Different Surgical Approaches for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Staging. A Large Monocentric Experience

Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in female reproductive system in the world, and the choice of its treatment is very important for the survival rate and prognosis of patients. Traditional open surgery is the main treatment for ovarian cancer, but it has the disadvantages of big trauma and slow recovery. With the continuous development of minimally invasive technology, minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia has been gradually applied to the treatment of ovarian cancer because of its advantages of less trauma and quick recovery. However, the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia in the treatment of ovarian cancer are still controversial.

AIM

To explore the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 90 patients with early ovarian cancer in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different surgical treatment methods, patients were divided into study group and control group (45 cases in each group). The study group received minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia for ovarian cancer, while the control group received traditional open surgery for ovarian cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), clinical efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postoperative gas evacuation time, and postoperative EORTC QLQ-C30 score of the study group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the preoperative adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), androstenedione (AD), cortisol (Cor), cluster of differentiation 3 positive (CD3+), and cluster of differentiation 4 positive (CD4+) indexes (P > 0.05). In contrast, postoperatively, the study group's ACTH, AD, and Cor indexes were lower, and the CD3+ and CD4+ indexes were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia in patients with early ovarian cancer can significantly improve the efficacy and safety, improve the short-term prognosis and quality of life of patients, and is worth popularizing.

New therapeutic targets for endometrial cancer: a glimpse into the preclinical sphere

INTRODUCTION

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the only gynecologic malignancy showing increasing trends in incidence and mortality. While standard treatment has been effective primarily for early-stage EC, precision medicine with tailored therapy has revolutionized the management of this disease. Genome sequencing analyses have identified four sub-types of EC. Treatments for primary and metastatic disease can now be tailored more accurately to achieve better oncologic results.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the most relevant and updated evidence in the literature regarding EC molecular analysis and its role in risk classification, prognostication, and guidance for tailored and target therapies in early and advanced/metastatic stages. In addition, it provides updated information on optimal surgical management based on molecular classification and highlights key advances and future strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

EC molecular analysis yields the potential of tailoring adjuvant treatment by escalating or deescalating therapy, as shown for POLE-mutated and p53-mutated tumors. Moreover, the expression of specific molecular signatures offers the possibility to employ novel target therapies, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitors that have demonstrated a significant benefit on prognosis. New treatment guidelines are still being established, and ongoing studies are exploring the potential prognostic role of further sub-stratifications of the four molecular classes and treatment options.

Speculation on optimal numbers of examined lymph node for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer from the perspective of stage migration

Introduction

In early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), how to perform lymphadenectomy to avoid stage migration and achieve reliable targeted excision has not been explored in depth. This study comprehensively considered the stage migration and survival to determine appropriate numbers of examined lymph node (ELN) for early-stage EOC and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

Methods

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we obtained 10372 EOC cases with stage T1M0 and ELN ≥ 2, including 2849 HGSOC cases. Generalized linear models with multivariable adjustment were used to analyze associations between ELN numbers and lymph node stage migration, survival and positive lymph node (PLN). LOESS regression characterized dynamic trends of above associations followed by Chow test to determine structural breakpoints of ELN numbers. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

More ELNs were associated with more node-positive diseases, more PLNs and better prognosis. ELN structural breakpoints were different in subgroups of early-stage EOC, which for node stage migration or PLN were more than those for improving outcomes. The meaning of ELN structural breakpoint varied with its location and the morphology of LOESS curve. To avoid stage migration, the optimal ELN for early-stage EOC was 29 and the minimal ELN for HGSOC was 24. For better survival, appropriate ELN number were 13 and 8 respectively. More ELNs explained better prognosis only at a certain range.

Discussion

Neither too many nor too few numbers of ELN were ideal for early-stage EOC and HGSOC. Excision with appropriate numbers of lymph node draining the affected ovary may be more reasonable than traditional sentinel lymph node resection and systematic lymphadenectomy.

The value of ultrasonography combined with carbohydrate antigen 125 and 19-9 detection in the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors and prediction of recurrence

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of ultrasonography combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis and prediction of recurrence of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and analyze the value of the combination of two different auxiliary examinations in the diagnosis and prediction of recurrence of BOTs.

