1
|
Lyte JM, Seyoum MM, Ayala D, Kers JG, Caputi V, Johnson T, Zhang L, Rehberger J, Zhang G, Dridi S, Hale B, De Oliveira JE, Grum D, Smith AH, Kogut M, Ricke SC, Ballou A, Potter B, Proszkowiec-Weglarz M. Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research? Poult Sci 2025; 104:105242. [PMID: 40334389 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2025] [Revised: 04/30/2025] [Accepted: 04/30/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Bacteria are the major component of poultry gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota and play an important role in host health, nutrition, physiology regulation, intestinal development, and growth. Bacterial community profiling based on the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing approach has become the most popular method to determine the taxonomic composition and diversity of the poultry microbiota. The 16S rRNA gene profiling involves numerous steps, including sample collection and storage, DNA isolation, 16S rRNA gene primer selection, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), library preparation, sequencing, raw sequencing reads processing, taxonomic classification, α- and β-diversity calculations, and statistical analysis. However, there is currently no standardized protocol for 16S rRNA gene analysis profiling and data deposition for poultry microbiota studies. Variations in DNA storage and isolation, primer design, and library preparation are known to introduce biases, affecting community structure and microbial population analysis leading to over- or under-representation of individual bacteria within communities. Additionally, different sequencing platforms, bioinformatics pipeline, and taxonomic database selection can affect classification and determination of the microbial taxa. Moreover, detailed experimental design and DNA processing and sequencing methods are often inadequately reported in poultry 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies. Consequently, poultry microbiota results are often difficult to reproduce and compare across studies. This manuscript reviews current practices in profiling poultry microbiota using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and proposes the development of guidelines for protocol for 16S rRNA gene sequencing that spans from sample collection through data deposition to achieve more reliable data comparisons across studies and allow for comparisons and/or interpretations of poultry studies conducted worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Lyte
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Area, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research, Fayetteville 72701, AR, United States
| | - Mitiku M Seyoum
- Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, AR, United States
| | - Diana Ayala
- Purina Animal Nutrition Center, Land O'Lakes, Gray Summit 63039, MO, United States
| | - Jannigje G Kers
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, and Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
| | - Valentina Caputi
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Area, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research, Fayetteville 72701, AR, United States
| | - Timothy Johnson
- University of Minnesota, Saint Paul 55108, MN, United States
| | - Li Zhang
- Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762, MS, United States
| | - Joshua Rehberger
- Arm and Hammer Animal Nutrition, Waukesha 53186, WI, United States
| | - Guolong Zhang
- Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078, OK, United States
| | - Sami Dridi
- Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, AR, United States
| | - Brett Hale
- AgriGro, Doniphan 6393, MO, United States
| | | | - Daniel Grum
- Purina Animal Nutrition Center, Land O'Lakes, Gray Summit 63039, MO, United States
| | - Alexandra H Smith
- Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762, MS, United States
| | - Michael Kogut
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, College Station 77845, TX, United States
| | - Steven C Ricke
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 53706, WI, United States
| | - Anne Ballou
- Iluma Alliance, Durham 27703, NC, United States
| | - Bill Potter
- Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, AR, United States
| | - Monika Proszkowiec-Weglarz
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Northeast Area, Beltsville Agriculture Research Center, Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Beltsville 20705, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sands N, Malka S, Vecere G, Lee M, Stockman J, Krumbeck JA. Determining the Fecal Microbiome of Healthy Cockatiels ( Nymphicus hollandicus) Fed Seeds Versus Formulated Pelleted Diets by Next-Generation DNA Sequencing. J Avian Med Surg 2025; 39:2-11. [PMID: 40085117 DOI: 10.1647/avianms-d-24-00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
