Is Frailty a Modifiable Risk Factor of Future Adverse Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Incident End-Stage Renal Disease?

Frailty Assessment Tools in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rationale & Objective

Frailty represents a loss of physiologic reserve across multiple biological systems, confers a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, and is highly prevalent among people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated the measurement properties of frailty tools used in CKD and summarized the association of frailty with death and hospitalization.

Study Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting & Study Populations

Studies assessing multidimensional frailty tools in adults at any stage of CKD and evaluating a measurement property of interest as per the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments taxonomy.

Selection Criteria for Studies

Observational studies and randomized trials.

Data Extraction

Risk and precision measurements; measurement properties.

Analytical Approach

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment was the clinical standard for frailty identification. We pooled data using random effects models or summarized with narrative synthesis when data were too heterogenous to pool.

Results

We included 105 studies with data for at least one of the following: discriminative (n = 84; 80%), convergent (n = 20; 19%), and criterion validity (n = 2; 2%); responsiveness (n = 9; 9%) and reliability (n = 1; 0.1%). For the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP), the pooled adjusted HR (aHR) for mortality was 2.01 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.35-2.98; P = 0.001; I 2 = 58%) and 1.89 (95% CI, 1.25-2.85; P = 0.002; I 2 = 0%) for hospitalization in kidney failure (KF) populations. The pooled aHR for the Clinical Frailty Scale for mortality in pre-frail versus non-frail was 1.75 (95% CI, 1.17-2.60; I 2 = 26%) and 2.20 (95% CI, 1.00-4.80; I 2 = 66%) in frail versus non-frail. The Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss of weight scale showed consistent discriminative validity for higher mortality in non-dialysis CKD. The modified FFP (self-reported) showed acceptable discriminative validity and agreement with the FFP in patients with KF. In CKD and KF populations, agreement between clinicians' subjective impression of frailty and frailty tools was low.

Limitations

Few studies compared the accuracy of frailty tools to the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment. Only 1 study reported reliability. Studies were of overall low-moderate quality.

Conclusions

The FFP and Clinical Frailty Scale showed acceptable discriminant validity for clinical outcomes, and the modified FFP is an alternative tool to use if direct measurements are not feasible. The evidence does not support the use of clinicians' subjective impression to identify frailty.

The prevalence of frailty among older adults with maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the epidemiological data on the prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in individuals aged 60 years or older on MHD patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, CBM, and VIP were searched from inception to February 2023 using combinations of subject words and free words. The methodological quality of all the selected studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological Studies Checklist and Newcastle‒Ottawa Cohort Quality Assessment Scale. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates from different studies. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of the 4,190 documents retrieved, 16 observational studies involving 2,446 participants from 8 countries were included in this systematic review. Among older adults receiving MHD, the overall prevalence of frailty and prefrailty was 41% (95% CI = 34-49%) and 37% (95% CI = 26-48%), respectively, with considerable heterogeneity. The pooled prevalence of frailty was greater among individuals aged > 70 years (45%) than among those aged ≤ 70 years (37%). However, subgroup analyses indicated that the confidence intervals for the age group overlap substantially.

CONCLUSION

Our research showed that the prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in older patients with MHD are high.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROSPERO registration number for this study was CRD42023442569.

Frailty in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review to Advance Its Clinical and Research Applications

Frailty is a multisystem syndrome of decreased physiologic reserve that has been shown to strongly and independently predict morbidity and mortality. Frailty is prevalent in patients living with kidney disease and occurs earlier in individuals with kidney disease as compared to the general population. In this comprehensive review, we examine clinical and research applications of frailty in kidney disease populations. Specifically, we clarify the definition of frailty and address common misconceptions, review the mechanisms and epidemiology of frailty in kidney disease, discuss challenges and limitations in frailty measurement, and provide updated evidence related to risk factors for frailty, its associated adverse outcomes, and interventions. We further add to the literature in this topic by highlighting the potential applications of frailty measurement in the care of patients with kidney disease and conclude with our recommendations for future research related to this important syndrome.

