Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection techniques across diverse ecosystems: a mini-review of promising new tools for eDNA metabarcoding

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has significantly transformed the way biodiversity assessment and monitoring are conducted in many environments. This review study synthesizes findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive overview of eDNA collection strategies in diverse settings. The review examines the techniques used for sampling eDNA in water, air, soil, sediment, and coral reef ecosystems. Water filtration, sediment sampling, and passive sampling devices are commonly used methods for collecting eDNA in aquatic environments. These techniques provide non-invasive ways to identify and track aquatic organisms, offering vital information about the interactions within the community and the global distribution of species. Similarly, the use of airborne eDNA sampling techniques is becoming increasingly promising for evaluating biodiversity on land, although there is room for improvement. Soil eDNA extraction techniques involve the use of soil coring to collect samples, followed by DNA extraction from these samples, and the application of metabarcoding methods. These techniques allow for thorough investigations of biodiversity in the soil. Specialized techniques for collecting eDNA are required for coral reef ecosystems due to their intricate habitat structure and fluctuating water conditions. The importance of choosing appropriate techniques for eDNA collection based on ecosystem parameters and research objectives is emphasized by comparative analysis. This mini-review consolidates knowledge from a selected body of recent studies and serves as a helpful resource for scholars and practitioners involved in biodiversity monitoring and conservation across diverse ecosystems.

Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION Sequencer as a Novel Short Amplicon Metabarcoding Tool Using Arthropod Mock Sample and Irish Bat Diet Characterisation

Biodiversity monitoring using metabarcoding is now widely used as a routine environmental management tool. However, despite the rapid advancement of third-generation high-throughput sequencing platforms, there are limited studies assessing the most suitable tools and approaches for environmental metabarcoding studies. We tested the utility of Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION sequencing for short-read amplicon sequencing of mitochondrial COI mini-barcodes from a known composition of arthropod species and compared its performance with more commonly used Illumina NovaSeq sequencing. The mock arthropod species assemblage allowed us to optimise a bioinformatic filtering pipeline to identify arthropod species using MinION long reads. Using this pipeline, we identified host species and diet composition by sequencing droppings collected from five individual Irish brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus) roosts. We showed that MinION data provided a similar taxonomic assignment to NovaSeq but only if the reference species barcode database was accurate and comprehensive. The P. auritus diet inferred was as expected based on previous morphological and Illumina metabarcoding studies. We showed that less sequencing depth, but a higher number of biological samples were necessary for complete species composition detection by MinION. A relatively simple bioinformatic filtering tool such as NanoPipe could adequately retrieve both host species and diet composition. The biggest standing challenge was the reference database format transferability and comprehensiveness. This pipeline can be used to guide future metabarcoding studies using nanopore sequencing to minimise the cost and effort while optimising results.

Robot-Aided Measurement of Insect Diversity on Vegetation Using Environmental DNA

Traditional methods of biodiversity monitoring are often logistically challenging, time-consuming, require experienced experts on species identification, and sometimes include destruction of the targeted specimens. Here, we investigated a non-invasive approach of combining the use of drones and environmental DNA (eDNA) to monitor insect biodiversity on vegetation. We aimed to assess the efficiency of this novel method in capturing insect diversity and comparing insect composition across different vegetation types (grassland, shrub and forest) in Switzerland. A commercial, off-the-shelf drone was equipped with a specialised probe that autonomously swabbed vegetation and collected eDNA. Then, samples were processed using rapid third-generation Oxford Nanopore sequencing. The obtained data were analysed for insect diversity, comparing taxonomic richness, evenness and community composition across the three habitat types using statistical techniques. Sequencing of the samples yielded 76 hexapod taxa, revealing an insect community with notable differences in taxonomic richness but not in evenness across grassland, shrub and forest habitats. Our study demonstrates the potential of drone-based sampling integrated with eDNA and nanopore sequencing for biodiversity monitoring, offering a non-destructive method for detecting insect occurrence on plant surfaces. Integrating robotics and eDNA technology provides a promising solution for fast, large-scale, non-invasive biodiversity monitoring, potentially improving conservation efforts and ecosystem management.

