1
|
Newton HS, Cedrone E, Grunberger J, Xie S, Zhao Y, Tran B, Toms BS, Xu W, Plant-Hately A, Liptrott NJ, Dobrovolskaia MA. Nanoparticles may influence mast cells gene expression profiles without affecting their degranulation function. NANOMEDICINE : NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND MEDICINE 2025; 66:102818. [PMID: 40185352 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2025.102818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2025] [Revised: 03/09/2025] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025]
Abstract
An in vitro method for monitoring nanoparticle effects on IgE-dependent mast cell degranulation was developed and validated. The assayed nanoparticles included four clinical-grade nanomedicines (Abraxane, Doxil, AmBisome, and Feraheme) and three commercial research-grade nanomaterials (generation 5 PAMAM dendrimers with carboxy-, hydroxy-, or amine- surface functionalities). Most of the tested materials did not alter IgE-dependent mast cell degranulation, suggesting that nanoparticles and nanomedicines are unlikely to worsen pre-existing allergies to other antigens. Two clinical-grade formulations containing cytotoxic oncology drugs-Abraxane and Doxil-decreased degranulation. Abraxane but not Doxil decreased FcεR expression on the cell surface. Single-cell sequencing revealed the most differentially expressed genes (DEG) in Abraxane and Doxil-treated cultures. Interestingly, Feraheme and amine-terminated dendrimers induced DEG without affecting degranulation. These data demonstrate that some nanomaterials have more effects on immune cells than can be detected by a functional immunoassay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah S Newton
- Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Edward Cedrone
- Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Jason Grunberger
- Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shaojun Xie
- Sequencing Facility Bioinformatics Group, Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Yongmei Zhao
- Sequencing Facility Bioinformatics Group, Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Bao Tran
- CCR Sequencing Facility, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | | | - Weining Xu
- 10x Genomics, Inc., Pleasanton, CA 94588-3260, USA
| | - Alexander Plant-Hately
- Immunocompatibility Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 3NY, UK; Centre of Excellence for Long-Acting Therapeutics (CELT), Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK
| | - Neill J Liptrott
- Immunocompatibility Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 3NY, UK; Centre of Excellence for Long-Acting Therapeutics (CELT), Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK
| | - Marina A Dobrovolskaia
- Nanotechnology Characterization Lab., Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Avila YI, Rebolledo LP, Leal Santos N, Rawlins B, Radwan Y, Andrade-Muñoz M, Skelly E, Chandler MR, Andrade LNS, Kim TJ, Dobrovolskaia MA, Afonin KA. Changes in Generations of PAMAM Dendrimers and Compositions of Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles Govern Delivery and Immune Recognition. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2025. [PMID: 40391736 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
Nucleic acid nanoparticles (NANPs) are promising immune modulators due to their well-established structural properties and distinct structure-activity relationship with the immune system. We previously identified that NANPs' size, shape, composition, and type of delivery vehicle define their uptake by immune cells and subsequently induced cytokine profile. In this work, we examined the delivery efficiencies and immunological impacts of two representative NANPs─DNA cubes and RNA cubes─complexed with a benchmark delivery vehicle, Lipofectamine 2000 vs. different generations of amine-terminated poly(amidoamine) dendrimers. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we modeled dendrimer interactions with nucleic acid cargos. Next, we used traditional 2D and more recently established 3D cell cultures to assess dendrimers' influence on NANPs uptake. Immune activation was evaluated in several cell lines engineered with reporter genes driven by key immune signaling pathways. Specifically, HEK-lucia reporter cells were used to evaluate RIG-I activation, while THP1-Dual cells provided quantitative readouts for both IRF and NF-κB transcription factor activity. Our findings demonstrate that both dendrimer generation and NANP composition influence cellular uptake and immune responses. This study underscores the importance of formulation in shaping NANPs' biological properties and further advances the understanding of their immunological properties critical for the development of NANPs-based adjuvants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelixza I Avila
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| | - Laura P Rebolledo
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| | - Nathalia Leal Santos
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
- Center for Translational Research in Oncology (LIM24), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Comprehensive Center for Precision Oncology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Brandon Rawlins
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| | - Yasmine Radwan
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
