Effect of pemafibrate on liver enzymes and shear wave velocity in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients

Selective PPARα Modulator (SPPARMα) in the Era of the MASLD Pandemic: Current Insights and Future Prospects

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has emerged as a significant global health concern, affecting approximately 30% of the population. In Japan, its prevalence is also rising rapidly and is expected to reach 50% by 2040. This situation can be described as a "MASLD pandemic", emphasizing the urgent need for effective therapeutic interventions. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are nuclear receptors that play essential roles in lipid metabolism, inflammation regulation, and fibrosis modulation. Among them, PPARα is a key regulator of lipid homeostasis, primarily expressed in the liver and other metabolically active tissues. Its activation promotes fatty acid oxidation and improves lipid profiles, making it a crucial target for metabolic disorders. In Japan, a novel selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα) was developed as a lipid-lowering agent for treating dyslipidemia. Over time, increasing clinical evidence has suggested that SPPARMα has beneficial effects on MASLD patients' liver function. This review aims to summarize the therapeutic potential of SPPARMα in MASLD by examining the functional mechanisms of PPARα, preclinical studies in animal models, and accumulating clinical evidence from MASLD patients. Furthermore, we provide an overview of ongoing clinical trials investigating SPPARMα for MASLD treatment.

Pemafibrate Reduced Liver Stiffness in Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease Complicated with Hyperlipidemia and Liver Fibrosis with a Fibrosis-4 Index Above 1.3

Objective To evaluate the effect of pemafibrate (PEM) on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods We retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with hyperlipidemia and MASLD to determine changes in clinical factors between the start of PEM treatment and 0.5 years later. Using FibroScan, 39 of 43 patients were evaluated for liver stiffness (LS; kPa) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP; dB/m). None of the patients had decompensated cirrhosis. Results Thirty patients were women, the median age was 66 years old, the median fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score was 2.52, the median LS was 8.05 kPa, and the median CAP was 280.5 dB/m at the start of PEM treatment. AST, ALT, ALP, γGTP, and triglyceride levels decreased 0.5 years after starting PEM treatment, but FIB-4, LS, and CAP values did not decrease. However, LS decreased in patients with a FIB-4 index ≥1.3 at the start of PEM treatment, whereas it did not change in patients with a FIB-4 index <1.3. Similarly, LS decreased in patients with a value ≥8 kPa at the start of treatment and did not change in those with <8 kPa. The decreased LS group had higher baseline ALT and LS levels and lower ALT levels during 0.5 years of follow-up than the increased LS group. Conclusion At the initiation of PEM treatment, the LS decreased in patients with MASLD complicated by hyperlipidemia and moderate LS (FIB-4>1.3 or LS >8 kPa). Although there is currently no approved treatment for MASLD, PEM may be a viable treatment option for MASLD with mild LS.

Current and experimental pharmacotherapy for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease, with its incidence increasing in parallel with the global prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite our steadily increasing knowledge of its pathogenesis, there is as yet no available pharmacotherapy specifically tailored for NAFLD. To define the appropriate management, it is important to clarify the context in which the disease appears. In the case of concurrent metabolic comorbidities, NAFLD patients are treated by targeting these comorbidities, such as diabetes and obesity. Thus, GLP-1 analogs, PPAR, and SGLT2 inhibitors have recently become central to the treatment of NAFLD. In parallel, randomized trials are being conducted to explore new agents targeting known pathways involved in NAFLD progression. However, there is an imperative need to intensify the effort to design new, safe drugs with biopsy-proven efficacy. Of note, the main target of the pharmacotherapy should be directed to the regression of fibrotic NASH, as this histologic stage has been correlated with increased overall as well as liver-related morbidity and mortality. Herein we discuss the drugs currently at the forefront of NAFLD treatment.

