Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Infection: Non Nova Sed Nove

Magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of deep venous thrombosis of 338 discharged viral pneumonia patients

Background

Viral pneumonia (VP) often leads to the development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in hospitalized patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of DVT in discharged patients with VP, and whether new and old DVT differ in transverse relaxation time.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study in Wuhan, China, 338 consecutive discharged VP patients from February 2021 to March 2023 who underwent T2 weighted Sampling Perfection with Application Optimized Contrast Evolution (SPACE) were recruited to detect DVT. T2 mapping and T2* mapping were performed for the patients with DVT detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The minimum, maximum, mean of T2 time and T2* time of DVT were recorded as T2min, T2max, T2mean, T2*min, T2*max, and T2*mean, respectively. Clinical data and laboratory findings were compared between new and old DVT cases, which were defined based on the examination results before and after discharge. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare transverse relaxation time parameters between new and old DVT.

Results

Twelve percent of VP patients (40/338) developed new DVT after discharge. Thirty-three out of 104 DVTs did not resolve after discharge. Compared with patients with new DVT, patients with old DVT were older (67 vs. 59 years, P=0.003); and had a higher proportion of bedridden time >72 hours (72.7% vs. 37.0%, P<0.001). Patients with old DVT had a lower lymphocyte count (0.67×109/L vs. 0.97×109/L, P=0.01), higher C-reactive protein (59 vs. 35 mg/L, P=0.019), and higher levels of D-dimer (6.7 vs. 0.9 µg/mL, P<0.001) than patients with new DVT. Patients with old DVT received more invasive mechanical ventilation (30.3% vs. 7.4%, P<0.001) and had a higher proportion of acute respiratory distress syndrome (75.8% vs. 51.9%, P<0.001), and a higher proportion of cardiac injury (39.4% vs. 14.8%, P=0.033) than patients with new DVT. T2min, T2max, T2mean, and T2*max of new DVT were significantly greater than old DVT (17.6±10.4 vs. 13.2±5.9 ms, 94.9±44.9 vs. 42.3±23.6 ms, 46.8±24.0 vs. 25.0±12.6 ms, 22.5±12.4 vs. 10.7±3.5 ms, P<0.05 for all). There was no significant difference in T2*min or T2*mean between new and old DVT (3.2±0.4 vs. 3.1±0.4 ms, 8.2±4.9 vs. 5.5±1.5 ms, P>0.05 for both).

Conclusions

T2 weighted SPACE magnetic resonance (MR) is valuable in the follow-up of thrombosis of discharged VP patients. T2 mapping distinguishes between new and old DVT.

Effect of vitamin D3 on antiphospholipid antibodies in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a single oral dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 on antiphospholipid antibodies in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc, exploratory analysis from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial performed in two centers in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to receive either vitamin D3 (n = 97) or placebo (n = 97). In this post-hoc analysis, the endpoints were titers and frequency of anti-β2-Glycoprotein-I (aβ2-GP) and Anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies [Immunoglobulin G, M and A (IgG, IgM and IgA)].

RESULTS

Overall mean (SD) age was 55.3 (13.9) years, Body Mass Index (BMI) was 32.2 (7.1 kg/m2), and 106 participants (54.6 %) were male. There was a significant group by time interaction (p = 0.046) for frequency of aCL IgG, with increased values from baseline to discharge in the placebo group [n (%), from 13 (13.4) to 25 (25.8)] compared to the vitamin D3 [from 25 (25.8) to 29 (29.9)]. However, the frequency of aCL IgG did not change between the groups on discharge. No significant differences between vitamin D3 and placebo groups were found for any other autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

These findings do not support the use of a single oral dose of 200,000 IU of vitamin D3 to modulate autoantibodies in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic

Thrombosis is one of the many signs of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and COVID-19 infection. Although the mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in APS and COVID-19 are relatively similar, this remains an open subject. Even now (when the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided), there is no conclusive solution to APS and COVID-19 co-occurrence. The presence of newly generated antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in COVID-19 infection may or may not be connected to the diagnosis of APS. The prevalence of aPLs is substantial in severe COVID-19 but not related to thrombosis or a worse outcome. Adequate monitoring of antibody positivity over time is recommended for APL diagnosis. On the other hand, thrombosis and thrombocytopenia can rarely occur with vaccination with mRNA vaccines. Some studies have shown that COVID-19 immunization is well tolerated among APS patients who are triple-positive for aPL, which may comfort patients and referring physicians and lessen hesitation in unvaccinated APS/aPL-positive patients. In this narrative review, we will give an overview of the interaction between aPL-APS-COVID-19-thrombosis and related diagnostic insights learned during the pandemic.

