Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Recanalization Compared With Optimal Medical Therapy for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Impact of complete revascularization on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multi-vessel disease, including chronic total occlusion

To compare the long-term prognostic effect of complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on cardiovascular events in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients with the multi-vessel disease (MVD) compared with medical therapy (MT). We enrolled 441 patients with CTO and MVD who underwent PCI. The study population was divided into the CTO-PCI (n = 231) and the CTO-MT (n = 210) groups. Active PCI for non-CTO lesions was permitted in both groups. The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI). The primary endpoint occurred more frequently in the CTO-MT group (13.5%) than in the CTO-PCI group (4.7%; P = 0.002). However, the target vessel revascularization (TVR), as a secondary endpoint, occurred more in the CTO-PCI group (16.3% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.001). After propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, the primary endpoint was higher in the CTO-MT group (12.6%) than in the PCI group (2.3%): all-cause death (8.4% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.042) and MI (4.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.023). Moreover, TVR of the CTO lesions occurred more frequently in the CTO-PCI group (18.1% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.009). Significant improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was observed in both groups. According to the results of the subgroup analysis, CTO-PCI may be more effective in patients with diabetes, preserved LVEF (> 50%), and well-developed collateral vessels (> grade II). In this study, complete revascularization in CTO with MVD reduced the incidence of all-cause death, MI, and a composite of both over a 5 year follow-up compared to medical treatment for CTO lesions.

The Predictive Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Who Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background

There is limited research on the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients who have previously undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Additionally, the prognostic value of a novel systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in this specific patient population remains unclear.

Methods

To adjust for differences in baseline features and minimize bias, 335 pairs of patients with or without prior CABG undergone PCI were obtained after probability score matching (PSM) in a single-center cohort. The clinical characteristics were collected, and the primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACE), which included all-cause death, nonfatal MI and unplanned revascularization, were recorded during the follow-up period after discharge. The group with prior CABG were divided according to the median level of SII: Lower SII group (SII ≤ 570.10, N = 167) and higher SII group (SII ≥ 570.10, N = 168).

Results

The SII values were significantly higher in the prior CABG group than in the without prior CABG group [570.10 (444.60, 814.12) vs 519.65 (446.86, 565.84), P < 0.001, respectively]. The survival Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with prior CABG was significantly associated with a higher risk of MACE than patients without prior CABG (P = 0.016) in the long-term follow-up. As SII levels increased, the cumulative risk of MACE became significantly higher in the patients with prior CABG (P = 0.023) stratified by the median value of SII. The Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis indicated that the level of SII (hazard ratio = 2.035, 95% CI, 1.103-3.753, P = 0.023) emerged as independent predictors of MACE. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis illustrated that the HR for MACE increased with increasing SII.

Conclusion

SII is a reliable predictor of long-term cardiovascular events after PCI in CTO patients with prior CABG, suggesting that SII may be helpful in identifying high-risk patients who need more aggressive treatment and follow-up strategies.

Efficacy of revascularization in CTO patients based on hibernating myocardium therapy

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) is still uncertain, especially for patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. This study aimed to assess hibernating myocardium (HM), as determined by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET), and to compare the benefits of PCI and optimal medical therapy (OMT).

METHODS

A retrospective study collected data from 332 patients with CTO and ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. The study compared patients who underwent PCI or OMT via propensity score matching (PSM) analysis which was performed with a 1:2 matching protocol using the nearest neighbour matching algorithm. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, readmission for worsening heart failure (WHF), revascularization and myocardial infarction (MI).

RESULTS

After PSM, there were a total of 246 individuals in the PCI and OMT groups. Following Cox regression, hibernating myocardium/total perfusion defect (HM/TPD) was identified as an independent risk factor (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.008-1.052, p = .007). The cut-off value of HM/TPD was 38%. The results of the subgroup analysis suggest that for patients with HM/TPD >38%, the OMT group had a greater risk of MACE (p = .035). A sensitivity analysis restricting patients with single-vessel CTO lesions, HM/TPD remained an independent predictor (HR 1.025, 95% CI 1.008-1.043, p = .005).

CONCLUSION

HM/TPD is an independent predictor of MACE, and for patients with HM/TPD > 38%, CTO-PCI had a lower risk of MACE compared with OMT. However, further validation is still needed through large-scale studies.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a prevalent finding in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with increased mortality. Prior reports on the efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) were controversial. Following the emergence of recently published new evidence, a meta-analysis is warranted. The current meta-analysis assessed the effects of PCI compared to OMT in the treatment of CTO. Methods: A structured literature search was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions were eligible. The primary outcome was an accumulated composite of cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction and target vessel/lesion revascularization events. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting on 11260 patients were included. Of these, 5712 (50.7%) were assigned to the PCI and 5548 (49.3%) were allocated to the OMT group. The primary outcome occurred in 14.6% of the PCI and 20.1% of the OMT group (12 trials, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.88, p = 0.005, I2 = 67%). Subgrouping demonstrated a consistent reduction in the primary outcome for the PCI group in RCTs (six trials, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.05). The primary outcome reduction was irrespective of the study design, and it was replicable in sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Advantages in other outcomes were rather related to statistical pooling effects and dominated by observational data. Conclusions: CTO-PCI was associated with improved patient-oriented primary outcome compared to OMT in a study-level meta-analysis. This composite outcome effect was mainly driven by target vessel treatment, but a significant reduction in mortality and myocardial infarction was observed, irrespectively. These findings have hypothesis-generating implications. Future RCTs with adequate statistical power are eagerly awaited.

Development of a Novel Nomogram to Predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion

Objectives: To create a nomogram using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging and 18F-FDG positron emissions tomography (PET) gated myocardial metabolism imaging to forecast major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT). Methods: A total of 257 patients who received OMT between January 2016 and December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were randomly divided into development (n=179) and validation (n=78) cohorts. A thorough evaluation was conducted, encompassing clinical features and imaging analysis, which involved assessing myocardial perfusion and metabolism. Independent risk factors were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness. Results: In the development cohort, 53 patients (29.6%) experienced MACE out of 179 patients, while in the validation cohort, MACE occurred in 23 (29.5%) patients out of 78. The PET-left ventricular end-systolic volume (P-ESV) (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.003-1.017; p=0.003), hibernating myocardium / total perfusion defect (HM/TPD) (HR 1.053; 95% CI 1.038-1.069; p<0.001), PET-left ventricular ejection fraction (P-LVEF) (HR 0.862; 95% CI 0.788-0.943; p=0.001), and left anterior descending branch (LAD) (HR 2.303; 95% CI 1.086-4.884; p=0.03) were significantly associated with MACE and were used to develop the nomogram. The nomogram demonstrated excellent discrimination with C-indexes of 0.931 and 0.911 in the development and validation cohorts. DCA determined that the model exhibited a considerably superior net advantage in predicting MACE. Conclusion: A new nomogram integrating clinical factors and imaging features was created to predict the risk of MACE in patients with CTO.

Safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy (RA) versus conventional stenting in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Interventional cardiologists face challenges in managing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with conflicting results when comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) to conventional PCI. This meta-analysis aims to provide a critical evaluation of the safety and feasibility of RA in CTO lesions.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane central library until April 2023 were searched for relevant studies. MACE was our primary outcomes, other outcomes were all cause of death, cardiac death, MI, and TVR. Also, we reported angiographic outcomes as technical success, procedural success, and procedural complications in a random effect model. The pooled data was analyzed using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% CI using STATA 17 MP.

RESULTS

Seven studies comprising 5494 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.1 months were included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that RA was comparable to PCI to decrease the incidence of MACE (OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.74 to 1.3], p = 0.9). Moreover, there was no significant difference between RA and conventional PCI in terms of other clinical or angiographic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that RA had comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes as conventional PCI in CTO lesions, which offer interventional cardiologists an expanded perspective when addressing calcified lesions.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42023417362.

Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO)

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) improves clinical symptoms and quality of life. The longer-term safety of PCI compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains uncertain.

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the long-term safety of PCI for CTO in a randomised trial as compared to OMT.

METHODS

A total of 396 patients with a symptomatic CTO were enrolled into a randomised, multicentre clinical trial comparing PCI and OMT. Half of the patients had a single CTO; the others had multivessel disease. Non-CTO lesions were treated prior to randomisation (2:1 ratio). During follow-up, crossover from OMT to PCI occurred in 7.3% (1 year) and 17.5% (3 years) of patients.

RESULTS

At 3 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups (OMT 3.7% vs PCI 6.2%; p=0.29). By per-protocol analysis, the difference remained non-significant (OMT 5.7% vs PCI 4.7%; p=0.67). Overall, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were more frequent with OMT (OMT 21.2% vs PCI 11.2%), largely because of ischaemia-driven revascularisation. The rates of stroke or hospitalisation for bleeding were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 years there was no difference in the rate of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between PCI or OMT among patients with a remaining single coronary CTO. The MACE rate was higher in the OMT group due largely to ischaemia-driven revascularisation. CTO PCI appears to be a safe option for patients with a single remaining significant coronary CTO. CinicalTrials.gov: NCT01760083.

STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here.

METHODS

The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from ≈45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG.

RESULTS

The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05427370.

Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO), which occurs in 18. 4-52% of all patients referred for coronary angiography, represents one of the last barriers in coronary intervention. Approximately half of all patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), who undergo coronary angiography, are diagnosed with coronary CTO. In fact, these patients often develop recurrent symptoms and events, necessitating revascularization. Currently, there is neither a consensus nor developed guidelines for the treatment of CTO patients with prior CABG, and the prognosis of these patients remains unknown. In this review, we discuss current evidence and future perspectives on CTO revascularization in patients with prior CABG, with special emphasis on clinical and lesion characteristics, procedural success rates, periprocedural complications, and long-term outcomes.

The Comparison of Long-Term Outcome Between Patients with Single and Multiple Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

Rapid advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved the outcome of chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs); however, data regarding the difference in long-term outcomes in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with single and multiple CTOs who underwent PCI are scarce. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with multiple CTOs and single CTO after PCI.

Methods

This study cohort included stable CAD patients who were diagnosed with CTO and treated with PCI from a single center. The primary endpoint was all-cause death.

Results

We retrospectively reviewed 670 consecutive patients with CTO-PCI. Among them, 539 patients had a single CTO, and 131 (19.7%) patients had multiple (at least two) CTOs. CTO revascularization was achieved in 470 (70.1%) patients. After a median follow-up duration of 33.7 months, the cumulative all-cause mortality (p = 0.037) and cardiac mortality (p = 0.003) were higher in patients with multiple CTOs than in those with a single CTO. In the multivariable model, multiple CTOs and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% were independent predictors for cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.53; P = 0.013 and adjusted HR 3.95; P < 0.001), while age older than 65 and LVEF less than 40% were independent predictors for all-cause death in CTO-PCI patients (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.84; P = 0.035 and adjusted HR 2.54; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

In CTO-PCI patients, long-term survival was associated with multiple CTOs, age and LVEF, but not with CTO revascularization.

Predictors of Adverse Events Among Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Undergoing Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Medical Therapy

Objective

Limited data are available on the predictors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after a successful coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy. This study aimed to identify predictors of MACE in CTO patients undergoing successful recanalization and medical therapy.

Methods

A total of 2015 patients with CTOs were enrolled. About 718 patients underwent successful CTO recanalization, and 1297 patients received medical therapy. The primary outcome was the frequency of MACE, defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization. Multivariate models were used to determine predictors of MACE.

Results

In successful CTO recanalization group, MACE occurred in 123 (17.1%) patients. In multivariate analysis, heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–3.04, p = 0.036) was identified as independent predictors for MACE in successful CTO recanalization. Additionally, in medical therapy group, the significant predictors of MACE were male gender (HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.13–2.05, p = 0.005), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.11–1.74, p = 0.003), heart failure (HR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10–1.87, p = 0.007), J-CTO score (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07–1.28, p = 0.001) and multivessel disease (HR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.42–3.39, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Heart failure was predictor for composite cardiovascular events in patients with CTO after successful recanalization. Male gender, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, J-CTO score and multivessel disease were predictors of MACE in CTO patients with medical therapy.