Comparable Long-Term Outcomes of Cyclosporine and Infliximab in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Meta-Analysis

Factors Associated With Response to Rescue Therapy in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency for which colectomy is required in patients who do not respond to rescue therapy. While previous studies have predominantly focused on predicting outcome to first-line corticosteroid therapy, there is a need to understand the factors associated with response to rescue therapies in order to improve clinical outcomes. We reviewed the evidence regarding factors associated with response to rescue therapy in adults with ASUC and identified future directions for research.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted, and 2 reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of 3509 records screened, 101 completed studies were eligible for inclusion. We identified 42 clinical, hematological, biochemical, endoscopic, or pharmacological factors associated with response to rescue therapy. Older age (≥50 years), thiopurine experience, and cytomegalovirus or Clostridioides difficile infection were associated with a higher risk of nonresponse to rescue therapy. Biochemical factors associated with poorer response included an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥30mg/L on admission, hypoalbuminemia and an elevated ratio of CRP to albumin. Severe endoscopic findings, including a Mayo endoscopic score of 3 or Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity ≥5, portended poorer outcomes. The role of fecal calprotectin and therapeutic value of measuring infliximab drug levels in ASUC remain to be defined.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to rescue therapy can be predicted by several specific factors, which would aid clinical decision-making. Existing and emerging factors should be integrated within predictive and prognostic models to help improve clinical outcomes.

Tofacitinib in Steroid-Refractory Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) patients are at the highest risk of colectomy. Among the available options, cyclosporine and infliximab have similar efficacy but infliximab is a costly drug and cyclosporine has multiple side effects like kidney injury, neurotoxicity, and dyselectrolytemia. Surgical management is often associated with higher morbidity. Newer oral small molecules like Janus kinase inhibitors are the ideal molecules to bridge the gap. Tofacitinib has already been extensively evaluated in patients with moderate to severe UC; however, data on ASUC treated by tofacitinib are limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with ASUC who were admitted to our hospital's luminal gastroenterology unit between January 2021 and July 2023. Patients with ASUC who were managed with tofacitinib were included in the study.

RESULTS

Eight patients with ASUC were identified who did not respond to intravenous hydrocortisone and were treated with tofacitinib. The mean age was 39 ± 15 years and 87.5% were female. The median duration of illness was 24 months (interquartile range (IQR): 12-120 months). Seven of eight patients (87.5%) responded to oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice a day by the fifth day of treatment. The median follow-up period was six months (IQR: 1-12 months). One patient required colectomy and one patient had varicella zoster reactivation requiring treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Tofacitinib is an attractive alternative to the currently available salvage therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC; however, long-term efficacy and risk remain to be explored.

Emergency subtotal colectomy rates in relation to anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: comparison of retrospective cohorts

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of anti-TNF therapy has revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to investigate the impact of anti-TNF therapy on emergency subtotal colectomy rates in patients with IBD (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis) during two time periods.

METHODS

IBD patients treated with emergency subtotal colectomy for acute severe colitis at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, during two six-year windows were included. The two time-windows represented pre- and introductory (2004-2009) versus post-introductory (2012-2017) anti-TNF therapy usage. The two periods were compared in terms of the proportion of patients who received anti-TNF therapy, rates of emergency subtotal colectomy, and local IBD prevalence numbers.

RESULTS

In total 91 patients were included, 42 (2004-2009) and 49 (2012-2017) patients, respectively. The proportion of patients that received anti-TNF therapy prior to admission was increased from 29% (2004-2009) to 63% (2012-2017) (p = .001). Despite this no significant difference was found in the emergency subtotal colectomy rates between the time periods considering the population at risk (IBD patients living in Skåne county); 1.44/1000 person years versus 1.37/1000 person years (p = .83).

CONCLUSION

Despite an increased proportion of patients with IBD that received anti-TNF therapy prior to admission, no significant decrease in emergency subtotal colectomy rates was noted. Further research is warranted, and a prospective study design would facilitate a better causal understanding.

A review of the therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting gastrointestinal disorder of uncertain aetiology. The last two decades have seen an expansion in the therapeutic arsenal used to treat UC. This has resulted in improved clinical remission and response rates. Nonetheless, staples in our current medical management originate from trials conducted in the early 20th century. In this review article, we aim to outline the key milestones in the history of the medical management of UC in addition to highlighting promising therapeutic developments for the future.

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment

This is the second of a series of two articles reporting the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] evidence-based consensus on the management of adult patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. The first article is focused on medical management, and the present article addresses medical treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] and surgical management of medically refractory UC patients, including preoperative optimisation, surgical strategies, and technical issues. The article provides advice for a variety of common clinical and surgical conditions. Together, the articles represent an update of the evidence-based recommendations of the ECCO for UC.

A Microsimulation Model to Project the 5-Year Impact of Using Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis Patients Hospitalized for Acute Flares

BACKGROUND

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) improves short-term outcomes for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients hospitalized for acute flares. Longer-term impacts and cost-effectiveness are unknown.

