Study on the Retreatment, Outcome, and Potential Predictors of Recurrence in Patients With Recurrence of Hepatitis B After Functional Cure

Predicting relapse after achieving a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) using baseline HBsAg and end-of-treatment HBsAb levels

Among the factors influencing relapse after clinical cure of chronic hepatitis B(CHB). There is no standardization of baseline HBsAg levels and end-of-treatment HBsAb levels. This multicenter, retrospective study enrolled 136 patients who achieved functional cure from June 2019 to December 2023, and a total of 48 weeks of follow-up was conducted after treatment cessation according to the CHB guidelines. Baseline characteristics of patients were analyzed using univariates. Multifactorial logistic regression was used to analyze the different levels of HBsAg at baseline and HBsAb at the end of treatment in CHB recurrence. The working characteristic curve of the subject was constructed and observed by the column line graphical prediction model. Our data showed the cumulative recurrence rate using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. At baseline, the level of HBsAg was significantly greater in the group with recurrence than in the group without recurrence (P = 0.038). At EOT, HBsAb levels were lower in the relapsed group than in the nonrelapsed group (P = 0.014). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a baseline serum HBsAg concentration ≥ 100 IU/mL was a risk factor for recurrence, and an EOT serum HBsAb concentration ≥ 500 mIU/mL was a protective factor for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed relapse rates of 3.8% and 12.2% for HBsAg ≤ 100 IU/mL at baseline and HBsAb ≥ 500 mIU/mL at the end of treatment, respectively. Functionally cured patients with CHB when baseline HBsAg ≤ 100 IU/mL and HBsAb ≥ 500 mIU/mL at the end of treatment have a low relapse rate.

Discussion on the duration of response following HBsAg clearance in patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with PegIFNα-2b

Aim

Functional cure strategies based on interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are gaining increasing attention among clinicians. However, studies investigating the duration of response after achieving HBsAg clearance with interferon treatment are limited. This study aims to explore the patterns of sustained response following HBsAg clearance in patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (PegIFNα-2b) through long-term follow-up, providing guidance for clinical practice.

Methods

We collected data from CHB patients who achieved HBsAg clearance and were treated with either PegIFNα-2b monotherapy or in combination with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) at Tianjin Third Central Hospital from January 2018 to May 2024. Regular follow-up assessments were conducted to observe the dynamic changes in HBsAg, HBV DNA, and liver function during the follow-up period. We recorded the time to HBsAg reversion (defined as HBsAg ≥ 0.05 IU/mL), analyzed the patterns of HBsAg reversion, and investigated the optimal time points for evaluating sustained HBsAg clearance.

Results

A total of 173 patients with CHB or compensated hepatitis B cirrhosis were included. The mean age was 41.5 ± 9.0 years, with 16.19% of patients having compensated cirrhosis. The median follow-up duration was 89.3 weeks (range: 18.6 to 289.1 weeks). HBsAg reversion occurred in 26 patients, yielding a reversion rate of 15.03% (26/173). Among these 26 patients, 50% (13/26) experienced reversion within 24 weeks, and 80.77% within 48 weeks; thereafter, the number of reversions gradually decreased. At 48 weeks post-treatment cessation, the HBsAg sustained response rate was 95.45%, stabilizing at 100% after 120 weeks. Among patients with regular follow-ups, virtually none experienced reversion beyond 72 weeks. At the time of HBsAg reversion, all 26 patients exhibited normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels, with a median HBsAg level of 0.70 IU/mL (range: 0.05 to 8.13 IU/mL), and only one patient showing low-level positive HBV DNA (117 IU/mL). No adverse events, including liver failure, decompensation, or hepatocellular carcinoma, occurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

Patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with PegIFNα-2b demonstrated favorable long-term persistence of HBsAg clearance. However, there remains a risk of HBsAg reversion after treatment cessation, predominantly within the first 48 weeks. HBsAg sustained response (HSR) at 48 weeks post-treatment is a critical follow-up time point for CHB patients post-HBsAg clearance, with HSR at 72 weeks potentially representing an ideal follow-up timeframe, while HSR at 120 weeks may serve as a marker for extended follow-up.

Nucleos(t)ide analogs continuation is not associated with a lower risk of HBsAg seroreversion following PEG-IFN-induced HBsAg loss

BACKGROUND/AIMS

It is unclear whether nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) continuation provides clinical benefits following HBsAg seroclearance with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-based therapy. This study aims to investigate the role of NUCs continuation in HBsAg seroreversion.

