Influencing Factors of Transportation Costs Regarding Healthcare Service Utilization in Korea

Telehealth-based assessment of cognition, social cognition, mood, and functional independence in older adults

Background Mild cognitive impairment affects over 15% of adults aged 50+ years and is a primary risk indicator for dementia. Although access to assessment is crucial, many older adults face barriers to in-person evaluation. Methods This study used a randomised cross-over design to assess the practicality, acceptability, and adaptation of a telehealth-based screening battery tailored for older adults. Forty-three volunteers aged 50+ years (m =70.3, s.d.=10.8) completed in-person or videoconference assessments, including the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Brief Assessment of Social Skills (BASS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Assessment of Living Skills And Resources-2 (ALSAR-R2). The alternate format was administered after 3weeks. Practicality was assessed with reference to task modifications, completion, and administration time. Acceptability was evaluated via questionnaire. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Minimal modifications were needed for the videoconference format, and it was highly acceptable to respondents. Reliability across formats was excellent for BASS Empathy, HADS Depression, MBI and ALSAR-R2 (ICC=1.00-0.92) and good for ACE-III, HADS Anxiety, and BASS Face Emotion Perception, Face Identification, and Social Disinhibition scales (ICC=0.77-0.89). Conclusions Findings support the feasibility of telehealth-based administration of the screening battery; however, biases in emotion perception performance between modalities require further research.

Determinants of default from outpatient management of severe acute malnutrition among caregivers of children aged 6-59 months at Fortportal regional referral hospital, Southwestern Uganda: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Successful outpatient management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) significantly lowers the morbidity and mortality of patients. However, 29.5% of children under five years of age default from outpatient management of SAM in the Tooro subregion in southwestern Uganda, and little is known about the associated factors. This study assessed the determinants of default from the outpatient management of SAM among caregivers of children aged 6-59 months. It explored their experiences and perceptions of SAM and its management at Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital in the Tooro subregion, Uganda.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was conducted among caregivers of children who received outpatient management between January 2018 and August 2022. Cases were selected purposively, whereas controls were randomly selected. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and exported to STATA 14 for analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of default from the outpatient management of SAM. Fourteen caregivers and five health workers were purposively selected and interviewed, with informed consent. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Atlas. Ti 9 software. Ethical approval was sought from the Makerere School of Public Health Research & Ethics Committee (Protocol ID: 087).

RESULTS

A total of 88 cases and 111 controls were recruited. Several factors, including being Protestant (AOR = 2.60; 95% CI: 1.12-5.90), being Orthodox/Seventh-day Adventist (AOR = 3.65; 95% CI: 1.47-9.10), high transport costs (AOR = 3.30; 95% CI: 1.59-6.80), lacking perceived susceptibility to other illnesses (AOR = 3.90; 95% CI: 1.84-8.30), lacking health education (AOR = 3.97; 95% CI: 1.1-14.30) and lacking self-efficacy (AOR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16-0.66), were significantly associated with default from the outpatient management of SAM. Most caregivers reported being afraid of the possible consequences of default and agreed that SAM management was beneficial. However, their confidence in adhering to management was undermined by several factors, including transport costs, distance to the health facility, and discrimination.

CONCLUSION

Being Protestant, Orthodox/Seventh-day Adventist, high transport costs, lack of perceived susceptibility to other illnesses, lack of health education, and lack of self-efficacy were essential determinants of default from outpatient management of SAM. To reduce the default rate, stakeholders must strengthen peripheral sites and community health workers to bring SAM management services closer to the community. Additionally, a closer examination of the role of religious beliefs in default from the outpatient management of SAM is needed.

Transportation and Access to Healthcare in Morocco: An Exploratory Study of Guelmim-Oued Noun Region

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine the correlation between accessibility to healthcare facilities and transportation in the Guelmim Oued Noun region of Morocco, where transportation barriers continue to pose a major challenge to accessing healthcare, despite efforts aimed at reducing access barriers.

Methods

Data collection for this study involved the administration of a survey among 328 outpatients residing in the Guelmim Oued Noun region, Morocco. The utilization of canonical correlation served as the analytical method, employed to quantify and assess the relationship between transportation related barriers and the access of healthcare services in the specified region.

Results

Our research reveals that transportation factors account for approximately 25% of the variation in access to healthcare services. The number of transportation modes utilized by outpatients and the affordability of transportation were found to be significant contributors to the transportation dimension. These findings confirm the significant relationship between transportation and access to healthcare facilities in the region under investigation.

Conclusion

Further research is recommended to specifically address transportation barriers to healthcare access services among socially excluded populations, with a focus on promoting mobility inclusivity.

Relevance Index Regional Variation by Each Disease and Its Essential Medical Field: A Retrospective Data Analysis From 2016-2020 in Korea

BACKGROUND

To precisely build a healthcare delivery system at regional levels, local patients' healthcare service utilization patterns must be examined. Hence, this study utilized trend analysis of the relevance index of each disease of each essential medical service field at the municipal and provincial levels.

METHODS

This study analyzed customized databases released by the National Health Insurance Service from 2016-2020. Diseases defined in the Korean National Burden of Disease (KNBD) study were categorized into the following essential medical service fields: trauma care, cardiocerebrovascular, maternal and neonatal, mental health, infection, cancer, older adults' care and rehabilitation, and others. Relevance index, the percentage of medical service utilization in a region by the residents of that region relative to their total medical service utilization, was examined by region (17 municipal and provincial regions) and disease area. The relevance index was determined based on the number of patients and the total out-of-pocket expenses.

