Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in children and young people with primary hypertension: Meta-analysis and meta-regression

Cognitive performance in children and adolescents with primary hypertension and the role of body mass

Objective

Primary hypertension has been shown to affect cognitive functions in adults but evidence in the pediatric population remain scarce and equivocal. We aimed to compare cognitive functioning between children diagnosed with primary hypertension and normotensive controls, with a focus on the role of different blood pressure (BP) parameters and body mass.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study of children and adolescents (6-17 years old) with primary hypertension and age- and sex-matched normotensive controls. All participants underwent office BP, ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and central BP measurements using an oscillometric device. Neurocognitive assessment consisted of evaluation of (i) intelligence quotient (IQ), (ii) categorical and phonemic fluency, (iii) verbal memory (verbal-logical story recall), and (iv) non-verbal computerized cognitive assessment.

Results

The study included a total of 59 patients with primary hypertension (14 ± 3 years) and 37 normotensive controls (14 ± 3 years). Participants in the primary hypertension group had a significantly higher body mass index z-score (BMIz: 2.1 ± 1.4 vs. 0.7 ± 0.9, p < 0.001), and 85% received antihypertensive therapy. Participants with primary hypertension showed worse performance in the domains of reaction speed, attention and processing speed, visual memory, new learning, and phonemic fluency. After adjusting for BMIz, only the differences in the reaction speed tasks remained significant. None of the BP parameters was associated with cognitive outcomes after adjustment for age, sex, and BMIz. BMIz associated with tasks of visual memory, new learning, spatial planning, and working memory, independent of age and sex.

Conclusion

Children and adolescents diagnosed with primary hypertension exhibit worse performance in the cognitive domains of reaction speed, attention, processing speed, visual memory, and new learning. These differences to healthy controls can be partially attributed to accompanying increase of body mass.

The Importance of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement, as Highlighted by the Correlation with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in an Untreated Hypertensive Population

Background and Objectives: Hypertensive heart disease, especially left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), is considered to be one of the main types hypertension-mediated organ damage. Hence, the purpose of this study was to examine which method of measuring BP (office BP measurement (OBPM), 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), or home BP monitoring (HBPM)), can be better correlated with echocardiographic LVH in the untreated hypertensive population. Materials and Methods: This study's population consisted of 202 patients 58 ± 15 years old (40.8% males). All patients reported elevated home BP measurements for at least 3 months, but they had never been treated before for hypertension. Office and out-of-office BP measurements, including ABPM on a usual working day and seven-day HBPM, as well as 2D echocardiography, were performed. Results: In the univariate analysis, LVH was associated (p < 0.05) with a mean 24 h systolic BP (OR: 1.93, CI: 1.29-2.91), a mean 24 h diastolic BP (OR: 1.30, CI: 1.16-1.80), ambulatory daytime systolic (OR: 1.11, CI:1.01-1.82) and diastolic BP (OR: 1.13, CI:1.09-1.17), ambulatory nighttime systolic BP (OR: 2.11, CI: 1.04-4.31), and mean home systolic BP (OR: 1.05, CI:1.01-1.12). Pearson's correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the LV mass index and the mean 24 h systolic BP (r = 0.58, p < 0.05), daytime systolic BP (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.57, p < 0.05). Most of the population with confirmed LVH presented confirmed hypertension (based on ABPM, 48.1% or HBPM, 40%). The second most dominant phenotype was masked hypertension (ABPM, 32.7% and HBPM, 23.7%). The majority (59.3%) had non-dipping status, 20.4% had a reverse dipping pattern, 13% had a dipping pattern, and only 7.3% had extreme dipping BP. Conclusions: Out-of-office BP measurement devices seemed to be superior compared to in-office. This advantage is highlighted by better correlations in the identification of LVH as well as the diagnosis of masked hypertension, a condition also highly correlated with LVH.