METHODS

We compared disease outcomes and cost-effectiveness of HBOT in addition to standard of care versus standard of care alone for UC patients hospitalized for acute flares using a microsimulation model. Published literature was used for transition probabilities, costs, and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates. We modeled 100,000 individuals in each group over a 5-year horizon and compared rates of re-hospitalization, rescue medical therapy, colectomy, death, and cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay of $100,000/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with 500 samples and 250 trials, in addition to multiple microsimulation sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The use of HBOT at the time of index hospitalization for an acute UC flare is projected to reduce the risk of re-hospitalization, inpatient rescue medical therapy, and inpatient emergent colectomy by over 60% (p < 0.001) and mortality by over 30% (p <0.001), during a 5-year horizon. The HBOT strategy costs more ($5600 incremental cost) but also yielded higher QALYs (0.13 incremental yield), resulting in this strategy being cost-effective ($43,000/QALY). Results were sensitive to HBOT costs and rates of endoscopic improvement with HBOT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses observed HBOT to be more cost-effective than standard of care in 95% of iterations.

CONCLUSION

The use of HBOT to optimize response to steroids during the index hospitalization for an acute UC flare is cost-effective and is projected to result in significant reductions in disease-related complications in the long term.

Venous and arterial thromboembolism in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

The risk of thromboembolism (TE) is increased in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), mainly due to an increased risk of venous TE (VTE). The risk of arterial TE (ATE) is less pronounced, but an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases needs to be addressed in IBD patients. IBD predisposes to arterial and venous thrombosis through similar prothrombotic mechanisms, including triggering activation of coagulation, in part mediated by impairment of the intestinal barrier and released bacterial components. VTE in IBD has clinical specificities, i.e., an earlier first episode in life, high rates during both active and remission stages, higher recurrence rates, and poor prognosis. The increased likelihood of VTE in IBD patients may be related to surgery, the use of medications such as corticosteroids or tofacitinib, whereas infliximab is antithrombotic. Long-term complications of VTE can include post-thrombotic syndrome and high recurrence rate during post-hospital discharge. A global clot lysis assay may be useful in identifying patients with IBD who are at risk for TE. Many VTEs occur in IBD outpatients; therefore, outpatient prophylaxis in high-risk patients is recommended. It is crucial to continue focusing on prevention and adequate treatment of VTE in patients with IBD.

Integrated Analysis of Multiple Microarray Studies to Identify Novel Gene Signatures in Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, complicated, inflammatory disease with an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. However, the intrinsic molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of UC have not yet been fully elucidated.

Methods: All UC datasets published in the GEO database were analyzed and summarized. Subsequently, the robust rank aggregation (RRA) method was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between UC patients and controls. Gene functional annotation and PPI network analysis were performed to illustrate the potential functions of the DEGs. Some important functional modules from the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network were identified by molecular complex detection (MCODE), Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and analyses were performed. The results of CytoHubba, a plug for integrated algorithm for biomolecular interaction networks combined with RRA analysis, were used to identify the hub genes. Finally, a mouse model of UC was established by dextran sulfate sodium salt (DSS) solution to verify the expression of hub genes.

Results: A total of 6 datasets met the inclusion criteria (GSE38713, GSE59071, GSE73661, GSE75214, GSE87466, GSE92415). The RRA integrated analysis revealed 208 significant DEGs (132 upregulated genes and 76 downregulated genes). After constructing the PPI network by MCODE plug, modules with the top three scores were listed. The CytoHubba app and RRA identified six hub genes: LCN2, CXCL1, MMP3, IDO1, MMP1, and S100A8. We found through enrichment analysis that these functional modules and hub genes were mainly related to cytokine secretion, immune response, and cancer progression. With the mouse model, we found that the expression of all six hub genes in the UC group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The hub genes analyzed by the RRA method are highly reliable. These findings improve the understanding of the molecular mechanisms in UC pathogenesis.

Ciclosporin or Infliximab as Rescue Therapy in Acute Glucorticosteroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and trial-based meta-analyses, the optimal rescue therapy for patients with acute glucorticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis [UC], to avoid colectomy and improve long-term outcomes, remains unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis examining this issue.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic and the Cochrane central register up to June 2020. We included RCTs comparing ciclosporin and infliximab, either with each other or with placebo, in patients with glucorticosteroid-refractory UC.

RESULTS

We identified seven RCTs containing 534 patients [415 in head-to-head trials of ciclosporin vs infliximab]. Risk of colectomy at ≤ 1 month was reduced significantly with both treatments, compared with placebo (relative risk [RR] of colectomy with infliximab vs placebo = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.65, RR with ciclosporin vs placebo = 0.40; 95% CI 0.21-0.77). In terms of colectomy between > 1 month and < 1 year, both drugs ranked equally [P-score 0.75]. Neither treatment was more effective than placebo in reducing the risk of colectomy at ≥ 1 year. Both ciclosporin and infliximab were significantly more efficacious than placebo in achieving a response. Neither treatment was more effective than placebo in inducing remission, nor more likely to cause serious adverse events than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ciclosporin and infliximab were superior to placebo in terms of response to therapy and avoiding colectomy up to 1 year, with no significant differences in efficacy or safety between the two. Ciclosporin remains a valid option to treat refractory UC patients, especially those who do not respond to previous treatment with infliximab, or as a bridge to other biological therapies.

Treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency. Due to the increasing incidence of ulcerative colitis in recent years, ASUC has become increasingly common in clinical practice. Presently, corticosteroids remain the first choice, whose efficacy should be evaluated after 3 d. If unsatisfactory, it should be switched to infliximab or cyclosporine salvage treatment timely. Besides, colectomy may be an option when medical treatment is ineffective or serious complications occur. This review describes the current treatment regimens for ASUC, with an aim to help develop treatment plans and improve the prognosis and life quality of patients with ASUC .