Fecal samples were collected from 34 clinically healthy cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), with 15 consuming a commercially available seed diet and 19 on a formulated pelleted diet. Next-generation DNA sequencing was used to analyze the samples, revealing a diverse microbial landscape. A total of 179 bacterial species from 94 genera and 244 fungal species from 156 genera were identified across both diet groups. Although no significant differences in microbial diversity were observed between the 2 groups, distinct microbial compositions were noted. Notably, Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii and Enterococcus durans/faecium were enriched in the pellet-fed group, whereas Lactobacillus oris and a species in the Brevinemataceae family were more abundant in the seed-fed group. In the mycobiome, Aspergillus penicillioides, Meyerozyma sp, and Fusarium sp were enriched in the pelleted diet group, whereas Bulleribasidium oberjochense was more prevalent in the seed diet group. These findings highlight the nuanced effects of diet on the fecal microbiome of cockatiels, providing valuable insights for avian health management and potential probiotic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Sands
- Long Island Bird and Exotics Veterinary Clinic, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA,
| | - Shachar Malka
- Long Island Bird and Exotics Veterinary Clinic, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA
| | - Gina Vecere
- Long Island Bird and Exotics Veterinary Clinic, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA
| | - Margaret Lee
- Long Island Bird and Exotics Veterinary Clinic, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA
| | - Jonathan Stockman
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, LIU College of Veterinary Medicine, Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Proszkowiec-Weglarz M, Miska KB, Ellestad LE, Schreier LL, Kahl S, Darwish N, Campos P, Shao J. Delayed access to feed early post-hatch affects the development and maturation of gastrointestinal tract microbiota in broiler chickens. BMC Microbiol 2022; 22:206. [PMID: 36002800 PMCID: PMC9404604 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-022-02619-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The first two weeks of post-hatch (PH) growth in broilers (meat-type birds) are critical for gut development and microbiota colonization. In the current broiler production system, chicks may not receive feed and water for 24 to 72 h due to variations in hatching time and hatchery management. Post-hatch feed delay affects body weight, feed efficiency, mortality, and gut development. The goal of this study was to investigate changes in the microbiome in broiler chickens early PH and the effect of delayed access to feed on the microbiota. Results Chicks either received feed and water immediately after hatch or access to feed was delayed for 48 h to mimic commercial hatchery settings (treatment, TRT). Both groups were sampled (n = 6) at -48, 0, 4 h, and 1 (24 h), 2 (48 h), 3 (72 h), 4 (96 h), 6 (144 h), 8 (192 h), 10 (240 h), 12 (288 h) and 14 (336 h) days PH. Ileal (IL) and cecal (CE) epithelial scrapings (mucosal bacteria, M) and digesta (luminal bacteria, L) were collected for microbiota analysis. Microbiota was determined by sequencing the V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA and analyzed using QIIME2. The microbiota of early ileal and cecal samples were characterized by high abundance of unclassified bacteria. Among four bacterial populations (IL-L, IL-M, CE-L, CE-M), IL-M was the least affected by delayed access to feed early PH. Both alpha and beta diversities were affected by delayed access to feed PH in IL-L, CE-M and CE-L. However, the development effect was more pronounced. In all four bacterial populations, significant changes due to developmental effect (time relative to hatch) was observed in taxonomic composition, with transient changes of bacterial taxa during the first two weeks PH. Delayed access to feed has limited influence on bacterial composition with only a few genera and species affected in all four bacterial populations. Predicted function based on 16S rRNA was also affected by delayed access to feed PH with most changes in metabolic pathway richness observed in IL-L, CE-L and CE-M. Conclusions These results show transient changes in chicken microbiota biodiversity during the first two weeks PH and indicate that delayed access to feed affects microbiota development. Proper microbiota development could be an important factor in disease prevention and antibiotic use in broiler chickens. Moreover, significant differences in response to delayed access to feed PH between luminal and mucosal bacterial populations strongly suggests the need for separate analysis of these two populations. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-022-02619-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Proszkowiec-Weglarz
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.
| | - Katarzyna B Miska
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| | - Laura E Ellestad
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Lori L Schreier
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| | - Stanislaw Kahl
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| | - Nadia Darwish
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.,United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Statistic Group, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| | - Philip Campos
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (ABBL), Beltsville, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, B-200, Rm. 100B, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA.,United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Statistic Group, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| | - Jonathan Shao
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Northeast Area (NEA), Statistic Group, Beltsville, MD, 20705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kers JG, de Oliveira JE, Fischer EAJ, Tersteeg‐Zijderveld MHG, Konstanti P, Stegeman JA(A, Smidt H, Velkers FC. Associations between phenotypic characteristics and clinical parameters of broilers and intestinal microbial development throughout a production cycle: A field study. Microbiologyopen 2020; 9:e1114. [PMID: 33068065 PMCID: PMC7658455 DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Disturbances in intestinal health are a common problem affecting commercial broiler chickens worldwide. Several studies have revealed associations between health, production performance, and intestinal microbiota. This study aimed to describe the development of the intestinal microbiota of broilers within a production cycle to evaluate to what extent clinical parameters and phenotypic characteristics can explain the intestinal microbiota variation. Of four well-performing flocks within two farms, the cecal content was collected of nine broilers at 0, 2, 4, or 5, 7, 11, or 12, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 40 days of the production cycle. In total, 342 samples were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Variables as macroscopic gut abnormalities, gut lesions, age, individual body weight, sex, footpad integrity, the color of ceca, and foam in cecal content were determined. Ileum tissue was collected for histological quantification of villus length and crypt depth. Flock infection levels of the intestinal disease coccidiosis were measured in pooled feces from the poultry house. Increases in phylogenetic diversity were observed from hatch until day 21 of age. Constrained multivariate analysis indicated that age, farm, body weight, ileum crypt depth, cecal color, and the coccidiosis lesion score were important variables to describe the variation in cecal microbiota. These results contribute to determining relevant variables in flocks that may be indicative of the intestinal microbiota composition. Moreover, this knowledge increases the awareness of interactions between the intestinal microbiota and broiler health as well as their relative importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannigje G. Kers
- Department of Population Health SciencesDivision of Farm Animal HealthFaculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Laboratory of MicrobiologyWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Jean E. de Oliveira
- Cargill Animal Nutrition and HealthInnovation Center VelddrielVelddrielThe Netherlands
| | - Egil A. J. Fischer
- Department of Population Health SciencesDivision of Farm Animal HealthFaculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Monique H. G. Tersteeg‐Zijderveld
- Department of Population Health SciencesInstitute for Risk Assessment SciencesFaculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Prokopis Konstanti
- Laboratory of MicrobiologyWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Jan Arend (Arjan) Stegeman
- Department of Population Health SciencesDivision of Farm Animal HealthFaculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Hauke Smidt
- Laboratory of MicrobiologyWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Francisca C. Velkers
- Department of Population Health SciencesDivision of Farm Animal HealthFaculty of Veterinary MedicineUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taylor KJM, Ngunjiri JM, Abundo MC, Jang H, Elaish M, Ghorbani A, Kc M, Weber BP, Johnson TJ, Lee CW. Respiratory and Gut Microbiota in Commercial Turkey Flocks with Disparate Weight Gain Trajectories Display Differential Compositional Dynamics. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86:e00431-20. [PMID: 32276973 PMCID: PMC7267191 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00431-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Communities of gut bacteria (microbiota) are known to play roles in resistance to pathogen infection and optimal weight gain in turkey flocks. However, knowledge of turkey respiratory microbiota and its link to gut microbiota is lacking. This study presents a 16S rRNA gene-based census of the turkey respiratory microbiota (nasal cavity and trachea) alongside gut microbiota (cecum and ileum) in two identical commercial Hybrid Converter turkey flocks raised in parallel under typical field commercial conditions. The flocks were housed in adjacent barns during the brood stage and in geographically separated farms during the grow-out stage. Several bacterial taxa, primarily Staphylococcus, that were acquired in the respiratory tract at the beginning of the brood stage persisted throughout the flock cycle. Late-emerging predominant taxa in the respiratory tract included Deinococcus and Corynebacterium Tracheal and nasal microbiota of turkeys were identifiably distinct from one another and from gut microbiota. Nevertheless, gut and respiratory microbiota changed in parallel over time and appeared to share many taxa. During the brood stage, the two flocks generally acquired similar gut and respiratory microbiota, and their average body weights were comparable. However, there were qualitative and quantitative differences in microbial profiles and body weight gain trajectories after the flocks were transferred to geographically separated grow-out farms. Lower weight gain corresponded to the emergence of Deinococcus and Ornithobacterium in the respiratory tract and Fusobacterium and Parasutterella in gut. This study provides an overview of turkey