Association of smoking status with non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

Revisiting variation in the somatic mutation landscape of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is driven by a diverse array of somatic mutations. The vast majority of literature on NSCLC is based on targeted assays or small sample sizes, limiting the ability to provide a comprehensive view of NSCLC mutation profiles. Here, we analyzed genome-wide screen data (including whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing) from 1,874 NSCLC subjects to identify molecular subtypes and putative driver genes and to explore the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on somatic mutation profiles. We showed that genome-wide screen data support existing knowledge, such as the TP53:KRAS mutation co-occurrence pattern as a key distinctive feature, but do not reveal additional broad molecular subtypes. In contrast, we demonstrated that low-frequency molecular subtypes or potential driver genes continue to be identified. Using driver gene identification algorithms, we found 50 potential driver genes including ANG, CDK10, CTDSP2, HOXA5, RBP4, and SPHK2, which show evidence of positive selection in NSCLC. Finally, we provided insights into the intrinsic and extrinsic covariates associated with the NSCLC somatic mutation landscape, while confirming associations with ethnicity (TP53 and EGFR), NSCLC subtype (14 genes including KRAS, NFE2L2, and STK11), and smoking history (KRAS, CSMD3, and TP53), we dismissed gene-level associations with sex when other covariates are controlled for. The results presented here represent a concise up-to-date summary of variation in the somatic mutation landscape and carry importance for NSCLC geneticists, medical practitioners, and drug discovery scientists.

Decoding the Clinical and Molecular Signatures of EGFR Common, Compound, and Uncommon Mutations in NSCLC: A Brief Report

INTRODUCTION

EGFR mutations are key oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), predominantly affecting Asian, nonsmoking, and female populations. Although common mutations, such as exon 19 deletions and L858R, respond well to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), uncommon EGFR mutations and compound variants exhibit variable treatment responses. This study aims to compare clinical characteristics and molecular profiles of patients with common, uncommon, and compound EGFR mutations, assessing their implications for therapy outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed a multi-cohort genomic dataset of 19,163 patients with LUAD (5,212 with EGFR mutations), categorizing mutations into common, uncommon, and compound classes. Patient demographics, mutational signatures, and tumor microenvironment factors were assessed, with particular attention to smoking status and concomitant alterations in KRAS and TP53. Treatment outcomes were analyzed by time under treatment as a surrogate measure of TKI efficacy.

RESULTS

Uncommon EGFR mutations, comprising 8.9% of EGFR-altered cases, were significantly more frequent among smokers and associated with tobacco-related mutational signatures. Compared with common EGFR-mutant cases, tumors harboring uncommon EGFR mutations reported higher rates of EGFR amplifications, KRAS, and TP53 mutations. Uncommon mutations also exhibited higher tumor mutational burden and distinct transcriptional profiles linked to cell cycle activity. Median time on treatment with TKIs was notably shorter in patients with uncommon mutations (4.1 mo) than those with common and compound mutations (10.9 mo and 12.4 mo, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the clinical and molecular heterogeneity of EGFR mutation classes in LUAD, highlighting the unique profile of uncommon mutations, particularly their association with smoking and co-mutations in KRAS and TP53. Comprehensive molecular testing, including next-generation sequencing, is crucial to identify these uncommon mutations and inform therapeutic decisions. Further investigation into the role of immunotherapy in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations is warranted given the tobacco-related molecular signatures and high tumor mutational burden associated with this subgroup.

Unraveling Survival Determinants in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Taiwan. It is often associated with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, with common mutations accounting for approximately 85% of all EGFR-related cases. However, the remaining 15% are caused by uncommon mutations in EGFR, mainly insertions in exon 20 (about 4%). The response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can vary markedly with exon 20 insertions. However, few prior large-scale studies have examined patients with these EGFR mutations.

METHODS

This study combines the databases of several large hospitals in Taiwan to analyze the effects and clinical significance of rare EGFR mutations on responses to EGFR-TKIs, considering the changes in medication.

RESULTS

This study enrolled 38 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and EGFR exon 20 insertions. It assessed the correlations of various predictors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). It showed that among those with EGFR exon 20 insertions, the median PFS was 5.15 months, and OS reached 13 months. The median PFS was 5.4 months for afatinib, 5.7 months for chemotherapy, and 4.3 months for first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR-TKIs may be considered as an alternative treatment option for patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions in cases where the currently recommended therapies, such as chemotherapy with or without amivantamab, are either unavailable or intolerable. The potential use of afatinib for specific patients in this context depends on the precise characteristics of their mutation and remains to be determined.

Immunotherapy and PD-L1 Tumor Expression in Moroccan Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Various Metastasis

INRODUCTION

The question of whether tumor expression of PD-L1 and the presence of distant metastasis could influence the efficacy of immunotherapy represents a major challenge and needs to be further elucidated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive significance of tumor expression of PD-L1 as well as the number and site of metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among Moroccan patients treated with immunotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2019 and February 2023, we recruited Moroccan patients with metastatic NSCLC. All were treated with immunotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess PD-L1 (clone 22C3) and ALK (clone D5F3) status. EGFR status was established by qPCR. Tumor PD-L1 expression was classified into 2 levels: TPS <1% (negative expression) and TPS ≥1% (positive expression). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V.21 software.

