Reduction in Methane Emissions From Acidified Dairy Slurry Is Related to Inhibition of Methanosarcina Species

Acidification of animal slurry in housing and during storage to reduce NH3 and GHG emissions-recent advancements and future perspectives

Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions are an environmental issue associated with animal manure management. Concrete, practical, and economic solutions are needed for farmers and other stakeholders around the globe to solve this issue. Decreasing slurry pH with the help of acids or other compounds is a well-documented technique to reduce ammonia and methane emissions from slurry. However, the effect of manure acidification on N2O emissions is still not clear. Recently, acidifying agents other than the previously used mineral acids have been tested such as e.g. organic acids, bio-waste materials, and microbial inoculations. However, the effectiveness of these acidifying agents in reducing the slurry pH and mitigation of gaseous emissions further needs to be reviewed. Also, the effectiveness of acidification in combination with other manure treatments such as composting, solid-liquid separation, and anaerobic digestion requires consideration in whole-system solutions. Here, recent studies have been compiled and reviewed to determine the applicability of acidification options for slurry management to deepen our understanding of the environmental impact of slurry acidification. The literature review revealed that temperature fluctuations have a substantial impact on the acidified slurry's performance during storage. A viable substitute for conventional mineral acids could be organic acids and biomaterials like sugars whey, and microbes. Furthermore, apple pulp, sugar beet molasses, and grass silage are examples of bio-waste products that exhibit promise as acidifying agents. However, to gain a better understanding of the viability and usefulness of the recently evaluated acidifying compounds, more research is still required.

Mitigation of ammonia and methane emissions with manure amendments during storage of cattle slurry

This study aimed at assessing the efficacy of manure amendments in abating ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) emissions during storage. Two experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 was conducted using 20 L of slurry for 98 days. Treatments were: aluminium sulphate (alum), lactogypsum, zeolite, actiglene, ammonium thiosulphate, biochar, dairy processing waste, Digest-IT and control (without amendment). Experiment 2 was conducted using 660 L of slurry in underground storage tanks for 77 days. Treatments were: sulphuric acid, gypsum, biochar and control (without amendment). NH3 measurements for experiment 1 and experiment 2 were conducted using the photoacoustic gas monitor and dynamic chamber techniques, respectively. CH4 was measured using the static chamber technique in both experiments. The effect of amendments on slurry composition was determined at the end of the experiments. Experiment 1 showed a significant reduction in NH3 emissions in the alum (82%), lactogypsum (46%) and zeolite (32%) treatments relative to the control (100.3% total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN)). CH4 was reduced significantly in the alum (87%), ammonium thiosulphate (64%) and lactogypsum (67%) relative to the control (291.9 g m-2). Experiment 2 showed a significant reduction (32%) in NH3 emissions in the sulphuric acid relative to the control (4.4% TAN). CH4 was reduced significantly in the sulphuric acid (46%), gypsum (39%) and biochar (15%) treatments relative to the control (291.9 g m-2). In general, amendments altered slurry composition such as dry matter, volatile solids, carbon and nitrogen contents at the end of storage. Lactogypsum, alum and sulphuric acid were effective in abating both NH3 and CH4 emissions and can contribute to improving air quality.

Low-dose acidification of cattle slurry with sulfuric acid enhances oilseed-rape yield but risks elevated sulfide formation during prolonged storage

Slurry acidification using sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is an effective strategy for reducing ammonia and methane emissions during storage while providing a valuable source of sulfur (S) for crops. However, the optimal H2SO4 dose for balancing emission mitigation, S availability, and cost-effectiveness remains unclear, particularly concerning the formation of undesirable sulfides during storage. This study investigated the effects of H2SO4 dose on S transformations during storage of cattle slurry (CS), anaerobically digested slurry (DS), the liquid fraction of separated digested slurry (LFDS), and the subsequent S fertilizer replacement value (SFRV) for oilseed rape (OSR). A 5-month storage experiment at 10 °C was conducted, followed by a pot experiment. Each slurry type received three H2SO4 doses targeting pH values of 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5. Slurry pH, redox potential, dissolved sulfate, and sulfide were monitored during storage. S offtake in OSR biomass was measured at harvest, and the SFRV was assessed. Low-dose acidification of CS to pH 6.5 triggered rapid sulfate reduction to sulfide within 4 weeks of storage, while in the DS and LFDS treatments, sulfide formation was delayed at the low acid dose. The highest dose of acidification to pH ≤ 4.5 maintained lower pH and sulfide levels in all stored slurry types. The SFRV of non-acidified slurry ranged from 19 to 24 % of total slurry S, increasing with acidification and higher sulfate+sulfide content. These results suggest that low-dose acidification with H2SO4 can satisfy crop S demands but may lead to undesired sulfide formation during storage, although this effect is delayed in digested slurries.

