Rescue therapy with adefovir in decompensated liver cirrhosis patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus

Targeting hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy: efficacy and challenges of current antiviral treatments

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global health challenge, affecting approximately 296 million people and causing significant mortality annually. Despite vaccination efforts, HBV prevalence persists, particularly in low- and middle-income regions and endemic areas like China. HBV is closely associated with various kidney diseases, including acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and glomerulonephritis, through mechanisms such as immune complex deposition, direct viral invasion, and chronic inflammation. Patients undergoing hemodialysis or kidney transplantation are at increased risk of HBV infection and reactivation, highlighting the need for effective preventive and therapeutic measures. This review examines the classification and clinical features of HBV-associated nephropathy, focusing on membranous nephropathy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. It explores the pathogenesis, emphasizing immune complex deposition and podocyte apoptosis. Antiviral therapy, particularly with nucleos(t)ide analogs like entecavir and tenofovir (including TAF and TMF), demonstrates superior efficacy and safety compared to older agents such as lamivudine and adefovir. While interferon therapy offers benefits, its use is limited by adverse effects. Additionally, individualized treatment strategies for specific populations, including pregnant women and HIV co-infected patients, are crucial. Addressing HBV-associated nephropathy requires enhanced surveillance, timely antiviral intervention, and tailored therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes.

Autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in the treatment of HIV patients with compensated cirrhosis

Liver stem cell therapy is a promising tool to improve decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC). Especially in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the condition of the liver may be aggravated by antiretroviral therapy. A total of 21 patients diagnosed with DLC and HIV infection were divided into two groups as follows: those who received (combination therapy group, 14 patients) and those who did not receive (routine therapy group, 7 patients) bone marrow cell transplantation through the portal vein. Two patients died of surgery-related complications in the combination therapy group. The results showed that the survival rate was 85.7% in the combination therapy group after 2 years of follow-up, which was significantly higher than the 14.3% in the conventional therapy group (P<0.01). After treatment, the liver function score decreased significantly in the combination therapy group at 1 (t = 4.276, P = 0.000), 3 (t = 9.153, P = 0.000), and 12 (t = 13.536, P = 0.000) months, the levels of albumin were significantly increased, and the total bilirubin level and prothrombin time were significantly reduced or shortened as compared with the routine therapy group (P<0.05 or <0.01). The white blood cell count, hemoglobin, platelet count, and CD4+ and CD8+ levels were significantly higher in the combination therapy group at different time points as compared with the routine therapy group (P<0.05 or <0.01). In summary, the combination therapy is effective in HIV-infected patients with DLC and useful for the recovery of liver function and cellular immune function but may increase the risk of severe complications after surgery.

Entecavir monotherapy versus de novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir for compensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: a real-world prospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

De novo combination of lamivudine (Lam) and adefovir (Adv) was not rarely used in clinical practice. However, head-to-head comparisons of entecavir (Etv) monotherapy with this combination in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related compensated cirrhosis patients are unavailable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Etv monotherapy with combination therapy in patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis were recruited to receive either Etv monotherapy or a de novo combination of Lam and Adv. Data were collected at baseline and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients (485 in Etv group, 93 in combination group) were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. At the end of 1, 2, and 3 years, HBV DNA was undetectable in 82.7%, 96.2%, and 94.3% of patients in the Etv group and 88.9%, 81.7%, and 84.6% in the combination group, respectively (all P>0.05). The cumulative virological breakthrough rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.7%, 6.7%, and 9.8% in the Etv group and 2.9%, 13.3%, and 32.2% in the combination group, respectively (P=0.003). After propensity-score adjustment for age, sex, and baseline HBeAg, ALT, and total bilirubin, virological breakthrough was higher in the de novo combination of Lam and Adv (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.37-5.86; P<0.01). The cumulative rate of liver-related events, including decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, at 1, 2, and 3 years was 2.9%, 4.2%, and 6.1% in the Etv group and 2.2%, 2.2%, and 6.7% in combination group, respectively (P=0.83). Biochemical response and serological response were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Etv treatment had less virological breakthrough and potentially higher HBV-DNA suppression than de novo combination of Lam and Adv during 3 years in treatment-naïve HBV-related compensated liver cirrhosis.

