Non-invasive Maternal Hemodynamic Assessment to Classify High-Risk Pregnancies Complicated by Fetal Growth Restriction

Maternal cardiovascular profile is altered in the preclinical phase of normotensive early and late intrauterine growth restriction

BACKGROUND

The maternal cardiovascular profile of patients who develop late fetal growth restriction has yet to be well characterized, however, a subclinical impairment in maternal hemodynamics and cardiac function may be present before pregnancy and may become evident because of the hemodynamic alterations associated with pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate if maternal hemodynamics and the cardiovascular profile might be different in the preclinical stages (22-24 weeks' gestation) in cases of early and late fetal growth restriction in normotensive patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective echocardiographic study of 1152 normotensive nulliparous pregnant women at 22 to 24 weeks' gestation. The echocardiographic evaluation included morphologic parameters (left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness, left atrial volume index) and systolic and diastolic maternal left ventricular function (ejection fraction, left ventricular global longitudinal strain, E/A ratio, and E/e' ratio). Patients were followed until the end of pregnancy to note the development of normotensive early or late fetal growth restriction.

RESULTS

Of the study cohort, 1049 patients had no complications, 73 were classified as having late fetal growth restriction, and 30 were classified as having early fetal growth restriction. In terms of left ventricular morphology, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was greater in uneventful pregnancies (4.84±0.28 cm) than in late (4.67±0.26 cm) and in early (4.55±0.26 cm) (P<.001) fetal growth restriction cases, whereas left ventricular end-systolic diameter was smaller in uneventful pregnancies (2.66±0.39 cm) than in late (2.83±0.40 cm) and in early (2.82±0.38 cm) (P<.001) fetal growth restriction cases. The relative wall thickness was slightly higher in early (0.34±0.05) and late (0.35±0.04) fetal growth restriction cases than in uneventful pregnancies (0.32±0.05) (P<.05). In terms of systolic left ventricular function, at 22 to 24 weeks' gestation, cardiac output was higher in uneventful pregnancies (6.58±1.07 L/min) than in late (5.40±0.97 L/min) and in early (4.76±1.05 L/min) (P<.001) fetal growth restriction cases with the lowest values in the early-onset group. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was lower in appropriate for gestational age neonates (-21.6%±2.0%) and progressively higher in late (-20.1%±2.2%) and early (-18.5%±2.3%) (P<.001) fetal growth restriction cases. In terms of diastolic left ventricular function, the E/e' ratio showed intermediate values in the late fetal growth restriction group (7.90±2.73) when compared with the appropriate for gestational age group (7.24±2.43) and with the early fetal growth restriction group (10.76±3.25) (P<.001). The total peripheral vascular resistance was also intermediate in the late fetal growth restriction group (1300±199 dyne·s·cm-5) when compared with the appropriate for gestational age group (993±175 dyne·s·cm-5) and the early fetal growth restriction group (1488±255 dyne.s.cm-5) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Early and late fetal growth restriction share similar maternal hemodynamic and cardiovascular profiles with a different degree of expression. These features are already present at 22 to 24 weeks' gestation and are characterized by a hypodynamic state. The degree of these cardiovascular changes may influence the timing of the manifestation of the disease; a hypovolemic, high resistance, low cardiac output state might be associated with early-onset fetal growth restriction, whereas a milder hypovolemic state seems to favor the development of the disease in the final stages of pregnancy.

Maternal Hemodynamics from Preconception to Delivery: Research and Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications: Position Statement by Italian Association of Preeclampsia and Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine

OBJECTIVE

 The Italian Association of Preeclampsia (AIPE) and the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine (SIMP) developed clinical questions on maternal hemodynamics state of the art.

STUDY DESIGN

 AIPE and SIMP experts were divided in small groups and were invited to propose an overview of the existing literature on specific topics related to the clinical questions proposed, developing, wherever possible, clinical and/or research recommendations based on available evidence, expert opinion, and clinical importance. Draft recommendations with a clinical rationale were submitted to 8th AIPE and SIMP Consensus Expert Panel for consideration and approval, with at least 75% agreement required for individual recommendations to be included in the final version.

RESULTS

 More and more evidence in literature underlines the relationship between maternal and fetal hemodynamics, as well as the relationship between maternal cardiovascular profile and fetal-maternal adverse outcomes such as fetal growth restriction and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Experts agreed on proposing a classification of pregnancy hypertension, complications, and cardiovascular states based on three different hemodynamic profiles depending on total peripheral vascular resistance values: hypodynamic (>1,300 dynes·s·cm-5), normo-dynamic, and hyperdynamic (<800 dynes·s·cm-5) circulation. This differentiation implies different therapeutical strategies, based drugs' characteristics, and maternal cardiovascular profile. Finally, the cardiovascular characteristics of the women may be useful for a rational approach to an appropriate follow-up, due to the increased cardiovascular risk later in life.

CONCLUSION

 Although the evidence might not be conclusive, given the lack of large randomized trials, maternal hemodynamics might have great importance in helping clinicians in understanding the pathophysiology and chose a rational treatment of patients with or at risk for pregnancy complications.

KEY POINTS

· Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to fetal growth restriction.. · Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to complicated hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.. · Maternal hemodynamics might help choosing a rational treatment during hypertensive disorders..