Prevalence and risk factors of pre-frailty and frailty in hemodialysis patients in central China

The current study was to explore the prevalence and risk factors elements of pre-frailty and frailty among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in central China. A cross-sectional, multi-institutional investigation was conducted. From March to May 2024, using the convenience sampling method, a total of 408 HD patients from four hospitals in Xiangyang, China, were recruited for this study. The participants' demographics, lifestyle factors, factors related to dialysis treatment, the FRAIL scale, psychological resilience, and medical coping modes were assessed using a questionnaire. Multi-categorical logistic regression was performed to examine factors associated with pre-frailty and frailty in this population. Furthermore, to evaluate the independent relationship between frailty and psychological resilience, multiple regression analysis was used to adjust potential confounders and obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Pearson correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis among various scales. Among the 408 participants, the prevalence of pre-frailty and frailty among participants for all ages was 26.2% and 38.5%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking status, falls, heart disease, and psychological resilience are all associated with pre-frailty and frailty. The Pearson correlation analysis showed that resignation was positively related to frailty and negatively related to psychological resilience in patients. Confrontation and avoidance were positively related to psychological resilience. Frailty was negatively related to psychological resilience. Psychological resilience was independently linearly associated with pre-frailty (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.75, p < 0.001) and frailty (OR  0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.80, p = 0.003). Our findings point to the necessity for active screening prevalence and risk factors for pre-frailty (26.2%) and frailty (38.5%) in adult HD patients of all ages. Pre-frailty and frailty among HD patients are associated with lower psychological resilience and a higher likelihood of using negative coping mechanisms.

Association between frailty and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the strength of the association between frailty and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥18 years who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, the China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, the Wanfang Database and the Weipu Database were searched from inception until 11 April 2024. The reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the studies. Stata 15.1 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles were included in this study, including 56,867 patients. The primary outcome events in this study were mortality, hospitalization, and vascular access events. The secondary outcomes were depression, cognitive impairment, falls, fracture, sleep disturbances, and quality of life. This study suggested that frailty was associated with mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis [hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95% CI, 1.62-2.40]. Frailty increased the risk of mortality in patients [odds ratio (OR), 2.33; 95% CI, 1.47-3.68]. In addition, we found that frailty was significantly associated with hospitalization in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.52-4.03). Patients who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and who were frail had a greater risk of hospitalization [RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05-2.08] and emergency visits (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.78-2.92). The results of this study also suggested that frailty was associated with a greater risk of vascular access events (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.97). Finally, frailty increased the risk of depression (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.83-10.18), falls and fractures, and reduced quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggested that frailty was an important predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. In the future, medical staff should regularly evaluate signs of weakness, formulate individual diagnosis and treatment plans, adjust dialysis plans according to the patient's condition, and reduce the occurrence of adverse events.

REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, number: CRD42023486239).

Prevalence of Frailty and Its Impact on Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background & aims

Frailty in patients with cirrhosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

An elaborate search was undertaken in the databases "PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and preprint servers", and an assessment of all published articles till 17 February 2023 was done. Studies that provided data on prevalence, mortality and hospitalization among frail patients with cirrhosis were included. The study characteristics and data on the prevalence, mortality, and hospitalization were extracted from included studies. The primary outcome was to estimate the pooled prevalence of frailty and determine its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis.

Results

Overall, 12 studies were included. Data on prevalence of frailty and mortality were available in 11 studies, while seven studies reported data on hospitalization. The analysis conducted among 6126 patients with cirrhosis revealed pooled prevalence of frailty to be 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24-41). A total of 540 events of death revealed a pooled mortality rate of 29% (95% CI, 19-41). Six-month and twelve-month pooled estimates of mortality were found to be 24% (95% CI, 17-33) and 33% (95% CI, 23-45), respectively. The pooled hospitalization rate among the seven studies was 43% (95% CI, 21-68).

