Progress in the Development of Anti-tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitors for Haemophilia Management

An Inhibitory Single-Domain Antibody against Protein Z-Dependent Protease Inhibitor Promotes Thrombin Generation in Severe Hemophilia A and FXI Deficiency

BACKGROUND

 Protein Z-dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI) is an anticoagulant serpin that targets factor Xa (FXa) in the presence of protein Z (PZ), and factor XIa (FXIa). In factor-VIII-deficient mice, PZ or ZPI gene knock-out mitigates the bleeding phenotype, and pharmacological inhibition of PZ enhances thrombin generation in plasma from patients with hemophilia.

AIMS

 To develop a single-domain antibody (sdAb) directed against ZPI to inhibit its anticoagulant activity.

METHODS

 We screened for anti-ZPI sdAbs in a llama-derived phage display immune library of sdAbs. The sdAbs that bound ZPI were produced and purified for characterization. The binding of sdAbs to ZPI or other serpins was evaluated using ELISAs, and ZPI inhibition was measured in an anti-FXa or anti-FXIa chromogenic assay. The sdAbs's procoagulant activity was assessed in a thrombin generation assay in normal plasma, factor VIII- and FXI-deficient plasma.

RESULTS

 Of the four sdAbs found to bind to ZPI, one (referred to as ZPI-sdAb2) dose-dependently inhibited ZPI's anti-FXa and anti-FXIa activities with a mean half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 1.8 and 1.3 µM, respectively. ZPI-sdAb2 did not cross-react with other plasma serpins, such as antithrombin and α1-antitrypsin. ZPI-sdAb2 induced a significant increase in thrombin generation in plasma samples from healthy donors, patients with severe hemophilia A, and patients with FXI deficiency.

CONCLUSION

 ZPI-sdAb2 is the first specific, direct ZPI inhibitor found to exhibit procoagulant activity in plasma. This sdAb might have potential as a treatment for hemophilia or other bleeding disorders.

Current and emerging therapies as potential treatment for people with von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) reflects the most common inherited bleeding disorder, arising from defects or deficiencies in the von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD treatment mostly relies on the replacement of missing or defective VWF, but additional ('adjunct') therapies are useful in select patients/situations. Patients with VWD are often misdiagnosed and therefore non-optimally managed.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a narrative review, following relevant literature searches in PubMed related to the topic up to September 2024. After an overview of VWF, VWD, and current treatments, we explore the use of nonstandard or emerging therapies for VWD. For example, FVIII replacement or antibody-based FVIII bypassing strategies (e.g. emicizumab) may prove useful in some cases or in initial treatment of certain VWD patients, including those with type 2N or 3 VWD, or those with inhibitors. Additional emerging therapies may also be useful, including hemostasis rebalancing agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Just as hemophilia is experiencing a renaissance of treatment options, so too will the landscape of VWD treatment change over time. This will be fueled by the concept of personalized treatment, meaning potentially different treatments for different VWD patients, or for given patients according to treatment aims.

The current challenges faced by people with hemophilia B

Hemophilia B (HB) is a rare, hereditary disease caused by a defect in the gene encoding factor IX (FIX) and leads to varying degrees of coagulation deficiency. The prevailing treatment for people with HB (PWHB) is FIX replacement product. The advent of recombinant coagulation products ushered in a new era of safety, efficacy, and improved availability compared with plasma-derived products. For people with severe HB, lifelong prophylaxis with a FIX replacement product is standard of care. Development of extended half-life FIX replacement products has allowed for advancements in the care of these PWHB. Nonetheless, lifelong need for periodic dosing and complex surveillance protocols pose substantive challenges in terms of access, adherence, and healthcare resource utilization. Further, some PWHB on prophylactic regimens continue to experience breakthrough bleeds and joint damage, and subpopulations of PWHB, including women, those with mild-to-moderate HB, and those with inhibitors to FIX, experience additional unique difficulties. This review summarizes the current challenges faced by PWHB, including the unique subpopulations; identifying the need for improved awareness, personalized care strategies, and new therapeutic options for severe HB, which may provide future solutions for some of the remaining unmet needs of PWHB.

