Efficacy of computed tomography in diagnosing pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for detecting pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: a narrative review

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is highly prevalent in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Widely available noninvasive screening tools are warranted to identify patients at risk for PH, especially severe PH, that could be managed at expert centres. This review summarises current evidence on noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for the timely detection of PH in patients with ILD. It critically evaluates these approaches and discusses future perspectives in the field. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed and Scopus, identifying 39 articles that fulfilled inclusion criteria. There is currently no single noninvasive test capable of accurately detecting and diagnosing PH in ILD patients. Estimated right ventricular pressure (RVSP) on Doppler echocardiography remains the single most predictive factor of PH, with other indirect echocardiographic markers increasing its diagnostic accuracy. However, RVSP can be difficult to estimate in patients due to suboptimal views from extensive lung disease. The majority of existing composite scores, including variables obtained from chest computed tomography, pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise tests, were derived from retrospective studies, whilst lacking validation in external cohorts. Only two available scores, one based on a stepwise echocardiographic approach and the other on functional parameters, predicted the presence of PH with sufficient accuracy and used a validation cohort. Although several methodological limitations prohibit their generalisability, their use may help physicians to detect PH earlier. Further research on the potential of artificial intelligence may guide a more tailored approach, for timely PH diagnosis.

Scoping review of post-TB pulmonary vascular disease: Proceedings from the 2nd International Post-Tuberculosis Symposium

Tuberculosis (TB) may cause significant long-term cardiorespiratory complications, of which pulmonary vascular disease is most under-recognized. TB is rarely listed as a cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in most PH guidelines, yet PH may develop at various stages in the time course of TB, from active infection through to the post-TB period. Predisposing risk factors for the development of PH are likely multifactorial, involving active TB disease and post-TB lung disease (PTLD), host-related and environment-related factors. Moreover, post-TB PH should likely be classified in Group 3 PH, with the pathogenesis similarly complex and multifactorial as other Group 3 PH causes. Identifying risk factors that predispose to post-TB PH may aid in developing risk stratification criteria for early identification and referral for confirmatory diagnostic tests. Given that universal screening for PH in TB survivors may be impractical and unfeasible, a targeted screening approach for high-risk individuals would be sensible. In this scoping review of post-TB PH, resulting from the proceedings of the 2nd International Post-Tuberculosis Symposium, we aim to describe the epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology of post-TB PH. We emphasize diagnosing PH with an alternative set of diagnostic guidelines in resource-constrained settings where right heart catheterization may not be feasible. Research to describe the burden and distribution of post-TB PH should be prioritized as there is a current gap in knowledge regarding the prevalence and incidence of post-TB PH among persons with TB.

Sarcoidosis-Associated Pulmonary Hypertension

Sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH) is a very severe complication of the disease, largely impacting its morbidity and being one of its strongest predictors of mortality. With the recent modifications of the hemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension (mean arterial pulmonary pressure >20 instead of <25 mmHg,) its prevalence is presently not precisely known, but it affects from 3 to 20% of sarcoid patients; mostly, although not exclusively, those with an advanced, fibrotic pulmonary disease. Its gold-standard diagnostic tool remains right heart catheterization (RHC). The decision to perform it relies on an expert decision after a non-invasive work-up, in which echocardiography remains the screening tool of choice. The mechanisms underlying SAPH, very often entangled, are crucial to define, as appropriate and personalized therapeutic strategies will aim at targeting the most significant ones. There are no recommendations so far as to the indications and modalities of the medical treatment of SAPH, which is based upon the opinion of a multidisciplinary team of sarcoidosis, pulmonary hypertension and sometimes lung transplant experts.

Unmasking a Silent Threat: Improving Pulmonary Hypertension Screening Methods for Interstitial Lung Disease Patients

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the diagnostics and treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Heightened suspicion for PH arises when the advancement of dyspnoea in ILD patients diverges from the expected pattern of decline in pulmonary function parameters. The complexity of PH associated with ILD (PH-ILD) diagnostics is emphasized by the limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in the ILD population, necessitating the exploration of alternative diagnostic approaches. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges as a promising tool, offering insights into hemodynamic parameters and providing valuable prognostic information. The potential of biomarkers, alongside pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary exercise tests, is explored for enhanced diagnostic and prognostic precision. While specific treatments for PH-ILD remain limited, recent studies on inhaled treprostinil provide new hope for improved patient outcomes.

Comparison of cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography of the updated and old diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background

In the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines, the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary hypertension (PH) included a reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 20 mmHg (mPAP >20 mmHg). This study aimed to reassess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) to optimize the timely diagnosis of patients with suspected PH.