microbiota under field conditions and suggests several hypotheses concerning the respiratory microbiome.IMPORTANCE Turkey meat is an important source of animal protein, and the industry around its production contributes significantly to the agricultural economy. The microorganisms present in the gut of turkeys are known to impact bird health and flock performance. However, the respiratory microbiota in turkeys is entirely unexplored. This study has elucidated the microbiota of respiratory tracts of turkeys from two commercial flocks raised in parallel throughout a normal flock cycle. Further, the study suggests that bacteria originating in the gut or in poultry house environments influence respiratory communities; consequently, they induce poor performance, either directly or indirectly. Future attempts to develop microbiome-based interventions for turkey health should delimit the contributions of respiratory microbiota and aim to limit disturbances to those communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara J M Taylor
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - John M Ngunjiri
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael C Abundo
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hyesun Jang
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mohamed Elaish
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Amir Ghorbani
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mahesh Kc
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Bonnie P Weber
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | - Timothy J Johnson
- Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
- Mid-Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Willmar, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chang-Won Lee
- Food Animal Health Research Program, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilson KM, Rodrigues DR, Briggs WN, Duff AF, Chasser KM, Bottje WG, Bielke LR. Impact of in ovo administered pioneer colonizers on intestinal proteome on day of hatch. Poult Sci 2020; 99:1254-1266. [PMID: 32111303 PMCID: PMC7587751 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pioneer colonization of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) by bacteria is thought to have major influence on neonatal tissue development. Previous studies have shown in ovo inoculation of embryos with saline (S), species of Citrobacter (C, C2), or lactic acid bacteria (L) resulted in an altered microbiome on day of the hatch (DOH). The present study investigated GIT proteomic changes at DOH in relation to different inoculations. Embryos were inoculated in ovo with S or ∼102 cfu of C, C2, or L at 18 embryonic days. On DOH, the GIT was collected, and tissue proteins were extracted for analysis via tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 493 proteins were identified for differential comparison with S at P ≤ 0.10. Different levels were noted in 107, 39, and 78 proteins in C, C2, and L groups, respectively, which were uploaded to Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to determine canonical pathways and biological functions related to these changes. Three members of the cytokine family (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL6, and Oncostatin M) were predicted to be activated in C2, indicated with Z-score ≥ 1.50, which suggested an overall proinflammatory GIT condition. This was consistent with the activation of the acute-phase response signaling pathway seen exclusively in C2 (Z-score = 2.00, P < 0.01). However, activation (Z-score = 2.00) of IL-13, upregulation of peroxiredoxin-1 and superoxide dismutase 1, in addition to activation of nitric oxide signaling in the cardiovascular system of the L treatment may predict a state of increased antioxidant capacity and decreased inflammatory status. The nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)-mediated oxidative stress response (Z-score = 2.00, P < 0.01) was predicted to be upregulated in C which suggested that chicks were in an inflammatory state and associated oxidative stress, but the impact of these pathways differed from that of C2. These changes in the proteome suggest that pioneer colonizing microbiota may have a strong impact on pathways associated with GIT immune and cellular development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Wilson
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - D R Rodrigues
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - W N Briggs
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - A F Duff
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - K M Chasser
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - W G Bottje
- Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
| | - L R Bielke
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilson KM, Rodrigues DR, Briggs WN, Duff AF, Chasser KM, Bielke LR. Evaluation of the impact of in ovo administered bacteria on microbiome of chicks through 10 days of age. Poult Sci 2020; 98:5949-5960. [PMID: 31298298 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Initial inoculation and colonization of the chicken gastrointestinal tract (GIT) by microbiota have been suggested to have a major influence on the growth performance and health of birds. Commercial practices in chicken production may alter or delay microbial colonization by pioneer colonizing bacteria that can have an impact on the development and maturation of the GIT and intestinal microflora. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of apathogenic Gram-negative isolates or lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as pioneer colonizers on the microbiome at the day of hatch (DOH) and evaluate the influence through 10 D of age on ceca. At 18 embryonic days (E), the amnion of embryos was inoculated with either saline (S), approximately 102 CFU of LAB (L), Citrobacter freundii (C), or Citrobacter species (C2). Once DNA was isolated from mucosal and digesta contents, samples underwent 2 × 300 paired-end Illumina MiSeq library preparation for microbiome analysis. An increased abundance of Lactobacillaceae family and Lactobacillus genus was observed in the L group at DOH (P < 0.05), whereas the abundance of Enterococcaceae and Enterococcus was numerically decreased. While Lactobacillus salivarius was one of the pioneer colonizers in the L group at 18E, the population decreased by 10 D (39.59 to 0.09%) and replaced with a population of undefined Lactobacillus (10.36%) and Lactobacillus reuteri (3.63%). Results suggest that L treatment may have accelerated a mature microbiota. Enterobacteriaceae was the dominant family (57.44%) in C group at DOH (P < 0.05). The C2 group only showed some abundance of the C2 species (7.92%) at DOH but had the highest overall abundance of undefined Lactobacillus in the ceca by 10 D (25.28%). Taken together, different isolates provided in ovo can have an impact on the initial microbiome of the GIT, and some of these differences in ceca remain notable at 10 D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Wilson