RESULT

Eight of the 17 regions showed over a 90.0% relevance index in the infection area. In the cancer area, 14 regions (not including Seoul, Daegu, and Busan) had a relevance index lower than 75.0%. Throughout the analysis period (2016-2020), there were no significant variations in the relevance index. Diseases such as bone and connective tissue cancer (39.0%), neural tube defects (16.7%), and autism (57.1%) had low relevance index in the essential medical service fields. In all 17 regions, the relevance index of inpatients was lower than that of outpatients, and that for out-of-pocket expenses was lower than that based on the number of patients.

CONCLUSION

The relevance index of major diseases of each essential medical service field calculated in this study can provide good indicators for monitoring the level of an independent regional healthcare delivery system.

Multidimensional Measures and the Extra Costs of Disability: How Are They Related?

People with disabilities are more likely than individuals without disabilities to face higher levels of deprivation and multidimensional poverty, and those deprivations might be associated with the extra costs of living with a disability. However, there has not been an analysis of how multidimensional poverty measures are related to the extra costs of disability or whether these measures can be used as a proxy of the standard of living in the analysis of the extra costs of disability. This paper aims to analyse whether multidimensional poverty measures can be used to study the extra costs of disability and, based on the capability approach, how multidimensional poverty is related to the extra costs of disability. This paper discusses theoretical, technical, and methodological aspects to be considered when studying the relationship between extra costs and multidimensional poverty, and we used data from Chile and Nigeria to illustrate this relationship. We conclude that when analysing the extra costs of disability, multidimensional measures might be an option; however, it is necessary to clearly stablish the relationship among income, deprivation, and the extra costs of disability.

Decomposing Disability Inequality in Unmet Healthcare Needs and Preventable Hospitalizations: An Analysis of the Korea Health Panel

Objectives: This study examines the inequality between people with and without disabilities regarding unmet healthcare needs and preventable hospitalization. Methods: We used the Korea Health Panel of 2016-2018; the final analytical observations were 43,512, including 6.95% of persons with disabilities. We examined the differences in contributors to the two dependent variables and decomposed the observed differences into explained and unexplained components using the Oaxaca-Blinder approach. Results: Unmet healthcare needs and preventable hospitalizations were 5.6% p (15.36% vs. 9.76%) and 0.68% p (1.82% vs. 0.61%), respectively, higher in people with disabilities than in those without, of which 48% and 35% were due to characteristics that the individual variables cannot explain. Decomposition of the distributional effect showed that sex, age, and chronic disease significantly increased disparities for unmet healthcare needs and preventable hospitalization. Socioeconomic factors such as income level and Medical aid significantly increased the disabled-non-disabled disparities for unmet healthcare needs. Conclusion: Socioeconomic conditions increased the disparities, but around 35%-48% of the disparities in unmet healthcare needs and preventable hospitalization were due to unexplained factors, such as environmental barriers.

Patient-reported distress and problems among elderly patients with hematological malignancy in Korea

PURPOSE

Treatment for hematological malignancies (HMs) and functional decline associated with age can cause distress in elderly patients with HMs. However, information about the nature and effects of distress in this population is scarce. Therefore, this study examined the level of distress, its source, and the practical/familial/physical/emotional problems among elderly patients with HMs.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with HMs aged ≥ 65 years who visited an outpatient clinic at a tertiary medical center in Korea between November 2019 and March 2020. Patient-reported distress and problems were measured using the distress thermometer (DT) and 39-item Problem List by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Descriptive statistics, χ² test or Fisher's exact test, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted (N = 132).

RESULTS

In total, 62.1% of patients had moderate to severe distress (DT score ≥ 4), experiencing an average of nine problems. Significant sources of distress on multivariate logistic analysis included problems with transportation, depression, and constipation, accounting for 47% of distress variance. Most patients had physical (97.0%) or emotional problems (79.5%). Among these, fatigue (60.6%), worry (59.8%), tingling (59.8%), difficulty with mobility (47.0%), and memory/concentration (40.2%) were the most frequently reported problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with HMs have a high burden of distress, which is affected by different sources, compared with younger patients with solid tumors. Thus, in this population, assessment and management of distress need to be conducted considering the unique features of their source and burden. Further research on distress should consider the cancer type and population age.

Association between Moving to a High-Volume Hospital in the Capital Area and the Mortality among Patients with Cancer: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study

This study aimed to identify the association between moving to a high-volume hospital and the mortality of patients with cancer living in the district. The study population comprised participants diagnosed with cancer within the past nine years (2004-2012). The final sample included 8197 patients with cancer, 3939 were males (48.1%), and 4258 were females (51.9%). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for death. Confounding variables including sex, age, type of social security, income level, disability, and utilization volume were incorporated into the model. Among patients with cancer living in the district, 2874 (35.1%) used healthcare services in Seoul. About 10% (n = 834) of patients died during the follow-up period. The HR for death in females (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81) was lower than that in males. Additionally, the HR for the death of patients using healthcare services in Seoul (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) was higher than those patients who did not use healthcare services in Seoul. Among patients utilizing services in the province, wealthier patients' survival probability was significantly higher than that of others. The cause of income differences should be identified, and accessibility to medical use of low-income families should be enhanced to prevent mortality of patients from cancer disparities.