Negative conversion of antimitochondrial antibody in primary biliary cirrhosis: a case of autoimmune cholangitis

Review article: is there an optimal therapeutic regimen for antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis (autoimmune cholangitis)?

Testing for antimitochondrial antibodies is the most useful laboratory procedure in the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis; nevertheless, 5-10% of patients with typical features of primary biliary cirrhosis do not have detectable antimitochondrial antibodies, their condition being referred to as antimitochondrial antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis or "autoimmune cholangitis". Uncertainty exists whether antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis represent distinct entities. We reviewed studies that compared: (i) the clinical, laboratory and histological characteristics of antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis; (ii) the response to treatment of both conditions; and (iii) the response of autoimmune cholangitis to ursodeoxycholic acid and immunosuppressive therapy. Antimitochondrial antibody-positive and -negative primary biliary cirrhosis were characterized by similar clinical, laboratory and histological abnormalities, clinical course and survival. Antimitochondrial antibody status did not seem to affect the response to ursodeoxycholic acid. At present, the efficacy of therapies for autoimmune cholangitis has not been established in controlled trials. Of 52 patients with autoimmune cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid in 13 uncontrolled studies, 83% had serum biochemical improvement. Also, a favourable effect of immunosuppressive drugs occurred in 57% of 54 patients with autoimmune cholangitis in 17 uncontrolled studies. Each of these trials included very few patients and most evaluated the effects of treatment on surrogate markers of disease only. No marker that consistently distinguished patients who would respond favourably to ursodeoxycholic acid or immunosuppression was apparent. Consequently, treatment is, at present, empirical. However, ursodeoxycholic acid may be given when histology reveals bile duct lesions, whereas immunosuppressive therapy should probably be reserved for patients exhibiting interface hepatitis.

Autoimmune liver disease. Current standards, future directions

The diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis continues to evolve as new diagnostic tests and new therapies are added to the armamentarium. Also encouraging are the advances in the understanding of the human immune system and its involvement in the origin and course of auto immune diseases in general and in the variants of autoimmune liver disease. Promising changes are expected in the next few years as new medications become available to the practicing hepatologist. New immune tests may allow therapies to be customized to patients, and antiviral therapies may also eventually be used in the management of this autoimmune liver diseases.

Changes in titers of antimitochondrial and antinuclear antibodies during the course of primary biliary cirrhosis

A case of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) in whom a complete biochemical (serum bilirubin, transaminases and alkaline phosphatase) remission was noted after combination treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and corticosteroid is reported. The antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) detected by indirect immunofluorescence was initially positive, and the antinuclear antibody (ANA) was negative, but these two antibodies subsequently fluctuated independently (AMA-positive/ANA-negative, AMA-negative/ANA-negative, AMA-negative/ANA-positive, AMA-positive/ANA-positive, and again AMA-negative/ANA-positive) in spite of a lack of histopathological improvement in the liver after treatment. The clinical presentation in our case suggests that in some cases the diagnosis of PBC or so-called autoimmune cholangitis (AIC) might depend on the 'phase' of the same disease. Our results also suggest that detailed immunoreactive profiles against 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (2-OADC) enzymes by using immunoblotting, together with a serial histological examination, should provide more precise information for a diagnosis of PBC.