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| | - D R Rodrigues
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| | - W N Briggs
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| | - A F Duff
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| | - K M Chasser
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| | - L R Bielke
- Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 44691
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antibiotics and Host-Tailored Probiotics Similarly Modulate Effects on the Developing Avian Microbiome, Mycobiome, and Host Gene Expression. mBio 2019; 10:mBio.02171-19. [PMID: 31615957 PMCID: PMC6794479 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02171-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Alternative approaches are greatly needed to reduce the need for antibiotic use in food animal production. This study utilized a pipeline for the development of a host-tailored probiotic to enhance performance in commercial turkeys and modulate their microbiota, similar to the effects of low-dose antibiotic administration. We determined that a host-tailored probiotic, developed in the context of the commercial turkey gut microbiome, was more effective at modulating these parameters than a nontailored probiotic cocktail. Furthermore, the host-tailored probiotic mimicked many of the effects of a low-dose antibiotic growth promoter. Surprisingly, the effects of the antibiotic growth promoter and host-tailored probiotic were observed across kingdoms, illustrating the coordinated interkingdom effects of these approaches. This work suggests that tailored approaches to probiotic development hold promise for modulating the avian host and its microbiota. The microbiome is important to all animals, including poultry, playing a critical role in health and performance. Low-dose antibiotics have historically been used to modulate food production animals and their microbiome. Identifying alternatives to antibiotics conferring similar modulatory properties has been elusive. The purpose of this study was to determine if a host-tailored probiotic could recapitulate effects of a low-dose antibiotic on host response and the developing microbiome. Over 13 days of life, turkey poults were supplemented continuously with a low-dose antibiotic or oral supplementation of a prebiotic with or without two different probiotics (8 cage units, n = 80 per group). Gastrointestinal bacterial and fungal communities of poults were characterized by 16S rRNA gene and ITS2 amplicon sequencing. Localized and systemic host gene expression was assessed using transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq), kinase activity was assessed by avian-specific kinome peptide arrays, and performance parameters were assessed. We found that development of the early-life microbiome of turkey poults was tightly ordered in a tissue- and time-specific manner. Low-dose antibiotic and turkey-tailored probiotic supplementation, but not nontailored probiotic supplementation, elicited similar shifts in overall microbiome composition during development compared to controls. Treatment-induced bacterial changes were accompanied by parallel shifts in the fungal community and host gene expression and enhanced performance metrics. These results were validated in pen trials that identified further additive effects of the turkey-tailored probiotic combined with different prebiotics. Alternative approaches to low-dose antibiotic use in poultry are feasible and can be optimized utilizing the indigenous poultry microbiome. Similar approaches may also be beneficial for humans.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen X, Zheng M, Lin F, Cheng X, Xiao S, Chen S, Chen S. Impacts of novel duck reovirus infection on the composition of intestinal microbiota of Muscovy ducklings. Microb Pathog 2019; 137:103764. [PMID: 31585153 DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Novel duck reovirus (NDRV) is pathogenic to young ducks, which is characterized by hemorrhagic spots and necrotic foci of the livers and necrotic foci of spleens. However, the effect of NDRV infection on the composition of the host's intestinal microbiota remains poorly understood. In this study, three-day-old Muscovy ducklings were inoculated with either the virulent NDRV strain NP03 or sterile Hank's solution. Through Illumina MiSeq sequencing, the whole cecal microbiota of healthy and NDRV infected ducklings was examined. The results showed that the gut microbiota was mainly dominated by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidestes in both healthy and NDRV infected ducks. NDRV infection altered the relative abundance of bacteria. Specifically, families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were remarkably reduced, whereas Escherichia_Shigella belonging to family Enterobacteriaceae was significantly increased. Collectively, NDRV infection in Muscovy ducks resulted in a shift of the gut microbiota, including a net loss of probiotic bacteria with a compensatory expansion of pathogenic bacteria. These results provide new insights into the potential pathogenic mechanisms of NDRV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiuqin Chen
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China
| | - Min Zheng
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China
| | - Fengqiang Lin
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China
| | - Xiaoxia Cheng
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China
| | - Shifeng Xiao
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China
| | - Shaoying Chen
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China.
| | - Shilong Chen
- Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China; Fujian Animal Diseases Control Technology Development Center, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China.
| |
Collapse
|