Methods

Patients with suspected CTEPH who underwent CTPA and right heart catheterization (RHC) between January 2019 and December 2022 in China-Japan Friendship Hospital were retrospectively included. They were grouped into CTEPH and non-PH groups according to the new and old criteria (2022 and 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines) for the diagnosis of PH. Cardiovascular metrics including the main pulmonary artery diameter (MPAd), Cobb angle, and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVWT), among others, were measured. The correlation of these metrics with hemodynamic data was analyzed with Spearman rank correlation analysis, while the differences in cardiovascular metrics between the updated (mPAP >20 mmHg) and old PH criteria (mPAP ≥25 mmHg) were compared with independent samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney test. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for the prediction model.

Results

The study enrolled 180 patients (males n=86; age 55.5±12.0 years old). According to the old guidelines, 119 patients were placed into the PH group (mPAP ≥25 mmHg) , while according to the new guidelines, 130 patients were placed into the PH group (mPAP >20 mmHg). Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA between the updated and old guidelines were comparable (P>0.05). Compared to other metrics, an MPAd of 30.4 mm exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC: 0.934±0.021), with a sensitivity of 0.88 and specificity of 0.90. MPAd [odds ratio (OR) =1.271], transverse diameter of the right ventricle (RVtd; OR =1.176), Cobb angle (OR =1.108), and RVWT (OR =3.655) were independent factors for diagnosing CTEPH (P<0.05). Cobb angle, right and left ventricular transverse diameter ratio, and right and left ventricular area ratio moderately correlated with mPAP (r=0.586, r=0.583, r=0.629) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (r=0.613, r=0.593, r=0.642).

Conclusions

Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA were comparable between the new and old guidelines for CTEPH diagnosis. Cardiovascular metrics on CTPA can noninvasively assess the hemodynamics of patients with CTEPH.

The Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Up to 1% of the world population and 10% of all persons over age 65 suffer from pulmonary hypertension (PH). The latency from the first symptom to the diagnosis is more than one year on average, and more than three years in 20% of patients. 40% seek help from more than four different physicians until their condition is finally diagnosed.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search on pulmonary hypertension.

RESULTS

The most common causes of pulmonary hypertension are left heart diseases and lung diseases. Its cardinal symptom is exertional dyspnea that worsens as the disease progresses. Additional symptoms of right heart failure are seen in advanced stages. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are rare, difficult to diagnose, and of particular clinical relevance because specific treatments are available. For this reason, strategies for the early detection of PAH and CTEPH have been developed. The clinical suspicion of PH arises in a patient who has nonspecific symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, and an abnormal (NT-pro-)BNP concentration. Once the suspicion of PH has been confirmed by echocardiography and, if necessary, differential-diagnostic evaluation with a cardiopulmonary stress test, and after the exclusion of a primary left heart disease or lung disease, the patient should be referred to a PH center for further diagnostic assessment, classification, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

If both the (NT-pro-)BNP and the ECG are normal, PH is unlikely. Knowledge of the characteristic clinical manifestations and test results of PH is needed so that patients can be properly selected for referral to specialists and experts in PH.

Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension - re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE

To re-assess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) under the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational study retrospectively included 272 patients (female 143, mean age = 54.9 ± 12.5 years old) with suspected PH. 218 patients were grouped to evaluate cardiovascular metrics on CTPA and develop a binary logistic regression model. The other 54 patients were grouped into the validation group to assess the performance of the prediction model under the updated criteria. Based on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), patients were divided into three groups: group A consisted of patients with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg, group B included patients with 20 mmHg < mPAP < 25 mmHg, and group C comprised patients with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Cardiovascular metrics among the three groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to evaluate the performance of cardiovascular metrics in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg.

RESULTS

The main pulmonary arterial diameter (MPAd), MPAd/ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPAd/AAd ratio), and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVFWT) showed significant differences among the three groups (p < 0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of MPAd was larger than MPAd/AAd ratio and RVFWT. A MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 90.4%. The AUC of the binary logistic regression model (Z =  - 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was 0.938 ± 0.018. In the validation group, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.878, 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Under the updated criteria, MPAd with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting PH. The binary logistic regression model may improve the diagnostic accuracy.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Under the updated criteria, the main pulmonary arterial diameter with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting pulmonary hypertension. The binary logistic regression model may improve diagnostic accuracy.

KEY POINTS

• According to 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, a MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg • A binary logistic regression model (Z = - 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was developed and had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9% in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. • A binary logistic regression prediction model outperforms MPAd in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg.