Analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine in vincristine-evoked painful neuropathic rats

Milnacipran Has an Antihyperalgesic Effect on Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathy

(1) Background: Milnacipran is a typical serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has been shown to have analgesic effects in several pain models. However, its antihyperalgesic effect in cisplatin-induced neuropathy remains unknown. We examined the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) milnacipran on allodynia in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice. (2) Methods: Peripheral neuropathy was induced by injecting cisplatin (2.3 mg/kg/day, IP) six times, on every other day. Saline or milnacipran (10, 30, 50 mg/kg, IP) were then administered to the neuropathic mice. We examined mechanical allodynia using von Frey hairs at preadministration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min and 24 h after drug administration. We also measured the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to confirm the analgesic effects of milnacipran. (3) Results: For the milnacipran groups, the decreased paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimuli were significantly reversed when compared to the preadministration values and the values in the saline-injected control group (p < 0.0001). Milnacipran administration to cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice resulted in a significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Milnacipran given via IP injection attenuates mechanical allodynia in mouse models of cisplatin-induced poly-neuropathic pain. These effects were confirmed by significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation in the DRG.

Effect of Pregabalin Combined with Duloxetine and Tramadol on Allodynia in Chronic Postischemic Pain and Spinal Nerve Ligation Mouse Models

Although there are various drugs for Neuropathic pain (NP), the effects of single drugs are often not very satisfactory. The analgesic effects of different combinations of pregabalin, duloxetine, and tramadol or the combination of all three are still unclear. Mixtures of two or three drugs at low and high concentrations (7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg pregabalin; 7.5, 10, 15, and 30 mg/kg duloxetine; 5 and 10 mg/kg tramadol) were administered to chronic postischemic pain (CPIP) and spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model mice. The effects of these combinations of drugs on mechanical allodynia were investigated. The expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) was measured. The combination of pregabalin, duloxetine, and tramadol significantly alleviated mechanical hyperalgesia in mice with CPIP and SNL. After the administration of this drug combination, the expression of GFAP in the spinal cord and DRGs was lower in the CPIP and SNL model mice than in control mice. This result suggests that the combination of these three drugs may be advantageous for the treatment of NP because it can reduce side effects by preventing the overuse of a single drug class and exert increased analgesic effects via synergism.

The Protective Effects of Dexmedetomidine against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation-Induced Inflammatory Injury and Permeability in Brain Endothelial Cells Mediated by Sigma-1 Receptor

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI) mainly arises from the clinical treatment of ischemic stroke, induced by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and infiltrated inflammation. The Sigma-1 receptor (Sigma-1R) is a novel target for neuroprotection, and the α2-receptor agonist pain medication dexmedetomidine displays a neuroprotective effect through activating Sigma-1R. The present study aims to investigate the potential therapeutic effect of dexmedetomidine in a mouse stroke model and hypoxia/reoxygenation(OGD/R)-induced brain endothelial dysfunction. First, we found that Sigma-1R was significantly upregulated in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mice by the administration of dexmedetomidine. In vivo experiments revealed that dexmedetomidine ameliorated hyperpermeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), lowered the expression level of Occludin, and impaired brain function as measured by neurological scores in MCAO mice. In vitro assays show that dexmedetomidine alleviated OGD/R-caused cytotoxicity, hyperpermeability, abnormal expression of Occludin, and inflammatory factors in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMVECs). Moreover, blockage of Sigma-1R by its antagonist BD1047 abolished the neuroprotective property of dexmedetomidine in both animal and cell culture experiments. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that dexmedetomidine therapy shows neuroprotection in MCAO mice. Mechanistically, dexmedetomidine alleviated hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cerebral endothelial dysfunction by activating the Sigma-1R-mediated signaling pathway.