Conclusion

The prevalence of frailty in patients with cirrhosis is high, leading to poor outcomes. Frailty assessment should become an integral part of cirrhosis evaluation.

Registry and registration number of study

PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022377507.

Short-term and long-term survival in patients with prevalent haemodialysis-an integrated prognostic model: external validation

OBJECTIVES

Prognostic tools with evidence for external validity in routine clinical practice are needed to align care with patients' preferences and deliver timely supportive services. Current models have limited, if any, evidence for external validity and none have been implemented and evaluated in clinical practice on a large scale. This study sought to provide evidence for external validity in a real life setting of the Cohen prognostic model that integrates actuarial factors with the 'Surprise Question' to assess 6-month, 12-month and 18-month survival of prevalent haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of 1372 patients in a Canadian university-based programme between 2010 and 2019. Survival probabilities were compared with observed survival. Discrimination and calibration were assessed through predicted risk-stratified observed survival, cumulative AUC, Somer's Dxy and a calibration slope estimate.

RESULTS

Discrimination performance was moderate with a C statistic of 0.71-0.72 for all three time points. The model overpredicted mortality risk with the best predictive accuracy for 6- month survival. The differences between observed and mean predicted survival at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months were 3.2%, 8.8% and 12.9%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by Cox-based risk group showed good discrimination between high-risk and low-risk patients with HR estimates (95% CI): C2 vs C1 3.07 (1.57-5.99), C3 vs C1 5.85 (3.06-11.17), C4 vs C1 13.24 (6.91-25.34)).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cohen prognostic model can be incorporated easily into routine dialysis care to identify patients at high risk for death over 6 months, 12 months and 18 months and help target vulnerable patients for timely supportive care interventions.

Prevalence and associated factors of frailty in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional analysis of PEAKING study

AIM

 Frailty is common and is reported to be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with chronic diseases in Western countries. However, the prevalence of frailty remains unclear in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in China. We examined the prevalence of frailty and factors associated with frailty in patients with CKD.

METHODS

 This was a cross-sectional analysis of 177 adult patients (mean age 54 ± 15 years, 52% men) with CKD from the open cohort entitled Physical Evaluation and Adverse outcomes for patients with chronic Kidney disease IN Guangdong (PEAKING). Frailty at baseline were assessed by FRAIL scale which included five items: fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight. Potential risk factors of frailty including age, sex, body mass index, and daily step counts recorded by ActiGraph GT3X + accelerometer were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of prefrailty and frailty was 50.0% and 11.9% in patients with stages 4-5 CKD, 29.6% and 9.3% in stage 3, and 32.1% and 0 in stages 1-2. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, an increase of 100 steps per day (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, P = 0.01) and an increase of 5 units eGFR (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.045) were inversely associated with being frail; higher BMI was associated with a higher likelihood of being frail (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-2.06, P = 0.008) and prefrail (OR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.42, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Frailty and prefrailty were common in patients with advanced CKD. A lower number of steps per day, lower eGFR, and a higher BMI were associated with frailty in this population.

Trends in Frailty Prevalence Among Older Adults in Korea: A Nationwide Study From 2008 to 2020

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the nationwide trend of the prevalence of frailty in older adults in Korea from 2008 to 2020 to inform future geriatric healthcare policies.

METHODS

The study used data of individuals aged 65 years and older from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationwide repeated cross-sectional survey. Frailty was defined using frailty index, classified as non-frail (frailty index ≤ 0.15), pre-frail (0.15 < frailty index ≤ 0.25), or frail (frailty index > 0.25).

RESULTS

The study included 17,784 individuals, with the mean age of 72.4 and mean frailty index of 0.2. The prevalence of frailty in older adults in South Korea decreased significantly from 2008 (41.1%) to 2020 (23.1%). The decrease in the frailty index was observed in all age groups (all P < 0.05). As components of frailty index, we found that certain comorbidities, such as dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease, have increased over time, while factors such as chewing difficulty, activity limitation, and smoking, have decreased.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of frailty in older adults in South Korea has decreased significantly during the study period. Historical improvements in healthcare access and preventive measures may have contributed to this trend.

