Deubiquitinating Enzymes Orchestrate the Cancer Stem Cell-Immunosuppressive Niche Dialogue: New Perspectives and Therapeutic Potential

Uncovering global research frontiers in deubiquitinating enzymes and immunotherapy: A bibliometric study

Recently, immunotherapy has been a key therapeutic strategy for cancer. Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), which are protein-modifying enzymes, have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of cancer, autoimmune diseases, and inflammation. DUBs influence the tumor immune microenvironment by regulating immune cell functions and key signaling pathways. Thus, the potential applications of DUBs in immunotherapy have piqued the interest of the scientific community. This study performed bibliometric analysis to comprehensively examine the research hotspots and trends in this field, providing theoretical foundations and guidance for future research. Studies associated with DUBs and immunotherapy conducted over a decade (2014 to 2024) were searched and extracted from Web of Science Collection database. The analysis was performed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the Bibliometrix package in R software. Visualizations were generated for countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keyword co-occurrences. In total, 321 articles related to DUBs and immunotherapy were retrieved. The number of publications increased markedly since 2020. China had the highest number of publications, while the United States exerted the most influence in this field. Zhang Jinfang was the most influential author in this field. Zhejiang University was the institution with the highest number of publications. Nature was the most cited journal (807 total citations). Keyword analysis revealed that the primary research hotspots were expression, immunotherapy, ubiquitination, degradation, and cancer. This bibliometric analysis revealed the research trends and emerging frontiers in DUBs and immunotherapy, offering novel strategies for the application of DUBs in immunotherapy.

ASB6 as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer Progression Involves Lymphatic Invasion and Immune Infiltration

Background: ASB6, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, mediates the proteasomal degradation of its substrate proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. ASB6 has been reported to play significant roles in several biological processes, including tumor stemness and endoplasmic reticulum stress. However, the underlying role and mechanism of ASB6 in colorectal cancer, particularly its association with immune infiltration levels and its prognostic significance, remain to be fully elucidated. Methods: We identified key prognostic genes in CRC patients through LASSO-penalized Cox regression, Univariate and Multivariate Cox regression analyses. Subsequently, we comprehensively analyzed the prognostic value of hub genes and constructed a prognostic nomogram. Finally, we identified ASB6 interacting proteins through immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) and constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and performed pathway enrichment analysis to explore the potential mechanisms of ASB6. Meanwhile, we evaluated the functions of ASB6 in CRC cells through in vitro cell experiments. Results: We identified ASB6 as a hub gene in CRC. ASB6 was highly expressed in CRC, and patients with high ASB6 expression had worse Disease-Free Interval (DFI), Disease-Specific Survival (DSS), Overall Survival (OS), and Progression-Free Interval (PFI). Correlation analysis showed that ASB6 expression were positively correlated with lymph node invasion and distal metastasis. Overexpression of ASB6 enhanced the migration ability of CRC cells. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that ASB6 was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DSS in CRC. The nomogram model constructed based on multivariate analysis results had good predictive effects, with C-indexes of 0.811 and 0.934 for OS and DSS, respectively. Furthermore, analysis of immune infiltration levels showed that ASB6 expression were positively correlated with M2-type macrophage infiltration levels in CRC, and patients with high levels of both ASB6 and M2-type macrophages had a worse prognosis. Furthermore, pathway enrichment analysis of ASB6 interacting proteins identified by IP-MS suggested that ASB6 may play a crucial role through the response to unfolded protein pathway and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum pathway. Conclusions: ASB6 is significantly upregulated in CRC tissues and is a risk factor for prognosis in CRC patients. ASB6 enhances the migration ability of CRC cells. Therefore, ASB6 may be an independent prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for CRC patients.

Single-cell RNA-Seq Elucidates the Crosstalk Between Cancer Stem Cells and the Tumor Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: The challenge of systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stems from the development of drug resistance, primarily driven by the interplay between cancer stem cells (CSCs) and the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, there is a notable dearth of comprehensive research investigating the crosstalk between CSCs and stromal cells or immune cells within the TME of HCC. Methods: We procured single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) data from 16 patients diagnosed with HCC. Employing meticulous data quality control and cell annotation procedures, we delineated distinct CSCs subtypes and performed multi-omics analyses encompassing metabolic activity, cell communication, and cell trajectory. These analyses shed light on the potential molecular mechanisms governing the interaction between CSCs and the TME, while also identifying CSCs' developmental genes. By combining these developmental genes, we employed machine learning algorithms and RT-qPCR to construct and validate a prognostic risk model for HCC. Results: We successfully identified CSCs subtypes residing within malignant cells. Through meticulous enrichment analysis and assessment of metabolic activity, we discovered anomalous metabolic patterns within the CSCs microenvironment, including hypoxia and glucose deprivation. Moreover, CSCs exhibited aberrant activity in signaling pathways associated with lipid metabolism. Furthermore, our investigations into cell communication unveiled that CSCs possess the capacity to modulate stromal cells and immune cells through the secretion of MIF or MDK, consequently exerting regulatory control over the TME. Finally, through cell trajectory analysis, we found developmental genes of CSCs. Leveraging these genes, we successfully developed and validated a prognostic risk model (APCS, ADH4, FTH1, and HSPB1) with machine learning and RT-qPCR. Conclusions: By means of single-cell multi-omics analysis, this study offers valuable insights into the potential molecular mechanisms governing the interaction between CSCs and the TME, elucidating the pivotal role CSCs play within the TME. Additionally, we have successfully established a comprehensive clinical prognostic model through bulk RNA-Seq data.

Tumor microenvironment enriches the stemness features: the architectural event of therapy resistance and metastasis

Cancer divergence has many facets other than being considered a genetic term. It is a tremendous challenge to understand the metastasis and therapy response in cancer biology; however, it postulates the opportunity to explore the possible mechanism in the surrounding tumor environment. Most deadly solid malignancies are distinctly characterized by their tumor microenvironment (TME). TME consists of stromal components such as immune, inflammatory, endothelial, adipocytes, and fibroblast cells. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cancer stem-like cells are a small sub-set of the population within cancer cells believed to be a responsible player in the self-renewal, metastasis, and therapy response of cancer cells. The correlation between TME and CSCs remains an enigma in understanding the events of metastasis and therapy resistance in cancer biology. Recent evidence suggests that TME dictates the CSCs maintenance to arbitrate cancer progression and metastasis. The immune, inflammatory, endothelial, adipocyte, and fibroblast cells in the TME release growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, microRNAs, and exosomes that provide cues for the gain and maintenance of CSC features. These intricate cross-talks are fueled to evolve into aggressive, invasive, migratory phenotypes for cancer development. In this review, we have abridged the recent developments in the role of the TME factors in CSC maintenance and how these events influence the transition of tumor progression to further translate into metastasis and therapy resistance in cancer.