In-vitro method and model to estimate methane emissions from liquid manure management on pig and dairy farms in four countries

Methane (CH4) emissions from manure management on livestock farms are a key source of greenhouse gas emissions in some regions and for some production systems, and the opportunities for mitigation may be significant if emissions can be adequately documented. We investigated a method for estimating CH4 emissions from liquid manure (slurry) that is based on anaerobic incubation of slurry collected from commercial farms. Methane production rates were used to derive a parameter of the Arrhenius temperature response function, lnA', representing the CH4 production potential of the slurry at the time of sampling. Results were used for parameterization of an empirical model to estimate annual emissions with daily time steps, where CH4 emissions from individual sources (barns, outside storage tanks) can be calculated separately. A monitoring program was conducted in four countries, i.e., Denmark, Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands, during a 12-month period where slurry was sampled to represent barn and outside storage on finishing pig and dairy farms. Across the four countries, lnA' was higher in pig slurry compared to cattle slurry (p < 0.01), and higher in slurry from barns compared to outside storage (p < 0.01). In a separate evaluation of the incubation method, in-vitro CH4 production rates were comparable with in-situ emissions. The results indicate that lnA' in barns increases with slurry age, probably due to growth or adaptation of the methanogenic microbial community. Using lnA' values determined experimentally, empirical models with daily time steps were constructed for finishing pig and dairy farms and used for scenario analyses. Annual emissions from pig slurry were predicted to be 2.5 times higher than those from cattle slurry. Changing the frequency of slurry export from the barn on the model pig farm from 40 to 7 d intervals reduced total annual CH4 emissions by 46 %; this effect would be much less on cattle farms with natural ventilation. In a scenario with cattle slurry, the empirical model was compared with the current IPCC methodology. The seasonal dynamics were less pronounced, and annual CH4 emissions were lower than with the current methodology, which calls for further investigations. Country-specific models for individual animal categories and point sources could be a tool for assessing CH4 emissions and mitigation potentials at farm level.

Responses of CH4, N2O, and NH3 emissions to different slurry pH values of 5.5-10.0: Characteristics and mechanisms

Animal slurry storage is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. pH is a basic but key factor that could pose great influence on gas emissions, but the simultaneous evaluation of its influence on GHG and NH3 emissions and the understanding of its underlying mechanism are not enough. In this work, pH was adjusted between 5.5 and 10.0 by a step of 0.5 unit by adding lactic acid and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) properly and frequently to the stored slurry during a 43-day storage period. The cumulative NH3 emissions were linearly correlated with the slurry pH, with R2 being 0.982. Maintaining the slurry pH at 5.5-6.0 could reduce NH3 emissions by 69.4%-85.1% compared with the non-treated group (CK). The pH ranges for maximum methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were 7.5-8.5 and 6.5-8.5, respectively, and the slurry under pH 7.5-8.5 showed the highest GHG emissions. Acidification to pH 5.5 helped reduce the CH4, N2O, and total GHG emissions by 98.0%, 29.3%, and 81.7%, respectively; while alkalinization to pH 10.0 helped achieve the mitigation effects of 74.1%, 24.9%, and 30.6%, respectively. The Pearson's correlation factor between CH4 and the gene copy of mcrA under different pH values was 0.744 (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the correlation factors between N2O and the gene copies of amoA, narG, and nirS were 0.644 (p < 0.05), 0.719 (p < 0.05), and 0.576 (p = 0.081), respectively. The gene copies of mcrA, amoA, narG, and nirS were maintained at the lowest level under pH 5.5. These results recommended keeping slurry pH lower than 5.5 with lactic acid can help control GHG and NH3 emissions simultaneously and effectively.