- MIMETAS US, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States
| | - Melanie Andrade-Muñoz
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| | - Elizabeth Skelly
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| | | | - Luciana N S Andrade
- Center for Translational Research in Oncology (LIM24), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Comprehensive Center for Precision Oncology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Tae Jin Kim
- Department of Physical Sciences, West Virginia University Institute of Technology, Beckley, West Virginia 25801, United States
| | - Marina A Dobrovolskaia
- Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States
| | - Kirill A Afonin
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grunberger J, Newton H, Donohue D, Dobrovolskaia M, Ghandehari H. Role of physicochemical properties in silica nanoparticle-mediated immunostimulation. Nanotoxicology 2024; 18:599-617. [PMID: 39460666 PMCID: PMC11967568 DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2024.2418088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024]
Abstract
Immunostimulation caused by nanoparticles may be beneficial or adverse depending on their intended application. Activation of immune cells is beneficial for indications targeting the immune system for therapeutic purposes, such as tumor microenvironment reprogramming, immunotherapy, and vaccines. When it is unwanted, however, immunostimulation may lead to excessive inflammation, cytokine storm, and hypersensitivity reactions. The increasing use of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) for the delivery of drugs, imaging agents, and antigens warrants preclinical studies aimed at understanding carrier-mediated effects on the number, activation status, and function of immune cell subsets. Herein, we present an in vitro study utilizing primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to investigate the proinflammatory properties of four types of SiNPs varying in size and porosity. Cytokine analysis was performed in resting and LPS-primed PBMC cultures to understand the ability of silica nanoparticles to induce de novo and exaggerate preexisting inflammation, respectively. Changes in the number and activation status of lymphoid and myeloid cells were studied by flow cytometry to gain further insight into SiNP-mediated immunostimulation. Nonporous SiNPs were found to be more proinflammatory than mesoporous SiNPs, and larger-sized particles induced greater cytokine response. LPS-primed PBMC resulted in increased susceptibility to SiNPs. Immunophenotyping analysis of SiNP-treated PBMC resulted in T and B lymphocyte, natural killer cell, and dendritic cell activation. Additionally, a loss of regulatory T cells and an increase in γδ TCR T cell population were observed with all particles. These findings have implications for the utility of SiNPs for the delivery of drugs and imaging agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Grunberger
- Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Hannah Newton
- Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Duncan Donohue
- Statistics Department, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Marina Dobrovolskaia
- Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21701, USA
| | - Hamidreza Ghandehari
- Utah Center for Nanomedicine, Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Newton HS, Zhang J, Dobrovolskaia MA. Immunophenotyping, Part II: Analysis of Nanoparticle Effects on the Composition and Activation Status of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells. Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2789:269-291. [PMID: 38507010 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3786-9_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
The use of nanoparticles as drug delivery carriers requires analysis of their safety, which among other tests, includes immunotoxicity. Nanoparticles are also increasingly used for applications intended to specifically activate, inhibit, or modify the immune system's responses to improve the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, cancer immunotherapy, and vaccines targeting cancer cells and viral and bacterial pathogens. In addition to the safety, the analysis of nanoparticles intended for immune system targeting includes mechanistic immunology investigations. Immunophenotyping provides researchers with a tool to assess the immune cell viability and activation status. These results provide mechanistic insights into nanoparticle efficacy and toxicity and therefore are of interest to the biomedical nanotechnology field. However, no standardized approaches exist due to the breadth of methods and instruments available for this analysis. This chapter provides detailed instructions for applying this methodology to analyze nanoparticle effects on subsets of immune cells present in peripheral blood. While this experimental strategy is specific to the NovoCyte 3005 flow cytometer, it can be adapted to other instruments. Instructions for instrument setup, calibration, and antibody qualification are described in this book's Chapter 24 , Immunophenotyping, part I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah S Newton
- Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | | | - Marina A Dobrovolskaia
- Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|