Use of frailty assessment instruments in nephrology populations: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a clinical syndrome of accelerated aging associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease but is infrequently assessed in clinical settings, due to lack of consensus regarding frailty definitions and diagnostic tools. This study aimed to review the practice of frailty assessment in nephrology populations and evaluate the context and timing of frailty assessment.

METHODS

The search included published reports of frailty assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease, undergoing dialysis or in receipt of a kidney transplant, published between January 2000 and November 2021. Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were examined. A total of 164 articles were included for review.

RESULTS

We found that studies were most frequently set within developed nations. Overall, 161 studies were frailty assessments conducted as part of an observational study design, and 3 within an interventional study. Studies favoured assessment of participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplant candidates. A total of 40 different frailty metrics were used. The most frequently utilised tool was the Fried frailty phenotype. Frailty prevalence varied across populations and research settings from 2.8% among participants with CKD to 82% among patients undergoing haemodialysis. Studies of frailty in conservatively managed populations were infrequent (N = 4). We verified that frailty predicts higher rates of adverse patient outcomes. There is sufficient literature to justify future meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing recognition of frailty in nephrology populations and the value of assessment in informing prognostication and decision-making during transitions in care. The Fried frailty phenotype is the most frequently utilised assessment, reflecting the feasibility of incorporating objective measures of frailty and vulnerability into nephrology clinical assessment. Further research examining frailty in low and middle income countries as well as first nations people is required. Future work should focus on interventional strategies exploring frailty rehabilitation.

Combined evaluation of Geriatric nutritional risk index and Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Malnutrition, accompanied by an inflammatory profile, is a risk factor for poor prognosis in hemodialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of NLR combined with GNRI for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

A total of 240 maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients in hemodialysis centers were enrolled in this retrospective study. The influencing factors of all-cause death in hemodialysis patients were analyzed by COX regression. The cut-off values of GNRI and NLR for predicting mortality in enrolled MHD patients were 89.01 and 4, respectively. Based on these cut-off values, the patients were divided into four groups: G1: high GNRI (≥ 89.01) + high NLR (≥ 4) group; G2: high GNRI (≥ 89.01) + low NLR (<4) group, G3: low GNRI (< 89.01) + high NLR (≥4) group; G4: low GNRI (< 89.01) + low NLR (<4).

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (average: 58 months), the all-cause mortality was 20.83%(50/240) and the cardiovascular mortality was 12.08%(29/240). Both NLR and GNRI were independent risk factors for the prognosis of MHD patients (P<0.05). Survival analysis showed that patients with low GNRI had a lower survival rate than those with high GNRI, whereas patients with high NLR had a lower survival rate than those with low NLR. Kaplan-Meier curve for all-cause mortality revealed that compared to G1, G2, and G4, G3 had the lowest survival rate, while G2 had the highest survival rate among all groups (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curve for cardiovascular mortality showed that G3 had lower survival than G1, G2, and G4 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that bothGNRI and NLR are associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in MHD patients. Combining these two factorsmay contribute to a prognostic evaluation for MHD patients.

Dialysis or kidney transplantation in older adults? A systematic review summarizing functional, psychological, and quality of life-related outcomes after start of kidney replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

In older patients, the choice between kidney transplantation (KT) and dialysis may be complicated because of a high prevalence of comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. Ideally, this decision-making process focusses on older patients' outcome priorities, which frequently include functional, psychological, and quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes.

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to summarize functional, psychological (including cognition), and QOL-related outcomes after start of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in older adults.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for research that investigated change in these variables after start of KRT in patients aged ≥ 60 years. Data were extracted using the summary measures reported in the individual studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool.

