Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Successfully Detects Pulmonary Infectious Pathogens in Children With Hematologic Malignancy

Clinical and diagnostic values of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for infection in hematology patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis focused on systematically assessing the clinical value of mNGS for infection in hematology patients.

METHODS

We searched for studies that assessed the clinical value of mNGS for infection in hematology patients published in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI from inception to August 30, 2023. We compared the detection positive rate of pathogen for mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMTs). The diagnostic metrics, antibiotic adjustment rate and treatment effective rate were combined.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with 2325 patients were included. The positive rate of mNGS was higher than that of CMT (blood: 71.64% vs. 24.82%, P < 0.001; BALF: 89.86% vs. 20.78%, P < 0.001; mixed specimens: 82.02% vs. 28.12%, P < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 87% (95%CI: 81-91%) and 59% (95%CI: 43-72%), respectively. The reference standard/neutropenia and research type/reference standard may be sources of heterogeneity in sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The pooled antibiotic adjustment rate according to mNGS was 49.6% (95% CI: 41.8-57.4%), and the pooled effective rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 62.4-99.3%).

CONCLUSION

mNGS has high positive detection rates in hematology patients. mNGS can guide clinical antibiotic adjustments and improve prognosis, especially in China.

[Value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in children with hematological malignancies complicated with infections]

OBJECTIVES

To explore the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the pathogen identification in children with hematological malignancies complicated with infections.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data and pathogenic test results of 43 children with hematological malignancies who underwent microbial culture and mNGS due to infections in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between June 2020 and July 2022. Differences in detection rates and characteristics of pathogenic microorganisms detected by mNGS and microbial culture were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 54 specimens were examined, and the overall detection rate of pathogen by mNGS (80%, 43/54) was significantly higher than that by microbial culture (30%, 16/54) (P<0.001). The most commonly detected infection type by mNGS was viral infection, followed by fungal infection combined viral infection, while that by microbial culture was bacterial infection, followed by fungal infection. The detection rate of fungi by mNGS (33%, 18/54) was higher than that by microbial culture (6%, 3/54) (P<0.001). The detection rate of two or more pathogenic microorganisms by mNGS was higher at 48% compared to microbial culture at 9% (P<0.05). The detection rate of two or more types of pathogenic microorganisms by mNGS was also significantly higher at 33% compared to microbial culture at 2% (P<0.05). The most commonly detected bacteria and fungi by mNGS were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida tropicalis, respectively, in peripheral blood, while Streptococcus pneumoniae and Pneumocystis jirovecii were most commonly detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Treatment adjustments based on mNGS results were beneficial for 35% (15/43) of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

mNGS has a higher detection rate than microbial culture and has obvious advantages in diagnosing mixed and fungal infections, making it a useful supplementary diagnostic method to microbial culture.

Diagnostic value of a nanopore sequencing assay of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in pulmonary tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a nanopore sequencing assay of PCR products from a M. tuberculosis complex-specific region for testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples or sputum samples from suspected pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients and compare the results to results obtained for MGIT and Xpert assays.

METHODS

Cases with suspected PTB (n = 55) were diagnosed from January 2019 to December 2021 based on results of nanopore sequencing, MGIT culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF testing of BALF and sputum samples collected during hospitalization. Diagnostic accuracies of assays were compared.

RESULTS

Ultimately, data from 29 PTB patients and 26 non-PTB cases were analyzed. PTB diagnostic sensitivities of MGIT, Xpert MTB/RIF, and nanopore sequencing assays were 48.28%, 41.38%, and 75.86%, respectively, thus demonstrating that nanopore sequencing provided greater sensitivity than was provided by MGIT culture and Xpert assays (P < 0.05). PTB diagnostic specificities of the respective assays were 65.38%, 100%, and 80.77%, which corresponded with kappa coefficient (κ) values of 0.14, 0.40, and 0.56, respectively. These results indicate that nanopore sequencing provided superior overall performance as compared to Xpert and MGIT culture assays and provided significantly greater PTB diagnostic accuracy than Xpert and sensitivity comparable to that of the MGIT culture assay.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that improved detection of PTB in suspected cases was achieved using nanopore sequencing-based testing of BALF or sputum samples than was achieved using Xpert and MGIT culture-based assays, and nanopore sequencing results alone cannot be used to rule out PTB.