METHODS

Patients who experienced serum HBsAg loss after PEG-IFN-based therapy were enrolled and followed up for 96 weeks. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using a 1:1 ratio to adjust for the associated factors. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors associated with HBsAg seroreversion.

RESULTS

In total, 220 patients with HBsAg seroclearance were divided into NUCs (n = 54) and non-NUCs (n = 166) consolidation therapy groups. At week 96, the HBsAg seroreversion (12/54 vs. 31/166, P = 0.709) and virological relapse (2/54 vs. 10/166, P = 0.759) rates were similar in the NUCs and non-NUCs groups. After PSM, HBsAg seroreversion (12/53 vs. 13/53; P = 1.000) and virological relapse (2/53 vs. 4/53; P = 0.674) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Serum hepatitis B surface antibody titer (odds ratio, 0.388; 95% confidence interval, 0.245-0.616; P < 0.001) was found to be associated with HBsAg seroreversion, while NUCs continuation was not related to HBsAg seroreversion.

CONCLUSIONS

NUCs continuation is not associated with a lower risk of HBsAg seroreversion in patients with serum HBsAg loss following PEG-IFN-based therapy.

Update on the treatment navigation for functional cure of chronic hepatitis B: Expert consensus 2.0

As new evidence emerges, treatment strategies toward the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B are evolving. In 2019, a panel of national hepatologists published a Consensus Statement on the functional cure of chronic hepatitis B. Currently, an international group of hepatologists has been assembled to evaluate research since the publication of the original consensus, and to collaboratively develop the updated statements. The 2.0 Consensus was aimed to update the original consensus with the latest available studies, and provide a comprehensive overview of the current relevant scientific literatures regarding functional cure of hepatitis B, with a particular focus on issues that are not yet fully clarified. These cover the definition of functional cure of hepatitis B, its mechanisms and barriers, the effective strategies and treatment roadmap to achieve this endpoint, in particular new surrogate biomarkers used to measure efficacy or to predict response, and the appropriate approach to pursuing a functional cure in special populations, the development of emerging antivirals and immunomodulators with potential for curing hepatitis B. The statements are primarily intended to offer international guidance for clinicians in their practice to enhance the functional cure rate of chronic hepatitis B.

Surveillance Following Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Loss: An Issue Requiring Attention

Due to the lack of agents that directly target covalently closed circular DNA and integrated HBV DNA in hepatocytes, achieving a complete cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains challenging. The latest guidelines recommend (hepatitis B surface antigen) HBsAg loss as the ideal treatment target for improving liver function, histopathology, and long-term prognosis. However, even after HBsAg loss, hepatitis B virus can persist, with a risk of recurrence, reactivation, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, follow-up and surveillance are still necessary. With increasing treatment options available for achieving HBsAg loss in patients with CHB, developing effective surveillance strategies has become crucial. Recent studies on outcomes following HBsAg loss provide new insights for refining current surveillance strategies, though further improvement is needed through long-term observation and follow-up.

[Predictive Value of Baseline Serum Marker Levels for the Effect of Interferon Therapy in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B]

Objective

To study the changes in the serum markers in chronic hepatitis B patients who have had previous treatment with long-acting interferon therapy of nucleoside and those who have not and to assess the value of the serum markers for clinical prognosis evaluation.

Methods

The clinical data of 411 cases of chronic hepatitis B were collected. All cases were given the additional treatment of long-acting interferon between October 2019 to April 2022. The cases were divided into two groups, a previously treated group consisting of patients who had been treated with nucleoside and nucleotide analogues (NAs) for more than 6 months after they became infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) for over 6 months and an initial treatment group, or treatment naïve group, consisting of patients who had HBV infection for over 6 months and received no treatment or patients who have stopped NAs therapy for more than 6 months. The serum marker levels of the previously treated group and the initial treatment group, i.e., the previously treatment-naïve patients, were compared, and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of the baseline levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) for predicting the rate of cured cases in the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the rate of cured cases between the previously treated group and the initial treatment group. The baseline HBV DNA, HBsAg, and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) levels of the cured cases in both groups were significantly lower than those in the uncured cases (P<0.0001). After 48 weeks of treatment, the serum HBsAb levels (mIU/mL) of the cured cases in both the previously treated and initial treatment groups were significantly higher than those of the uncured cases in the two groups (previously treated group: 78.97±22.57 vs. 0.99±0.38, P<0.0001; initial treatment group: 235.50±175.00 vs. 1.32±0.88, P<0.0001). The serum HBsAb levels (mIU/mL) of the cured cases in the initial treatment groups were significantly higher than that of cured cases in the previously treated group (235.50±175.00 vs. 78.97±22.57, P<0.0001). Within 0 to 60 weeks of treatment, HBV pgRNA levels of cured cases in both groups were significantly lower than those of the the uncured cases in both groups (P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression and ROC curve analysis showed that baseline serum HBsAg was the influencing factor and predictor of interferon efficacy in both the previously treated cases and the initial treatment cases, with the area under the curve (AUC) being 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7423-0.8615, P<0.0001) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.6283-0.8604, P=0.0079), respectively, and the optimal cut-off values being 244.60 IU/mL and 934.40 IU/mL, respectively. However, the baseline serum HBV pgRNA level of under 1340.00 copies/mL in the initial treatment cases led to better sensitivity and better specificity in efficacy prediction, with the AUC of the baseline HBV pgRNA being 0.9649 (95% CI: 0.9042-1.0000, P<0.0001).