Mechanisms of Dexmedetomidine in Neuropathic Pain

Dexmedetomidin is a new-generation, highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist with a large number of advantages, including its sedative and analgesic properties, its ability to inhibit sympathetic nerves, its reduced anesthetic dosage, its hemodynamic stability, its mild respiratory depression abilities, and its ability to improve postoperative recognition. Its safety and effectiveness, as well as its ability to provide a certain degree of comfort to patients, make it a useful anesthetic adjuvant for a wide range of clinical applications. For example, dexmedetomidine is commonly used in patients undergoing general anesthesia, and it also exerts sedative effects during tracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit patients. In recent years, with the deepening of clinical research on dexmedetomidine, the drug is still applied in the treatment of spastic pain, myofascial pain, neuropathic pain, complex pain syndrome, and chronic headache, as well as for multimodal analgesia. However, we must note that the appropriateness of patient and dose selection should be given attention when using this drug; furthermore, patients should be observed for adverse reactions such as hypotension and bradycardia. Therefore, the safety and effectiveness of this drug for long-term use remain to be studied. In addition, basic experimental studies have also found that dexmedetomidine can protect important organs, such as the brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung, through various mechanisms, such as antisympathetic effects, the inhibition of apoptosis and oxidative stress, and a reduction in the inflammatory response. Moreover, the neuroprotective properties of dexmedetomidine have received the most attention from scholars. Hence, in this review, we mainly focus on the characteristics and clinical applications of dexmedetomidine, especially the role of dexmedetomidine in the nervous system and the use of dexmedetomidine in the relief of neuropathic pain.

The effect of analgesics on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour in animal models for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy- a meta-analysis

Chemotherapy induced painful peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting side effect of several chemotherapeutic agents. Despite large amounts of human and animal studies, there is no sufficiently effective pharmacological treatment for CIPN. Although reducing pain is often a focus of CIPN treatment, remarkably few analgesics have been tested for this indication in clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses regarding the effects of analgesics on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour during CIPN in animal models. This will form a scientific basis for the development of prospective human clinical trials. A comprehensive search identified forty-six studies. Risk of bias (RoB) analyses revealed that the design and conduct of the included experiments were poorly reported, and therefore RoB was unclear in most studies. Meta-analyses showed that administration of analgesics significantly increases pain threshold for mechanical (SMD: 1.68 [1.41; 1.82]) and cold (SMD: 1. 41 [0.99; 1.83]) evoked pain. Subgroup analyses revealed that dexmedetomidine, celecoxib, fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone and tramadol increased the pain threshold for mechanically evoked pain, and lidocaine and morphine for cold evoked pain. Altogether, this meta-analysis shows that there is ground to investigate the use of morphine in clinical trials. Lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, celecoxib, fentanyl, oxycodone and tramadol might be good alternatives, but more animal-based research is necessary.

Protective effect of dexmedetomidine on kidney injury of parturients with preeclampsia undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study

The present study aimed to elucidate the effects of dexmedetomidine on kidney injury of parturients with preeclampsia (PE) undergoing cesarean section. Total 134 cesarean delivery women with PE were randomly divided into intervention group (IG) and control group (CG). Both groups underwent combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA), the IG was treated with 0.4 μg/(kg·min) dexmedetomidine for 10 min before surgery. The CG was treated with equivalent saline. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, oxygen saturation (SpO₂) of the two groups were measured at different time point after administration. Level of inflammatory factors were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Visual analogue score (VAS), Ramsay sedation score (RSS), and kidney injury related indexes were evaluated at different time points. The plasma-drug concentration of patients was determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method. Compared with CG, HR, PE, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed lower level while SpO₂ showed higher level in IG. Furthermore, expression of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and IL-10 in IG was decreased after drug administration, the contents of β2-MG, KIM-1 and urine protein were also decreased in contrast to the CG (all P<0.05). Besides, VAS score was decreased but Ramsay score was increased in the IG (both P<0.05). The results of HPLC showed that the half life of dexmedetomidine was about 20 min and it is speculated that the drug can be quickly metabolized within 24 h. Dexmedetomidine exerted protective effects on kidney injury of parturients with PE undergoing cesarean section.