Effects of self-produced lactic fermentation (SPLF) on GHG and VSC emissions during swine slurry storage

Self-produced lactic fermentation (SPLF) is a new valued utilization technology, but its impact on gas emission remains unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of replacing the H2SO4 additive with SPLF on greenhouse gas (GHG), and volatile sulfur compound (VSC) emissions from swine slurry storage in a laboratory-scale study. In this study, SPLF is directed toward producing lactic acid (LA) through the anaerobic fermentation of slurry and apple waste under the most suitable conditions, with the LA concentration kept at 10,000-52000 mg COD/L and the pH remaining within 4.5 during the following 90 days of slurry storage. Compared with that in the slurry storage treatment (CK), the GHG emissions decreased by 86% and 87% in the SPLF and H2SO4 groups, respectively. The low pH (i.e., less than 4.5) inhibited the growth of Methanocorpusculum and Methanosarcina and resulted in very low mcrA gene copies in the SPLF group, leading to a reduction in CH4 emissions. The methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and H2S emissions in the SPLF group were reduced by 57%, 42%, 22%, and 87% and increased by 2206%, 61%, 173%, and 1856% in the H2SO4 group, respectively. Therefore, SPLF can be an innovative bioacidification technology for effectively reducing GHG and VSC emissions from animal slurry storage.

Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility

Despite its projected crucial role in stringent, future global climate policy, non-CO2 greenhouse gas (NCGG) mitigation remains a large uncertain factor in climate research. A revision of the estimated mitigation potential has implications for the feasibility of global climate policy to reach the Paris Agreement climate goals. Here, we provide a systematic bottom-up estimate of the total uncertainty in NCGG mitigation, by developing 'optimistic', 'default' and 'pessimistic' long-term NCGG marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves, based on a comprehensive literature review of mitigation options. The global 1.5-degree climate target is found to be out of reach under pessimistic MAC assumptions, as is the 2-degree target under high emission assumptions. In a 2-degree scenario, MAC uncertainty translates into a large projected range in relative NCGG reduction (40-58%), carbon budget (±120 Gt CO2) and policy costs (±16%). Partly, the MAC uncertainty signifies a gap that could be bridged by human efforts, but largely it indicates uncertainty in technical limitations.

Nitrogen transformation processes catalyzed by manure microbiomes in earthen pit and concrete storages on commercial dairy farms

Storing manure is an essential aspect of nutrient management on dairy farms. It presents the opportunity to use manure efficiently as a fertilizer in crop and pasture production. Typically, the manure storages are constructed as earthen, concrete, or steel-based structures. However, storing manure can potentially emit aerial pollutants to the atmosphere, including nitrogen and greenhouse gases, through microbial and physicochemical processes. We have characterized the composition of the microbiome in two manure storage structures, a clay-lined earthen pit and an aboveground concrete storage tank, on commercial dairy farms, to discern the nitrogen transformation processes, and thereby, inform the development of mitigation practices to preserve the value of manure. First, we analyzed the 16S rRNA-V4 amplicons generated from manure samples collected from several locations and depths (0.3, 1.2, and 2.1-2.75 m below the surface) of the storages, identifying a set of Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASVs) and quantifying their abundances. Then, we inferred the respective metabolic capabilities. These results showed that the manure microbiome composition was more complex and exhibited more location-to-location variation in the earthen pit than in the concrete tank. Further, the inlet and a location with hard surface crust in the earthen pit had unique consortia. The microbiomes in both storages had the potential to generate ammonia but lacked the organisms for oxidizing it to gaseous compounds. However, the microbial conversion of nitrate to gaseous N₂, NO, and N₂O via denitrification and to stable ammonia via dissimilatory nitrite reduction seemed possible; minor quantities of nitrate was present in manure, potentially originating from oxidative processes occurring on the barn floor. The nitrate-transformation linked ASVs were more prevalent at the near-surface locations and all depths of the inlet. Anammox bacteria and archaeal or bacterial autotrophic nitrifiers were not detected in either storage. Hydrogenotrophic Methanocorpusculum species were the primary methanogens or methane producers, exhibiting higher abundance in the earthen pit. These findings suggested that microbial activities were not the main drivers for nitrogen loss from manure storage, and commonly reported losses are associated with the physicochemical processes. Finally, the microbiomes of stored manure had the potential to emit greenhouse gases such as NO, N₂O, and methane.