RESULTS

The median age of patients (N=40) was 67 years (39- 92 years) and the sex ratio was 9. Disease dissemination revealed that 22.5% (N=9) of patients had a metastatic burden ≥ 3 (MB≥3). As for the sites of metastasis, the results showed that 20% (N=8), 10% (N=4), 42.5% (N=17), 22.5% (N=9), 27.5% (N=11), 45% (N=18) and 27.5% (N=11) of patients had developed lymph node, liver, bone, brain, pleural, contralateral lung and adrenal metastasis respectively. Positive PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS = 17.19 vs. 28.85 months, p=0.01). High metastatic burden (MB ≥ 3) was associated with lower objective response rate (ORR), shorter progression-free survival (PFS), and reduced OS, respectively (ORR = 0 vs. 58.06%, p=0.002; PFS = 10.23 vs. 25.27 months, p=0.001; and OS = 11.60 vs. 27.91 months, p=0.003). Only the presence of osseous metastasis was significantly associated with lower ORR, shorter PFS, and OS compared to other metastatic locations (ORR = 5.88 vs. 73.9%, p=0.000; PFS = 10.72 vs. 31.33 months, p=0.000; and OS = 11.39 vs. 36.17 months, p=0.000). Finally, the presence of hepatic metastasis was significantly associated with shorter PFS (10.75 months) compared to those without hepatic metastasis (22.53 months) (p=0.046). Finally, the results of the multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of bone metastasis was strongly correlated with a significant decrease in progression-free survival (p=0.001) as well as overall survival (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that tumor expression of PD-L1 and metastatic burden should play a significant role in predicting the response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, it is important to note that the presence of osseous and hepatic metastasis could negatively influence the clinical outcomes of immunotherapy.

Targeted therapeutic options in early and metastatic NSCLC-overview

The complex therapeutic strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed significantly in recent years. Disease-free survival increased significantly with immunotherapy and chemotherapy registered in perioperative treatments, as well as adjuvant registered immunotherapy and targeted therapy (osimertinib) in case of EGFR mutation. In oncogenic-addictive metastatic NSCLC, primarily in adenocarcinoma, the range of targeted therapies is expanding, with which the expected overall survival increases significantly, measured in years. By 2021, the FDA and EMA have approved targeted agents to inhibit EGFR activating mutations, T790 M resistance mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET fusion. In 2022, the range of authorized target therapies was expanded. With therapies that inhibit KRASG12C, EGFR exon 20, HER2 and MET. Until now, there was no registered targeted therapy for the KRAS mutations, which affect 30% of adenocarcinomas. Thus, the greatest expectation surrounded the inhibition of the KRAS G12C mutation, which occurs in ∼15% of NSCLC, mainly in smokers and is characterized by a poor prognosis. Sotorasib and adagrasib are approved as second-line agents after at least one prior course of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Adagrasib in first-line combination with pembrolizumab immunotherapy proved more beneficial, especially in patients with high expression of PD-L1. In EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation of lung adenocarcinoma, amivantanab was registered for progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. Lung adenocarcinoma carries an EGFR exon 20, HER2 insertion mutation in 2%, for which the first targeted therapy is trastuzumab deruxtecan, in patients already treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Two orally administered selective c-MET inhibitors, capmatinib and tepotinib, were also approved after chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma carrying MET exon 14 skipping mutations of about 3%. Incorporating reflex testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) expands personalized therapies by identifying guideline-recommended molecular alterations.

Association between cigarette smoking history, metabolic phenotypes, and EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Cigarette smoking exerts a significant impact on metabolic phenotypes and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status; however, their correlation remains insufficiently established. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between cigarette smoking history, metabolic phenotypes, and EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 198 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before treatment and were tested for EGFR mutation status between September 2019 and March 2022. Metabolic phenotypes, including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumors (pSUVmax), metastatic lymph nodes (nSUVmax), and distant metastases (mSUVmax) were assessed. Patients were classified into never-smokers and smokers based on detailed smoking history. The correlations between smoking status, metabolic parameters, and EGFR mutation status were evaluated in patients with NSCLC.

Results

We observed EGFR mutations in 73 (60.3%) of 121 never-smokers and 18 (23.4%) of 77 smokers (P<0.001). EGFR-mutant NSCLC had a lower pSUVmax than that of EGFR wild-type (WT; 8.9±4.5 vs. 12.7±6.9, P<0.001). Smokers had a higher pSUVmax than never-smokers (12.5±6.4 vs. 9.9±5.9, P=0.004). With the increase of cumulative smoking dose, the pSUVmax increased significantly (r=0.198, P=0.005). There was no significant difference between nSUVmax and mSUVmax in patients with or without EGFR mutation and smoking history. Cumulative smoking dose, pSUVmax, and their combination predicted EGFR mutation status with areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) 0.688, 0.673, and 0.753, respectively.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that cigarette smoking may be one of the triggers for increased pSUVmax and decreased EGFR mutations, further suggesting that EGFR mutations are associated with low pSUVmax, which may guide clinicians in risk stratification and treatment strategy selection for patients with NSCLC.