Spinal α2 -adrenoceptors and neuropathic pain modulation; therapeutic target

Neuropathic pain can arise from disease or damage to the nervous system. The most common symptoms of neuropathic pain include spontaneous pain, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. There is still limited knowledge about the factors that initiate and maintain neuropathic pain. However, ample evidence has proved the antinociceptive role of spinal α-adrenoceptors following nerve injury. It is well-documented that noradrenergic descending pathways from supraspinal loci exert an inhibitory influence on the spinal cord nociceptive neurons, mostly through the activation of spinal α₂ -adrenoceptors. This, in turn, suppresses transmission of pain input and the hyperexcitability of spinal dorsal horn neurons. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that spinal application of α₂ -adrenoceptor agonists leads to analgesic effects in animal models of neuropathic pain. Today, despite the recent rapid development of neuroscience and drug discovery, effective drugs with clear basic mechanisms have remained a mystery. Here, we give an overview of the cellular mechanisms through which brainstem adrenergic descending inhibitory processing can alter spinal pain transmission to the higher centres, and how these pathways change in neuropathic pain conditions focusing on the role of spinal α₂ -adrenoceptors in the spinal dorsal horn. We then suggest that α₂ -adrenoceptor agonist may be useful to treat neuropathic pain. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Adrenoceptors-New Roles for Old Players. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.14/issuetoc.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on the development of mechanical allodynia and central sensitization in chronic post-ischemia pain rats

PURPOSE

Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS I) is an intractable neuropathic pain syndrome. Chronic post-ischemia pain (CPIP) model is an animal model of CRPS I which is produced by ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury of the hind limb. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a selective and potent α2 adrenergic receptor agonist with analgesic and protective effects following an IR injury. We hypothesized that DEX protects the development of mechanical allodynia and central sensitization in CRPS I. Therefore, we evaluated the dose-related protective effect of DEX in a CPIP model.

METHODS

We divided 45 rats into five groups: sham, CPIP, CPIP + DEX 10 µg/kg, CPIP + DEX 50 µg/kg, and CPIP + DEX 100 µg/kg. Rats in the sham group underwent sham surgery, and the other rats received CPIP injury. One hour before reperfusion or end of sham surgery, normal saline was injected into the rats in the sham and CPIP groups, and DEX (designated dose) was injected into the rats in the other groups. All rats were evaluated for the withdrawal threshold of both hind paws before surgery and 1, 3, and 7 days after surgery. Phosphorylation of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunits (pGluN1) and phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (pERK) in the spinal cord were measured 3 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Administration of DEX before reperfusion showed a significant increase in the withdrawal threshold in both hind paws and a significant decrease of the expressions of pGluN1 and pERK in CPIP rats dose dependently (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

DEX may inhibit the development of mechanical allodynia and central sensitization in CPIP rats.

[Analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine on oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain in rats]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain in rats and explore its mechanism.

METHODS

SD rats were randomly divided into control, model, Dextreatment, and Dex + atipamezole groups. In the latter 3 groups, rat models of neuropathic pain were established by a single intraperitoneal injection of oxaliplatin. The paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) to mechanical stimuli and tail withdrawal latency (TWL) to thermal stimuli of the rats were determined. Western blotting and immunofluorescence assay were performed to observe the expression of spinal phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3) in the rats.

RESULTS

Compared with the rats in the control group, the rats in the model group and Dex+atipamezole group showed significantly decreased PWT and TWL (cold) and increased expression of p-STAT3 in the spinal cord (P < 0.05). In Dex group, PWT and TWL (cold) were significantly increased (P < 0.05) and p-STAT3 expression in the spinal cord was significantly decreased (P < 0.01) 60 to 120 after Dex treatment as compared with those in the model group, and these effects of Dex were significantly attenuated by the administration of atipamezole (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dex can alleviate oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain in rats by inhibiting the phosphorylation of STAT3 in the spinal cord.