Comparison of Efficacy between Pemafibrate and Omega-3-Acid Ethyl Ester in the Liver: the PORTRAIT Study

AIM

No pharmacotherapeutic treatment has been established for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This trial compared the effects of pemafibrate and omega-3-acid ethyl ester on hepatic function in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD.

METHODS

Patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD were enrolled, randomly assigned to the pemafibrate or omega-3-acid ethyl ester group, and followed for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to week 24. The secondary endpoints included other hepatic enzymes, lipid profiles, and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were enrolled and randomized. The adjusted mean change in ALT from baseline to week 24 was significantly lower in the pemafibrate group (-19.7±5.9 U/L) than in the omega-3-acid ethyl ester group (6.8±5.5 U/L) (intergroup difference, -26.5 U/L; 95% confidence interval, -42.3 to -10.7 U/L; p=0.001). Pemafibrate significantly improved the levels of other hepatic enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase), lipid profiles (triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers (Mac-2 binding protein glycan isomer and Fibrosis-4 index). No cases of discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions were identified in either group, and there were no safety concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemafibrate is recommended over omega-3-acid ethyl ester for lipid management and MASLD treatment in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD. The study results may contribute to the development of future treatment strategies for patients with MASLD/MASH.

Managing hypertriglyceridemia for cardiovascular disease prevention: Lessons from the PROMINENT trial

BACKGROUND

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride-lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride-lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial.

METHODS

This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride-lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride-lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride-lowering effect, slight increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high-intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease.

CONCLUSION

Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride-lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real-world settings.

Effect of Pemafibrate on the Lipid Profile, Liver Function, and Liver Fibrosis Among Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

Background

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are prevalent conditions linked to obesity and metabolic disturbances, with potential complications such as cirrhosis and cardiovascular risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pemafibrate, a drug targeting fat and sugar metabolism genes, in treating patients with MASLD/MASH.

Methods

Databases such as MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until September 2023 to identify relevant studies. Selected studies underwent a thorough quality assessment using tools like Risk of Bias 2 tool (ROB-2) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used for statistical evaluations, with a focus on lipid profiles, liver function tests, and fibrosis measurements.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included; 10 of them were included in the quantitative analysis. Our findings showed that pemafibrate significantly decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (effect size (ES) = -9.61 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -14.15 to -5.08), increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (ES = 3.15 mg/dL, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.78), and reduced triglycerides (TG) (ES = -85.98 mg/dL, 95% CI: -96.61 to -75.36). Additionally, pemafibrate showed a marked reduction in liver enzyme levels, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), with significant effect sizes and P values. For liver stiffness outcomes, pemafibrate decreased AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) (ES = -0.180, 95% CI: -0.221 to -0.138).

Conclusions

Pemafibrate, with its enhanced efficacy and safety profile, presents as a pivotal agent in MASLD/MASH treatment. Its lipid-regulating properties, coupled with its beneficial effects on liver inflammation markers, position it as a potentially invaluable therapeutic option.

Effectiveness of 1-year pemafibrate treatment on steatotic liver disease: the influence of alcohol consumption

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that improves serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in dyslipidemia patients. We previously reported that pemafibrate significantly improves liver function, serum triglyceride (TG) levels and liver stiffness in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients, however the influence of alcohol consumption was not considered. Therefore, we explored pemafibrate efficacy in patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD) and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated pemafibrate efficacy on liver enzymes and lipids in metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD) (n = 93), MASLD plus increased alcohol intake (MetALD; n = 23) and ALD (n = 22) patients who had taken pemafibrate for at least 48 weeks. Liver shear wave velocity (SWV, n = 75) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In MASLD group, ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and TG values were significantly decreased from baseline to week 24 and week 48 ( P  < 0.0001). ALT and TG values in MetALD group and ALT and AST values in ALD group were also significantly decreased from baseline to week 24 and week 48. Study participant SWV values decreased from baseline to week 48. We observed no significant difference in changes to ALT, AST, γ-GTP and TG (value at week 24 or week 48 minus value at baseline) among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Pemafibrate improves liver function and liver stiffness thus making it a promising therapeutic agent for SLD, even in patients with excess alcohol consumption (MetALD and ALD groups).