Acidification of slurry to reduce ammonia and methane emissions: Deployment of a retrofittable system in fattening pig barns

Livestock farming, and in particular slurry management, is a major contributor to ammonia (NH₃) and methane (CH₄) emissions in Europe. Furthermore, reduced NH₃ and CH₄ emissions are also relevant in licensing procedures and the management of livestock buildings. Therefore, the aim is to keep emissions from the barn as low as possible. Acidification of slurry in the barn can reduce these environmental and climate-relevant emissions by a pH value of 5.5. In this study, an acidification technology was retrofitted in an existing fattening pig barn equipped with a partially slatted floor. The slurry in a compartment with 32 animals was acidified. An identical compartment was used for reference investigations (case-control approach). Several times a week slurry was pumped for acidification in a process tank outside the barn compartment in a central corridor, where sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄) was added. Then the slurry was pumped back into the barn. In contrast to other systems, where acidified slurry was stored mainly in external storage tanks, in this study the slurry was completely stored in the slurry channels under the slatted floor, during the entire fattening period. The emission mass flow of NH₃ and CH₄ was measured continuously over three fattening periods, with one period in spring and two periods in summer. On average 17.1 kg H₂SO₄ (96%) (m³ slurry)^-1 were used for acidification during the three fattening periods. NH₃ and CH₄ emissions were reduced by 39 and 67%, respectively. The hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) concentration in the barn air of the acidification compartment was harmlessly low (0.02 ppm). Thus, despite the storage of the acidified slurry in the barn, the system leads to a lower concentration of detrimental gases, which is beneficial for the animals' as well as for the workers' health. The study shows that it is possible to retrofit acidification technology into existing pig barns. Further investigations shall identify possible measures to reduce the amount of H₂SO₄ used and thus minimise the sulphur input into the slurry.

Effects of Stepwise Temperature Shifts in Anaerobic Digestion for Treating Municipal Wastewater Sludge: A Genomic Study

In wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), anaerobic digester (AD) units are commonly operated under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. In some cases, during the dry season, maintaining a stable temperature in the digester requires additional power to operate a conditioning system. Without proper conditioning systems, methanogens are vulnerable to temperature shifts. This study investigated the effects of temperature shifts on CH₄ gas production and microbial diversity during anaerobic digestion of anaerobic sewage sludge using a metagenomic approach. The research was conducted in lab-scale AD under stepwise upshifted temperature from 42 to 48 °C. The results showed that significant methanogen population reduction during the temperature shift affected the CH₄ production. With 70 days of incubation each, CH₄ production decreased from 4.55 L·g⁻¹-chemical oxygen demand (COD) at 42 °C with methanogen/total population (M·TP⁻¹) ratio of 0.041 to 1.52 L·g⁻¹ COD (M·TP⁻¹ ratio 0.027) and then to 0.94 L·g⁻¹ COD ( M·TP⁻¹ ratio 0.026) after the temperature was shifted to 45 °C and 48 °C, respectively. Methanosaeta was the most prevalent methanogen during the thermal change. This finding suggests that the Methanosaeta genus was a thermotolerant archaea. Anaerobaculum, Fervidobacterium, and Tepidanaerobacter were bacterial genera and grew well in shifted-up temperatures, implying heat-resistant characteristics.

Microbial β-oxidation of synthetic long-chain fatty acids to improve lipid biomethanation

β-oxidation is a well-known pathway for fatty acid (FA) degradation. However, the wide range of feedstocks, their intermediates, and complex microbial networks involved in anaerobic digestion (AD) make β-oxidation unclear during lipid digestion having a variety of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs). Here, we demonstrated the detailed metabolic pathway of major bacteria and enzymes responsible for the β-oxidation of individual saturated FAs (C16:0 and C18:0) and unsaturated FAs (C18:1 and C18:2). C16:0 showed no negative impact on AD. The relative enzyme abundance and production of shorter-chain FAs ( Collapse

Key Words

• Biomethanation
• Community response
• Saturated fatty acids
• Unsaturated fatty acids
• Β-oxidation

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Muhammad Usman MOE, Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China; Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
Shuai Zhao MOE, Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
Byong-Hun Jeon Department of Earth Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
El-Sayed Salama Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China.
Xiangkai Li MOE, Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China.

