not detected in either race, and no significant race‐gene or gene‐gene interactions were detected. As several of the analyses may have been underpowered (especially the analyses in the African American cohort), the findings not suggesting an association should not be considered conclusive and warrant further investigation. The finding regarding SLCO1B1 521C in whites was consistent with several previous reports. SLCO1B1 521C resulted in a diminished cholesterol‐lowering response, but a marginal effect size limits utility for predicting simvastatin response.