RESULTS

Sixteen observational studies (prospective n = 9, retrospective n = 7; KT-recipients n = 3, dialysis patients n = 13) were included. The results show that QOL improves in the majority of the older KT recipients. After start of dialysis, QOL improved or remained stable for most patients, but this seems less prevalent than after KT. Functional status decreases in a substantial part of the older dialysis patients. Furthermore, the incidence of serious fall injuries increases after start of dialysis. Nutritional status seems to improve after start of dialysis.

CONCLUSION

The interpretability and comparability of the included studies are limited by the heterogeneity in study designs and significant risk of bias in most studies. Despite this, our overview of functional, psychological (including cognition), and QOL-related outcomes is useful for older adults and their clinicians facing the decision between KT and dialysis.

Frailty in end stage renal disease: Current perspectives

Frailty is common in end stage renal disease (ESRD) and is a marker of poor outcomes. Its prevalence increases as chronic kidney disease (CKD) progresses. There are different measurement tools available to assess frailty in ESRD. The pathogenesis of frailty in ESRD is multifactorial including uraemia and dialysis related factors. In this current review, we discuss the importance of frailty, its pathogenesis, screening methods, prognostic implications and management strategies in context of ESRD.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Frailty and Mortality in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hemodialysis is the most common type of treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Frailty is associated with poor outcomes such as higher mortality. ESRD patients have a higher prevalence of frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the prevalence and associated factors of frailty and examine whether it is a predictor of mortality among ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Five electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies up to 30 November 2020. A total of 752 articles were found, and seven studies with 2604 participants in total were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of frailty in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis was 46% (95% Confidence interval (CI) 34.2−58.3%). Advanced age, female sex, and the presence of diabetes mellitus increased the risk of frailty in ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis. Our main finding showed that patients with frailty had a greater risk of all-cause mortality compared with those without (hazard ratio (HR): 2.02, 95% CI: 1.65−2.48). To improve ESRD patient outcomes, healthcare professionals need to assess the frailty of older ESRD patients, particularly by considering gender and comorbidities. Comprehensive frailty screening tools for ESRD patients on hemodialysis need to be developed.

Association between physical performance and incidence of end-stage renal disease in older adults: a national wide cohort study

Background

Physical frailty has previously been associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to determine whether impaired physical performance at baseline is associated with the incidence of ESRD, using a nationwide database.

Methods

The timed up-and-go (TUG) test was used to assess physical frailty in 1,552,781 66-year-old individuals, using health examination database records from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. As a primary endpoint, incident ESRD was defined operationally using healthcare claims data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.

Results

Our results showed that baseline kidney function was significantly worse in individuals with TUG results of > 10 s compared to individuals with an intact TUG performance (≤10 s). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a stepwise dose-response relationship between baseline physical performance and the incidence rate of ESRD (log-rank test P-value of < 0.001). An increasing ESRD incidence rate trend with poor physical performance remained significant after adjusting for characteristics such as baseline glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria.

Conclusion

Poor baseline physical performance was associated with an increased risk of ESRD, suggesting possible interactions between systemic frailty and vascular aging processes.

Severity of frailty as a significant predictor of mortality for hemodialysis patients: a prospective study in China