Afatinib overcoming resistance to icotinib and osimertinib in NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with acquired EGFR L858R/T790M or L858R/S768I mutations: Two case reports

Background

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often complicated by leptomeningeal metastases (LMs), especially in patients carrying EGFR mutations. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line drug for patients with specific gene mutations, such as EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation. However, after long-term TKI use, patients eventually develop drug resistance and acquire new mutations. Acquiring the EGFR T790 M mutation during TKI treatment is a marker for first/second generation TKI resistance. Osimertinib (a third-generation TKI) could overcome this resistance, especially for patients who have already developed NSCLC-LM. Treating NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance is challenging. Our aim was to investigate whether afatinib is effective in NSCLC-LM patient who showed resistance to osimertinib. Herein, we report two patients with resistance to first- and third-generation TKIs who benefited from second-generation TKI.

Case summary

Case one: A 43-year-old man was diagnosed with stage 3A NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion. He underwent surgery and received 4 rounds of chemotherapy (oxaliplatin combined with liposomal paclitaxel), after which the disease was controlled by icotinib (a first-generation TKI) for 4 years. Then, he showed poor drug response and bone metastasis. A liquid biopsy was carried out, and the EGFR L858R/T790 M compound mutation was found. The patient was given osimertinib (a third-generation TKI). The patient was in a stable condition for 2 years and then he developed bilateral peripheral facial palsy. Brain MRI showed enhancement in the left temporal lobe and meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology detected tumour cells in the CSF. NSCLC-LM was diagnosed. His performance status (PS) score was 3-4. Liquid biopsy and next-generation sequencing were performed again. Different gene mutations and copy number alterations were found this time, including EGFR L858R, but without the EGFR T790 M mutation. His disease was controlled with intrathecal methotrexate and oral afatinib (a second generation TKI). The patient has shown clinical remission (PS score: 1-2) until now, which is longer than 10 months.

Case two

A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with NSCLC in May 2020. He underwent one round of chemotherapy before thoracoscopic partial lobectomy of the right upper lung. Histological study of the lung tissue showed lung adenocarcinoma with the EGFR L858R mutation. Then, the disease was controlled with icotinib. One year later, he was diagnosed with NSCLC-LM. Liquid biopsy and sequencing showed an EGFR L858R/S768I compound mutation. The patient was treated with osimertinib. His condition was stable for 5 months before his central nervous system (CNS) symptoms were exacerbated. Liquid biopsy and sequencing were carried out again, and his gene mutation profile had not changed much. Then, the patient was given afatinib, and his condition has remained stable for 11 months.

Conclusion

Afatinib might be suitable for NSCLC-LM patients with EGFR compound mutations who show resistance to icotinib and osimertinib, since it might help overcome first- and third-generation TKI resistance.

A Functional Genomics Review of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers

There is currently a dearth of information regarding lung cancer in never smokers (LCINS). Additionally, there is a difference in somatic mutations, tumour mutational burden, and chromosomal aberrations between smokers and never smokers (NS), insinuating a different disease entity in LCINS. A better understanding of actionable driver alterations prevalent in LCINS and the genomic landscape will contribute to identifying new molecular targets of relevance for NS that will drastically improve outcomes. Differences in treatment outcomes between NS and smokers, as well as sexes, with NSCLC suggest unique tumour characteristics. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase mutations and echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) gene rearrangements are more common in NS and have been associated with chemotherapy resistance. Moreover, NS are less likely to benefit from immune mediators including PD-L1. Unravelling the genomic and epigenomic underpinnings of LCINS will aid in the development of not only novel targeted therapies but also more refined approaches. This review encompasses driver genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of LCINS and a deeper exploration of the genomic landscape and tumour microenvironment. We highlight the dire need to define the genetic and environmental aspects entailing the development of lung cancer in NS.

Genetic differences between smokers and never-smokers with lung cancer

Smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer, therefore lung cancer epidemiological trends reflect the past trends of cigarette smoking to a great extent. The geographic patterns in mortality closely follow those in incidence. Although lung cancer is strongly associated with cigarette smoking, only about 15% of smokers get lung cancer, and also some never-smokers develop this malignancy. Although less frequent, lung cancer in never smokers is the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths in both sexes worldwide. Lung cancer in smokers and never-smokers differs in many aspects: in histological types, environmental factors representing a risk, and in genes associated with this disease. In this review, we will focus on the genetic differences between lung cancer in smokers versus never-smokers: gene expression, germ-line polymorphisms, gene mutations, as well as ethnic and gender differences. Finally, treatment options for smokers and never-smokers will be briefly reviewed.