Cas9-based enrichment for targeted long-read metabarcoding

Metabarcoding is a valuable tool for characterizing the communities that underpin the functioning of ecosystems. However, current methods often rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification for enrichment of marker genes. PCR can introduce significant biases that affect quantification and is typically restricted to one target loci at a time, limiting the diversity that can be captured in a single reaction. Here, we address these issues by using Cas9 to enrich marker genes for long-read nanopore sequencing directly from a DNA sample, removing the need for PCR. We show that this approach can effectively isolate a 4.5 kb region covering partial 18S and 28S rRNA genes and the ITS region in a mixed nematode community, and further adapt our approach for characterizing a diverse microbial community. We demonstrate the ability for Cas9-based enrichment to support multiplexed targeting of several different DNA regions simultaneously, enabling optimal marker gene selection for different clades of interest within a sample. We also find a strong correlation between input DNA concentrations and output read proportions for mixed-species samples, demonstrating the ability for quantification of relative species abundance. This study lays a foundation for targeted long-read sequencing to more fully capture the diversity of organisms present in complex environments.

Genus Bithynia: morphological classification to molecular identification

Snails of the genus Bithynia, whose primary habitat is slow-flowing ponds and ditches, serve as the first intermediate hosts of liver fluke. Currently, approximately 200 million individuals worldwide are at risk of liver fluke infection, yet questions still persist regarding the taxonomic identification of Bithynia genus, a crucial player in the transmission of this disease. Accurate taxonomic classification of the Bithynia genus could significantly enhance current understanding of the disease's transmission mechanisms. In this article we comprehensively review the extensive research conducted on Bithynia genus, spanning past inquiries up to the latest findings. The primary emphasis is placed on exploring the taxonomic identification of this genus within various technological settings. We then present a consolidated analysis of the morphological taxonomic identification methods, highlighting their strengths and limitations. We also introduce a novel perspective on the future direction of identification and classification efforts for the members of this genus, emphasizing the crucial role Bithynia plays in the epidemiological cycle of liver fluke transmission. We conclude by urging researchers to prioritize the significance of the members of this genus in the epidemiological cycle of liver fluke transmission and in control measures for disease dissemination, within the context of the vector organisms.

Environmental DNA: The next chapter

Molecular tools are an indispensable part of ecology and biodiversity sciences and implemented across all biomes. About a decade ago, the use and implementation of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect biodiversity signals extracted from environmental samples opened new avenues of research. Initial eDNA research focused on understanding population dynamics of target species. Its scope thereafter broadened, uncovering previously unrecorded biodiversity via metabarcoding in both well-studied and understudied ecosystems across all taxonomic groups. The application of eDNA rapidly became an established part of biodiversity research, and a research field by its own. Here, we revisit key expectations made in a land-mark special issue on eDNA in Molecular Ecology in 2012 to frame the development in six key areas: (1) sample collection, (2) primer development, (3) biomonitoring, (4) quantification, (5) behaviour of DNA in the environment and (6) reference database development. We pinpoint the success of eDNA, yet also discuss shortfalls and expectations not met, highlighting areas of research priority and identify the unexpected developments. In parallel, our retrospective couples a screening of the peer-reviewed literature with a survey of eDNA users including academics, end-users and commercial providers, in which we address the priority areas to focus research efforts to advance the field of eDNA. With the rapid and ever-increasing pace of new technical advances, the future of eDNA looks bright, yet successful applications and best practices must become more interdisciplinary to reach its full potential. Our retrospect gives the tools and expectations towards concretely moving the field forward.