Pulse Pressure as a Hemodynamic Parameter in Preeclampsia with Severe Features Accompanied by Fetal Growth Restriction

Background: Modern management of preeclampsia can be optimized by tailoring the targeted treatment of hypertension to an individual's hemodynamic profile. Growing evidence suggests different phenotypes of preeclampsia, including those with a hyperdynamic profile and those complicated by uteroplacental insufficiency. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is believed to be a result of uteroplacental insufficiency. There is a paucity of research examining the characteristics of patients with severe preeclampsia who do and who do not develop FGR. We aimed to elucidate which hemodynamic parameters differed between these two groups. Methods: All patients admitted to a single referral center with severe preeclampsia were identified. Patients were included if they had a live birth at 23 weeks of gestation or higher. Multiple gestations and pregnancies complicated by fetal congenital anomalies and/or HELLP syndrome were excluded. FGR was defined as a sonographic estimation of fetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile or abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th percentile. Results: There were 76% significantly lower odds of overall pulse pressure upon admission for those with severe preeclampsia comorbid with FGR (aOR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.07-0.83). Advanced gestational age on admission was associated with lower odds of severely abnormal labs and severely elevated diastolic blood pressure in preeclampsia also complicated by FGR. Conclusions: Subtypes of preeclampsia with and without FGR may be hemodynamically evaluated by assessing pulse pressure on admission.

The "Preeclampsia and Hypertension Target Treatment" study: a multicenter prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of the antihypertensive therapy based on maternal hemodynamic findings

BACKGROUND

Despite major advances in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in the nonpregnant population, treatments for hypertension in pregnancy have remained largely unchanged over the years. There is recent evidence that a more adequate control of maternal blood pressure is achieved when the first given antihypertensive drug is able to correct the underlying hemodynamic disorder of the mother besides normalizing the blood pressure values.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control in women receiving an appropriate or inappropriate antihypertensive therapy following the baseline hemodynamic findings.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective multicenter study that included a population of women with de novo diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A noninvasive assessment of the following maternal parameters was performed on hospital admission via Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor before any antihypertensive therapy was given: cardiac output, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume. The clinician who prescribed the antihypertensive therapy was blinded to the hemodynamic evaluation and used as first-line treatment a vasodilator (nifedipine or alpha methyldopa) or a beta-blocker (labetalol) based on his preferences or on the local protocols. The first-line pharmacologic treatment was retrospectively considered hemodynamically appropriate in either of the following circumstances: (1) women with a hypodynamic profile (defined as low cardiac output [≤5 L/min] and/or high systemic vascular resistance [≥1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral nifedipine or alpha methyldopa and (2) women with a hyperdynamic profile (defined as normal or high cardiac output [>5 L/min] and/or low systemic vascular resistances [<1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral labetalol. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the occurrence of severe hypertension between women treated with a hemodynamically appropriate therapy and women treated with an inappropriate therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 152 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were included in the final analysis. Most women displayed a hypodynamic profile (114 [75.0%]) and received a hemodynamically appropriate treatment (116 [76.3%]). The occurrence of severe hypertension before delivery was significantly lower in the group receiving an appropriate therapy than in the group receiving an inappropriately treated (6.0% vs 19.4%, respectively; P=.02). Moreover, the number of women who achieved target values of blood pressure within 48 to 72 hours from the treatment start was higher in the group who received an appropriate treatment than in the group who received an inappropriate treatment (70.7% vs 50.0%, respectively; P=.02).

CONCLUSION

In pregnant individuals with de novo hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a lower occurrence of severe hypertension was observed when the first-line antihypertensive agent was tailored to the correct maternal hemodynamic profile.

Early Fetal Growth Restriction with or Without Hypertensive Disorders: a Clinical Overview

Early onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the main adverse pregnancy conditions, often associated with poor neonatal outcomes. Frequently, early onset FGR is associated with early onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and in particular preeclampsia (PE). However, to date, it is still an open question whether pregnancies complicated by early FGR plus HDP (FGR-HDP) and those complicated by early onset FGR without HDP (normotensive-FGR (n-FGR)) show different prenatal and postnatal outcomes and, consequently, should benefit from different management and long-term follow-up. Recent data support the hypothesis that the presence of PE may have an additional impact on maternal hemodynamic impairment and placental lesions, increasing the risk of poor neonatal outcomes in pregnancy affected by early onset FGR-HDP compared to pregnancy affected by early onset n-FGR. This review aims to elucidate this poor studied topic, comparing the clinical characteristics, perinatal outcomes, and potential long-term sequelae of early onset FGR-HDP and early onset n-FGR.

Associations between Maternal Nutritional Status, Hemodynamic Parameters, and Delivery Outcomes in Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Observational Study

Maternal nutritional status represents a pivotal predictor of pregnancy outcome. This prospective observational study investigates the associations between maternal characteristics and nutritional habits at term, hemodynamic parameters, and pregnancy outcomes. Healthy women with singleton uncomplicated pregnancies were enrolled at 36-41 gestational weeks. At enrollment, a nutritional score (0-10) was calculated in order to quantify maternal adherence to a healthy diet and lifestyle. Maternal hemodynamic parameters were assessed by using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM), including cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and Smith-Madigan inotropy index (SMII). Pregnancy outcomes were recorded at delivery. Associations between maternal characteristics and nutritional score, hemodynamic parameters, and pregnancy outcomes were investigated by using multi-adjusted generalized linear models. In total, 143 pregnancies were enrolled. Pregestational body mass index (BMI) was positively associated with SVR, and negatively associated with CO and SMII. Additionally, a positive association was detected between the nutritional score and SMII. Finally, CO was positively associated with birth and placental weight, while RVS showed a negative association with birth and placental weight. This study shows that maternal derangements in nutritional status and habits are associated with a compromised hemodynamic profile at term, with additional impacts on intrauterine growth.