Inhibition of the Protein Arginine Methyltransferase PRMT5 in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma as a Novel Treatment Approach

Mechanistic Insights into CLNS1A-Mediated Chemoresistance and Tumor Progression in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

CLNS1A is a chloride channel protein and an essential component of the methylosome complex, which additionally comprises PRMT5 and MEP50. In this study, we investigated its contribution to lung cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target. Analysis of transcriptomic datasets and western blotting revealed that CLNS1A, PRMT5, and MEP50 were overexpressed in lung cancer tissues, with elevated CLNS1A expression correlating with poor patient survival. CLNS1A overexpression enhanced platinum clearance from cells, increased the IC50 values for chemotherapy, and improved cell survival. Conversely, the knockdown of CLNS1A increased drug accumulation, reduced survival, and increased sensitivity to chemotherapy. The 3W mutant, a chloride channel-defective variant with steric hindrance at key bottleneck residues, impaired chloride ion transport, thereby reducing drug resistance, migration, and anchorage-independent growth. Mechanistically, CLNS1A promotes drug efflux through its chloride channel activity and activates the FAK-SRC-RAC1 pathway to enhance motility and clonogenicity. It also facilitates PRMT5-mediated RUVBL1 methylation to support anti-apoptotic DNA damage response signaling. In vivo, CLNS1A overexpression accelerated tumor growth and reduced survival, whereas CLNS1A knockdown sensitized tumors to cisplatin, enhancing therapeutic efficacy. These findings suggest that CLNS1A is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target, and its inhibition offers a strategy to overcome drug resistance and limit the metastatic progression of lung cancer.

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibit the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 and enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 in breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo

PURPOSE

Histone methyltransferases are enzymes that selectively methylate lysine or arginine residues on both histone and non-histone proteins, categorized into lysine methyltransferases and arginine methyltransferases. Notably, EZH2 and PRMT5 are known for catalyzing trimethylation of H3 at K27 and symmetric dimethylation of H4 at R3, respectively. These methylation events are recognized as characteristic histone-repressive marks in cancer. The over expression of PRMT5 and EZH2 were reported in various cancers and recognized as a drug target. The study aims to explore the inhibitory potential of phytocompound, Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), against PRMT5 and EZH2 in the breast cancer model.

METHODS

Screening of an array of phytocompounds was conducted through a combination of in-silico and in-vitro assays. Interactions between EGCG and human PRMT5: MEP50 and EZH2 were evaluated using molecular docking. Binding efficiency was validated, by Surface Plasmon Resonance studies and inhibitory potential was accessed by in vitro methylation followed by western blots, ELISA, and cell-based assays. In-vivo efficacy of EGCG was carried on cell line derived mice xenograft model.

RESULTS

EGCG demonstrated robust interactions with PRMT5:MEP50 complex and EZH2, particularly within the SAM binding site. Surface Plasmon Resonance analysis revealed strong binding affinity in nanomolar concentrations, particularly with PRMT5-MEP50 compared to EZH2. In-vitro assays confirmed EGCG's ability to inhibit PRMT5 and EZH2, leading to a decrease in their catalytic products, namely H4R3me2s and H3K27me3, respectively. EGCG treatment induced both autophagy and apoptosis invitro. In-vivo studies demonstrated significant reductions in tumor size and the proliferation marker ki67, accompanied by a decrease in histone repressive marks.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that EGCG effectively inhibits PRMT5 and EZH2, underscoring its potential for combined therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment.

PRMT blockade induces defective DNA replication stress response and synergizes with PARP inhibition

Multiple cancers exhibit aberrant protein arginine methylation by both type I arginine methyltransferases, predominately protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) and to a lesser extent PRMT4, and by type II PRMTs, predominately PRMT5. Here, we perform targeted proteomics following inhibition of PRMT1, PRMT4, and PRMT5 across 12 cancer cell lines. We find that inhibition of type I and II PRMTs suppresses phosphorylated and total ATR in cancer cells. Loss of ATR from PRMT inhibition results in defective DNA replication stress response activation, including from PARP inhibitors. Inhibition of type I and II PRMTs is synergistic with PARP inhibition regardless of homologous recombination function, but type I PRMT inhibition is more toxic to non-malignant cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the combination of PARP and PRMT5 inhibition improves survival in both BRCA-mutant and wild-type patient-derived xenografts without toxicity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that PRMT5 inhibition may be a well-tolerated approach to sensitize tumors to PARP inhibition.

Inhibiting PRMT5 induces DNA damage and increases anti-proliferative activity of Niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, in models of breast and ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerases (PARP) provide clinical benefit to patients with breast and ovarian cancers, by compromising the DNA repair activity of cancer cells. Although these agents extend progression-free survival in many patients, responses can be short lived with many patients ultimately progressing. Identification of combination partners that increase dependence of cancer cells to the DNA repair activity of PARPs may represent a strategy to increase the utility of PARP inhibitors. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) regulates DNA damage response pathways through splicing and protein modification, and inhibitors of PRMT5 have recently entered clinical trials.

METHODS

The effect of PRMT5 inhibition on the levels of DNA damage and repair markers including γH2AX, RAD51, and 53BP1 was determined using high content immunofluorescent imaging. The anti-proliferative activity of the combination of PRMT5 and PARP inhibitors was evaluated using in vitro models of breast and ovarian cancers using both cell lines and ex vivo patient derived xenografts. Finally, the combinations of PRMT5 and PARP inhibitors were evaluated in cell line xenograft models in vivo.

RESULTS

Inhibition of PRMT5 by GSK3326595 led to increased levels of markers of DNA damage. The addition of GSK3326595 to the PARP inhibitor, niraparib, resulted in increased growth inhibition of breast and ovarian cancer cell lines and patient derived spheroids. In vivo, the combination improved the partial effects on tumor growth inhibition achieved by either single agent, producing complete tumor stasis and regression.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that inhibition of PRMT5 induced signatures of DNA damage in models of breast and ovarian cancer. Furthermore, combination with the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib, resulted in increased anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Overall, these data suggest inhibition of PRMT5 as a mechanism to broaden and enhance the clinical application of PARP inhibitors.