Arthropod diversity in the alpine tundra using metabarcoding: Spatial and temporal differences in alpha- and beta-diversity

All ecosystems face ecological challenges in this century. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly important to understand the ecology and degree of local adaptation of functionally important Arctic-alpine biomes by looking at the most diverse taxon of metazoans: the Arthropoda. This is the first study to utilize metabarcoding in the Alpine tundra, providing insights into the effects of micro-environmental parameters on alpha- and beta-diversity of arthropods in such unique environments. To characterize arthropod diversity, pitfall traps were set at three middle-alpine sampling sites in the Scandinavian mountain range in Norway during the snow-free season in 2015. A metabarcoding approach was then used to determine the small-scale biodiversity patterns of arthropods in the Alpine tundra. All DNA was extracted directly from the preservative EtOH from 27 pitfall traps. In order to identify the controlling environmental conditions, all sampling locations were equipped with automatic data loggers for permanent measurement of the microenvironmental conditions. The variables measured were: air temperature [°C] at 15 cm height, soil temperature [°C] at 15 cm depth, and soil moisture [vol.%] at 15 cm depth. A total of 233 Arthropoda OTUs were identified. The number of unique OTUs found per sampling location (ridge, south-facing slope, and depression) was generally higher than the OTUs shared between the sampling locations, demonstrating that niche features greatly impact arthropod community structure. Our findings emphasize the fine-scale heterogeneity of arctic-alpine ecosystems and provide evidence for trait-based and niche-driven adaptation. The spatial and temporal differences in arthropod diversity were best explained by soil moisture and soil temperature at the respective locations. Furthermore, our results show that arthropod diversity is underestimated in alpine-tundra ecosystems using classical approaches and highlight the importance of integrating long-term functional environmental data and modern taxonomic techniques into biodiversity research to expand our ecological understanding of fine- and meso-scale biogeographical patterns.

Environmental DNA Isolation, Validation, and Preservation Methods

Environmental DNA (eDNA) workflows contain many familiar molecular-lab techniques, but also employ several unique methodologies. When working with eDNA, it is essential to avoid contamination from the point of collection through preservation and select a meaningful negative control. As eDNA can be obtained from a variety of samples and habitats (e.g., soil, water, air, or tissue), protocols will vary depending on usage. Samples may require additional steps to dilute, block, or remove inhibitors or physically break up samples or filters. Thereafter, standard DNA isolation techniques (kit-based or phenol:chloroform:isoamyl [PCI]) are employed. Once DNA is extracted, it is typically quantified using a fluorometer. Yields vary greatly, but are important to know prior to amplification of the gene(s) of interest. Long-term storage of both the sampled material and the extracted DNA is encouraged, as it provides a backup for spilled/contaminated samples, lost data, reanalysis, and future studies using newer technology. Storage in a freezer is often ideal; however, some storage buffers (e.g., Longmires) require that filters or swabs are kept at room temperature to prevent precipitation of buffer-related solutes. These baseline methods for eDNA isolation, validation, and preservation are detailed in this protocol chapter. In addition, we outline a cost-effective, homebrew extraction protocol optimized to extract eDNA.

An Environmental DNA Primer for Microbial and Restoration Ecology

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sequencing-DNA collected from the environment from living cells or shed DNA-was first developed for working with microbes and has greatly benefitted microbial ecologists for decades since. These tools have only become increasingly powerful with the advent of metabarcoding and metagenomics. Most new studies that examine diverse assemblages of bacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, and viruses lean heavily into eDNA using these newer technologies, as the necessary sequencing technology and bioinformatic tools have become increasingly affordable and user friendly. However, eDNA methods are rapidly evolving, and sometimes it can feel overwhelming to simply keep up with the basics. In this review, we provide a starting point for microbial ecologists who are new to DNA-based methods by detailing the eDNA methods that are most pertinent, including study design, sample collection and storage, selecting the right sequencing technology, lab protocols, equipment, and a few bioinformatic tools. Furthermore, we focus on how eDNA work can benefit restoration and what modifications are needed when working in this subfield.