Antiviral Therapy for AECHB and Severe Hepatitis B (Liver Failure)

This chapter describes the principles of antiviral therapy, treatment strategies, medications and recommendations for AECHB, HBV-ACLF, HBV-related liver cirrhosis, HBV-related HCC, and liver transplantation.

Severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B is closely related to continuous HBV replication. Therefore, inhibiting HBV replication to reduce viral load may block disease progression and improve the quality of life of these patients. ETV or TDF has been recommend first-line drug for the treatment of AECHB.

A hyperactive immune response due to continuous HBV replication is the main mechanism for development of severe hepatitis B. In addition to comprehensive treatment, early administration of potent nucleoside analogs can rapidly reduce HBV DNA concentration, relieve immune injury induced by HBV, and reduce liver inflammation and patient mortality. Antiviral agents have become important in the treatment of severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.

Long-term antiviral treatment with nucleoside analogs can delay or reverse the progress of liver cirrhosis. Virologic response, viral resistance and adverse drug reactions should be closely monitored during treatment. The treatment should be optimized for maximum effect based on each patient’s responses.

Effective antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication and reduce the incidence of HBV-related HCC. Patients with HBV-related HCC should receive individualized and optimal multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment. Anti-viral drugs with high efficacy, low resistance and low adverse drug reactions should be selected to improve the patient’s quality of life and prolong survival time.

Methods to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation include passive immunization (HBIG), antiviral treatment (nucleoside analogs) and active immunization (hepatitis B vaccine).

Clinical trials involving sequential combination therapy with NUC and Peg-IFN have shown statistically significant decline in HBsAg levels on treatment and high rates of sustained post-treatment serologic response. Combination therapy with novel DAA and immunotherapeutic approach may hold promise to overcome both cccDNA persistence and immune escape, representing a critical step towards HBV cure.

Analysis of the prevalence of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus in patients with antiviral therapy failure in a Chinese tertiary referral liver centre (2010-2014)

OBJECTIVES

To study the prevalence of drug-resistant HBV in patients with therapy failure in a Chinese tertiary referral liver centre.

METHODS

1223 HBV-infected patients who underwent genotypic resistance testing between 2010-2014 were studied.

RESULTS

3TC genotypic resistance was the most common (46.5%), followed by LdT resistant (46.2%), ETV intermediate (37.9%), ADV resistant (11.4%), TDF intermediate (11.4%) and ETV resistant (1.7%). The 3TC resistance rate increased from 39.8% in 2010 to 56.6% in 2013, before decreasing to 49.5% in 2014, evidence of a lagging effect of l-nucleoside consumption. M204I, N236T and L180M+M204V+V173L/S202G were the most common substitutions for l-nucleoside (3TC and LdT), ADV and ETV genotypic resistant phenotypes, respectively. 3TC-exposed patients showed a high multiple genetic resistance rate (3TC-resistant+LdT-resistant+ETV intermediate; 58.8%). Resistance rates to 3TC, LdT and ETV in HCC patients were significantly higher than in cirrhosis and CHB patients. Resistance rates to different drugs showed no statistical difference between genotype B and C patients, whilst some amino acid substitution showed genotype bias, e.g. N236T incidence in genotype B was significantly higher than in genotype C (43.2% vs. 5.9%; P<0.0001), and genotype C isolates had a significantly higher A181V/T incidence than genotype B (54.9% vs. 19.3%; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

3TC genotypic resistance was most common in this centre, whilst ETV had the lowest resistance rate. HBV genotypes had no impact on antiviral drug resistance, except for some drug resistance substitutions bias. Optional initial therapy and subsequent rescue treatment should be based on knowledge of nucleos(t)ide analogue resistance.