Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities for Stage I-III Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma

Definitive chemo-radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal cancer: a comprehensive review of literature

Background and Objectives

Despite decades of experience with definitive chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in cervical oesophageal cancer (CEC), the loco-regional control and survival outcomes are dismal. This review evaluated the outcomes of various treatment strategies being commonly utilized.

Materials and methods

A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles on CEC published from years 2000-2023 addressing the predefined key questions. These questions focussed on the comparative outcomes of various primary treatment approaches (surgery, CRT, or trimodality treatment) and the radiation dose schedules, volumes, and techniques.

Results

CRT is the standard approach for treatment for CEC so far. The potential role of surgery and trimodality approach in settings of evolving surgical approaches needs to be validated. The high dose schedules that are preferentially practiced in CEC have not shown any benefit in improving the disease outcomes over the standard dose schedule of 50.4 Gy. The target volume delineation practice of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) does not have a proven benefit over the involved field irradiation (IFI). The limited evidence on radiation techniques suggests that intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT) techniques can improve toxicity profile over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), but no advantage proven in disease outcomes so far.

Conclusion

This review will guide clinicians in decision-making for the management of this relatively rare entity and the directions for future research in these areas. Future large-scale multicentre prospective studies are needed for validating and standardizing our current practices and exploring potential options to improve the outcomes.

Primary adenocarcinoma of the upper esophagus: A rare presentation

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Cervical esophageal cancer is a rare condition, accounting for less than 5 % of all esophageal malignancies.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report here a case of a 65-year-old female patient with a history of breast cancer diagnosed in 1985 treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. This woman presented with chronic organic high dysphagia to both solid and liquids and food impaction. Gastroscopy showed a stenosing esophageal budding tumor located at 20 cm from the incisors. Histological examination showed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The diagnosis of primary adenocarcinoma of the upper esophagus is based on a combination of clinical presentation, imaging studies, and confirmed by histopathological examination. Upper digestive endoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSION

Primary adenocarcinoma of the upper esophagus is a rare form of esophageal cancer.

Elective nodal irradiation versus involved-field irradiation for stage II-IV cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective propensity study with 8-year survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) is suggested as the standard treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC). This retrospective propensity study compared the 8-year survival outcomes and acute treatment toxicities of these patients treated with elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field irradiation (IFI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage II-IV CESCC treated with dCCRT at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2020 were enrolled in the study. All the patients were restaged according to the American Joint Commission 8th edition criteria. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the effects of treatment selection bias and potential confounding factors including sex, age, ECOG score, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, clinical TNM stage and radiation dose between the ENI group and IFI group. Survival and the prognostic factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 131 eligible patients underwent ENI (60 patients, 45.8%) or IFI (71 patients, 54.2%). The median follow-up time was 91.1 months (range, 23.8-182.0 months) for all the patients. The median OS, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates were 44.4 months, 87.8%, 55.1%, 38.3%, and 27.2%, respectively. After PSM, there were 49 patients in each group. The median OS, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year OS rates for ENI and IFI group were 32.0 months, 83.7%, 48.5%, 38.5% and 31.1% versus 45.2 months, 89.8%, 52.5%, 37.5%, 26.1%, respectively (P = 0.966; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.61-1.61). Similar locoregional control was obtained in both groups. The tendency of leukocytopenia and neutropenia was higher in ENI than in IFI (59.2% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.068 and 30.6% vs. 14.3%; P = 0.089) at the end of dCCRT.

CONCLUSION

Cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy has a satisfactory prognosis with organ conservation. The involved-field irradiation might be a better alternative owing to similar overall survival outcomes and local control with less toxicity of myelosuppression.

Stage IIB-IVA cervix carcinoma in elderly patients treated with radiation therapy: a longitudinal cohort study by propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the treatment modality and prognostic impact of the age at diagnosis on stage IIB-IVA cervix carcinoma (CC) patients who received radiotherapy (RT).The evaluation was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From the SEER database, we included the patients with a histopathological diagnosis of CC between 2004 and 2016. Subsequently, we compared the treatment outcomes between patients aged ≥ 65 years (OG) and < 65 years (YG) by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

The data of 5,705 CC patients were obtained from the SEER database. We observed that the OG patients were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy, brachytherapy, or combination treatment compared to the YG (P < 0.001). Further, the advanced age at diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor associated with decreasing overall survival (OS) before and after PSM. Even in the subgroup analysis of patients who received trimodal therapy, an advanced age had a significant negative impact on OS compared to their younger counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is associated with less aggressive treatment regimens and is independently associated with impaired OS for stage IIB-IVA CC patients who received RT. Hence, future studies should incorporate geriatric assessment into clinical decision-making to select appropriate and effective treatment strategies for elderly CC patients.

Survival Comparison Between Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma for Radiotherapy-Treated Patients with Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer

Objective

To compare the prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma (AC) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer (CC) treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BRT) with/without chemotherapy registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Methods

Data of eligible patients were extracted between 2004 and 2016. A univariate analysis was conducted using the cumulative incidence function (CIF) by considering competing events and compared using Gray’s test. The significant variables in univariate analysis were further evaluated in a multivariate analysis performed with the Fine-Gray regression model. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was also employed to reconfirm the results found in the present study.

Results

A total of 2,243 patients with SCC and 176 patients with AC were extracted from the database. The 5-year OS rates were 57.8% in the SCC group and 52.8% in the AC group. 149 patients died of causes other than CC—considered as competing events. Compared with the SCC group, patients diagnosed with AC had statistically significant worse 5-year OS rate before and after PSM. In the multivariate Fine-Gray regression model, the histological subtype of AC was proven as an independent prognostic factor associated with poorer OS before [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.340; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.081-1.660; P = 0.007] and after [HR = 1.376; 95% CI: 1.107-1.711; P = 0.004] PSM.

Conclusions

The histological subtype of AC is significantly correlated with impaired OS as an independent prognostic variable in patients with stage IIB-IVA CC who received EBRT and BRT compared to patients with SCC. Future studies should incorporate effective and individualized treatment strategies into clinical decision-making to improve the unsatisfactory survival outcomes for patients with AC.