Different effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on the expression of NR2B and GABAA-α1 following peripheral nerve injury in rats

Neuropathic pain is a complex, chronic pain condition and the treatment is a major clinical challenge. Recent studies have shown that two FDA approved drugs dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam (MZL), may be useful in treating neuropathic pain, but the mechanism is not fully dementated. Here, we investigated the effects and mechanisms of DEX and MZL treatment in the peripheral nerve injury model. Intramuscular injection with DEX and MZL attenuated the development of mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in rats with chronic constriction injury (CCI). Concurrently, the expression of NMDA receptor subunit 2B (NR2B), GABA (A) receptor subunit alpha1 (GABAA-α1), and Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) displayed different temporal patterns in the thalamus and the ipsilateral dorsal horn of the spinal cord after CCI. Such that (1) NR2B expression was decreased on day 1 and 14, whereas GABAA-α1 expression was increased on day 1 in the thalamus, and NR2B expression was decreased on day 1, whereas GABAA-α1 expression was increased on day 1 and day 30 in the ipsilateral spinal cord dorsal horn after DEX treatment. (2) NR2B expression was increased on day 1, then decreased on day 14 and returned to baseline on day30, whereas GABAA-α1 expression was no significant changes on day 1, 14, 30 in the thalamus, and NR2B expression was decreased on day 14 and 30, whereas GABAA-α1 expression was no changes on day 1 and 14 but increased on day 30 after MZL treatment. Furthermore, the mechanical allodynia was significantly attenuated after PUR administration. Meanwhile the expression of NR2B was significantly decreased, and the expression of GABAA-α1 was significantly increased, in the thalamus and in the ipsilateral spinal cord dorsal horn when detected on postoperative day 1, 7, and 14. Our findings indicate that DEX and MZL have different mechanisms in CCI rats, suggesting different strategies could be considered in managing neuropathic pain in different individuals. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 70(2):143-152, 2018.

Synergistic Interaction Between Dexmedetomidine and Ulinastatin Against Vincristine-Induced Neuropathic Pain in Rats

Antimicrotubulin chemotherapeutic agents such as vincristine (VCR), often induce peripheral neuropathic pain. It is usually permanent and seriously harmful to cancer patients' quality of life and can result in the hampering of clinical treatments. Currently, there is no definitive therapy, and many of the drugs approved for the treatment of other neuropathic pain have shown little or no analgesic effect. It is therefore vital to find new and novel therapeutic strategies for patients suffering from chemotherapeutic agent-induced neuropathic pain to improve patients' quality of life. This study shows that intrathecal injections of dexmedetomidine (DEX), or intraperitoneally administered ulinastatin (UTI) significantly reduces Sprague Dawley rats' mechanical allodynia induced by VCR via upregulation of interleukin-10 expression and activating the α2-adrenergic receptor in dorsal root ganglion (DRG). Moreover, when combined there is a synergistic interaction between DEX and UTI, which acts against VCR-induced neuropathic pain. This synergistic interaction between DEX and UTI may be partly attributed to a common analgesic pathway in which the upregulation of interleukin -10 plays an important role via activating α2-adrenergic receptor in rat dorsal root ganglion. The combined use of DEX and UTI does not affect the rat's blood pressure, heart rate, sedation, motor score, spatial learning, or memory function. All of these show that the combined use of DEX and UTI is an effective method in relieving VCR-induced neuropathic pain in rats.

PERSPECTIVE

This article documents the synergistic interaction between 2 widely used drugs, DEX and UTI, against VCR-induced neuropathic pain. The results provide a potential target and novel drug administrated method for the clinical treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain.