Methods

Here, 221 patients with BOTs confirmed by postoperative pathology were enrolled. Their clinical data, including the ultrasonography features, tumor markers, and clinicopathological data, were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The statistical data of the 221 cases with BOTs were as follows: 94 (42.5%) with left-sided lesions, 102 (46.2%) with right-sided lesions, and 25 (11.3%) with bilateral lesions. Moreover, 93 cases (42.1%) had a borderline serous tumor, 110 (49.8%) had a borderline mucinous tumor, 12 (5.4%) had a borderline serous mucinous tumor, 2 (0.9%) had a borderline endometrioid tumor, 1 (0.5%) had a borderline Brenner tumor, and 2 (0.9%) had a clear cell BOT. There were 104 cases (47.1%) with a tumor diameter of ≤10 cm and 117 cases (52.9%) with a tumor diameter of >10 cm as suggested by ultrasonography. There were 89 cases (40.3%) with septation, 44 (19.9%) with papilla, and 97 (43.9%) with blood flow as demonstrated by ultrasonography. Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125) was elevated in 132 cases (59.7%), and CA 19-9 was elevated in 52 cases (23.5%).

Conclusion

In general, BOTs are difficult to diagnose preoperatively and have a certain recurrence rate. Ultrasonography combined with CA 125 and CA 19-9 is significant for the preoperative diagnosis and selection of surgical modality for BOTs and could be used as a guideline to achieve good preoperative preparation and avoid secondary surgery.

Where are we going with sentinel nodes mapping in ovarian cancer?

Lymph node involvement is a major predictive indicator in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). There is presently no effective way to determine lymph node involvement other than surgical staging. As a result, traditional ovarian cancer surgery still includes pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. However, it might be linked to higher blood loss, lengthier operations, and longer hospital stays. The creation of a technique for accurately predicting nodal status without significant lymphadenectomy is thus the subject of ongoing research. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) mapping is a routine procedure in oncological surgery and has been proven to be effective and safe in cervical, vulvar, and uterine cancer. On the other hand, SLN mapping is not yet widely accepted and recognized in EOC. A thorough search of the literature was conducted between January 1995 to March 2022, using PubMed and Embase. This review included studies on lymphatic outflow of the ovaries and the sentinel lymph node method. A total of 13 studies involving 212 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node mapping for ovaries were included. Both open and laparoscopic approach are used. The most popular injection site is the ovarian ligaments, and a variety of agents are utilized, although the main markers were, technetium-99m radiocolloid (Tc-99m) or indocyanine green, either alone or in combination. Overall detection rate for SLN in ovaries is 84.5% (interquartile range: 27-100%). We suggest a standardized method for sentinel lymph node mapping in ovarian cancer. The detection rates, characterization and true positive rates of the approach in investigations support further study. The use of ultra-staging is essential for lower-volume metastasis and reproducibility. To ascertain the clinical utility of sentinel node in early ovarian cancer, larger collaborative prospective clinical trials are necessary.

Prognostic nomogram that predicts progression-free survival and overall survival of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma

Objectives

We aims to develop nomograms to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) after primary treatment and compare the predictive accuracy with the currently used International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) system.

Methods

We collected data from 358 Chinese patients diagnosed with OCCC and who underwent standard treatment at our hospital. Patients diagnosed from 1982-9 to 2011-12 were classified as the training group and patients diagnosed from 2012-1 to 2016-11 were classified as the validation group. Nomograms were developed based on the training group and was validated in the validation group. The predictive performance was determined by concordance index and calibration curve.

Results

The most predictive nomogram for PFS was constructed using variables: thrombosis, the FIGO staging, residual of the tumor and distant metastasis, with a concordance index of 0.738. While the nomogram for OS consisted of thrombosis, lymph node metastasis, residual of the tumor, malignant ascites/washing, and platinum resistance, with a concordance index of 0.835. The nomograms were internally validated by concordance indexes of 0.775 and 0.807 for predicting PFS and OS, respectively. In comparison, the concordance statistics for OS based on the FIGO staging was significantly lower (P&lt;0.05).

Conclusion

We have established two prognostic nomograms for recurrence and long-term survival in patients with OCCC after primary treatment in a large Chinese center and validated them in patients from the same center. This tool used variables specifically related to OCCC and was more accurate than the FIGO system. It is relatively easy to use in clinic for patient counseling, postoperative management, and follow-up for individual patients.