Antiphospholipid antibody-related hepatic vasculitis in a juvenile after non-severe COVID-19: a case report and literature review

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are both laboratory evidence and causative factors for a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), with thrombotic and obstetric events being the most prevalent. Despite the aPL-triggered vasculopathy nature of APS, vasculitic-like manifestations rarely exist in APS and mainly appear associated with other concurrent connective tissue diseases like systemic lupus erythematous. Several studies have characterized pulmonary capillaritis related to pathogenic aPL, suggesting vasculitis as a potential associated non-thrombotic manifestation. Here, we describe a 15-year-old girl who develops hepatic infarction in the presence of highly positive aPL, temporally related to prior non-severe COVID-19 infection. aPL-related hepatic vasculitis, which has not been reported before, contributes to liver ischemic necrosis. Immunosuppression therapy brings about favorable outcomes. Our case together with retrieved literature provides supportive evidence for aPL-related vasculitis, extending the spectrum of vascular changes raised by pathogenic aPL. Differentiation between thrombotic and vasculitic forms of vascular lesions is essential for appropriate therapeutic decision to include additional immunosuppression therapy. We also perform a systematic review to characterize the prevalence and clinical features of new-onset APS and APS relapses after COVID-19 for the first time, indicating the pathogenicity of aPL in a subset of COVID-19 patients.

Are Antiphospholipid Antibodies a Surrogate Risk Factor for Thrombosis in Sepsis?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulable state caused by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS clinically manifests with arterial or venous or microvascular thrombi and/or pregnancy complications. It is well-known that the development of aPL can be a transient phenomenon and thus the current diagnostic criterion for APS requires repeat laboratory testing several weeks apart before a definitive diagnosis is made. However, transient presence of aPL may also be pathogenic. In this article, we attempt to give historical and clinical evidence for the importance of these antibodies, even when transient, and call for further research into mechanisms by which these antibodies may promote thrombosis and pregnancy morbidities.

Ischemic Stroke with Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Bloom Syndrome: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

Bloom syndrome is a chromosomal breakage disorder associated with immune deficiency, characterized by short stature, predisposition to early-onset cancer, and immune defects. Currently, there have been no reports of acute cerebral infarction in patients with Bloom syndrome. Here, we report a case of Bloom syndrome complicated by elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 23-year-old male with a known genetic diagnosis of Bloom syndrome was admitted to the Respiratory Department due to pulmonary aspergillosis. The patient experienced sudden dizziness, and subsequent cranial MRI revealed a newly developed infarction in the right cerebellar hemisphere.

RESULTS

Six days later, the patient presented with sudden right visual field loss, and a repeat cranial MRI showed new infarctions in the left occipital and temporal lobes. Positive lupus anticoagulant and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time suggested elevated antiphospholipid antibodies causing thrombus formation. Unfortunately, anticoagulant treatment was not administered due to recurrent hemoptysis.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the first case of a Bloom syndrome patient with elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction, suggesting that the immune and coagulation abnormalities caused by Bloom syndrome may contribute to the development of acute cerebral infarction.