Future of DNA-based insect monitoring

Insects are crucial for ecosystem health but climate change and pesticide use are driving massive insect decline. To mitigate this loss, we need new and effective monitoring techniques. Over the past decade there has been a shift to DNA-based techniques. We describe key emerging techniques for sample collection. We suggest that the selection of tools should be broadened, and that DNA-based insect monitoring data need to be integrated more rapidly into policymaking. We argue that there are four key areas for advancement, including the generation of more complete DNA barcode databases to interpret molecular data, standardisation of molecular methods, scaling up of monitoring efforts, and integrating molecular tools with other technologies that allow continuous, passive monitoring based on images and/or laser imaging, detection, and ranging (LIDAR).

Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring

The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) is revolutionizing the monitoring of biodiversity as it allows to assess organismic diversity at large scale and unprecedented taxonomic detail. However, eDNA consists of an extracellular and intracellular fraction, each characterized by particular properties that determine the retrievable information on when and where organisms live or have been living. Here, we review the fractions of eDNA, describe how to obtain them from environmental samples and present a four-scenario concept that aims at enhancing spatial and temporal resolution of eDNA-based monitoring. Importantly, we highlight how the appropriate choice of eDNA fractions precludes misinterpretation of eDNA-based biodiversity data. Finally, future avenues of research towards eDNA fraction-specific analyses are outlined to unravel the full potential of eDNA-based studies targeting micro- and macro-organisms.

Comparison of destructive and non-destructive DNA extraction methods for the metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples

DNA metabarcoding is routinely used for biodiversity assessment, especially targeting highly diverse groups for which limited taxonomic expertise is available. Various protocols are currently in use, although standardization is key to its application in large-scale monitoring. DNA metabarcoding of arthropod bulk samples can be either conducted destructively from sample tissue, or non-destructively from sample fixative or lysis buffer. Non-destructive methods are highly desirable for the preservation of sample integrity but have yet to be experimentally evaluated in detail. Here, we compare diversity estimates from 14 size sorted Malaise trap samples processed consecutively with three non-destructive approaches (one using fixative ethanol and two using lysis buffers) and one destructive approach (using homogenized tissue). Extraction from commercial lysis buffer yielded comparable species richness and high overlap in species composition to the ground tissue extracts. A significantly divergent community was detected from preservative ethanol-based DNA extraction. No consistent trend in species richness was found with increasing incubation time in lysis buffer. These results indicate that non-destructive DNA extraction from incubation in lysis buffer could provide a comparable alternative to destructive approaches with the added advantage of preserving the specimens for post-metabarcoding taxonomic work but at a higher cost per sample.

Metabarcoding the Antarctic Peninsula biodiversity using a multi-gene approach

Marine sediment communities are major contributors to biogeochemical cycling and benthic ecosystem functioning, but they are poorly described, particularly in remote regions such as Antarctica. We analysed patterns and drivers of diversity in metazoan and prokaryotic benthic communities of the Antarctic Peninsula with metabarcoding approaches. Our results show that the combined use of mitochondrial Cox1, and 16S and 18S rRNA gene regions recovered more phyla, from metazoan to non-metazoan groups, and allowed correlation of possible interactions between kingdoms. This higher level of detection revealed dominance by the arthropods and not nematodes in the Antarctic benthos and further eukaryotic diversity was dominated by benthic protists: the world's largest reservoir of marine diversity. The bacterial family Woeseiaceae was described for the first time in Antarctic sediments. Almost 50% of bacteria and 70% metazoan taxa were unique to each sampled site (high alpha diversity) and harboured unique features for local adaptation (niche-driven). The main abiotic drivers measured, shaping community structure were sediment organic matter, water content and mud. Biotic factors included the nematodes and the highly abundant bacterial fraction, placing protists as a possible bridge for between kingdom interactions. Meiofauna are proposed as sentinels for identifying anthropogenic-induced changes in Antarctic marine sediments.