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Slow pyrolysis liquid in reducing NH3 emissions from cattle slurry - Impacts on plant growth and soil organisms

A substantial percentage of manure nitrogen (N) can be lost as gaseous ammonia (NH₃) during storage and field spreading. Lowering slurry pH is a simple and accepted method for preserving its N. Efficiency of slow pyrolysis liquid (PL) produced from birch (Betula sp.) as an acidifying agent, and its ability to reduce NH₃ emissions following surface application of cattle slurry, was studied in a field experiment. Untreated slurry (US) and slurries acidified with PL and sulfuric acid (SA) were applied to the second harvest of a grass ley. Immediate NH₃ emissions, grass biomass, N-yield and possible toxic impacts on soil nematodes and enchytraeids were examined. Furthermore, the effects on soil respiration, nitrogen dynamics and seed germination were studied in subsequent laboratory experiments. In the field, over one third of the water-extractable ammonium-N (NH₄-N) applied was lost through NH₃ volatilization from US. SA and PL acidified slurries reduced NH₃-N emission rate equally from 3.4 to <0.04 kg ha^-1 h^-1. Acidification with SA resulted in the highest and that with PL in the lowest grass dry matter (DM) and N yield. Neither SA nor PL acidification had negative effects on soil enchytraeids or nematodes. Reduced yield production, seed germination and delayed microbial activity after PL slurry application were most probably caused by the PL containing organic compounds. However, later increase in carbon dioxide (CO₂) production and improved seed germination suggest that these compounds were rapidly volatilized and/or degraded by soil microbes. Though PL efficiently cut NH₃ emission from surface-spread slurry, further studies on appropriate application methods and possible phytotoxicity are needed.

Understanding methane emission from stored animal manure: A review to guide model development

National inventories of methane (CH₄ ) emission from manure management are based on guidelines from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change using country-specific emission factors. These calculations must be simple and, consequently, the effects of management practices and environmental conditions are only crudely represented in the calculations. The intention of this review is to develop a detailed understanding necessary for developing accurate models for calculating CH₄ emission from liquid manure, with particular focus on the microbiological conversion of organic matter to CH₄ . Themes discussed are (a) the liquid manure environment; (b) methane production processes from a modeling perspective; (c) development and adaptation of methanogenic communities; (d) mass and electron conservation; (e) steps limiting CH₄ production; (f) inhibition of methanogens; (g) temperature effects on CH₄ production; and (h) limits of existing estimation approaches. We conclude that a model must include calculation of microbial response to variations in manure temperature, substrate availability and age, and management system, because these variables substantially affect CH₄ production. Methane production can be reduced by manipulating key variables through management procedures, and the effects may be taken into account by including a microbial component in the model. When developing new calculation procedures, it is important to include reasonably accurate algorithms of microbial adaptation. This review presents concepts for these calculations and ideas for how these may be carried out. A need for better quantification of hydrolysis kinetics is identified, and the importance of short- and long-term microbial adaptation is highlighted.

Dairy manure acidification reduces CH4 emissions over short and long-term

Acidification with sulphuric acid and cleaning residual manure in tanks are promising practices for reducing methane (CH₄), which is a potent greenhouse gas. To date, no data are available on CH₄ reductions from acidifying only residual manure (rather than all manure). Moreover, long-term effects of manure acidification (i.e. inoculating ability of previously acidified residual manure in the subsequent storages) are not known. To address these gaps, fresh manure (FM; 150 mL) combined with treated or untreated inoculum (30 mL) were anaerobically incubated at 17°C, 20°C, and 23°C for 116 d. Acidified treatments, regardless of location of acid addition, reduced CH₄ production by 81% at 17°C, 78% at 20°C, and 19% at 23°C compared to the control (untreated FM and untreated inoculum). To test long-term acidification effects, FM was inoculated with manure that had been acidified 6-months prior. This created comparable CH₄ production to FM with no inoculum and reduced CH₄ production by 99% at 17°C and 20°C, and 49% at 23°C compared to the control. Results indicate that residual slurries of acidified manure become poor inoculants in subsequent storage, hence manure acidification has a long-term treatment effect in reducing CH₄ production. This could reduce how often acidification is needed in dairy manure tanks and also increasing its cost-effectiveness for farmers.

A mechanistic model of methane emission from animal slurry with a focus on microbial groups

Liquid manure (slurry) from livestock releases methane (CH4) that contributes significantly to global warming. Existing models for slurry CH4 production-used for mitigation and inventories-include effects of organic matter loading, temperature, and retention time but cannot predict important effects of management, or adequately capture essential temperature-driven dynamics. Here we present a new model that includes multiple methanogenic groups whose relative abundance shifts in response to changes in temperature or other environmental conditions. By default, the temperature responses of five groups correspond to those of four methanogenic species and one uncultured methanogen, although any number of groups could be defined. We argue that this simple mechanistic approach is able to describe both short- and long-term responses to temperature where other existing approaches fall short. The model is available in the open-source R package ABM (https://github.com/sashahafner/ABM) as a single flexible function that can include effects of slurry management (e.g., removal frequency and treatment methods) and changes in environmental conditions over time. Model simulations suggest that the reduction of CH4 emission by frequent emptying of slurry pits is due to washout of active methanogens. Application of the model to represent a full-scale slurry storage tank showed it can reproduce important trends, including a delayed response to temperature changes. However, the magnitude of predicted emission is uncertain, primarily as a result of sensitivity to the hydrolysis rate constant, due to a wide range in reported values. Results indicated that with additional work-particularly on the magnitude of hydrolysis rate-the model could be a tool for estimation of CH4 emissions for inventories.

Two-stage separation and acidification of pig slurry - Nutrient separation efficiency and agronomical implications

Separation of slurries can facilitate the nutrient management on farms through nutrient partitioning between the liquid and the solid fraction. The distribution of nutrients in the slurry fractions depends largely on the type of separator used. The current study assessed the separation efficiency of a two-step separation treatment of pig slurry including in-series a screw press and a centrifuge followed by acidification (to pH 5.9) of the final liquid effluent. The system concentrated 73.8% of the slurry's Phosphorus (P) content, 52.6% of Total solids (TS) and 14.4% of total Nitrogen to the solid fraction. The apparent N recovery from ryegrass fertilized with the raw slurry and non-acidified liquid fractions was not decreased by the separation treatment. The acidified liquid fraction showed 28% and 9% higher apparent N recovery compared to the raw slurry and the non-acidified liquid effluent from the centrifuge respectively. The biochemical methane production potential (B_o) of the acidified liquid fraction was reduced by 50% and 25%, compared to the non-acidified counterpart and the raw slurry, respectively. The results highlight the potential of a double separation system coupled with acidification of the liquid fraction, to extract P into a solid fraction which can be transported outside the farm, and to increase N utilization from the liquid fraction when this is used as organic fertiliser on or nearby the farm. The study further highlights the potential to reduce CH₄ emissions from slurry storage after mechanical separation and acidification of the liquid slurry fraction.

Use of citric acid for reducing CH4 and H2S emissions during storage of pig slurry and increasing biogas production: Lab- and pilot-scale test, and assessment

The use of sulfuric acid (SA) for reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs, mainly CH₄) emissions in manure management encounters with problems related with safety issue and increased H₂S emissions. In the present study, citric acid (CA) as an alternative to SA was assessed in the lab-scale experiment at various dosages (pH 5.0-7.0), and then confirmed in the pilot-scale tank (effective volume of 30 ton). During 35 d of pig slurry (PS) storage at 30 °C, it was found that the CA addition to initial pH down to 6.5 could lead negligible reduction, while 85-99% and 48-72% reduction of CH₄ and H₂S emissions were achieved at pH ≤ 6.0, respectively. The similar reduction performance was confirmed (control vs. pH 6.0) in the pilot-scale test, but, interestingly, two times higher CH₄ emissions of 123.7 kg CO₂ eq./ton PS was detected caused by the automatic temperature increase (≥35 °C). The pH of acidified PS did not exceed 6.5 during the whole storage period, while it was maintained 7.3-7.7 in the control. A continuous AD reactor fed with acidified PS exhibited a higher CH₄ yield of 10.0 m³ CH₄/ton PS, compared to the control (5.7 m³ CH₄/ton PS), due to the preservation of organic matters and added CA. In overall, about 8.5 [(4.4, storage) + (4.1, biogas)] kg of CH₄/ton PS was generated from raw PS and it was reduced to 7.8 [(0.7, storage) + (7.1, biogas)] kg of CH₄/ton PS by CA-acidification. Despite the carbon footprint for manufacturing CA, it was calculated that GHG reduction of 107 kg CO₂ eq./ton PS could be attained by CA-acidification. In terms of economic profit, it was estimated that 6.3 USD/ton PS can be gained by CA-acidification, while it was 2.4 USD/ton PS in case of control.