Antiphospholipid Antibodies Occurrence in Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection without Overt Thrombosis

We sought to determine the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and their correlation with COVID-19 severity (in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters) in patients without thrombotic events during the early phase of infection. This was a cross-sectional study with the inclusion of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from a single department during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-May 2021). Previous known immune disease or thrombophilia along with long-term anticoagulation and patients with overt arterial or venous thrombosis during SARS-CoV-2 infection were excluded. In all cases, data on four criteria for aPL were collected, namely lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgM and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), as well as IgG anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI). One hundred and seventy-nine COVID-19 patients were included, with a mean age of 59.6 (14.5) years and a sex ratio of 0.8 male: female. LA was positive in 41.9%, while it was strongly positive in 4.5%; aCL IgM was found in 9.5%, aCL IgG in 4.5%, and aβ2GPI IgG in 1.7% of the sera tested. Clinical correlation: LA was more frequently expressed in severe COVID-19 cases than in moderate or mild cases (p = 0.027). Laboratory correlation: In univariate analysis, LA levels were correlated with D-dimer (p = 0.016), aPTT (p = 0.001), ferritin (p = 0.012), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.027), lymphocyte (p = 0.040), and platelet (p < 0.001) counts. However, in the multivariate analysis, only the CRP levels correlated with LA positivity: OR (95% CI) 1.008 (1.001-1.016), p = 0.042. LA was the most common aPL identified in the acute phase of COVID-19 and was correlated with infection severity in patients without overt thrombosis.

Decreased protein C activity, lower ADAMTS13 antigen and free protein S levels accompanied by unchanged thrombin generation potential in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is associated with an increased thromboembolic risk. However, the mechanisms triggering clot formation in those patients remain unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 118 adult Caucasian severe but non-critically ill COVID-19 patients (median age 58 years; 73 % men) and 46 controls, we analyzed in vitro plasma thrombin generation profile (calibrated automated thrombogram [CAT assay]) and investigated thrombophilia-related factors, such as protein C and antithrombin activity, free protein S level, presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and factor V Leiden R506Q and prothrombin G20210A mutations. We also measured circulating von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) antigen and activity. In patients, blood samples were collected on admission to the hospital before starting any therapy, including heparin. Finally, we examined the relationship between observed alterations and disease follow-up, such as thromboembolic complications.

RESULTS

COVID-19 patients showed 17 % lower protein C activity, 22 % decreased free protein S levels, and a higher prevalence of positive results for IgM anticardiolipin antibodies. They also had 151 % increased vWF, and 27 % decreased ADAMTS13 antigens compared with controls (p < 0.001, all). On the contrary, thrombin generation potential was similar to controls. In the follow-up, pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in thirteen (11 %) patients. They were characterized by a 55 % elevated D-dimer (p = 0.04) and 2.7-fold higher troponin I (p = 0.002) during hospitalization and 29 % shorter time to thrombin peak in CAT assay (p = 0.009) compared to patients without PE.

CONCLUSIONS

In COVID-19, we documented prothrombotic abnormalities of peripheral blood. PE was characterized by more dynamic thrombin generation growth in CAT assay performed on admittance to the hospital.

COVID-19 and the antiphospholipid syndrome

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in a global pandemic. Most COVID-19 patients are asymptomatic or have flu-like symptoms. However, around 15% of the patients may have severe disease, including unilateral or bilateral pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome and progressive hypoxemia that may require mechanical ventilation assistance. A systemic inflammatory response syndrome occurs in the most severe forms of COVID-19, with multiorgan involvement which can be life threatening caused by a cytokine storm. Although what best characterizes COVID-19 are the manifestations of the respiratory system, it has been shown that it also acts at the cardiovascular level, producing coagulation abnormalities, which causes thrombotic events mainly in the arteries/arterioles, microcirculation and venous system, and potentially increased mortality risk. This multiorgan vascular disease overlaps with other known microangiopathies, such as thrombotic microangiopathy or paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, where complement overactivation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of thrombosis. Furthermore, coagulopathy secondary to COVID-19 occurs in the context of an uncontrolled inflammatory response, reminiscent of APS, especially in its catastrophic form. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the relationship between COVID-19 and the APS.

Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia in COVID-19 and after COVID-19 vaccination

Thrombosis that occurs in coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a serious complication and a critical aspect of pathogenesis in the disease progression. Although thrombocytopenia is uncommon in the initial presentation, it may also reflect disease severity due to the ability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to activate platelets. This occurs directly through the spike protein-angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) interaction and indirectly by coagulation and inflammation activation. Dysregulation in both innate and adaptive immune systems is another critical factor that causes thrombosis and thrombocytopenia in COVID-19. Vaccination is the most potent and effective tool to mitigate COVID-19; however, rare side effects, namely vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)/thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) can occur following adenovirus-vectored vaccine administration. VITT/TTS is rare, and thrombocytopenia can be the clue to detect this serious complication. It is important to consider that thrombocytopenia and/or thromboembolism are not events limited to post-vaccination with vectored vaccine, but are also seen rarely after vaccination with other vaccines. Various conditions mimic VITT/TTS, and it is vital to achieving the correct diagnosis at an earlier stage. Antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody detection by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is used for diagnosing VITT/TTS. However, false-positive rates also occur in vaccinated people, who do not show any thrombosis or thrombocytopenia. Vaccinated people with messenger RNA vaccine can show positive but low density and non-functional in terms of platelet aggregation, it is vital to check the optical density. If anti-PF4 ELISA is not available, discriminating other conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, systemic lupus erythematosus, and hemophagocytic syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is critical when the patients show thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after COVID-19 vaccination.

Antigens and Antibodies of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome as New Allies in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Coagulopathy

High prevalence of both criteria and extra-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) has been reported in COVID-19 patients. However, the differences in aPL prevalence decreased when an age-matched control group was included. The association of aPL with thrombotic events in COVID-19 is very heterogeneous. This could be influenced by the fact that most of the studies carried out were conducted on small populations enriched with elderly patients in which aPL was measured only at a single point and they were performed with non-standardized assays. The few studies that confirmed aPL in a second measurement showed that aPL levels hardly changed, with the exception of the lupus anticoagulant that commonly reduced. COVID-19 coagulopathy is an aPL-independent phenomenon closely associated with the onset of the disease. Thrombosis occurs later in patients with aPL presence, which is likely an additional prothrombotic factor. B2-glycoprotein deficiency (mainly aPL antigen caused both by low production and consumption) is very common during the SARS-CoV2 infection and has been associated with a greater predisposition to COVID-19 complications. This could be a new prothrombotic mechanism that may be caused by the blockage of its physiological functions, the anticoagulant state being the most important.

B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New insight into altered B cell distribution including newly identified subsets and abnormalities in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as well as their role in immune protection are summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

SLE carries characteristic B cell abnormalities, which offer new insights into B cell differentiation and their disturbances including discoveries of pathogenic B cell subsets and intrinsic B cell abnormalities. A recent study in SLE found that antigen-experienced B cell subsets lacking expression of CD27 and IgD defined by their lack of CXCR5 and CD19low expression are expanded in SLE and represent plasmablasts likely escaping proper selection. In terms of therapeutic targeting with broader coverage than rituximab, second-generation anti-CD20, anti-CD38 and CD19-CART treatment experiences have advanced our understanding recently. However, the key role of qualitative and quantitative B cell requirements in connection with T cells became apparent during SARS-Cov2 infection and vaccination, especially in patients with gradual B cell impairments by rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide.

SUMMARY

Identification and characterization relevant B cell subsets together with altered regulatory mechanisms in SLE facilitates new approaches in targeting pathogenic B cells but require consideration of preservation of protection.

Not all that is 'full house' is systemic lupus erythematosus: a case of membranous nephropathy due to syphilis infection

We describe an unusual case of membranous nephropathy precipitated by syphilis infection in a patient without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A previously healthy 20-year-old man presented with leg and facial swelling. Laboratory investigation revealed nephrotic range proteinuria, acute kidney injury, hypocomplementaemia and a highly positive rapid plasma reagin. Kidney biopsy showed membranous nephropathy with 'full-house' immunofluorescence (IgG, IgA, IgM, C1q and C3), mimicking lupus nephritis class Vb. However, the patient had no features of SLE and had negative antinuclear and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. He was treated with high-dose methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil for lupus nephritis and with penicillin for syphilis. After 2 months of therapy, his proteinuria resolved, and his renal function and C4 level normalised. This case illustrates that syphilis infection can be a mimicker of lupus nephritis. A literature review suggests that ful-house nephropathy may occur independently of lupus nephritis and may or may not develop into SLE.