Conclusion

Among the previously treated cases and the initial treatment cases, patients who achieve clinical cure have lower levels of HBV DNA, HBsAg, and HBeAg at baseline, lower level of HBV pgRNA over the course of their treatment, and higher level of HBsAb at week 48. Baseline HBsAg levels can be used to effectively predict the clinical cure outcomes in previously treated cases and initial treatment cases. Baseline HBV pgRNA levels also exhibit a high predictive value for treatment outcomes in initial treatment cases.

Clinical Utility of Quantitative HBV Core Antibodies for Solving Diagnostic Dilemmas

The present-day management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection relies on constant and appropriate monitoring of viral activity, disease progression and treatment response. Traditional HBV infection biomarkers have many limitations in predicting clinical outcomes or therapy success. Quantitation of HBV core antibodies (qAnti-HBc) is a new non-invasive biomarker that can be used in solving multiple diagnostic problems. It was shown to correlate well with infection phases, level of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, exacerbations during chronic infection and presence of occult infection. Further, the level of qAnti-HBc was recognised as predictive of spontaneous or therapy-induced HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance, relapse after therapy discontinuation, re-infection after liver transplantation and viral reactivation upon immunosuppression. However, qAnti-HBc cannot be relied upon as a single diagnostic test to solve all dilemmas, and its diagnostic and prognostic power can be much improved when combined with other diagnostic biomarkers (HBV DNA, HBeAg, qHBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies). The availability of commercial qAnti-HBc diagnostic kits still needs to be improved. The comparison of results from different studies and definitions of universal cut-off values continue to be hindered because many methods are only semi-quantitative. The clinical utility of qAnti-HBc and the methods used for its measurement are the focus of this review.

Short-Term Peg-IFN α-2b Re-Treatment Induced a High Functional Cure Rate in Patients with HBsAg Recurrence after Stopping Peg-IFN α-Based Regimens

Little is known about the treatment of patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) recurrence after being clinically cured by peginterferon alpha(peg-IFN-α)-based regimens. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of peg-IFNα-2b in re-treating patients with HBsAg recurrence after stopping peg-IFN α-based regimens. In this two-center, prospective observational study, 33 patients with HBsAg recurrence after stopping peg-IFN α-based regimens were enrolled and re-treated with an individualized course of peg-IFN α-2b. The hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine could be injected immediately after HBsAg clearance, according to patients’ willingness. All patients were monitored and followed-up for 48 weeks after peg-IFN α-2b re-treatment stop. The primary endpoint was HBsAg clearance at the end of follow-up. At baseline, all patients had HBsAg levels of <10 IU/mL and undetectable HBV DNA, with the median HBsAg level of 1.66 (0.56−2.87) IU/mL. After a median of 24 (24−30) weeks of peg-IFN α-2b re-treatment, 87.9% (29/33) of the patients achieved HBsAg clearance again and 66.7% (22/33) of the patients achieved HBsAg seroconversion. At the end of follow-up, the HBsAg clearance and HBsAg seroconversion rates decreased to 78.8% (26/33) and 51.5% (17/33), respectively. Furthermore, 88.9% (16/18) of the patients with HBsAg clearance benefited from receiving the HBV vaccine therapy. Generally, both peg-IFN α-2b and HBV vaccine therapy were well tolerated. A high functional cure rate can be achieved by a short-course of peg-IFN α-2b re-treatment in patients with HBsAg recurrence after stopping peg-IFN α-based regimens. Furthermore, injecting HBV vaccine is beneficial after HBsAg clearance.