Combination of H2SO4-acidification and temperature-decrease for eco-friendly storage of pig slurry

Owing to the economic benefit and efficiency, H₂SO₄-acidification is often applied for reducing CH₄ emissions during storage of pig slurry (PS). However, it encounters with several problems related with safety and the concomitant H₂S emissions. To reduce the required amount of H₂SO₄, in this study, the storage at low temperature (20-35 °C) was applied to the mild-acidified PS (pH 6.5 and 7.0). 55.1 kg CO₂ eq./ton PS of CH₄ was emitted from the control (non-acidified at 35 °C), which was reduced to 14.4-40.2 kg CO₂ eq./ton PS at 20-30 °C. Temperature-decrease led to the increase of the abundance of methanogens (Methanobrevibacter and Methanolobus) that can grow at low temperature and the drop of specific methanogenic activity value. To achieve 70 % CH₄ reduction, 1.6 kg H₂SO₄/ton PS was needed in PS acidification, which was decreased to 0.5 kg H₂SO₄/ton PS by decreasing temperature from 35 °C to 25 °C. CH₄ production potential of the PS stored at 35 °C-pH 6.5 and 25 °C-pH 7.0 was increased by 21-33 % compared to the control. The GHG reduction of 33.6-41.9 kg CO₂ eq./ton PS and the profit of 6.6 USD/ton PS could be attained by applying acidification or combined storage, indicating that the temperature-decrease can be effectively combined with H₂SO₄-acidification.

Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emission from Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle) Manure Management Systems

The agricultural sector is considered one of the major sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. The livestock industry as a significant contributor, is accounting for about 18% of GHG emissions measured in carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent from agricultural practices. Depending on farming practices and climatic conditions, GHGs such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from livestock agriculture can vary significantly. Country-specific emission factors are, therefore, needed for a precise estimation of GHG emissions and to avoid uncertainties. This study was aimed at estimating the CH4 and N2O emission fluxes from Hanwoo (the most famous and popular Korean native cattle) manure management systems. CH4 and N2O emission fluxes from litter in the Hanwoo cattle barn and composting lot were monitored and calculated for 52 weeks using the dynamic chamber method. The calculated monthly average fluxes of CH4 and N2O from litter in the cattle barn ranged from 0.0 to 30.0 ± 13.7 and 0.896 ± 0.557 to 2.925 ± 2.853 μg/m2 s, respectively during the whole measurement period. While during the composting period, the monthly average of CH4 and N2O emission fluxes were varied from 1.449 ± 0.783 to 86.930 ± 19.092 and 0.511 ± 0.410 to 2.629 ± 1.105 μg/m2 s, respectively. The calculated emission fluxes of CH4 and N2O from manure management systems in this study were almost 5.4 and 2.1 times, respectively higher than the values reported for the Asian, South and North American countries in the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Overall, this study initiates the process along with signifies the importance of developing country-specific GHG inventories for the effective reduction of GHG emissions from the livestock sector in Korea.

