Cryptococcal chest wall mass and rib osteomyelitis associated with the use of fingolimod: A case report and literature review

Cryptococcus Neoformans Osteomyelitis of the Right Ankle Diagnosed by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in a HIV-Negative Patient with Tuberculous Lymphadenitis and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Case Report and Recent Literature Review

Aim

Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis coupled with tuberculosis and tuberculous lymphadenitis, is a rare occurrence in clinical. Diagnostic challenges arise due to the clinical radiological similarity of this condition to other lung infections and the limited and sensitive nature of traditional approaches. Here, we present a case of co-infection diagnosed using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing, highlighting the effectiveness of advanced genomic techniques in such complex scenarios.

Case Presentation

We present a case of a 67-year-old female infected with cryptococcal osteomyelitis and presented with swelling and pain in the right ankle. Following a biopsy of the right ankle joint, Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) of the biopsy tissue revealed Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Positive results for Cryptococcus capsular antigen and pathological findings confirmed the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans. The patient underwent surgical debridement, coupled with oral fluconazole treatment (300mg/day), leading to the resolution of symptoms.

Conclusion

Cryptococcus neoformans is an uncommon cause of ankle infection. Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) serves as a valuable diagnostic tool, aiding clinicians in differentiating cryptococcal osteomyelitis from other atypical infections.

Cryptococcosis Associated With Biologic Therapy: A Narrative Review

Cryptococcus is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that can cause disseminated infection with predominant central nervous system involvement in patients with compromised immunity. Biologics are increasingly used in the treatment of neoplasms and autoimmune/inflammatory conditions and the prevention of transplant rejection, which may affect human defense mechanisms against cryptococcosis. In this review, we comprehensively investigate the association between cryptococcosis and various biologics, highlighting their risks of infection, clinical manifestations, and clinical outcomes. Clinicians should remain vigilant for the risk of cryptococcosis in patients receiving biologics that affect the Th1/macrophage activation pathways, such as tumor necrosis factor α antagonists, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, fingolimod, JAK/STAT inhibitors (Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription), and monoclonal antibody against CD52. Other risk factors-such as age, underlying condition, and concurrent immunosuppressants, especially corticosteroids-should also be taken into account during risk stratification.

COVID-19 associated with cryptococcosis: a scoping review

Background

There is growing evidence of fungal infections associated with COVID-19. The development of cryptococcosis in these patients has been infrequently reported. However, it can be life-threatening.

Objective

To identify cases of COVID-19 patients who developed cryptococcosis and to compare baseline characteristics and management between those who survived and those who died.

Methods

We conducted a scoping review using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase to identify studies that reported patients with COVID-19 and cryptococcosis. No language restriction was applied. Single case reports, case series, and original articles were included. It is important to note that 'n' refers to the total number of individuals with the specified variable.

Results

A total of 58 studies were included. Among these studies, 51 included individual patient data, detailing information on a total of 65 patients, whereas eight studies reported the proportion of cryptococcosis in COVID-19 patients. One study provided both individual and aggregate case information. From individual patient data, the majority were male (73.9%; n = 48) with a median age of 60 years (range: 53-70). Severe COVID-19 and multiple comorbidities, led by arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus, were frequently reported, but few had classic immunosuppression factors. On the other hand, HIV status, either negative or positive, was reported in just over half of the patients (61.5%; n = 40). Most were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (58.5%; n = 31), received mechanical ventilation (MV) (50.0%; n = 26), and developed disseminated cryptococcosis (55.4%; n = 36). Secondary infection, mainly bacterial, was reported in 19 patients (29.2%). Mortality was 47.7% (n = 31). Of the studies that reported the proportion of cryptococcosis in COVID-19 cases, the majority were descriptive studies published as conference abstracts.

Conclusion

Cryptococcosis in COVID-19 patients has been reported more frequently. However, it is still not as common as other fungal infections associated with COVID-19. Few patients have some classic immunosuppression factors. The factors associated with mortality were male sex, age, ICU admission, MV, secondary infections, and lymphopenia.

Cryptococcus neoformans osteomyelitis of the tibia: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Osteomyelitis is a bone inflammation that can be related to various infectious agents. As with any other type of inflammation, the prevailing symptoms and signs may include redness, swelling, pain, and heat. Fungal osteomyelitis is rare and usually found in immune-compromised patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

A non-human immunodeficiency virus immunocompromised Greek female patient, 82 years old, visited the emergency department due to a 3 day pain located mainly over the left tibia's anterior surface, accompanied by swelling and redness. There was also a subcutaneous lesion of her left breast. Medical history revealed that the patient had an unmasked close contact with pigeons, a main host of the disease. Initial x-ray imaging showed an osteolytic area in the upper third of the tibial diaphysis. The patient was admitted and underwent a computed tomography-guided biopsy. The specimen revealed a Cryptococcus neoformans infection of the bone and the breast. She was treated with 400 mg fluconazole twice a day for 3 weeks while in hospital and 200 mg twice a day upon discharge for 9 months. After that, she underwent surgical debridement because of lasting local irritation. She was closely monitored in our outpatient office, and in her last visit, 1 year after the initial admission, inflammatory signs had regressed vastly.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the ninth cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the tibia to be recorded since 1974, and the most unusual finding was the bifocal nature of the infection, affecting both the tibia and the breast.

Isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the sacrum in an immunocompetent patient: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Cryptococcus neoformans, an opportunistic fungal pathogen, seldom causes infection in immunocompetent people. Cryptococcal osteomyelitis is an uncommon condition in which Cryptococcus invades the bone. It usually occurs as part of a disseminated infection and rarely in isolation. The spine has been reported as the most common site of cryptococcal osteomyelitis; however, isolated case of sacrum involvement in immunocompetent patients has never been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 37-year-old man without underlying disease who presented with progressive low back and sacrococcygeal pain. The patient was initially diagnosed with sacral tumour by a local doctor, and subsequently, after admission, was diagnosed with sacral tuberculosis. He was empirically treated with antitubercular drugs. The patient failed to respond to antitubercular drugs and complained of worsening low back pain. Additionally, he developed persistent radiating pain and numbness in his legs. For further diagnosis, we performed a computed tomography-guided puncture biopsy of the sacrum, which revealed granulomatous inflammation with massive macrophage infiltration and special staining revealed a fungal infection. We performed sacral debridement and drainage and obtained purulent specimens for pathological examination and microbial culture. Microbial identification and drug susceptibility tests revealed a Cryptococcus neoformans infection sensitive to fluconazole. Postoperatively, the persistent radiating pain and numbness in the legs resolved. After 12 consecutive weeks of antifungal therapy, all his symptoms resolved. The patient remained without any signs of recurrence at the 8-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We reported a rare case of isolated sacrum cryptococcal osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent patient. Furthermore, we identified and reviewed 18 published cases of spine cryptococcal osteomyelitis. Immunocompetent individuals are also at risk for cryptococcal osteomyelitis. Clinical manifestation and imaging are insufficient to diagnose cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the spine, and invasive examinations, such as puncture biopsy and fungal examinations, are needed. Antifungal therapy yields satisfactory results for the treatment of cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the spine, however, if the infective lesion is large, especially when it compresses the spinal cord and nerves, a regimen combining aggressive surgery with antifungal therapy is indispensable.