A case of VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) with decreased oxidative stress levels after oral prednisone and tocilizumab treatment

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapies in VEXAS syndrome: retrospective study from the FRENVEX

OBJECTIVES

Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory and somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is an adult-onset autoinflammatory disease associated with somatic ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme 1 (UBA1) mutations. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapies.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study including patients with genetically proven VEXAS syndrome who had received at least one targeted therapy. Complete response (CR) was defined by a clinical remission, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤10 mg/L and a ≤10 mg/day of prednisone-equivalent therapy, and partial response (PR) was defined by a clinical remission and a 50% reduction in CRP levels and glucocorticoid dose.

RESULTS

110 patients (median age 71 (68-79) years) who received 194 targeted therapies were included: 78 (40%) received Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi), 51 (26%) interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors, 33 (17%) IL-1 inhibitors, 20 (10%) tumour necrosis factor (TNFα) blockers and 12 (6%) other targeted therapies. At 3 months, the overall response (CR and PR) rate was 24% with JAKi, 32% with IL-6 inhibitors, 9% with anti-IL-1 and 0% with TNFα blockers or other targeted therapies. At 6 months, the overall response rate was 30% with JAKi and 26% with IL-6 inhibitors. Survival without treatment discontinuation was significantly longer with JAKi than with the other targeted therapies. Among patients who discontinued treatment, causes were primary failure, secondary failure, serious adverse event or death in 43%, 14%, 19% and 19%, respectively, with JAKi and 46%, 11%, 31% and 9%, respectively, with IL-6 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the benefit of JAKi and IL-6 inhibitors, whereas other therapies have lower efficacy. These results need to be confirmed in prospective trials.

VEXAS syndrome: An update

VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 Enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a recently described autoinflammatory syndrome, mostly affecting men older than 50 years, caused by somatic mutation in the UBA1 gene, a X-linked gene involved in the activation of ubiquitin system. Patients present a broad spectrum of inflammatory manifestations (fever, neutrophilic dermatosis, chondritis, pulmonary infiltrates, ocular inflammation, venous thrombosis) and hematological involvement (macrocytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursor cells, dysplastic bone marrow) that are responsible for a significant morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic management is currently poorly codified but is based on two main approaches: controlling inflammatory symptoms (by using corticosteroids, JAK inhibitor or tocilizumab) or targeting the UBA1-mutated hematopoietic population (by using azacitidine or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation). Supportive care is also important and includes red blood cell or platelet transfusions, erythropoiesis stimulating agents, thromboprophylaxis and anti-infectious prophylaxis. The aim of this review is to provide a current overview of the VEXAS syndrome, particularly focusing on its pathophysiological, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Clinical characteristics, disease trajectories and management of vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is a newly discovered autoinflammatory condition characterised by somatic mutation of the UBA1 gene. The syndrome leads to multi-system inflammation affecting predominantly the skin, lungs and bone marrow.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review of the multisystem features and genotypes observed in VEXAS syndrome. Articles discussing VEXAS syndrome were included. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. Information was extracted on: demographics, type and prevalence of clinical manifestations, genetic mutations and treatment. Meta-analysis using a random effects model was used to determine pooled estimates of serum markers.

RESULTS

From 303 articles, 90 were included, comprising 394 patients with VEXAS. 99.2% were male, with a mean age of 67.1 years (SD 8.5) at disease onset. The most frequent diagnoses made prior to VEXAS were: relapsing polychondritis (n = 59); Sweet's syndrome (n = 24); polyarteritis nodosa (n = 11); and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 10). Fever was reported in 270 cases (68.5%) and weight loss in 79 (20.1%). Most patients had haematological (n = 342; 86.8%), dermatological (n = 321; 81.5%), pulmonary (n = 297; 75.4%%) and musculoskeletal (n = 172; 43.7%) involvement, although other organ manifestations of varying prevalence were also recorded. The most commonly reported mutations were "c.122T > C pMET41Thr" (n = 124), "c.121A > G pMET41Val" (n = 62) and "c.121A > C pMet41Leu" (n = 52). Most patients received glucocorticoids (n = 240; 60.9%) followed by methotrexate (n = 82; 20.8%) and IL-6 inhibitors (n = 61, 15.4%). One patient underwent splenectomy; 24 received bone marrow transplants.

CONCLUSION

VEXAS syndrome is a rare disorder affecting predominantly middle-aged men. This is the first systematic review to capture clinical manifestations, genetics and treatment of reported cases. Further studies are needed to optimise treatment and subsequently reduce morbidity and mortality.

How to treat VEXAS syndrome: a systematic review on effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current treatment strategies for the vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome.

METHODS

A protocolized systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Three databases were searched for reports on treatment strategies for VEXAS. Data from the included publications was extracted and a narrative synthesis was performed. Treatment response was recorded as complete (CR), partial (PR) or none (NR) depending on changes in clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters. Patient characteristics, safety data and previous treatments were analysed.

RESULTS

We identified 36 publications with a total of 116 patients; 113 (98.3%) were male. The identified reports included azacytidine (CR 9/36, 25%; PR 14/36, 38.9%), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) (CR 11/33, 33%; PR 9/33, 27.3%), tocilizumab (CR 3/15, 20%; PR 6/15, 40%), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (CR 6/7, 85.7%; one patient died), anakinra (CR 4/5, 80%; NR 1/5, 20%), canakinumab (CR 1/2, 50%; PR 1/2, 50%) and glucocorticoid monotherapy (CR 1/6, 16.7%; PR 4/6, 66.7%). Individual reports were available for TNF inhibitors, rituximab and MTX. Data on adverse events were available for 67 patients (67/116, 57.8%) and included: pneumonia (12/67, 17.9%), other infections (9/67, 13.4%), venous thromboembolisms (6/67, 8.9%), cytopenias (4/67, 5.9%), and acute (4/67, 5.9%) and chronic graft-vs-host-disease (2/67, 2.9%).

CONCLUSION

Current data on VEXAS treatment are limited and inhomogeneous. Treatment decisions should be individualized. For the devolvement of treatment algorithms clinical trials are needed. Adverse events remain a challenge, especially an elevated risk for venous thromboembolism associated to JAKi treatment should be carefully considered.

Case report: Schnitzler-like syndrome without monoclonal gammopathy

Schnitzler syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disorder characterized by urticarial rash, joint pain, recurrent fever, leucocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA), and monoclonal IgM or IgG gammopathy. According to the Strasbourg criteria, both urticarial rash and gammopathy are mandatorily required for the diagnosis of Schnitzler’s syndrome. However, incomplete variants lacking either skin symptoms or monoclonal gammopathy have also been described. Here, we report a case in which the diagnosis of Schnitzler-like syndrome was made despite the absence of gammopathy, based on neutrophilic dermal inflammation, episodic and excessive increase in inflammatory parameters, and prompt response to anakinra, a soluble IL1 receptor antagonist (sIL-1RA). In addition, we detected neutrophil epitheliotropism, which is highly suggestive of autoinflammatory disease. Using whole-exome sequencing, we were unable to find a causative pathogenic mutation but did find several mutations possibly related to the inflammatory processes in this patient. This and other cases highlight that the existing Strasbourg criteria are too strict to capture Schnitzler-like syndromes that may respond well and rapidly to IL1 inhibition. Recurrent episodes of disease with normalization of inflammatory symptoms in the interval, rapid response to anakinra, and neutrophilic epitheliotropism in a lesional skin biopsy may help confirm the diagnosis of Schnitzler-like syndrome.