Long-Term pemafibrate treatment exhibits limited impact on body fat mass in patients with hypertriglyceridemia accompanying NAFLD

AIM

Short-term use of pemafibrate (PEM), a selective modulator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, has been reported to improve abnormal liver function in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with hypertriglyceridemia (HTG-NAFLD). This study aimed to clarify the effects and predictive factors of long-term 72-week PEM administration on body composition, and laboratory tests in HTG-NAFLD patients.

METHODS

Fifty-three HTG-NAFLD patients receiving a 72-week PEM regimen were retrospectively enrolled. Routine blood and body composition results were analyzed immediately before and at the end of the study period.

RESULTS

PEM treatment significantly improved liver enzyme levels such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase, along with lipid profiles including triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. PEM did not have any detectable impact on body composition parameters. The factors of female, higher AST (≥ 46 U/L) and fat mass (≥ 31.9%), as well as lower soft lean mass (< 61.6%), skeletal muscle mass (< 36%), and skeletal muscle mass index (< 6.9 kg/m2) were significantly associated with the treatment response status of a > 30% decrease in ALT. All patients completed the treatment without any adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term PEM treatment had a positive impact on liver enzymes and lipid profiles, but it did not result in significant changes in body composition among HTG-NAFLD patients. In predicting the response to PEM treatment, the evaluation of AST and body composition may be useful.

A Comparison of Alanine Aminotransferase Normalization between Pemafibrate and Bezafibrate in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Objective Pemafibrate is a recently developed selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator that can improve alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the effectiveness of ALT normalization with pemafibrate and bezafibrate, a traditional fibrate, has not been compared. Methods In this retrospective study, we compared the effects of pemafibrate and bezafibrate on ALT normalization in patients with NAFLD. The primary endpoint was the ALT normalization rate at 12 months after administration. Patients Twenty and 14 patients with NAFLD receiving pemafibrate and bezafibrate, respectively, were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients had elevated ALT levels and dyslipidemia at entry. Results The ALT normalization rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 40%, 55%, and 60% for pemafibrate and 14.3%, 28.6%, and 14.3% for bezafibrate, respectively. The ALT normalization rate at 12 months was significantly higher in patients treated with pemafibrate than in those treated with bezafibrate (p=0.01). Pemafibrate, when compared with bezafibrate, was shown to be a significant factor for ALT normalization in a multivariable analysis with an adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 13.8 (1.6-115, p=0.01). Conclusion Pemafibrate is effective in ALT normalization in patients with NAFLD and may be used as a treatment for NAFLD.

Potential Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease is one of the outstanding challenges in gastroenterology. The increasing incidence of the disease is undoubtedly connected with the ongoing obesity pandemic. The lack of specific symptoms in the early phases and the grave complications of the disease require an active approach to prompt diagnosis and treatment. Therapeutic lifestyle changes should be introduced in a great majority of patients; but, in many cases, the adherence is not satisfactory. There is a great need for an effective pharmacological therapy for Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease, especially before the onset of steatohepatitis. Currently, there are no specific recommendations on the selection of drugs to treat liver steatosis and prevent patients from progression toward more advanced stages (steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and cancer). Therefore, in this Review, we provide data on the clinical efficacy of therapeutic interventions that might improve the course of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease. These include the drugs used in the treatment of obesity and hyperlipidemias, as well as affecting the gut microbiota and endocrine system, and other experimental approaches, including functional foods. Finally, we provide advice on the selection of drugs for patients with concomitant Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α in Lipoprotein Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a group of ligand-binding transcription factors with pivotal action in regulating pleiotropic signaling pathways of energetic metabolism, immune responses and cell proliferation and differentiation. A significant body of evidence indicates that the PPARα receptor is an important modulator of plasma lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, with pluripotent effects influencing the lipid and apolipoprotein cargo of both atherogenic and antiatherogenic lipoproteins and their functionality. Clinical evidence supports an important role of PPARα agonists (fibric acid derivatives) in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and/or low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, although the effects of clinical trials are contradictory and point to a reduction in the risk of nonfatal and fatal myocardial infarction events. In this manuscript, we provide an up-to-date critical review of the existing relevant literature.

