Myocardial Flow Reserve Measurement During CZT-SPECT Perfusion Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease Screening: Correlation With Clinical Findings and Invasive Coronary Angiography-The CFR-OR Study

Myocardial blood flow evaluation with dynamic cadmium-zinc-telluride single-photon emission computed tomography: Bright and dark sides

Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) assessment with non-invasive techniques represent an important tool to evaluate both coronary artery disease severity and extent. Currently, cardiac positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is the "gold standard" for the assessment of coronary function and provides accurate estimations of baseline and hyperemic MBF and MFR. Nevertheless, due to the high cost and complexity, PET-CT is not widely used in clinical practice. The introduction of cardiac-dedicated cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras has renewed researchers' interest on MBF quantitation by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Indeed, many studies evaluated MPR and MBF measurements by dynamic CZT-SPECT in different cohorts of patients with suspected or overt coronary artery disease. As well, many others have compared the values obtained by CZT-SPECT to the ones by PET-CT, showing good correlations in detecting significant stenosis, although with different and non-standardized cut-off values. Nevertheless, the lack of standardized protocol for acquisition, reconstruction and elaboration makes more difficult to compare different studies and to further assess the real advantages of MBF quantitation by dynamic CZT-SPECT in clinical routine. Many are the issues involved in the bright and dark sides of dynamic CZT-SPECT. They include different type of CZT cameras, different execution protocols, different tracers with different myocardial extraction fraction and distribution, different software packages with different tools and algorithms, often requiring manual post-processing elaboration. This review article provides a clear summary of the state of the art on MBF and MPR evaluation by dynamic CZT-SPECT and outlines the major issues to solve to optimize this technique.

Precision of Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve Measurement During CZT SPECT Perfusion Imaging Processing: Intra- and Interobserver Variability

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement in patients referred for dynamic SPECT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. SPECT data were acquired on a cadmium zinc telluride-based pinhole cardiac camera in list mode using a stress (251 ± 15 MBq)/rest (512 ± 26 MBq) 1-d ^99mTc-tetrofosmin protocol. Kinetic analyses were done with software using a 1-tissue-compartment model and converted to MBF using a previously determined extraction fraction correction. MFR was analyzed and compared globally and regionally. Motion detection was applied, but not attenuation correction. Results: In total, 124 patients (64 male, 60 female) were included, and SPECT acquisitions were twice reconstructed by the same nuclear medicine board-certified physician for 50 patients and by 2 different physicians for 74. Both intra- and interobserver measurements of global MFR had no significant bias (-0.01 [P = 0.94] and 0.01 [P = 0.67], respectively). However, rest MBF and stress MBF were significantly different in global left ventricular evaluation (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and in the anterior territory (P < 0.0001) on interuser analysis. The average coefficient of variation was 15%-30% of the mean stress MBF if the analysis was performed by the same physician or 2 different physicians and was around 20% of the mean MFR independently of the processing physician. Using the MFR threshold of 2, we noticed good intrauser agreement, whereas it was moderate when the users were different (κ = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94] vs. 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36-0.75], respectively). Conclusion: Repeated measurements of global MFR by the same physician or 2 different physicians were similar, with an average coefficient of variation of 20%. Better reproducibility was achieved for intrauser MBF evaluation. Automation of processing is needed to improve reproducibility.

Combining flow and reserve measurement during myocardial perfusion imaging: A new era for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?

Myocardial flow reserve represents the ratio of myocardial blood flow between stress and rest, giving functional information about both macrocirculation and microcirculation; it has been reported extensively in positron emission tomography, with an increase in diagnostic performance, providing important prognostic information and being a powerful tool to guide therapy. Advances in single photon emission computed tomography, with the widespread availability of "cadmium zinc telluride" single photon emission computed tomography cameras, raise the question of myocardial flow reserve use in daily clinical practice. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve, and the initial data available from single photon emission computed tomography myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve evaluation; we also discuss potential limitations to the wider implementation of flow evaluation in single photon emission computed tomography.