New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

The past few decades have seen a tremendous advancement in the management of hemophilia. Whether it is improved methods to attenuate critical viruses, recombinant bioengineering with decreased immunogenicity, extended half-life replacement therapies to mitigate the burden of repeated infusion treatments, novel nonreplacement products to avoid the drawback of inhibitor development with its attractive subcutaneous administration and then the introduction of gene therapy, the management has trodden a long way.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review describes the progress in the treatment of hemophilia over the years. We discuss, in detail, the past and current therapies, their benefits, drawbacks, along with relevant studies leading to approval, efficacy and safety profile, ongoing trials, and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

The technological advances in the treatment of hemophilia with convenient modes of administration and innovative modalities offer a chance for a normal existence of the patients living with this disease. However, it is imperative for clinicians to be aware of the potential adverse effects and the need for further studies to establish causality or chance association of these events with novel agents. Thus, it is crucial for clinicians to engage patients and their families in informed decision-making and tailor individual concerns and necessities.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities for ultra-rare inherited bleeding disorders

BACKGROUND

Ultra-rare inherited bleeding disorders (BDs) present important challenges for generating a strong evidence foundation for optimal diagnosis and management. Without disorder-appropriate treatment, affected individuals potentially face life-threatening bleeding, delayed diagnosis, suboptimal management of invasive procedures, psychosocial distress, pain, and decreased quality-of-life.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF) and the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network identified the priorities of people with inherited BDs and their caregivers, through extensive inclusive community consultations, to inform a blueprint for future decades of research. Multidisciplinary expert Working Group (WG) 3 distilled highly feasible transformative ultra-rare inherited BD research opportunities from the community-identified priorities.

RESULTS

WG3 identified three focus areas with the potential to advance the needs of all people with ultra-rare inherited BDs and scored the feasibility, impact, and risk of priority initiatives, including 13 in systems biology and mechanistic science; 2 in clinical research, data collection, and research infrastructure; and 5 in the regulatory process for novel therapeutics and required data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Centralization and expansion of expertise and resources, flexible innovative research and regulatory approaches, and inclusion of all people with ultra-rare inherited BDs and their health care professionals will be essential to capitalize on the opportunities outlined herein.

Hemophilia a patients with inhibitors: Mechanistic insights and novel therapeutic implications

The development of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibodies is a serious complication in hemophilia A (HA) patients after FVIII replacement therapy. Inhibitors render regular prophylaxis ineffective and increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) regimens have become the only clinically proven therapy for eradicating these inhibitors. However, this is a lengthy and costly strategy. For HA patients with high titer inhibitors, bypassing or new hemostatic agents must be used in clinical prophylaxis due to the ineffective ITI regimens. Since multiple genetic and environmental factors are involved in the pathogenesis of inhibitor generation, understanding the mechanisms by which inhibitors develop could help identify critical targets that can be exploited to prevent or eradicate inhibitors. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent advances related to mechanistic insights into anti-FVIII antibody development and discuss novel therapeutic approaches for HA patients with inhibitors.

Updates on Novel Non-Replacement Drugs for Hemophilia

Over the last decade, the world of hemophilia has experienced an unprecedented therapeutic advance, thanks to the progress in bioengineering technologies, leading to the introduction of drugs with novel mechanisms of action based on restoring thrombin generation or coagulation factor VIII mimicking. Apart from the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab, already approved for patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors, novel non-replacement drugs designed to reduce the treatment burden of patients with hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Thanks to their innovative mechanism of action and subcutaneous administration, these drugs promise to provide effective bleeding protection together with improved adherence and improve health-related quality of life for patients with hemophilia. On the other hand, rare thromboembolic events have been reported with some of these drugs and warrant continuous post-marketing surveillance and investigation of predisposing factors, although the overall safety profile of most of these drugs is good. Finally, new challenges need to be faced in the clinical and laboratory monitoring of the hemostatic status in patients treated with these innovative therapies. In this review, we provide an update on the available data on novel non-replacement drugs currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for patients with hemophilia.

Concizumab as a Subcutaneous Prophylactic Treatment Option for Patients with Hemophilia A or B: A Review of the Evidence and Patient’s Perspectives

Concizumab is a monoclonal, humanized IgG4 antibody specific for the Kunitz-2 domain of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI). Preclinical studies in vitro or on animal models and in vivo have demonstrated the ability of concizumab to restore thrombin generation, promoting the establishment of a procoagulant action; all these results were subsequently confirmed in the studies of EXPLORER program. Concizumab may represent a new opportunity for the treatment of persons with hemophilia, so there is much anticipation for the results of the ongoing trials still. This review retraces all the studies on concizumab published to date, with a brief discussion about the patient’ perspectives.

Changing paradigms of hemophilia care across larger specialized treatment centers in the European region

Introduction:

In early 2021, the European Collaborative Haemophilia Network (ECHN) conducted a survey to determine whether the paradigms of care across the European region have changed with the introduction of novel therapies for people with hemophilia.

Methods:

We conducted a survey in 19 ECHN centers from 17 countries in the European region. The aim was to track recent changes in the hemophilia treatment landscape, determine the impact of these changes on hemophilia treatment centers and comprehensive care centers in the region, and to look into the future of care as applied to people with hemophilia. The survey was structured to include three key areas: demographics and organization; current challenges and opportunities; and future directions.

