Association of IL1R1 Coding Variant With Plasma-Level Soluble ST2 and Risk of Aortic Dissection

Association of gene polymorphism in ERG rs2836411 with anemia and susceptibility to aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The erythroblast transformation-specific related gene (ERG) is expressed in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and endothelial cells. This study aimed to investigate if ERG rs2836411 is a novel genetic locus associated with anemia and aortic dissection (AD).

METHOD

A case-control trial was conducted to evaluate the association between ERG rs2836411 polymorphism, anemia, and AD risk. The ERG rs2836411 polymorphism was analyzed using Sanger dideoxy chain termination sequencing on genomic DNA extracted from whole blood. Serum erythropoietin (EPO) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

119 preoperative AD patients and 119 healthy controls were enrolled, with age and sex matched. Anemia was found independently associated with AD presence (Odds ratio (OR) 20.82, p < 0.001). Remarkably, T carriers (CT + TT) of ERG rs2836411 were associated with anemia in AD patients (OR 2.81, p = 0.013) but not in controls. After adjusting for conventional risk factors including age, sex, smoking and hypertension status, T carriers (CT + TT) were independently associated with AD presence (OR 2.20, p = 0.015), but were not associated if anemia was further adjusted. While EPO concentration was higher in AD patients and was associated with AD presence (OR 1.09, p = 0.006), no difference in EPO levels was observed between the ERG genotypes of AD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

T carriers (CT + TT) of ERG rs2836411 are independently associated with anemia and AD presence. The association between ERG rs2836411 polymorphism and susceptibility to AD may be mediated by anemia. Further studies are warranted to validate whether this association is causal.

Analysis of Inflammation-Related Genes in Patients with Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease. Pathophysiologically, it has been shown that aortic wall inflammation promotes the occurrence and development of aortic dissection. Thus, the aim of the current research was to determine the inflammation-related biomarkers in AD. Methods: In this study, we conducted differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis using the GSE153434 dataset containing 10 type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and 10 normal samples downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The intersection of DEGs and inflammation-related genes was identified as differential expressed inflammation-related genes (DEIRGs). Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were performed for DEIRGs. We then constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database and identified hub genes using the Cytoscape plugin MCODE. Finally, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used to construct a diagnostic model. Results: A total of 1728 DEGs were identified between the TAAD and normal samples. Thereafter, 61 DEIRGs are obtained by taking the intersection of DEGs and inflammation-related genes. The GO indicated that DEIRGs were mainly enriched in response to lipopolysaccharide, in response to molecules of bacterial origin, secretory granule membrane, external side of plasma, receptor ligand activity, and signaling receptor activator activity. KEGG analysis indicated that DEIRGs were mainly enriched in cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF signaling pathway, and proteoglycans in cancer. We identified MYC, SELL, HIF1A, EDN1, SERPINE1, CCL20, IL1R1, NOD2, TLR2, CD69, PLAUR, MMP14, and HBEGF as hub genes using the MCODE plug-in. The ROC indicated these genes had a good diagnostic performance for TAAD. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study identified 13 hub genes in the TAAD. This study will be of significance for the future development of a preventive therapy of TAAD.

Interleukin-38 suppresses abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in mice by regulating macrophages in an IL1RL2-p38 pathway-dependent manner

Macrophages play crucial roles in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) formation through the inflammatory response and extracellular matrix degradation; therefore, regulating macrophages may suppress AAA formation. Interleukin-38 (IL-38) is a member of the IL-1 family, which binds to IL-36 receptor (IL1RL2) and has an anti-inflammation effect. Because macrophages express IL1RL2, we hypothesized that IL-38 suppresses AAA formation by controlling macrophages. We assessed a C57BL6/J mouse angiotensin II-induced AAA model with or without IL-38 treatment. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured with tumor necrosis factor-α and treated with or without IL-38. Because p38 has important roles in inflammation, we assessed p38 phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo. To clarify whether the IL-38 effect depends on the p38 pathway, we used SB203580 to inhibit p38 phosphorylation. IL1RL2+ macrophage accumulation along with matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and -9 expression was observed in mouse AAA. IL-38 reduced the incidence of AAA formation along with reduced M1 macrophage accumulation and MMP-2 and -9 expression in the AAA wall. Macrophage activities including inducible nitric oxide, MMP-2, and MMP-9 production and spindle-shaped changes were significantly suppressed by IL-38. Furthermore, we revealed that inhibition of p38 phosphorylation diminished the effects of IL-38 on regulating macrophages to reduce AAA incidence, indicating the protective effects of IL-38 depend on the p38 pathway. IL-38 plays protective roles against AAA formation through regulation of macrophage accumulation in the aortic wall and modulating the inflammatory phenotype. Using IL-38 may be a novel therapy for AAA patients.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a growing public health burden, with mortality and rehospitalization rates comparable to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The evidence for the clinical usefulness of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) in HFpEF is contradictory. Therefore, we conducted the following systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum sST2 in HFpEF.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched exhaustively from their inception until March 15, 2022. In diagnostic analysis, we compared the diagnostic value of serum sST2 in HFpEF to NT pro-BNP. We separately pooled the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in prognostic analysis.

Results

A total of 16 publications from 2008 to 2021 were examined. The results of this analysis were as follow: Firstly, compared with NT pro-BNP, sST2 obtains poor diagnostic performance in independently identifying HFpEF from healthy controls, hypertensive patients, and HFrEF patient. Nevertheless, it may provide incremental value to other biomarkers for diagnosing HFpEF and deserves further investigation. Secondly, log sST2 was independently associated with adverse endpoints on multivariable analysis after adjusting for variables such as age, sex, race, and NYHA class. Per log unit rise in sST2, there was a 2.76-fold increased risk of all-cause death [HR:2.76; 95% CI (1.24, 6.16); p = 0.516, I² = 0%; P = 0.013] and a 6.52-fold increased risk in the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization [HR:6.52; 95% CI (2.34, 18.19); p = 0.985, I² = 0%; P = 0.000]. Finally, the optimal threshold levels of serum sST2 need further determined.

Conclusions

Higher sST2 was strongly linked to an increased risk of adverse outcomes in HFpEE. Especially, log sST2 independently predicted all-cause death and the composite endpoint of all-cause death and HF hospitalization. However, prospective and multicenter studies with large-sample and extended follow-up periods are required to validate our results due to limitations in our research.