Background: Frailty is known to be highly prevalent in older hemodialysis (HD) patients. We studied the prevalence of frailty and its associated factors in Chinese HD patients. We further studied if frailty could predict survival in HD patients. Methods: This is a prospective study involving patients receiving maintenance HD in the dialysis center of Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Study subjects were enrolled from October to December, 2017 and followed up for two years. Demographic data, comorbidities and biological parameters were collected. Frailty was assessed using the Fried frailty phenotype at baseline. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the relationship between frailty and mortality in HD patients. Kaplan-Meier was plotted using the cutoff value obtained by ROC curve to evaluate survival rates in different frailty status. Results: Total of 208 HD patients were enrolled with a mean age of 60.5±12.7 years. According to the frailty criteria, at baseline the prevalence of robust, pre-frail and frail in HD patients was 28.7%, 45.9%, and 25.4%, respectively. The two-year all-cause mortality was 18.8% (39/207) and underlying causes of death included coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), hyperkalemia, severe infection, malignant tumor and others. Survival curve showed the patients with frailty score ≥4 to have significantly shorter survival time as compared to patients with frailty score ≤ 3. Frailty predicted two-year mortality when frailty score ≥4 with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 83.67% with an AUC of 0.819. Frailty score was positively associated with age and ratio of ultrafiltration volume to dry weight, while negatively associated with levels of serum albumin, uric acid and diastolic blood pressure after HD. Conclusions: Our results confirm frailty to be very common among HD patients and severity of frailty was a significant predictor of mortality for HD patients. Factors such as age, malnutrition and low blood pressure are the factors to be associated with frailty. Interdialytic weight gain inducing excessive ultrafiltration volume is an important risk factor.

Risk factors for mortality in elderly haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Older haemodialysis patients accompany a high burden of functional impairment, limited life expectancy, and healthcare utilization. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate how various risk factors influenced the prognosis of haemodialysis patients in late life, which might contribute to decision making by patients and care providers.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched systematically for studies evaluating the risk factors for mortality in elderly haemodialysis patients. Twenty-eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The factors included age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, type of vascular access, dialysis initiation time, nutritional status and geriatric impairments. Geriatric impairments included frailty, cognitive or functional impairment and falls. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were derived.

Results

Functional impairment (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20–1.75), cognitive impairment (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.32–1.62) and falls (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.06–1.23) were significantly and independently associated with increased mortality in elderly haemodialysis patients. Low body mass index conferred a mortality risk (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31–1.56) paralleling that of frailty as a marker of early death. The results also confirmed that the older (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.22–1.68) and sicker (in terms of Charlson comorbidity index) (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.35–1.50) elderly haemodialysis patients were, the more likely they were to die. In addition, increased mortality was associated with early-start dialysis (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01–1.37) and with the use of a central venous catheter (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.44–1.62).

Conclusions

Multiple factors influence the risk of mortality in elderly patients undergoing haemodialysis. Geriatric impairment is related to poor outcome. Functional/cognitive impairment and falls in elderly dialysis patients are strongly and independently associated with mortality.

Frailty and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Frailty is highly prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Previous studies have shown that frailty is a sensitive predictor of survival in the elderly. However, convincing evidence supporting the causality between frailty and the adverse outcome in CKD patients is still lacking.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for identifying potentially relevant literature. Studies that investigated the association between frailty and overall mortality in patients with CKD and ESRD were included. Both unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 127, 373 participants were included for analysis. The results showed that frailty was associated with 2.28-fold increased risk of overall mortality in patients with CKD and dialysis (HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.71-3.05), while 1.95-fold increased after multivariable-adjusted (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.50-2.53). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that compared with the non-dialysis CKD patients (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.03-2.11), patients receiving dialysis have higher overall mortality risk (HR 2.19; 95% CI 1.82-2.64). Moreover, frailty can also significantly increase short-term mortality (follow-up < 3 years: HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.76-2.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that frailty significantly increased the overall mortality risk in patients with CKD and ESRD, especially in dialysis patients. Frailty can be regarded as a novel independent predictor of mortality for patients with CKD and dialysis.

Frailty, physical function and affective status in elderly patients on hemodialysis

OBJETIVES

To analyze depression, cognition, and physical function change in older adults on hemodialysis at 12-month follow-up, depending on frailty status.

DESIGN

Ongoing cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

117 patients older than 69 years on hemodialysis; 75 men.