Effects of Two Manure Additives on Methane Emissions from Dairy Manure

Simple Summary

Livestock farms often store liquid manure until it can be used to fertilize crops. During anaerobic storage, the manure produces methane, which is a greenhouse gas. Many livestock farms add special chemical products to the manure that are said to control odours or increase fertilizer value. We wanted to know if these additives change the amount of methane produced. Two additives that are commonly used by farmers in many countries were tested in the laboratory. We mixed liquid dairy manure with different amounts of these products and measured the amount of methane produced over 30 to 90 days. Results were then compared to the same manure without any product. These tests were done at two temperatures, around 37 °C (a typical biodigester temperature), and 20 °C (a typical manure storage temperature). We also compared the chemical and physical properties of manure. We found that adding these products did not change the amount of methane produced, and it did not change the chemical and physical properties of the manure related to methane production. These findings suggest that farms using these products can be expected to have normal methane emissions from stored manure.

Abstract

Liquid manure is a significant source of methane (CH₄), a greenhouse gas. Many livestock farms use manure additives for practical and agronomic purposes, but the effect on CH₄ emissions is unknown. To address this gap, two lab studies were conducted, evaluating the CH₄ produced from liquid dairy manure with Penergetic-g^® (12 mg/L, 42 mg/L, and 420 mg/L) or AgrimestMix^® (30.3 mL/L). In the first study, cellulose produced 378 mL CH₄/g volatile solids (VS) at 38 °C and there was no significant difference with Penergetic-g^® at 12 mg/L or 42 mg/L. At the same temperature, dairy manure produced 254 mL CH₄/g VS and was not significantly different from 42 mg/L Penergetic-g^®. In the second lab study, the dairy manure control produced 187 mL CH₄/g VS at 37 °C and 164 mL CH₄/g VS at 20 °C, and there was no significant difference with AgrimestMix (30.3 mL/L) or Penergetic-g^® (420 mg/L) at either temperature. Comparisons of manure composition before and after incubation indicated that the additives had no effect on pH or VS, and small and inconsistent effects on other constituents. Overall, neither additive affected CH₄ production in the lab. The results suggest that farms using these additives are likely to have normal CH₄ emissions from stored manure.

Cable bacteria reduce methane emissions from rice-vegetated soils

Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide and approximately 11% of the global anthropogenic methane emissions originate from rice fields. Sulfate amendment is a mitigation strategy to reduce methane emissions from rice fields because sulfate reducers and methanogens compete for the same substrates. Cable bacteria are filamentous bacteria known to increase sulfate levels via electrogenic sulfide oxidation. Here we show that one-time inoculation of rice-vegetated soil pots with cable bacteria increases the sulfate inventory 5-fold, which leads to the reduction of methane emissions by 93%, compared to control pots lacking cable bacteria. Promoting cable bacteria in rice fields by enrichment or sensible management may thus become a strategy to reduce anthropogenic methane emissions.

Rice paddies are a major source of the Earth’s atmospheric methane, making these important food crops potent contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Here the authors show that inoculation of paddies with a particular bacterium could significantly curb methane production.

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through Dairy Manure Acidification

Liquid dairy manure storages are sources of methane (CH), nitrous oxide (NO), and ammonia (NH) emissions. Both CH and NO are greenhouse gases (GHGs), whereas NH is an indirect source of NO emissions. Manure acidification is a strategy used to reduce NH emissions from swine manure; however, limited research has expanded this strategy to reducing CH and NO emissions by acidifying dairy manure. This study compared control dairy manure (pH 7.4) with two treatments of acidified manure using 70% sulfuric acid (HSO). These included a medium pH treatment (pH 6.5, 1.4 mL acid L manure) and a low pH treatment (pH 6, 2.4 mL acid L manure). Emissions were measured using replicated mesoscale manure tanks (6.6 m) enclosed by large steady state chambers. Both CH and NO were continuously measured (June-December 2017) using tunable diode laser trace gas analyzers. Ammonia emissions were measured three times weekly for 24 h using acid traps. On a CO equivalent basis, the medium pH treatment reduced total GHG emissions by 85%, whereas the low pH treatment reduced emissions by 88%, relative to untreated (control) manure. Total CH emissions were reduced by 87 and 89% from medium and low pH tanks, respectively. Ammonia emissions were reduced by 41 and 53% from medium and low pH tanks, respectively. Additional research is necessary to make acidification an accessible option for farmers by optimizing acid dosage. More research is need to describe the manure buffering capacity and emission reductions and ultimately find the best approaches for treating farm-scale liquid dairy manure tanks.