Discussion:

Our survey provides a snapshot of the current approach to hemophilia treatment that highlights a move toward preventive, rather than reactive care, but that also raises a number of key concerns related to costs and accessibility (particularly as related to novel therapies), time limitations for clinical research, and ongoing issues regarding human resources (particularly in terms of new doctors entering the field) and availability of laboratory resources as the use of novel therapies (some with unique modes of action and unusual adverse events, some with specialized monitoring requirements) becomes commonplace.

Conclusion:

While our survey suggests that specialized care will continue to play a central role in the management of hemophilia, the standards and protocols, as well as the centers themselves, will have to continue to evolve if they are to continue to provide the highest level of care. To meet this requirement, there is a clear need for engaging, ongoing education programs for healthcare professionals working in the field of hemophilia that can be adjusted to the changing landscape of hemophilia therapy and monitoring.

Hemostatic efficacy of marstacimab alone or in combination with bypassing agents in hemophilia plasmas and a mouse bleeding model

Background

Patients with hemophilia have deficiencies in intrinsic coagulation factors and can develop inhibitors that limit the effectiveness of replacement coagulation factors. Marstacimab, a human monoclonal antibody, binds and inhibits the human tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Marstacimab is currently under development as a potential prophylactic treatment to prevent bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A and B.

Objective

To assess the effects of marstacimab alone or in combination with the bypassing agent recombinant factor FVIIa (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on thrombin generation and bleeding.

Methods

Marstacimab and/or rFVIIa or aPCC were added to hemophilic A or B plasma or nonhemophilic plasma in vitro. Hemostatic activity was measured using the thrombin generation assay. In vivo effects were assessed using a mouse acute bleeding model. Male hemophilia A mice were dosed with marstacimab plus aPCC before tail clip; blood loss was quantified by measuring hemoglobin.

Results

Marstacimab plus rFVIIa or aPCC slightly increased peak thrombin levels compared with either agent alone. This increase was within the reported range for nonhemophilic plasma and did not exceed levels observed in nonhemophilic plasma treated with marstacimab alone. Hemophilia A mice that received 200 U/kg aPCC had significantly reduced bleeding (62%) compared with vehicle-treated mice (p < 0.05), and marstacimab plus aPCC reduced bleeding by 83.3% compared with vehicle (p= 0.0009).

Conclusions

Marstacimab alone or with bypassing agents increased hemostasis in hemophilia plasma without generating excessive thrombin. The hemostatic activity of marstacimab plus aPCC was confirmed in hemophilia A mice.

Factor-mimetic and rebalancing therapies in hemophilia A and B: the end of factor concentrates?

Hemophilia A (HA) and B are inherited bleeding disorders caused by a deficiency of factor VIII or factor IX, respectively. The current standard of care is the administration of recombinant or purified factor. However, this treatment strategy still results in a high economic and personal burden to patients, which is further exacerbated by the development of inhibitors—alloantibodies to factor. The treatment landscape is changing, with nonfactor therapeutics playing an increasing role in what we consider to be the standard of care. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody that mimics the function of factor VIIIa, is the first such nonfactor therapy to gain US Food and Drug Administration approval and is rapidly changing the paradigm for HA treatment. Other therapies on the horizon seek to target anticoagulant proteins in the coagulation cascade, thus “rebalancing” a hemorrhagic tendency by introducing a thrombotic tendency. This intricate hemostatic balancing act promises great things for patients in need of more treatment options, but are these other therapies going to replace factor therapy? In light of the many challenges facing these therapies, should they be viewed as a replacement of our current standard of care? This review discusses the background, rationale, and potential of nonfactor therapies as well as the anticipated pitfalls and limitations. This is done in the context of a review of our current understanding of the many aspects of the coagulation system.

Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms

Mainstay haemophilia treatment, namely intravenous factor replacement, poses several clinical challenges including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration (which is particularly challenging in those with difficult venous access), and the risk of inhibitor development. These impact negatively upon quality of life and treatment compliance, highlighting the need for improved therapies. Several novel pharmacological therapies developed for haemophilia aim to rebalance the clotting cascade and potentially circumvent the aforementioned challenges. These therapies utilise a range of different mechanisms, namely: the extension of the circulating half-life of standard recombinant factors; the mimicking of factor VIII cofactor activity; rebalancing of coagulation through targeting of natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin and tissue factor pathway inhibitor; and inducing the production of endogenous factors with gene therapy. These therapies carry the potential of revolutionising haemophilia treatment by alleviating the current challenges presented by mainstay factor replacement. This review will provide an overview of the key trial findings related to novel therapies based on the mechanisms described above.