Effects of Clostridium beijerinckii and Medium Modifications on Acetone–Butanol–Ethanol Production From Switchgrass

Developing a separation system to enable real-time recovery of acetone-butanol during fermentation

Methods such as gas stripping and vacuum-assisted gas stripping (VAGS) result in significant removal of water from the bioreactor, thus requiring continuous water replenishment in the bioreactor. In this study, we developed a hydrophobic stainless steel meshes capable of selectively recovering concentrated ABE stream from the bioreactor during VAGS. Three stainless steel meshes with pore sizes of 180 µm, 300 µm, and 425 µm were made hydrophobic and oleophilic with zinc oxide (ZnO) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Butanol concentrations in the model solutions range from 3 to 10 g/L which mimic concentrations typically produced during batch ABE fermentation. The meshes were integrated in a 5-L bioreactor containing 2.5 L of operational ABE model solution followed by the evaluation of selective extraction of ABE from both cell-free and Clostridium beijerinckii-rich ABE model solutions. The results show that the 180-µm ZnO/PDMS-coated mesh retained 54-64% more water in the bioreactor without C. beijerinckii cells and 61-65% more water with cells compared to the uncoated mesh. Furthermore, the butanol concentration of condensates recovered with 180-µm ZnO-PDMS-coated mesh was up to 10.8-fold greater than that of uncoated counterpart. Our data demonstrate that the developed ZnO-PDMS mesh can recover high concentrations of ABE while selectively retaining water in the bioreactor. Additionally, this technology demonstrates the potential for real-time ABE recovery during the fermentation of lignocellulosic and colloidal materials, without the concern of clogging the separation system. KEY POINTS: • Hydrophobic mesh enhanced water retention in the bioreactor by up to 1.65-fold. • Butanol concentration in the collected condensate was increased by up to 10.8-fold. • Hydrophobic mesh is compatible with fermentation of lignocellulose.

Microbial detoxification of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates: Biochemical and molecular aspects, challenges, exploits and future perspectives

Valorization of lignocellulosic biomass (LB) has the potential to secure sustainable energy production without impacting food insecurity, whist relieving over reliance on finite fossil fuels. Agro-derived lignocellulosic residues such as wheat straw, switchgrass, rice bran, and miscanthus have gained relevance as feedstocks for the production of biofuels and chemicals. However, the microorganisms employed in fermentative conversion of carbohydrates to fuels and chemicals are unable to efficiently utilize the sugars derived from LB due to co-production of lignocellulose-derived microbial inhibitory compounds (LDMICs) during LB pretreatment. LDMICs impact microbial growth by inhibition of specific enzymes, cause DNA and cell membrane damage, and elicit cellular redox imbalance. Over the past decade, success has been achieved with the removal of LDMICs prior to fermentation. However, LDMICs removal by chemical processes is often accompanied by sugar losses, which negatively impacts the overall production cost. Hence, in situ removal of LDMICs by fermentative organisms during the fermentation process has garnered considerable attention as the "go-to" approach for economical LDMICs detoxification and bio-chemicals production. In situ removal of LDMICs has been pursued by either engineering more robust biocatalysts or isolating novel microbial strains with the inherent capacity to mineralize or detoxify LDMICs to less toxic compounds. While some success has been made along this line, efficient detoxification and robust production of target bio-chemicals in lignocellulosic hydrolysates (LHs) under largely anaerobic fermentative conditions remains a lingering challenge. Consequently, LB remains an underutilized substrate for bio-chemicals production. In this review, the impact of microbial LH detoxification on overall target molecule production is discussed. Further, the biochemical pathways and mechanisms employed for in situ microbial detoxification of furanic LDMICs [e.g., furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF)] and phenolic LDMICs (e.g., syringaldehyde, p-coumaric acid, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, and ferulic acid) are discussed. More importantly, metabolic engineering strategies for the development of LDMIC-tolerant and bio-chemicals overproducing strains and processes are highlighted.