MEASUREMENTS

Frailty was measured with the frailty phenotype, disability in basic and instrumental activities of daily living with the Barthel and Lawton index respectively, physical function with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), cognitive status with the Mini Cognitive Examination, and depression with the Yesavage´s Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), at hemodialysis initiation and after 12-month follow-up. Inflammatory and nutrition profile was determined with C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and haemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 78.1 years; 63 (53.8 %) were frail. Frail participants had a higher 12-month mortality risk compared to the non frail ones, hazard ratio 2.6 (95 % CI 0.9-7.9). Frail 12-month survivors presented an improvement in median GDS scores (10 to 9; p = .009). There was no change in frail survivors from SPPB ≤ 6 to SPPB > 6 and a shift in 29.3 % of non-frail survivors from SPPB > 6 to SPPB ≤ 6 (p = .007) after 12-month follow-up. Median CRP and haemoglobin levels improved in frail 12-month survivors from 13.9 to 8.3 mg/dL (p = .019) and 9.9-11.1 g/dL (p < .001) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Frail older adults that initiate hemodialysis present higher mortality than the non-frail ones at 12-month follow-up. Frail patients that survive improve physical function, depression and inflammatory profile compared to the non frail ones.

Contributors, risk associates, and complications of frailty in patients with chronic kidney disease: a scoping review

Frailty exhibits diverse influences on health-related outcomes and represents a surrogate of increased susceptibility to harmful injuries. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a higher risk of accelerated biologic aging, and, in this population, the concept of frailty emerges as an instrumental measurement of physiologic reserves. However, a comprehensive description of known independent contributors to, and risk associates of, frailty in these patients remain unavailable. In the present review, original studies up to 28 February 2019 that assessed frailty in patients with all stages of CKD were retrieved and reviewed, with results extracted and summarized. By pooling 62 original investigations, 58.1% and 49.1% used cohort and cross-sectional designs, respectively. Dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease patients (n = 39; 62.9%) were the most commonly examined population, followed by those with nondialysis CKD (n = 12; 19.4%) and those receiving renal transplantation (n = 11; 17.7%). Contributors to frailty in CKD patients included sociodemographic factors, smoking, CKD severity, organ-specific comorbidities, depression, hypoalbuminemia, and low testosterone levels. Conversely, the development of frailty was potentially associated with the emergence of cardiometabolic, musculoskeletal, and cerebral complications; mental distress; and a higher risk of subsequent functional and quality-of-life impairment. Moreover, frailty in CKD patients increased healthcare utilization and consistently elevated mortality among affected ones. Based on the multitude of contributors to frailty and its diverse health influences, a multifaceted approach to manage CKD patients with frailty is needed, and its potential influences on outcomes besides mortality need to be considered.

Prediction of Risk of Death for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Dialysis is a preference-sensitive decision where prognosis may play an important role. Although patients desire risk prediction, nephrologists are wary of sharing this information. We reviewed the performance of prognostic indices for patients starting dialysis to facilitate bedside translation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus for eligible studies of patients starting dialysis published from inception to December 31, 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Articles describing validated prognostic indices predicting mortality at the start of dialysis. We excluded studies limited to prevalent dialysis patients, AKI and studies excluding mortality in the first 1-3 months. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, performed full text assessment of inclusion criteria and extracted: study design, setting, population demographics, index performance and risk of bias. Pre-planned random effects meta-analysis was performed stratified by index and predictive window to reduce heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 12,132 articles screened and 214 reviewed in full text, 36 studies were included describing 32 prognostic indices. Predictive windows ranged from 3 months to 10 years, cohort sizes from 46 to 52,796. Meta-analysis showed discrimination area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 073) with high heterogeneity (I2=99.12). Meta-analysis by index showed highest AUC for The Obi, Ivory, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)=0.74, also CCI was the most commonly used (ten studies). Other commonly used indices were Kahn-Wright index (eight studies, AUC 0.68), Hemmelgarn modification of the CCI (six studies, AUC 0.66) and REIN index (five studies, AUC 0.69). Of the indices, ten have been validated externally, 16 internally and nine were pre-existing validated indices. Limitations include heterogeneity and exclusion of large cohort studies in prevalent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Several well validated indices with good discrimination are available for predicting survival at dialysis start.