Noradrenergic inhibition of spinal hyperexcitation elicited by cutaneous cold stimuli in rats with oxaliplatin-induced allodynia: electrophysiological and behavioral assessments

We investigated the spinal action of noradrenaline on cold-elicited hyperexcitation detected in dorsal horn neurons of rats with allodynia induced by an oxaliplatin (6 mg/kg, i.p.) injection. In vivo extracellular recordings from the spinal dorsal horn showed that wide dynamic range neurons responded to cutaneous acetone (10 μl) stimulation in normal rats, and cold-elicited firings in oxaliplatin-administered rats were increased with a longer duration, correlated with behavioral responses. These responses were significantly attenuated by spinal administration (50 μM) of noradrenaline or its agonists, clonidine (α2), phenylephrine (α1) and isoprenaline (β), in descending order of efficacy. Thus, the inhibitory effect of noradrenaline on spinal oxaliplatin-induced cold hyperexcitation is mediated mainly by activation of α2- and/or α1-adrenoceptors.

Assessment of dexmedetomidine effects on left ventricular function using pressure-volume loops in rats

PURPOSE

The role of dexmedetomidine on left ventricular function is ambiguous. We analyzed pressure-volume loops to investigate whether dexmedetomidine has a myocardial depressive effect.

METHODS

Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and a pressure-volume loop catheter was advanced into the left ventricle. Rats were divided into four groups (n = 8 each). The control group received a 10-min infusion of 0.1 ml of normal saline, and the other three groups received 1.0 (Dex1.0 group) , 2.5 (Dex2.5 group), and 5.0 μg/kg (Dex5.0 group) dexmedetomidine in a similar fashion to the control group. Steady-state hemodynamic parameters were recorded. The inferior vena cava was occluded intermittently to assess preload-independent indices.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, changes in the Dex1.0 group were insignificant. In the Dex2.5 group, only the systolic blood pressure was higher (vs control, P = 0.03), and other parameters were insignificant. The Dex5.0 group exhibited a lower heart rate, higher systolic blood pressure, higher arterial elastance (vs control, all P < 0.001), and unaltered cardiac output. The Dex5.0 group showed steeper slopes of end-systolic pressure increment and end-systolic pressure-volume relationship than the control, Dex1.0, and Dex2.5 groups (all P < 0.001). Slopes of end-diastolic pressure decrement and end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine had no direct myocardial depressant effect in the rat heart in doses that are similar to those encountered under clinical conditions. Dexmedetomidine did not significantly alter the ability of the heart to cope with bradycardia and greatly increased afterload. Their potentially negative impact on cardiac output was effectively attenuated by improved myocardial contractility and preserved diastolic function in healthy subjects.

Dexmedetomidine pretreatment alleviates propofol injection pain

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of propofol injection pain during induction of general anesthesia varies from 28% to 90%. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) for reducing the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly allocated into seven groups of 30 patients each. Experimental treatments were intravenously administered over 10 min (total volume 10 mL) prior to intravenous propofol injection, as follows: group I, the control group, was given isotonic saline. Patients in groups II, III, and IV received DEX 0.25 µg/kg, 0.5 µg/kg, or 1.0 µg/kg, respectively, mixed with isotonic saline immediately before propofol injection. Patients in groups V, VI, and VII received DEX as above, but 5 minutes before propofol injection. Propofol consisted of 1% long-chain triglyceride propofol (2.5 mg/kg) injected at 1 mL/s.

RESULTS

Median propofol injection pain score was 0.00 (IQR 0.00-3.00) in patients who received 1.0 µg/kg DEX 5 min before the propofol injection (group VII), and only 1 patient (of 30) in this group received a pain score >2. The median pain score and number of patients with pain scores >2 in group VII were both significantly less than in the control (group I; p = 0.000, both). There were no differences in either mean arterial pressure or heart rate at any time point after DEX injection among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with intravenous DEX 1 µg/kg 5 min prior to injection of long-chain triglyceride propofol is effective and safe in reducing the incidence and severity of pain due to propofol injection.