Gamma-glutamyl transferase predicts pemafibrate treatment response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α modulator, has been shown to improve liver function among nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with dyslipidemia. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify predictors of pemafibrate efficacy in NAFLD patients.

METHODS

A total of 75 NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia who received pemafibrate twice per day for 48 weeks were enrolled in this study. We used the FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score as a benchmark for treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Median FAST score significantly decreased from 0.96 at baseline to 0.93 at week 48 (P < 0.001). Significant improvements in levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and triglycerides were also noted. The serum level of GGT at baseline was correlated with change in FAST score (r = -0.22, P = 0.049). Changes in AST, ALT, and GGT were positively correlated with change in FAST score (r = 0.71, r = 0.61, and r = 0.38). Multivariate analyses identified age and GGT level at baseline as significantly associated with improvement of FAST score by pemafibrate therapy (odds ratio 1.11, 1.02, respectively). Patients over 50 years of age and with a GGT of 90 IU/L or higher showed significantly greater improvement in the FAST score than other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemafibrate improves the FAST score of NAFLD patients with complicating dyslipidemia, especially in older patients with high GGT level. GGT is useful as an indicator of optimal treatment choice for NAFLD patients with dyslipidemia.

Current Clinical Trial Status and Future Prospects of PPAR-Targeted Drugs for Treating Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The number of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing globally and is raising serious concerns regarding the increasing medical and economic burden incurred for their treatment. The progression of NASH to more severe conditions such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma requires liver transplantation to avoid death. Therefore, therapeutic intervention is required in the NASH stage, although no therapeutic drugs are currently available for this. Several anti-NASH candidate drugs have been developed that enable treatment via the modulation of distinct signaling cascades and include a series of drugs targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes (PPARα/δ/γ) that are considered to be attractive because they can regulate both systemic lipid metabolism and inflammation. Multiple PPAR dual/pan agonists have been developed but only a few of them have been evaluated in clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH. Herein, we review the current clinical trial status and future prospects of PPAR-targeted drugs for treating NAFLD/NASH. In addition, we summarize our recent findings on the binding modes and the potencies/efficacies of several candidate PPAR dual/pan agonists to estimate their therapeutic potentials against NASH. Considering that the development of numerous PPAR dual/pan agonists has been abandoned because of their serious side effects, we also propose a repositioning of the already approved, safety-proven PPAR-targeted drugs against NAFLD/NASH.

Impact of Sex and Gender on Clinical Management of Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Gender differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical features in chronic liver diseases that may be associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been increasingly reported in recent years. This sexual dimorphism is due to a complex interaction between sex- and gender-related factors, including biological, hormonal, psychological and socio-cultural variables. However, the impact of sex and gender on the management of T2D subjects with liver disease is still unclear. In this regard, sex-related differences deserve careful consideration in pharmacology, aimed at improving drug safety and optimising medical therapy, both in men and women with T2D; moreover, low adherence to and persistence of long-term drug treatment is more common among women. A better understanding of sex- and gender-related differences in this field would provide an opportunity for a tailored diagnostic and therapeutic approach to the management of T2D subjects with chronic liver disease. In this narrative review, we summarized available data on sex- and gender-related differences in chronic liver disease, including metabolic, autoimmune, alcoholic and virus-related forms and their potential evolution towards cirrhosis and/or hepatocarcinoma in T2D subjects, to support their appropriate and personalized clinical management.